Meet Swingers

Site Stats

Members:
1,355,968
Online Now:
3,265
Msgs Sent:
154,952,773
Photo Ads:
723,993
User Pics:
562,932
Video Chat:
763
« Prev
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
< >

Smoking laws

1st Feb 2010 - 9:42am
kentswingers777's Avatarkentswingers777Godlike
Joined:
14 Dec 2005
Posts:
8462
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Now do not get me wrong here....I am a smoker and agree with some of the new laws that have been brought in over the last 12 months.

But stopping people from smoking at the wheel of your car or in your own home, surely is a step too far?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1247488/Cigarettes-sold-plain-packaging-latest-bid-sweep-away-smoking-Britain.html

" But Tory MP Philip Davies said: ‘Given that people are well aware of the dangers of smoking, the Government should let people decide for themselves what they want to do ".

Sounds like a very sensible approach to me but, as we have a Nanny state that seems to take away peoples FREE choices now, this will no doubt get backing and become law.

The idea that " hiding " fags uinder the counter will make them less attractive is a notion made up by a twat ( with an A ). Shows like Corrie and Eastenders watched by millions of people and no doubt a few million of those will be impressionable kids, should they not be looking more into stopping that on tv instead?

I cannot understand how having them on display in a shop makes them attractive to kids....sweets are far more attractive in a shop. Kids see it on the telly everyday so surely that is a place the Government should look at?

I kinow there will be a split on these new measures, the non smokers thinking it is great and a lot of smokers thinking it is going too far. I am in agreement as a smoker that some of the things they have done is a benefit, but I think things are now going a step too far.

The very people who are making these new laws are massive anti smokers themselves, so I believe have their own agendas. The smoking ban in pubs and clubs I agreed with but it should not have been a blanket ban, smokers should have been given some choice here as we live in a free society.....apparently.

The comment " Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson said: 'We must keep pushing hard for a tobacco free future and keep up the momentum gained by England going smoke-free in 2007 ", is all well and good but....why do they just not ban the sale of them in the UK? Revenue that is why.

They are always quick to spout the ammount the NHS spends on treating smokers, but are never equally as quick to say how much money is paid to the Government via tax on them, which I did see once is more taken in than taken out. Why do they never publish those figures?

Yes we should have laws to protect our children from smoking but I think they are now going too far. Proper school education like most things is a great way to start, not by inflicting draconian laws on people that choose to smoke.

 

1st Feb 2010 - 10:31am
Mr-Powers's AvatarMr-PowersGodlike
Joined:
7 Aug 2004
Posts:
6936
Location:
London
ProfilePM
Smoking at the wheel of your car,is no different than using a mobile phone whislt driving and should,if not already be,illegal to do.

 

1st Feb 2010 - 10:36am
meat2pleaseu's Avatarmeat2pleaseuGodlike
Joined:
16 Jun 2005
Posts:
6329
Location:
10 pixels up from
here
ProfilePM
They should make it illegal to smoke while driving. if you can be fined for eating while driving, using a phone while driving, blowing your nose while driving (or sat in traffic, out of gear with the handrake on icon_rolleyes.gif) then smoking while driving should be banned too.
i watched some idiot driving down the Aston Expressway at 50 last week, leaning over to the passenger seat to light a fag off his mates lighter, i don't see the sense in allowing people to hold a burning stick in their hand while driving several tonnes of metal at high speed doh.gif
If they wish to let their passengers smoke in the car, thats fine, same with smoking in your own home (as long as you don't have your brats breathing in the fumes).

 

1st Feb 2010 - 10:50am
GnV's AvatarGnVGodlike
Joined:
13 Dec 2005
Posts:
5787
Location:
embrasser la
grenouille
ProfilePM
Perhaps the lawmakers themselves should set the first example by banning smoking within the precincts of the Palace of Westminster... dunno.gif

 

1st Feb 2010 - 10:57am
kentswingers777's Avatarkentswingers777Godlike
Joined:
14 Dec 2005
Posts:
8462
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Yes a good point there Gnv. But as usual it is " do as we say and not as we do ".

Yes I also fully understand the smoking whilst driving.

I when I am out on me bike see car drivers trying to light their cigs up whilst driving, and yes have to agree that it is just as distracting as talking on a mobile is.

 

1st Feb 2010 - 3:41pm
GnV's AvatarGnVGodlike
Joined:
13 Dec 2005
Posts:
5787
Location:
embrasser la
grenouille
ProfilePM
kentswingers777 wrote:

Yes a good point there Gnv. But as usual it is " do as we say and not as we do ".

Yes I also fully understand the smoking whilst driving.

I when I am out on me bike see car drivers trying to light their cigs up whilst driving, and yes have to agree that it is just as distracting as talking on a mobile is.

I guess you must use a blow lamp to light yours whilst out on your bike smoke.gif

 

1st Feb 2010 - 4:55pm
Bluefish2009's AvatarBluefish2009Godlike
Joined:
20 Jun 2009
Posts:
3944
Location:
Dorset
ProfilePM
GnV wrote:

Perhaps the lawmakers themselves should set the first example by banning smoking within the precincts of the Palace of Westminster... dunno.gif


http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2007-06-11b.141621.h

 

1st Feb 2010 - 6:35pm
Lost's AvatarLostGodlike
Joined:
4 Feb 2006
Posts:
5646
Location:
-
ProfilePM
I don't think it should be made illegal to smoke in a car any more than it is now.
Smoking is a stimulant and that in itself can be a positive whilst driving can it not? nicotine taking 7 seconds from lung to brain and increasing neuro activity or something. Lighting a cigarette is possibly the only piece of the act of smoking I can see being worthy of comment in being unsafe otherwise its about time to leave people alone in my mind


Oh and bring back smoking in pubs please. I'm not a smoker but I miss it.

 

1st Feb 2010 - 6:43pm
Bluefish2009's AvatarBluefish2009Godlike
Joined:
20 Jun 2009
Posts:
3944
Location:
Dorset
ProfilePM
I am a none smoker and also hate smoke free pubs.

Smoking has already been over legislated, and now needs leaving alone. So far all the attempts to deter young smokers have been ill conceived, and done the exact opposite.

My personal feelings are, that I have had quite enough of the nanny state, and what I see as Labours over zealous approach curbing our activity's

 

1st Feb 2010 - 9:27pm
Plimboy's AvatarPlimboySuper human rambling
Joined:
1 Nov 2009
Posts:
675
Location:
rather not say
ProfilePM
Bluefish2009 wrote:

I am a none smoker and also hate smoke free pubs.

Smoking has already been over legislated, and now needs leaving alone. So far all the attempts to deter young smokers have been ill conceived, and done the exact opposite.

My personal feelings are, that I have had quite enough of the nanny state, and what I see as Labours over zealous approach curbing our activity's



Agreed, about much of the State's way of dealing with things, but it's not just Labour that get it wrong.

Plim icon_sad.gif

 

1st Feb 2010 - 10:18pm
Bluefish2009's AvatarBluefish2009Godlike
Joined:
20 Jun 2009
Posts:
3944
Location:
Dorset
ProfilePM
Plimboy wrote:

Bluefish2009 wrote:

I am a none smoker and also hate smoke free pubs.

Smoking has already been over legislated, and now needs leaving alone. So far all the attempts to deter young smokers have been ill conceived, and done the exact opposite.

My personal feelings are, that I have had quite enough of the nanny state, and what I see as Labours over zealous approach curbing our activity's



Agreed, about much of the State's way of dealing with things, but it's not just Labour that get it wrong.

Plim icon_sad.gif


No, of course not, but their cock ups are freshest in my mind

 

1st Feb 2010 - 10:25pm
Dave__Notts's AvatarDave__NottsSite Moderator
Joined:
4 Jun 2004
Posts:
5631
Location:
Nottingham
ProfilePM
Anything that reduces the amount of smokers should happen.........whether they like it or not.

Maybe one day in the future this country will become a smoke free island

Dave_Notts

 

2nd Feb 2010 - 9:07am
kentswingers777's Avatarkentswingers777Godlike
Joined:
14 Dec 2005
Posts:
8462
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Dave__Notts wrote:

Anything that reduces the amount of smokers should happen.........whether they like it or not.

Maybe one day in the future this country will become a smoke free island

Dave_Notts


Obviously that comes from a smoker? Thought not? Used to be a smoker? Probably.

Next you will want us to be a car free Island or....a drink free Island.

What about peoples RIGHT to smoke? Or would you like that taken away as well?

I doubt though if you want to be a car or drink free Island as you probably do both of them, and that would affect you.

Remember apparently 8 yes 8 million people smoke in this country.....why should that many people have their right to smoke taken away, just because others do not like it?

There are plenty of people out there who get pissed and cause havoc every weekend and cost the NHS billions of pounds, but I do not ask for drink to be banned, only the sale of it more controlled....which it is.

The same with fags....take some action to try and stop kiods from smoking, but that ain't gonna happen, and allowing soaps to shows big stars smoking does not help.

IF they banned smoking you would be ok for them to increase taxes to make up the shortfall of tax from smokers? Probably not.

Rights and freedom of speech in this country is slowly being eroded...soon we will just be told what to do over everything, you will moan though when they try and do that over something that you like to do though.

I understand why new laws are being brought in and agree with some of them but that does not mean we have to be treated like lepers!! They are fecking quick enough to take our taxes on it though....hypocrits!

 

2nd Feb 2010 - 9:14am
JTS's AvatarJTSGodlike
Joined:
27 Nov 2004
Posts:
1332
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Nobody has taken away their right to smoke, just their right to smoke where they like and when they like: Within a workplace environment.
You can still smoke down the pub, just not inside the pub. You can still smoke in your car, just not if it is used for work and carries others beside yourself (you are all forgetting that the no-smoking-in-the-workplace laws also banned smoking in, for instance, your VAN...TRUCK..and BUS...and your company car...if others use it as/are carried within it)
In fact the highly amusing result of the so-called anti-smoking laws was going into the office at work to obtain drawings/etc. and finding both of the "senior managers" away from their desks....out in the yard smoking their disgusting "cigarillos" that they had previously puffed over everyone.

Quote:

From July 1 2007, it is now illegal to smoke in the workplace in England, as part of new government legislation which was passed in the Health Act 2006. The ban applies to all workplaces and public places, public transport, **work vehicles**, restaurants, pubs, bars, cafes, shopping centres and offices

 

2nd Feb 2010 - 3:43pm
Ms_Whips's AvatarMs_WhipsGodlike
Joined:
27 Mar 2008
Posts:
3158
Location:
here of course!
ProfilePM
kentswingers777 wrote:

Dave__Notts wrote:

Anything that reduces the amount of smokers should happen.........whether they like it or not.

Maybe one day in the future this country will become a smoke free island

Dave_Notts


Obviously that comes from a smoker? Thought not? Used to be a smoker? Probably.

Next you will want us to be a car free Island or....a drink free Island.

What about peoples RIGHT to smoke? Or would you like that taken away as well?

I doubt though if you want to be a car or drink free Island as you probably do both of them, and that would affect you.

Remember apparently 8 yes 8 million people smoke in this country.....why should that many people have their right to smoke taken away, just because others do not like it?

There are plenty of people out there who get pissed and cause havoc every weekend and cost the NHS billions of pounds, but I do not ask for drink to be banned, only the sale of it more controlled....which it is.

The same with fags....take some action to try and stop kiods from smoking, but that ain't gonna happen, and allowing soaps to shows big stars smoking does not help.

IF they banned smoking you would be ok for them to increase taxes to make up the shortfall of tax from smokers? Probably not.

Rights and freedom of speech in this country is slowly being eroded...soon we will just be told what to do over everything, you will moan though when they try and do that over something that you like to do though.

I understand why new laws are being brought in and agree with some of them but that does not mean we have to be treated like lepers!! They are fecking quick enough to take our taxes on it though....hypocrits!


you know what kenty, i would have far more sympathy for that comment if what you were doing didn't affect those of us who don't. those of us who don't smoke can still die from passive smoking.

so my question to you kenty is this....should drink driving be legal then? i mean lets face it, there are those of them who do it and think they are in full control and won't kill anyone. so what is that about do you think? am i taking away the person's right to drink? or am i actually saying...you know what, it's fine that you drink, but you don't have the right to put someones life at risk while you do it? what about other people's rights to not want to be poluted by your killing smoke? it's always so one sided when it comes to smoker's rights

most of my friends are smokers while i am not. if they are in my car, or my house they don't smoke. if i'm in their's they do what they like but i'm lucky that they do take none smokers such as myself into consideration. but as i travel most days with smokers i do think that smoking at the wheel of a car should be banned. you are not even supposed to take your eye off the road to check the radio, talk on your phone, eat or drink. yet people seem to think it's ok to obscure their vision with smoke and not have hold of the wheel properly due to holding a fag and so on. ban it.

as for your own home, do what the hell you like.

whips

 

2nd Feb 2010 - 3:50pm
Kaznkev's AvatarKaznkevGodlike
Joined:
17 Sep 2009
Posts:
7494
Location:
Kneeling
ProfilePM
personally i wish theyd ban it, then id give up,i cant imagine anyone is actually happy about being a smoker dunno.gif

 

2nd Feb 2010 - 4:00pm
kentswingers777's Avatarkentswingers777Godlike
Joined:
14 Dec 2005
Posts:
8462
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Whips I understand what you are saying, and the passive smoking thing I have my own belief on that but...I understand about non smokers rights, and lets be fair here you have far more now than you have ever had.

My gripe is the hypocrisy of it all. They take the tax yes always bleat on about how much it costs the NHS....bollox is what I say to that as smokers put in more than they take out, and I saw that in a medical journal somewhere.

We cannot smoke in pubs or clubs....fine. We cannot smoke at our workplace or in the works van/car...fine. Is that not enough?

Local councils in some areas are banning people from smoking outside of pubs on the streets, as it seems some people just drop their fags on the pavement. Now whilst I believe that is true to an extent, I believe it is about over zelous councils.

So it seems that now I can smoke in my car and in my home but....IF they get their way both of those COULD be made illegal. Where the feck does it stop?

IF someone comes into my home and does not smoke they have a simple choice, either do not come in or put up with my smoking. It is my house and I will do as I choose in it.

But even then that is not quite true as IF someone enters my home to say fix an appliance, that becomes their place of work and they could ask me to refrain from smoking.

I would love to know the true figures of ALL the tax they take from smokers over a year, I bet it would be a massive ammount of money yet....treat us like lepers.

I just wish they would stop bleating on about it costs the NHS this or that....lets have the figures of how much we put in as well, but they won't as I think the figures would far outweigh what we take out.

Bottom line here Whips is that you are a non smoker and that is great, but you can go almost anywhere now and be smoke free, so what more do you want?

If they banned it completly would you or others be prepared to cough up the money they will lose through tax, via your paypacket? Probably not.

 

2nd Feb 2010 - 5:14pm
GnV's AvatarGnVGodlike
Joined:
13 Dec 2005
Posts:
5787
Location:
embrasser la
grenouille
ProfilePM
I'm sure some brainbox will come up with the research, but the burning question is...

Is the amount of tax and duty collected on smoking equal to, in excess of or less than the (perceived) amount of money spent providing care to those with tobacco related illness?

 

2nd Feb 2010 - 6:08pm
Ms_Whips's AvatarMs_WhipsGodlike
Joined:
27 Mar 2008
Posts:
3158
Location:
here of course!
ProfilePM
kentswingers777 wrote:

Whips I understand what you are saying, and the passive smoking thing I have my own belief on that but...I understand about non smokers rights, and lets be fair here you have far more now than you have ever had.

My gripe is the hypocrisy of it all. They take the tax yes always bleat on about how much it costs the NHS....bollox is what I say to that as smokers put in more than they take out, and I saw that in a medical journal somewhere.

We cannot smoke in pubs or clubs....fine. We cannot smoke at our workplace or in the works van/car...fine. Is that not enough?

Local councils in some areas are banning people from smoking outside of pubs on the streets, as it seems some people just drop their fags on the pavement. Now whilst I believe that is true to an extent, I believe it is about over zelous councils.

So it seems that now I can smoke in my car and in my home but....IF they get their way both of those COULD be made illegal. Where the feck does it stop?

IF someone comes into my home and does not smoke they have a simple choice, either do not come in or put up with my smoking. It is my house and I will do as I choose in it.

But even then that is not quite true as IF someone enters my home to say fix an appliance, that becomes their place of work and they could ask me to refrain from smoking.

I would love to know the true figures of ALL the tax they take from smokers over a year, I bet it would be a massive ammount of money yet....treat us like lepers.

I just wish they would stop bleating on about it costs the NHS this or that....lets have the figures of how much we put in as well, but they won't as I think the figures would far outweigh what we take out.

Bottom line here Whips is that you are a non smoker and that is great, but you can go almost anywhere now and be smoke free, so what more do you want?

If they banned it completly would you or others be prepared to cough up the money they will lose through tax, via your paypacket? Probably not.


so what? are you saying it doesn't exist? that there is no way that if i'm sat next to you while you smoke any of it can enter my lungs?

damn right i should have more rights in a public place than a smoker, and that includes family and friends too. i should have the right to clean air because i choose not to polute my lungs by smoking in the first place. what you do is toxic, why the hell should you have any right to do that to me or anyone else? if i choose to be around someone who smokes then i'm taking matters in my hands, it's not being forced on me. you talk about pubs too. so ok i used to walk into a pub where people smoked, my clothes stank, my hair stank, i've had clothes burnt, i've had my skin burnt, and to get away from all that i was forced to stand outside just to get some clean air!

that is exactly what i want and exactly how it should be. those of you who feel your rights are impinged only do so because you have go away with it for so long. none of you have thought about the rights of us non smokers when you have smoked in public places. now you know how we have felt for decades. you talk of hypocrisy, a little of your own in those words you right kenty.

like i said though, i have no problem with people smoking. i will gladly go and stand outside with my friends while they do. i know that the habit dictates that they need to smoke after they have eaten or at certain times. when i'm in their homes i don't mind, like you said, it's their home i can always go outside. but at least it gives me the choice. you can choose to maybe kill yourself smoking as is your right, i get to not have to suffer because of it. simple really.

whips

 

2nd Feb 2010 - 7:34pm
foxylady2209's Avatarfoxylady2209Godlike
Joined:
6 Jan 2005
Posts:
4069
Location:
Derby
ProfilePM
No smoker on this planet buys fags in order to supply the rest of us with healthcare. So lets forget this nonsense about "if we didn't smoke etc etc etc " that isn't WHY people smoke.

If it was - they could buy the fags and throw them away.

I dislike smoke - I suffer from allergic rhinitis (hay fever except it isnt hay I'm allergic to) - and smoke makes it 10 times worse. Cigarette smoke seems to be particularly unpleasant, along with burning plastic. So you can say I am biassed but bear with me.

But what I have never been able to fathom is why people smoke. OK I know all the arguments about having a right to smoke etc. I have the right to paint my face blue and eat spiders - but I have no desire to do it.

I get how hard it is to stop - I've seen family members try over and over to stop. But why start at all - and once started, why not try every day to stop?

This is an honest question : What is enjoyable about smoking?
« Prev
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
< >