Meet Swingers

Site Stats

Members:
1,389,800
Online Now:
2,079
Msgs Sent:
157,443,077
Photo Ads:
745,630
User Pics:
579,536
Video Chat:
171
Next »
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
< >

 

25th Aug 2011 - 8:14pm
Dave__Notts's AvatarDave__NottsSite Moderator
Joined:
4 Jun 2004
Posts:
5788
Location:
Nottingham
ProfilePM
I was young and just paid it but never gave it a thought. It was there one minute and gone the next.

Dave_Notts

 

26th Aug 2011 - 4:30am
Trevaunance's AvatarTrevaunanceI need to get out more
Joined:
27 Oct 2004
Posts:
248
Location:
Exeter, Devon
ProfilePM
deancannock wrote:

the idea the more people in a house means you use more rubbish does not always add up. The council will only allow one bin per household ( thou you do get that split now with garden refuse and re-cyle refuse). So even if you did have 4 in your household as opposed to 2 next door, you would still have the same amount of bins emptied.


Ok, whilst I agree with the second part of this post I do have an issue with the part quoted above.

If your going to state what the council will or won't o, how about remembering a few historical facts.

1. The Poll tax riots kicked off around March 1990.

2. Wheelie bins were not in general use at the time of the poll tax riots, in fact I believe only one local council was using them in March 1990.

3. Today's waste collections are different to those of the time in 1990.

4. In 1990 most people had their refuse contained in a traditional bin that required a man to physically lift the bin so as to empty it's contents.

5. The Household Waste Recycling Act that forced local councils to collect recyclables wasnt law until 2003, and enforceable until 2004.

Therefore whilst I agree with your arguement that can only, and is surely, based solely on todays standards, I don't think it works within it's historical period.

The facts are that there was very little in the way of kerbside recycling, there was very little home composting, only a dim but growing environmental awareness, little government direct control and therefore homes didn't just get one bin emptied each week. It was, from memory, more like three or four bins EVERY week.

So, with nothing getting recycled and little to no wish to anyway, it's easy to see that the throw away society DID in fact produce more rubbish per person back then, than it does now.

 

26th Aug 2011 - 7:56am
starlightcouple's AvatarstarlightcoupleGodlike
Joined:
10 Dec 2010
Posts:
1364
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Trevaunance wrote:


The facts are that there was very little in the way of kerbside recycling, there was very little home composting, only a dim but growing environmental awareness, little government direct control and therefore homes didn't just get one bin emptied each week. It was, from memory, more like three or four bins EVERY week.

So, with nothing getting recycled and little to no wish to anyway, it's easy to see that the throw away society DID in fact produce more rubbish per person back then, than it does now.


after deano wrote:

the idea the more people in a house means you use more rubbish does not always add up. The council will only allow one bin per household ( thou you do get that split now with garden refuse and re-cyle refuse). So even if you did have 4 in your household as opposed to 2 next door, you would still have the same amount of bins emptied.


makes perfect sence.thumbup.gif
Next »
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
< >