MidsCouple24 wrote:
Part of what you say is very true, but hate London, not at all, I am British to the core and it is our Nations Capital, I have and would again put my life on the line for it and what it stands for.
all you do is moan about how much london or the south gets in comparrison to the rest of the country

but london is your biggest gripe.
MidsCouple24 wrote:
What I do hate is how money is often channeled into the capital and it's surrounding areas that is denied to other developments, take Wembly stadium for instance, when funds were sought for the new stadium we struggled to raise the funds, we had to wait for the new stadium, yet all the while money was waiting and pledged to build a new National Stadium serving not only football but many other sports as well, all private money at no expense to the taxpayer, the problem, the money was available to build it in the centre of the country, between Birmingham and Coventry in an area that is already served well by rail, air and road links, has adequate accommodation and other facilities currently serving the NEC. Did the National Sports Stadium HAVE to be located in London ?
see you contradict yourself all the time. it is plain to see that someone up north has a constant pop because they moan about there bit of the country is not getting the same investments. oh and yes the national stadium should be in london, for the same reesons that the olympic stadium is as well
birmingham? i am sure there are many peeple outside of london who would love to have birmingham as its capital. will have to see if we can move buck house and the houses of parliament up there as well. have they got enough space in crossroads county?
MidsCouple24 wrote:
How many projects outside the Capital were financed for the Millenium, did anyone consider building a Dome elsewhere, would the failed Millenium Bridge have been better located elsewhere ?
not another moan is it

MidsCouple24 wrote:
I feel sorry for Londoners, yes there is a lot of money pumped into the Capital that could be better used elsewhere but they are also taken advantage of, congestion tax, parking fees outside your own homes, (I can park 9 cars on the street directly outside my house at no cost whatsoever) extortionate council tax rates and more, but this thread was asking what other people thought about the divide, because I don't know all the answers and wondered what other people thought, average people not the media and not the Government.
see what we have to put up with in london??

i can tell you what, there are bigger slums and lack of money spent in london than anywhere else. they have mentioned too boroughs in london but there are many many more places than those. stratford before the stadium had been screaming out for development since just after the war, it was virtually a slum and had been for yeers. there is no north south divide, only green eyed northerners who THINK there is a divide.
MidsCouple24 wrote:
I also wondered if anyone could justify the price difference between a house here (mine has a total of 12 rooms @ £120,00 and a similar property ANYWHERE south of Watford ? I really would like to know why there is such a huge difference in the cost, I know views, schools, transport links and so on make a difference but what makes such a huge difference ?
WAGES my friend. WAGES.
all of what you say above is just one contradiction after another. you dont like london etc etc etc. fine i am sure london can do without your good self. for me? i love london and the fact that we have the national stadium, and the olympic stadium, and the home of rugby, or as near to london as can be.
it happens in london for the same reesons it happens in new york, or paris, or any other major city, it is because it is the major city. surely anyone can see that

except northerners perhaps
oh and for the record. when a tourist comes to the uk, where do they want to go? ermmmm. i shall leeve that up to you to think about but it certainly aint birmingham. 