Just give them time and they'll either find the weapons of mass destruction and finally feel vindicated or all the natural resources there will be sucked dry by the declining power that is the US that the UK currently curtails to! Change to the world hierarchy is coming!!
In the meantime as the invasion took place due to "Saddam's failure to take a final opportunity to disarm itself of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons that US and British officials called an immediate and intolerable threat to world peace." as Blair put it and to date none have been found, then obviously some one was telling porkies, distorting facts for their own benefit. The moral high ground for the invasion has gone, so mankind being mankind needs to place the blame somewhere and unburden its guilt. Hence the inquest, Blair was PM at the time, start with him and work your way down till the shit sticks!
As an aside - Inquests also keep a lot of people in work and seem to be a relatively modern concept (can't remember any inquests being held after 200 years or so of Crusades) soon we'll have inquests into the inquest?!
Meet Swingers
Entertainment
Latest Members
Fun and Games
Information
Shopping
Site Stats
- Members:
- 1,389,800
- Online Now:
- 2,079
- Msgs Sent:
- 157,443,077
- Photo Ads:
- 745,630
- User Pics:
- 579,536
- Video Chat:
- 171
Bluefish2009 wrote:
We can not all be as perceptive as your self
and it would be unfair for you to imagine or presume we could be 
Ben_welshminx wrote:
My point is I wasnt convinced so why were they?
Or is it just a case of scapegoating?
My point is I wasnt convinced so why were they?
Or is it just a case of scapegoating?
We can not all be as perceptive as your self
and it would be unfair for you to imagine or presume we could be Many in the media were also unconvinced...had our M.P.'s taken the time to read a newspaper or watch the news they may have been convinced that an invasion or Iraq wasn't a good idea...the top and bottom of it is that our parliament is so dull that the only answer to the bombings and plane crashes they could come up with was an invasion....they didn't care of which country just somewhere,anyone with half a mind could have told you that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 or 7/7 but no-one was interested,the fact that Saddam was the most likely candidate as an ally against Al Qaeda was/is irrelevant, good ole G.W. wanted to do what daddy didn't/couldn't so we just we just padded along in his wake like any good poodle would
Staggerlee_BB wrote:
Many in the media were also unconvinced...had our M.P.'s taken the time to read a newspaper or watch the news they may have been convinced that an invasion or Iraq wasn't a good idea...the top and bottom of it is that our parliament is so dull that the only answer to the bombings and plane crashes they could come up with was an invasion....they didn't care of which country just somewhere,anyone with half a mind could have told you that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 or 7/7 but no-one was interested,the fact that Saddam was the most likely candidate as an ally against Al Qaeda was/is irrelevant, good ole G.W. wanted to do what daddy didn't/couldn't so we just we just padded along in his wake like any good poodle would
Bluefish2009 wrote:
We can not all be as perceptive as your self and it would be unfair for you to imagine or presume we could be
Ben_welshminx wrote:
My point is I wasnt convinced so why were they?
Or is it just a case of scapegoating?
My point is I wasnt convinced so why were they?
Or is it just a case of scapegoating?
We can not all be as perceptive as your self
and it would be unfair for you to imagine or presume we could be Many in the media were also unconvinced...had our M.P.'s taken the time to read a newspaper or watch the news they may have been convinced that an invasion or Iraq wasn't a good idea...the top and bottom of it is that our parliament is so dull that the only answer to the bombings and plane crashes they could come up with was an invasion....they didn't care of which country just somewhere,anyone with half a mind could have told you that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 or 7/7 but no-one was interested,the fact that Saddam was the most likely candidate as an ally against Al Qaeda was/is irrelevant, good ole G.W. wanted to do what daddy didn't/couldn't so we just we just padded along in his wake like any good poodle would
But not a French one in sight
