sexyslut79 wrote:
Oh I'm sorry, I thought that as an Historian with a Ph.D in the history of Anglo-Saxon England, I would know more about the subject than people who aren't Historians and don't teach the subject at university.
Oh I'm sorry, I thought that as an Historian with a Ph.D in the history of Anglo-Saxon England, I would know more about the subject than people who aren't Historians and don't teach the subject at university.
Distant history is largely based on a theory, and a theory is just an educated guess.
If the world was wiped out tomorrow and aliens came down and wanted to learn what western religion was in the 20th Century they could look at our churches, that are mostly east-west aligned and surmise that we worshiped the sun. They could then look at our crucifixes and surmise we also glorified human sacrifice.
So do historians really know more about the subject? Depends on what subject, and what theories they support. Sometimes the most popular views are discredited........so their knowledge was shown to be lacking. Even those with Ph.D's and teach in Universities.
Dave_Notts
