foxylady2209 wrote:
Hang on - we need to take timescales into consideration. Maybe there should be two ratings. One, as now, commenting on the total posts. But also another commenting on the posting rate. For instance, I've been here for just over 5 and a half years. So 3139 (including this one) isn't all that great a rate of posting. <<<<pause for mental maths>>>
Bugger it <<<gets calculator out>>>
That's about 46 posts a month - just about 1.5 a day. Not that I'm on every day. But you get the idea.
Now, Kenty (picked cos not a mod or anything) has 7672 posts at this point and been here just over 4 and a half years. With a posting rate of about 135 a month - far more than me. Definitely God-like in the posting stakes.
So, what do you think - should we have a post-rate score too?
I get about 148 posts a month

time to shut up
