Meet Swingers
Entertainment
Latest Members
Fun and Games
Information
Shopping
Site Stats
- Members:
- 1,355,968
- Online Now:
- 3,265
- Msgs Sent:
- 154,952,773
- Photo Ads:
- 723,993
- User Pics:
- 562,932
- Video Chat:
- 763
New Tagging Of Pics feature !!!
25th Mar 2009 - 3:59pm
After tagging of some pics, where can you see which pics are under the catagory chosen ?
what?
what?
If you look on peoples profiles, then look at the pics, on some of the pics that I have perved so far, you are able to tag the pics - it says "please help tag this photo" and then you have a couple of drop down boxes, one which is photo quality, on a scale of 1-10 and another drop down box with "who is in this photo" where you can say if it is male, female, couple, threesome etc.
You then have a series of tickboxes, with a number of descriptions, BBW, lesbian, gay, interracial, toys, anal, close up, creampie and a few others.
To be honest, I don't like this, especially the tickboxes, there are some people who are against labels, and it allows others to maybe tick boxes that are not applicable, in an effort to try and be spiteful, funny, mischievous etc.
You then have a series of tickboxes, with a number of descriptions, BBW, lesbian, gay, interracial, toys, anal, close up, creampie and a few others.
To be honest, I don't like this, especially the tickboxes, there are some people who are against labels, and it allows others to maybe tick boxes that are not applicable, in an effort to try and be spiteful, funny, mischievous etc.
My photos have now (yet again!!!!!!!) been moved into my private gallery. When will Admin learn to *let the membership know* that they are going to give people options like this.
If I wanted people to rate me out of ten I'd go to a site that's designed for that purpose, like "hot or not"
If I wanted people to rate me out of ten I'd go to a site that's designed for that purpose, like "hot or not"
On further investigation I've just removed all of my photos from my public album. No offense but I've no desire to have other people rate my pics on a 1-10 scale for "quality" or to decide which category they should be in.
*is very cross*
*is very cross*
Dirtygirly wrote:
*is very cross*
*is very cross*
How very polite!
Angel Chat is fucking furious
tag boxes
25th Mar 2009 - 4:28pm
The idea behind the system is so you can browse the photos that you want to.
The 1-10 scale isn't a rating, it's the quality of the image not the content. The data will be used to display the clearer better quality of images first, with the blurry ones at the back of the search query after we get the new search implemented.
The categories that the images are tagged into will be used to filter the images that you want to see e.g. if you are a couple looking for another couple, living 30 miles away, and not wanting to see cock shots, the new search will be able to meet that criteria. Currently the gallery has nil functionality or use for any thing other than looking at pictures, Russian Roulette style.
Currently there are nearly half a million photos that need to be categorised before any new relevant search can be implemented. We are actively encouraging users to tag their own photos that are uploaded and there will be an announcement on your homepage in the next few days.
Swinging Heaven is looking for ways to make all areas of the site more relevant and usable for the members. Our goal is continual improvement and listening to our member feedback. In the recent site surveys, a relevant image search was one of the top three points that our member base was asking for. As you are aware there are a large number of site improvements being worked on at the moment that will be rolled out over the next 18 months.
The 1-10 scale isn't a rating, it's the quality of the image not the content. The data will be used to display the clearer better quality of images first, with the blurry ones at the back of the search query after we get the new search implemented.
The categories that the images are tagged into will be used to filter the images that you want to see e.g. if you are a couple looking for another couple, living 30 miles away, and not wanting to see cock shots, the new search will be able to meet that criteria. Currently the gallery has nil functionality or use for any thing other than looking at pictures, Russian Roulette style.
Currently there are nearly half a million photos that need to be categorised before any new relevant search can be implemented. We are actively encouraging users to tag their own photos that are uploaded and there will be an announcement on your homepage in the next few days.
Swinging Heaven is looking for ways to make all areas of the site more relevant and usable for the members. Our goal is continual improvement and listening to our member feedback. In the recent site surveys, a relevant image search was one of the top three points that our member base was asking for. As you are aware there are a large number of site improvements being worked on at the moment that will be rolled out over the next 18 months.
yet another disgruntled user hence all our pics are now private on both our profiles..
and on looking at the tick box options there doesn't seem to be one for bi-sexual so there for if 2 women are in the photo they are lesbians, hows that going to help a cpl searching for a bi sexual women using the photo's...
and on looking at the tick box options there doesn't seem to be one for bi-sexual so there for if 2 women are in the photo they are lesbians, hows that going to help a cpl searching for a bi sexual women using the photo's...
Do you seriously believe that people will rate photos on their quality? I doubt it.
Also, what about the fact that I've now moved my pictures into the private gallery, but a link that was sent to me earlier (of one of my pictures) still takes you to that picture? Do I now have to delete every one of my photos again because Admin have brought in a feature without any kind of consultation or thought for people's privacy?
Also, what about the fact that I've now moved my pictures into the private gallery, but a link that was sent to me earlier (of one of my pictures) still takes you to that picture? Do I now have to delete every one of my photos again because Admin have brought in a feature without any kind of consultation or thought for people's privacy?
admin wrote:
We are actively encouraging users to tag their own photos that are uploaded and there will be an announcement on your homepage in the next few days.
We are actively encouraging users to tag their own photos that are uploaded and there will be an announcement on your homepage in the next few days.
Here's a radical idea. Why not get people to rate/tag/whatever their own photos before giving the general site population the opportunity to give them marks out of ten?
Moved phots yet again, but left my boobies 
it will be interesting to see how they get rated and if the system is open to abuse.
Ie they get rated as male, bi, and a group!!
Question:- can I get / how do I get to see what my photos have been rated as?
Edit:- how once a photo has been rated by others, if I don't agree with the rating catogries, apart from deleting it, can I change the ratings?
Edit2:- I have just been able to rate the same picture twice, but with different comments,how will / does this work, if everyone keeps rating the same photos over and over again.?
Last edited by on 25th Mar 2009 - 5:04pm; edited 2 times in total
it will be interesting to see how they get rated and if the system is open to abuse.
Ie they get rated as male, bi, and a group!!
Question:- can I get / how do I get to see what my photos have been rated as?
Edit:- how once a photo has been rated by others, if I don't agree with the rating catogries, apart from deleting it, can I change the ratings?
Edit2:- I have just been able to rate the same picture twice, but with different comments,how will / does this work, if everyone keeps rating the same photos over and over again.?
Last edited by on 25th Mar 2009 - 5:04pm; edited 2 times in total
I'm not keen on the idea of rating peoples' picture quality. Someone may think 5mp is good, but the next person may think that's rubbish. Some people can't afford 15mp cameras and use 5mp, for example. Yeah some pics aren't all that good - quality-wise - but I don't think it's a good idea putting these ppl's profiles, in essense, to the back of the pile.....just cos they can't afford a top of the range camera.
Miss Cream xxx
Miss Cream xxx
Mr-cream123 wrote:
I'm not keen on the idea of rating peoples' picture quality. Someone may think 5mp is good, but the next person may think that's rubbish. Some people can't afford 15mp cameras and use 5mp, for example. Yeah some pics aren't all that good - quality-wise - but I don't think it's a good idea putting these ppl's profiles, in essense, to the back of the pile.....just cos they can't afford a top of the range camera.
Miss Cream xxx
I'm not keen on the idea of rating peoples' picture quality. Someone may think 5mp is good, but the next person may think that's rubbish. Some people can't afford 15mp cameras and use 5mp, for example. Yeah some pics aren't all that good - quality-wise - but I don't think it's a good idea putting these ppl's profiles, in essense, to the back of the pile.....just cos they can't afford a top of the range camera.
Miss Cream xxx
Errrmmmm... I don't think they'd be bothered what camera you guys took your pics with personally - as long as you just keep taking 'em
BIoke wrote:
Errrmmmm... I don't think they'd be bothered what camera you guys took your pics with personally - as long as you just keep taking 'em
Mr-cream123 wrote:
I'm not keen on the idea of rating peoples' picture quality. Someone may think 5mp is good, but the next person may think that's rubbish. Some people can't afford 15mp cameras and use 5mp, for example. Yeah some pics aren't all that good - quality-wise - but I don't think it's a good idea putting these ppl's profiles, in essense, to the back of the pile.....just cos they can't afford a top of the range camera.
Miss Cream xxx
I'm not keen on the idea of rating peoples' picture quality. Someone may think 5mp is good, but the next person may think that's rubbish. Some people can't afford 15mp cameras and use 5mp, for example. Yeah some pics aren't all that good - quality-wise - but I don't think it's a good idea putting these ppl's profiles, in essense, to the back of the pile.....just cos they can't afford a top of the range camera.
Miss Cream xxx
Errrmmmm... I don't think they'd be bothered what camera you guys took your pics with personally - as long as you just keep taking 'em
Aww thanx Blokey
Miss Cream xxx
After reading this I can GUARANTEE this is in no way shape or form a ratings system.
At the moment feedback indicated that people do not want to click through 3000, pages of pictures in the public gallery. The image quality option is that, it is no way a public or displayed rating option. Many women indicated they did not want to sift through 1000s of cock shots.
We want to make all the features on this site as useable and relevant for everyone as possible. After each image/video has been tagged 10 times the option will disapear.
When the new search is released you will find it very very useful. We have a private image gallery for anyone who wants to keep pictures private and out of the public gallery. I dont know if you remember but we were one of the first to do this and seems everyone copied us also like the site watermarking and video chat.
We are only interested in giving the members on this site the best features possible.... please understand that. Every change we make has been asked for by the members here.
At the moment feedback indicated that people do not want to click through 3000, pages of pictures in the public gallery. The image quality option is that, it is no way a public or displayed rating option. Many women indicated they did not want to sift through 1000s of cock shots.
We want to make all the features on this site as useable and relevant for everyone as possible. After each image/video has been tagged 10 times the option will disapear.
When the new search is released you will find it very very useful. We have a private image gallery for anyone who wants to keep pictures private and out of the public gallery. I dont know if you remember but we were one of the first to do this and seems everyone copied us also like the site watermarking and video chat.
We are only interested in giving the members on this site the best features possible.... please understand that. Every change we make has been asked for by the members here.
Angel Chat wrote:
My photos have now (yet again!!!!!!!) been moved into my private gallery. When will Admin learn to *let the membership know* that they are going to give people options like this.
If I wanted people to rate me out of ten I'd go to a site that's designed for that purpose, like "hot or not"
My photos have now (yet again!!!!!!!) been moved into my private gallery. When will Admin learn to *let the membership know* that they are going to give people options like this.
If I wanted people to rate me out of ten I'd go to a site that's designed for that purpose, like "hot or not"
Couldn't agree with you more Angel. The number of times I've ranted about this precise issue and still nothing changes.
We're not lab rats we're people, please please please just tell us what 's going on.
Dirtygirly wrote:
On further investigation I've just removed all of my photos from my public album. No offense but I've no desire to have other people rate my pics on a 1-10 scale for "quality" or to decide which category they should be in.
*is very cross*
On further investigation I've just removed all of my photos from my public album. No offense but I've no desire to have other people rate my pics on a 1-10 scale for "quality" or to decide which category they should be in.
*is very cross*
… and this is precisely what upsets me too. Was I told about this? Was I asked whether I thought it was a good idea. Do I have an opt out option? So now I'm on X-Factor am I? With people giving me marks out of 10?
