Meet Swingers

Site Stats

Members:
1,389,800
Online Now:
2,079
Msgs Sent:
157,443,077
Photo Ads:
745,630
User Pics:
579,536
Video Chat:
171
Swearing at police is no longer a crime
  • (3) This is a good ruling
  • (10) This is a bad ruling
  • (2) Do not care
Total Votes : 15
Next »
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
< >

 

29th Nov 2011 - 7:34pm
Dave__Notts's AvatarDave__NottsSite Moderator
Joined:
4 Jun 2004
Posts:
5788
Location:
Nottingham
ProfilePM
starlightcouple wrote:

this is the most amazing site i am currently on for peeple who walk around with blindfolds on. it amazes me also that some fail to see what others find so obvius and when some peeple are confronted with facts they start the dummy throwing routine.


Knowing and admitting ones own faults is the first step to knowledge. Well done for taking it

Dave_Notts

 

30th Nov 2011 - 10:20am
GnV's AvatarGnVGodlike
Joined:
13 Dec 2005
Posts:
5973
Location:
j'aime la France
ProfilePM
Dave__Notts wrote:

starlightcouple wrote:

this is the most amazing site i am currently on for peeple who walk around with blindfolds on. it amazes me also that some fail to see what others find so obvius and when some peeple are confronted with facts they start the dummy throwing routine.


Knowing and admitting ones own faults is the first step to knowledge. Well done for taking it

Dave_Notts

laughabove.gif pmsl

 

30th Nov 2011 - 5:33pm
browning's AvatarbrowningSuper human rambling
Joined:
14 Dec 2005
Posts:
905
Location:
essex(white stilleto
land!)
ProfilePM
starlightcouple wrote:

browning wrote:


A truly truly bad judgement IMO.


and not for the first time either mr browning i am sure.
can you imagine being a police officer after this ruling?
why they bother i reely do not know.


Agree with you there.
I'm a huge fan of the police, overall they do a brilliant job for not alot of money under very very difficult circumstances.

What a difference when I watch cops, even gun toting criminals call police officers in the usa 'sir'.

Alot depends on where in the UK you live, my mum lives in a small village in hampshire, and when I spoke to the locals about this years riots, they were truly shocked, I, however was not.

 

30th Nov 2011 - 6:03pm
Lizaleanrob's AvatarLizaleanrobGodlike
Joined:
27 Mar 2007
Posts:
2078
Location:
somewhere between
trouble and chaos
ProfilePM
browning wrote:

starlightcouple wrote:

browning wrote:


A truly truly bad judgement IMO.


and not for the first time either mr browning i am sure.
can you imagine being a police officer after this ruling?
why they bother i reely do not know.


Agree with you there.
I'm a huge fan of the police, overall they do a brilliant job for not alot of money under very very difficult circumstances.

What a difference when I watch cops, even gun toting criminals call police officers in the usa 'sir'.

Alot depends on where in the UK you live, my mum lives in a small village in hampshire, and when I spoke to the locals about this years riots, they were truly shocked, I, however was not.


there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction huh.gif

 

8th Dec 2011 - 7:15pm
Bluefish2009's AvatarBluefish2009Godlike
Joined:
20 Jun 2009
Posts:
4359
Location:
Dorset
ProfilePM
Lizaleanrob wrote:

i think they post for a reaction huh.gif


What, on this site? Outrageous, I wont hear of it icon_wink.gif

 

8th Dec 2011 - 7:27pm
Staggerlee_BB's AvatarStaggerlee_BBGodlike
Joined:
14 Jun 2007
Posts:
2849
Location:
Cahoots
ProfilePM
Lizaleanrob wrote:



there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction huh.gif


Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot

Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion

 

8th Dec 2011 - 7:43pm
Bluefish2009's AvatarBluefish2009Godlike
Joined:
20 Jun 2009
Posts:
4359
Location:
Dorset
ProfilePM
Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Lizaleanrob wrote:



there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction huh.gif


Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot

Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion


You know we can not name and shame here small-print.gif jagsatwork.gif

 

8th Dec 2011 - 7:52pm
Staggerlee_BB's AvatarStaggerlee_BBGodlike
Joined:
14 Jun 2007
Posts:
2849
Location:
Cahoots
ProfilePM
Bluefish2009 wrote:

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Lizaleanrob wrote:



there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction huh.gif


Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot

Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion


You know we can not name and shame here small-print.gif jagsatwork.gif


No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)

 

8th Dec 2011 - 7:59pm
Bluefish2009's AvatarBluefish2009Godlike
Joined:
20 Jun 2009
Posts:
4359
Location:
Dorset
ProfilePM
Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Bluefish2009 wrote:

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Lizaleanrob wrote:



there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction huh.gif


Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot

Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion


You know we can not name and shame here small-print.gif jagsatwork.gif


No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)


Oh, you mean this kind of thing

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Re-arrange these words
Ignorant
wit
pig
fuck
Now say out loud .... (insert user of choice) is a .....

We can all confer later and see who won

 

8th Dec 2011 - 8:11pm
Lizaleanrob's AvatarLizaleanrobGodlike
Joined:
27 Mar 2007
Posts:
2078
Location:
somewhere between
trouble and chaos
ProfilePM
Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Bluefish2009 wrote:

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Lizaleanrob wrote:



there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction huh.gif


Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot

Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion


You know we can not name and shame here small-print.gif jagsatwork.gif


No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)


in the words of ant and dec "staggers"............. "its not you" icon_lol.gif

 

8th Dec 2011 - 9:05pm
Staggerlee_BB's AvatarStaggerlee_BBGodlike
Joined:
14 Jun 2007
Posts:
2849
Location:
Cahoots
ProfilePM
Bluefish2009 wrote:

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Bluefish2009 wrote:

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Lizaleanrob wrote:



there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction huh.gif


Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot

Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion


You know we can not name and shame here small-print.gif jagsatwork.gif


No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)


Oh, you mean this kind of thing

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Re-arrange these words
Ignorant
wit
pig
fuck
Now say out loud .... (insert user of choice) is a .....

We can all confer later and see who won


That would be for you to decide ...I couldn't possibly comment whistling.gif

 

9th Dec 2011 - 1:07am
starlightcouple's AvatarstarlightcoupleGodlike
Joined:
10 Dec 2010
Posts:
1364
Location:
-
ProfilePM
sleeping.gifsleeping.gif

amazing how the same peeples comments send me right to sleep. notes.gif

 

9th Dec 2011 - 3:17pm
Bluefish2009's AvatarBluefish2009Godlike
Joined:
20 Jun 2009
Posts:
4359
Location:
Dorset
ProfilePM
Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Bluefish2009 wrote:

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Lizaleanrob wrote:



there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction huh.gif


Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot

Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion


You know we can not name and shame here small-print.gif jagsatwork.gif


No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)


Well this one perhaps then? This looks quite vague to me

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

See, the thing I find most funny is, that he really does think he's winning the argument

 

9th Dec 2011 - 11:08pm
Staggerlee_BB's AvatarStaggerlee_BBGodlike
Joined:
14 Jun 2007
Posts:
2849
Location:
Cahoots
ProfilePM
Bluefish2009 wrote:


Well this one perhaps then? This looks quite vague to me

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

See, the thing I find most funny is, that he really does think he's winning the argument


Oh and I had thought that needed no qualification .... the he is obviously starlightcouple.... but you knew that didn't you

 

9th Dec 2011 - 11:39pm
starlightcouple's AvatarstarlightcoupleGodlike
Joined:
10 Dec 2010
Posts:
1364
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Staggerlee_BB wrote:

Bluefish2009 wrote:


Well this one perhaps then? This looks quite vague to me

Staggerlee_BB wrote:

See, the thing I find most funny is, that he really does think he's winning the argument


Oh and I had thought that needed no qualification .... the he is obviously starlightcouple.... but you knew that didn't you


it is so nice to see that someone is getting right up the nose of the forum bully.

you reely should not let on to these things rotflmao.gif

btw i think that everyone on here knew, there are many a smarter person on here than you!
your running out of those oportunities to point score. they can see through you very easily.thumbup.gif
Next »
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
< >