awayman wrote:kentswingers777 wrote:awayman wrote:kentswingers777 wrote:I always wondered this too.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1252452/Revealed-Why-disabled-bays-stay-empty.html
At our local shopping centre we can drive around for ages looking for a space, only to go past scores of disabled bays laying empty.
I am all for there being spaces but do we really need as many as there are?
It seems there is a silly law saying they have to have ex ammount of spaces but...it seems to me to far outweigh the people who actually use them.
So next time you are fighting for a space, check the disabled bays and see if this is a valid arguement.
There is an answer. Make able bodied people get the bus.
By the way, if there are scores of disabled bays empty at your local shopping centre, that means it has 1000 parking spaces overall. That's quite large.
It's a typical Daily Mail diatribe playing on the sense of grievance; mums who drive to the shops feel they should have more priority so they've got more room for their Chelsea tractors and their pushchairs.
I think it's safe to say there are bigger issues in the world.
Of course there are but it was something I felt was worth talking about.
How do YOU come to the conclusion that there are 1000 parking spaces? Based purely on my comment of " scores "?
Why should able bodied people be forced to catch a bus, when they pay large sums of money to be able to drive?
I feel that parents with young children should possibly be given more spaces too, just like at supermarkets where they realise how difficult it is for families with young children....or would you let them get the bus as well?
" Daily Mail diatribe " eh? That is just so funny!
If you have nothing constructive to say on the subject, why say anything at all?
Why say anything?
You started it.
You thought a cretinous article trying to create a grievance out of nothing in the Daily Mail was worth reposting here.
As to the calculation of 1000 spaces, yes, I took your claim that there were scores of empty spaces, and did some number crunching. A score is twenty. You do know that don't you? So scores (plural) would imply at least two scores, or 40. Since the article you quoted referred to planning guidance requiring 4% disabled spaces in larger car parks, that gives you a figure of approximately 1000 spaces for it to be possible that there were scores of empty parking spaces.
Of course, it's possible that you were exaggerating, or making it up for effect. I couldn't possibly comment.
Why make people catch the bus? Well, because it's a complex argument, transport policy, and owning and using a car is not an entitlement or a right. The debate over transport policy and land use policy is more complicated than the Daily Mail would ever understand. I think the debate around family spaces in supermarket car parks is more complex than 'some people think they should have priority in supermarket carparks because of their lifestyle choices.'
How odd is it to start a thread and complain when people join in?
Sounds like something children would say...." you started it "..." Oh no I did not, you did "....ner ner.FGS.
Not trying to create a grievance out of anything, and yes I feel it is ok to report that in here. Because you do not think it is, who the heck are you? Site owner? Run the AUP?
Instead of baying everyone at every opportunity, what about starting a thread...all of your own?
Is there now only certain things me or anyone else for that matter, can put on this forum? Do I have to answer to you at all?
Your a member just like me, and IF you do not like a subject, or feel it is not worthy of posting on here, then a suggestion is needed...............move on to something that interests you.
There are plenty of subjects that do not, interest me, and they I do not post in....may I suggest you do the same.
I will await a thread from you, with total excitement. Am sure the whole of SH will be only too eager to post in it.