Meet Swingers

Site Stats

Members:
1,355,961
Online Now:
2,954
Msgs Sent:
154,952,201
Photo Ads:
723,986
User Pics:
562,922
Video Chat:
778

 

23rd Jul 2009 - 11:23am
_Darth_'s Avatar_Darth_Godlike
Joined:
21 Apr 2004
Posts:
1086
Location:
Chingford
ProfilePM
I get the flu jab every year ... never had a problem with it and not caught flu either.

A couple people I know have apparently got swine flu - confined to home but otherwise ok - haven't seen either of them in weeks though. Still, does make it seem more 'real' somehow.

As always, the conspiracy theorists are popping out of the woodwork ... there something on youtube telling people to 'just say no' to the tamiflu jab as it's all a plan by the world govts to bump off the elderly and societies scumbags ... they've been watching Torchwood obviously ... icon_rolleyes.gif

 

23rd Jul 2009 - 4:27pm
Tamcouple's AvatarTamcoupleFinding my feet
Joined:
5 Jun 2009
Posts:
11
Location:
-
ProfilePM
OK, I admit to a slight conflict of interest here - as an ex-GP, and someone who until last year worked for a vaccine-manufacturing pharma company, I have a little bit of the inside knowledge regarding what's going on. As Midsprincess so comprehensively outlined, the estimate is that 1/3 of the population will have swine flu by the end of summer. It's also been estimated that there will be approximately 100,000 new cases diagnosed per day by then. As it stands, the virus is very contagious, but not particularly virulent - the death rate is similar to what would be expected from a "normal" flu outbreak. In terms of the vaccine, it takes a few months to "grow" the vaccine - it's not a case of simply manufacturing it. The annual flu jab protects against the predicted common strains, and has to be produced months in advance of the vaccination campaign, so sometimes they get it wrong, and people still get the flu. The vaccine CAN NOT cause flu. It causes some flu-like symptoms in some individuals, but it is an inactive vaccine, and therefore cannot possibly cause any illness directly. If people have suffered from full-blown flu, then they've just caught a strain which wasn't in the vaccine.

And as was pointed out earlier in this thread, Tamiflu is NOT a vaccine. They are two very different things - the vaccine will protect people and prevent them getting certain strains of the flu. Tamiflu reduces the severity once you get it.

Apparently the Government have now ordered in enough vaccine to vaccinate the entire population - having said that, I'd be very surprised if we all get it - I suspect it will be kids, the elderly and the unwell, and, if there is any left (it will arrive in batches), anyone willing to pay for it.

Not sure whether that helps or not, but thought I should just set a few things straight.

 

23rd Jul 2009 - 11:48pm
Steve's AvatarSteveGodlike
Joined:
30 Oct 2006
Posts:
6702
Location:
On a downward spiral
ProfilePM
Tamcouple wrote:

OK, I admit to a slight conflict of interest here - as an ex-GP, and someone who until last year worked for a vaccine-manufacturing pharma company, I have a little bit of the inside knowledge regarding what's going on. As Midsprincess so comprehensively outlined, the estimate is that 1/3 of the population will have swine flu by the end of summer. It's also been estimated that there will be approximately 100,000 new cases diagnosed per day by then. As it stands, the virus is very contagious, but not particularly virulent - the death rate is similar to what would be expected from a "normal" flu outbreak. In terms of the vaccine, it takes a few months to "grow" the vaccine - it's not a case of simply manufacturing it. The annual flu jab protects against the predicted common strains, and has to be produced months in advance of the vaccination campaign, so sometimes they get it wrong, and people still get the flu. The vaccine CAN NOT cause flu. It causes some flu-like symptoms in some individuals, but it is an inactive vaccine, and therefore cannot possibly cause any illness directly. If people have suffered from full-blown flu, then they've just caught a strain which wasn't in the vaccine.




What......I caught a strain that wasn't predicted every year icon_wink.gif




Tamcouple wrote:



Apparently the Government have now ordered in enough vaccine to vaccinate the entire population - having said that, I'd be very surprised if we all get it - I suspect it will be kids, the elderly and the unwell, and, if there is any left (it will arrive in batches), anyone willing to pay for it.




I thought as a tax payer I was already paying for it icon_wink.gif

 

28th Jul 2009 - 9:09pm
nellie-mwgc's Avatarnellie-mwgcGodlike
Joined:
1 Jul 2005
Posts:
1474
Location:
midlands
ProfilePM
well it has now hit our household and i have a very ill child here icon_sad.gif

 

30th Jul 2009 - 5:11pm
HugsnKisses's AvatarHugsnKissesSuper human rambling
Joined:
16 Jun 2005
Posts:
741
Location:
birmingham
ProfilePM
Hi Danne, our daughter has had it for 3 days now and her temp is fine, but she does have a horrible cough. She didnt have any side effects from the tamiflu either, which was a huge relief becaues when you read the leaflet it frightens the life outta ya !

 

30th Jul 2009 - 10:43pm
nellie-mwgc's Avatarnellie-mwgcGodlike
Joined:
1 Jul 2005
Posts:
1474
Location:
midlands
ProfilePM
welikesinglemen wrote:

Hi Danne, our daughter has had it for 3 days now and her temp is fine, but she does have a horrible cough. She didnt have any side effects from the tamiflu either, which was a huge relief becaues when you read the leaflet it frightens the life outta ya !




i havnt read the leaflet .......... yet !! i read the leaflet they gave us bout the flu tho and that was scary enough cus of the possibilites of other problems with health especially when asthmatic icon_sad.gif
we got the tamiflu tuesday and she is still so poorly now, high temp, aching and awful headache icon_sad.gif
think id better read the leaflet tomorrow tho as the rest of us will probably come down with it i guess !

hope ur daughter gets better soon xx

 

31st Jul 2009 - 4:49pm
Too Hot's AvatarToo HotSuper human rambling
Joined:
7 Oct 2005
Posts:
764
Location:
North West
ProfilePM
Cynical?????? - Me ???????????????

I wonder why Swine Flu has taken such a grip in the UK? 100,000 new cases a week - wow. Is it maybe because the vast majority of cases are diagnosed over the phone and/or via helpline? Just how many of these Swine Flu cases are ordinary flu or plain and simple summer colds and chills?

We Brits are so funny - nothing quite like taking things seriously eh?

 

31st Jul 2009 - 9:28pm
nellie-mwgc's Avatarnellie-mwgcGodlike
Joined:
1 Jul 2005
Posts:
1474
Location:
midlands
ProfilePM
Too Hot wrote:

Cynical?????? - Me ???????????????

I wonder why Swine Flu has taken such a grip in the UK? 100,000 new cases a week - wow. Is it maybe because the vast majority of cases are diagnosed over the phone and/or via helpline? Just how many of these Swine Flu cases are ordinary flu or plain and simple summer colds and chills?

We Brits are so funny - nothing quite like taking things seriously eh?



my child may well be suffering from another flu other than swine flu however its definetly flu, summer cold and chills (or any time of the year cold and chill) dont make people as ill as she is !!
there are to many cases now for each to be tested

 

4th Aug 2009 - 11:56pm
Nicekat's AvatarNicekatI need to get out more
Joined:
3 Sep 2007
Posts:
239
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Not sure but I think counties are not obligated count swine flu cases any more.

 

5th Aug 2009 - 2:14am
Theladyisaminx's AvatarTheladyisaminxGodlike
Joined:
10 Jul 2007
Posts:
5195
Location:
-
ProfilePM
I wonder why a friend of mine whos a gp son has swine flu and he said he will not be having the medication,

It makes you wonder, he said he is fit enough and the antibodies he will gain out weigh the risks of the medication.

I have had normal flu once a few years back, and you are really ill, high temperture aching everywhere with a pounding headache, I could not get out of bed for 4 days if I wanted to.
I really don't know what the flus have that are so different from each other.

 

5th Aug 2009 - 7:46am
nellie-mwgc's Avatarnellie-mwgcGodlike
Joined:
1 Jul 2005
Posts:
1474
Location:
midlands
ProfilePM
you dont have to take the tamiflu, its ur choice altho i think they recomend that people with other health problems take it
they say that its helpful in preventing further complications in people with asthma etc
a chest infection or worse is awful for asthmatics

 

7th Aug 2009 - 3:16pm
Too Hot's AvatarToo HotSuper human rambling
Joined:
7 Oct 2005
Posts:
764
Location:
North West
ProfilePM
Oh, no...........................

Just heard on the radio that some people are taking advantage of the swine flu hysteria and getting themselves diagnosed on the phone and extending their summer holidays. Expected to cost industry billions and raising questions about the integrity of workers.

Well !!! would you fucking believe it !! Who would have thought that??

 

9th Aug 2009 - 4:09pm
cushy's AvatarcushyJust popped in
Joined:
13 Dec 2005
Posts:
3
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Above comment absolutely spot on.

I read on the BBC website that cases this week had dramatically dropped, I wonder if that's because all the malingerers have used up that excuse.

It's amazing all the known scivers at work have all had it, indeed one twice. Nobody else has.

 

1st Sep 2009 - 9:38am
kentswingers777's Avatarkentswingers777Godlike
Joined:
14 Dec 2005
Posts:
8462
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Well after all the hype and over exageration, Swine flu it seems has just been a load of hot air.

I am not a lover of Mr. Littlejohn but this artical is absolutly bang on the money.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1210359/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-This-swine-flu-hotline--If-fancy-Miss-Piggy-press-.html

100.000 new cases every day eh? What a load of old balloney.....how much are these so called experts on a year? A lot more than they should be.

As I stated much earlier in this thread.....the ammount of people that have died on our roads far far far outweighs the Swine flu " pandemic ".....or did they say " epidemic "? Neither has happened and a typical over reaction which once again has cost millions of pounds of taxpayers money.

This Government could not run a bath properly!

 

1st Sep 2009 - 10:27am
ForestFunsters's AvatarForestFunstersI need to get out more
Joined:
29 Dec 2005
Posts:
227
Location:
-
ProfilePM
It must be said, that a lot of people who work for the NHS (including myself) have worked very hard in the past few months putting in place many preventative measures to avoid cross-infection between medical staff and patients. I think the telling time will be when kids go back to school and the weather turns colder. Little Johnny sneezes in class, and other kids catch the virus and before it mutates to full-blown symptoms, they visit their grandma in the home. Grandma then goes to the bingo evening with Doris, who sneezes. It can spread very easily, given the right conditions. I don't believe we've reached the right conditions yet, but we may very soon.

 

1st Sep 2009 - 6:30pm
JTS's AvatarJTSGodlike
Joined:
27 Nov 2004
Posts:
1332
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Deaths each year in the uk from hypothermia far exceed road deaths. We're still trying to stop global warming though.
At least we have an nhs under this government, the blue alternative will sell it to their friends, as they always have done. In any case, they're damned if they do anything and damned if they don't.
The forecasts for this current H1N1 virus are based upon past epidemics. The last one had a small flurry of cases and then after another 6 months the "second wave" arrived. Most seasonal flu does exactly that.
In any case, nobody has ever died from influenza. The deaths come from secondary illnesses, mainly pneumonia.

 

1st Sep 2009 - 6:46pm
kentswingers777's Avatarkentswingers777Godlike
Joined:
14 Dec 2005
Posts:
8462
Location:
-
ProfilePM
JTS wrote:

Deaths each year in the uk from hypothermia far exceed road deaths. We're still trying to stop global warming though.
At least we have an nhs under this government, the blue alternative will sell it to their friends, as they always have done. In any case, they're damned if they do anything and damned if they don't.
The forecasts for this current H1N1 virus are based upon past epidemics. The last one had a small flurry of cases and then after another 6 months the "second wave" arrived. Most seasonal flu does exactly that.
In any case, nobody has ever died from influenza. The deaths come from secondary illnesses, mainly pneumonia.


That will be a hard one as we don't know for sure if it is humans that are causing it.

Still banning 100 watt lightbulbs is sure gonna make a huge difference. icon_eek.gif

 

2nd Sep 2009 - 8:03am
GnV's AvatarGnVGodlike
Joined:
13 Dec 2005
Posts:
5787
Location:
embrasser la
grenouille
ProfilePM
kentswingers777 wrote:

JTS wrote:

We're still trying to stop global warming though.


Still banning 100 watt lightbulbs is sure gonna make a huge difference. icon_eek.gif

Not wishing to hijack the thread, but this is an interesting theory actually if the OP doesn't mind the intrusion.

I read an article the other day (from the UK HPA) that the EU policy on banning incandescent light bulbs in favour of the new energy saving variety (CFL's) is switching from one hazard (global warming) to another more serious one - ultraviolet radiation. It is suggested the risk is marginal (well, the would, wouldn't they!) but if there is no risk, why spend millions producing public information leaflets about it?

As for Global Warming, this is a huge money earner for Governments (and friends of Governments). If you are a conspiracy theorist, you would remind people that the reverse is happening in the Southern hemisphere as the ice cap is thickening pointing towards the development of a new ice age icon_eek.gif

 

2nd Sep 2009 - 8:30am
Max777's AvatarMax777Godlike
Joined:
3 Oct 2004
Posts:
1636
Location:
Oop North
ProfilePM
GnV wrote:

kentswingers777 wrote:

JTS wrote:

We're still trying to stop global warming though.


Still banning 100 watt lightbulbs is sure gonna make a huge difference. icon_eek.gif

Not wishing to hijack the thread, but this is an interesting theory actually if the OP doesn't mind the intrusion.

I read an article the other day (from the UK HPA) that the EU policy on banning incandescent light bulbs in favour of the new energy saving variety (CFL's) is switching from one hazard (global warming) to another more serious one - ultraviolet radiation. It is suggested the risk is marginal (well, the would, wouldn't they!) but if there is no risk, why spend millions producing public information leaflets about it?

As for Global Warming, this is a huge money earner for Governments (and friends of Governments). If you are a conspiracy theorist, you would remind people that the reverse is happening in the Southern hemisphere as the ice cap is thickening pointing towards the development of a new ice age icon_eek.gif


There is also the problem of Mercury in the new bulbs. Apparently a room should be vacated for 15 mins should one be broken and care taken not to inhale the dust!

As for Global Warming, haven't you noticed that it's now called climate change? I think that's down to the fact that "they" haven't really got a clue as to what the long term effects of any change will be....there are theories that Britain will end up having a climate similar to Alaska rather than the Med.

 

2nd Sep 2009 - 8:32am
JTS's AvatarJTSGodlike
Joined:
27 Nov 2004
Posts:
1332
Location:
-
ProfilePM
I find THIS website to offer the most understandable explanation for the reasoning behind the current H1N1 influenza outbreak and subsequent [near] panic. I think it is better to be prepared and spend some tens of millions on that preparation than spend hundreds of millions burying the dead. But that may just be me.

It is only illegal [in this country] to sell 100 watt incandescent bulbs intended for HOUSEHOLD use. It is still legal to sell them for other uses.
As for the effects on the enviro-eco-nment of stopping sales of the hot bulbs....in winter your heating costs will rise by an amount equivalent to the amount of watts you reduced by switching to cold bulbs !
Money-earner ?
Did you EVER think it was about anything else ?
There is NO evidence...NONE...that global warming is caused by CO2 emissions. There is plenty that CO2 emissions are increasing plant growth though...and even if the arctic ice melted entirely it would not raise the oceans levels at all...Not. One. Bit.