Kaznkev wrote:kentswingers777 wrote:anais wrote: Good point - you trying to provoke a response are ya?
I am waiting for a pm showing me the link so I can make my own mind up about the validity of the op's intentions, and also the validity of the author.
Someone said they were working on it, cannot remember who now.
Seems it takes a bit longer than usual?
I cannot understand where the problem is here?
and why is it up to you to decide what is valid or not,in fact why have you decided this thread was aimed at you?
In all honesty Kaz, Mr K does have a small (very small so I hear
) point. Your opening post wasn't really very explanatory and the poll was very one sided. It would have perhaps helped more if you had quoted here what the person actually said.
I would rather not see the group url posted onsite for privacy reasons as some members here are also members of the group/site. If they wished for it to be known they are members - they would let friends know privately.
So unfortunately Mr K - you nor anyone else won't be getting any validity or reading matter on this subject from this particular site. Unless Kaz cares to share privately and that is entirely up to her.
I think this ends the subject quite nicely - so I am going to lock the thread as it hasn't and isn't going anywhere.
By all means complain if you don't agree! Please send in a report via my profile report button (or a support ticket) as I won't be around tomorrow to deal with any personal pm's regarding this.
