Lost wrote:
If this is the case then why is the responsibility for "Unwanted" pregnancy shared equally between both partners?
Also the fact that there is the matter of cohersion into sex without protection. There are con men and women out there can talk people into doing things they shouldn't Yes OK in an equal world there is fairness but it aint an equal world. The woman in question had possibly been told that she was the only partner that it was safe that it was all OK and believed him. Why shouldn't she if she knew nothing but his supposed fidelity and honesty?
As for SH promoting sexual health? Well lets be honest it doesn't does it? Apart from a subtitle "Advice" under the information heading. In my mind that's not helping the people who are anti swinging understand that the swinging fraternity/sorority is sexually responsible and considerate is it? Why not a small banner saying this site promotes the idea of sexual well being and safety by advocating the use of condoms?
anais wrote:
Scary story lost....
If your having casual sex/one offs etc, its still the responsibility of each individual to ensure protection is being used for their own sexual health safety surely? If each person decides not to - who will be held responsible and accountable if something like the above happens in a swinging scenario? What if a person doesn't know they have HIV or another Sti? (yet)
Scary story lost....
If your having casual sex/one offs etc, its still the responsibility of each individual to ensure protection is being used for their own sexual health safety surely? If each person decides not to - who will be held responsible and accountable if something like the above happens in a swinging scenario? What if a person doesn't know they have HIV or another Sti? (yet)
If this is the case then why is the responsibility for "Unwanted" pregnancy shared equally between both partners?
Also the fact that there is the matter of cohersion into sex without protection. There are con men and women out there can talk people into doing things they shouldn't Yes OK in an equal world there is fairness but it aint an equal world. The woman in question had possibly been told that she was the only partner that it was safe that it was all OK and believed him. Why shouldn't she if she knew nothing but his supposed fidelity and honesty?
As for SH promoting sexual health? Well lets be honest it doesn't does it? Apart from a subtitle "Advice" under the information heading. In my mind that's not helping the people who are anti swinging understand that the swinging fraternity/sorority is sexually responsible and considerate is it? Why not a small banner saying this site promotes the idea of sexual well being and safety by advocating the use of condoms?
The idea that people who are 'anti swinging' will change their attitude because this site promotes sexual health is attractive, but unlikely. They'll still be anti swinging.
