Meet Swingers

Site Stats

Members:
1,355,960
Online Now:
3,308
Msgs Sent:
154,951,753
Photo Ads:
723,980
User Pics:
562,922
Video Chat:
781
Takeover Good or Bad
  • (30) I do not think the SH changing hands will have any benefit to the community
  • (15) I do think the SH changing hands will be beneficial to the community
  • (80) Im sitting on the fence and waiting.
Total Votes : 125

 

19th Nov 2005 - 11:17am
WibblyWobbly's AvatarWibblyWobblySuper human rambling
Joined:
11 Feb 2004
Posts:
670
Location:
SE Sheffield
ProfilePM
Happy Cats wrote:

The attraction of this site to the purchasers is its large number of members.

The large number of members is what will attract new paying members

To do anything that might make this existing large number leave would therefore not be in the interest of the owners

Keeping this site in its existing format with its existing mods is low maintenance for the owners.

My belief is that it will be new members, attracted by the size of the site, that will give the owners their return on investment.

The new owners are obviously not daft - they know that if they dont look at after the existing large group of members, they will go off and form their own free "son of SH" site.

So, nothing to worry about.


Hiya HC... icon_smile.gif

Just bear one thing in mind though... those of us that actively contribute in the forum are very much a minority of the total membership... in the bigger scheme of things, although we are the most vociferous we are also the most expendable... just do the math and you'll see what I mean.

The new owners will have seen that there are a lot of inactive members out there and by greatly improving the features of SH they can attract them with the benefits which the members will gladly pay for... more chat rooms for different interests... better photo ads section... Lots of members + relatively small fee = nice grin on face.

As a self employed person I cannot criticise that at all... good luck to them... all I'm pointing out is that although we were/are doing a lot of shouting we are the least of their worries... as the real money is in the other parts of the site. I sincerely believe that if they removed the forum sections it would not affect their future cash flow one iota... I don't think that is in their plans but if it got to be too much trouble then who could blame them for removing it.

We have a simple choice... we continue here and as long as things are not changed too detrimentally then we are going to be happy... with regard to munches etc... we are innovative enough to rebrand if necessary... and carry on with the same rules.

If things become too unpalatable then a leader amongst us will finally have enough and will create another forum that will cater for what we like about this site and that is chatting, sharing, meeting, exchanging jokes and just general all round silliness...

All I'm saying is let's not get too inflated with our own importance on SH... I do believe we are relatively small fry in their bigger scheme of things... just a pragmatic and hopefully realistic POV... awaits brickbats... icon_smile.gif

Hugggggggggggs and and happy Saturday's icon_smile.gif

Wibbly
xxx

 

19th Nov 2005 - 11:18am
tallnhairy's AvatartallnhairyGodlike
Joined:
27 Feb 2004
Posts:
2937
Location:
Surrey
ProfilePM
Dawn_Mids wrote:

Will you lot stop talking about me eeek.gif

A girl could get one hell of a complex around here you know icon_rolleyes.gif


Dawn sure you could get whatever you wanted my dear icon_wink.gif

 

19th Nov 2005 - 11:18am
Anonymous's AvatarAnonymous
Joined:
20 May 2003
Posts:
0
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Astonishing news.... absolutely astonishing.

The charm of SH is that it was a free community on the ideas and practices of those that many other sites have easily milked money from in the past.

The "upgrade for one year" is business speak for "help us make a mint and then you're on your arse".

Being an amatuer website developer myself, the only thing that has stopped me creating my own free swinging site as a hobby was that there was absolutely no point when there was already one in existence that did as good a job as you could wish.

Swinger paysites start off one of three ways.

A) Free to all and then gradual implementation of paysite system. (e.g whats happening here)

or

B) The owners create a load of fake accounts on their recently opened site to entice customers to pay out, and eventually the community comes about when so many mugs eventually join.

or

C) A "first 1000 people free" system to build up a core and then charge afterwards.

There is no other site in existence on the internet at all that compares with Swinging Heaven, and theres a reason for it - it has a genuine "good feel factor" to it where people are here to enjoy sex, enjoy the community and enjoy discussion.

To believe that making it a corporation won't change much and will be better is naive - no other website has been made "better" than SH despite being paysites - all the privileges we need are already here and will be lost in a years time anyway.

To the new owners - you really will have to tread water lightly because it will be very very easy for any number of "techies" on this site to create a "clone site" within a matter of hours - the only thing that has stopped people in the past is that they've had no need to!

My prediction - they'll make an absolute bomb for 6 months with increased advertising meaning that SH will become the number 1 swinging paysite, the core membership won't matter anymore because they've already achieved absolutely everything they've needed by having a new "paid" core membership, and we'll either have to shell out after 12 months (not bloody likely) or find somewhere else.

I hope i'm wrong, even though i know i'm not - i'm gutted and i'm not a "full-time" SH'er so to speak, so i feel really really sorry for the likes of Bluexxx and Jags (well all the mods) who have been dumped into this without any notice.

It's a strange corporate takeover from people who couldn't give a flying crap about swinging - the reason i know is because more than once i've had the thought "ya know, a huge core membership with devoted 'disciples'... if Mark turned this into a paid venture he'd make a bomb!" - i'm a bloody swinger and i've had that idea!!!

It's like a swinging club suddenly being taken over by EasyJet and becoming EasySwing.... or EagerSwing... EagerSlut... i'm confused!

Anyway i had to add my rant to this - and final note; whereas everybodies worried - don't be. If push comes to shove people will create a new site and transfer the whole thing over piece by piece - it's literally take a day or so to do!

T & L xxx

 

19th Nov 2005 - 11:23am
silent_bob's Avatarsilent_bobSuper human rambling
Joined:
28 Jun 2005
Posts:
782
Location:
South Shields, Tyne
& Wear
ProfilePM
tallnhairy wrote:

Deviated Prevert wrote:

No, it stands for Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert. rotflmao.gif

Actually it's Microsoft Certified Service Engineer, I got halfway through one in NT4 before I decided that working with Windows made me feel dirty and Linux/BSD was much more fun. icon_smile.gif


Well I am really good at minesweeper, and it is a systems engineer icon_wink.gif I not allowed to say nasty things about microsoft, is in the small print when you signup for the exam icon_confused.gif Funny world but the only bits of my MCSE I use these days are TCP/IP troubleshooting cause I work with DB's and non microsoft application software in the enterprise now anyway icon_biggrin.gif

Morbious n blue, well said. Good to see things have settled down a little in cold light of day... Wonder when our new owners and techy friends will surface. On standby with the quiet room and dark glasses.


Oops, looks like Bill will be sending his goons 'round ASAP to repossess my MCP certificate and pin badge. icon_lol.gif

You'd be surprised at how much interest I've had from agencies when I admit to being certified on NT4 - I think it's a bit like COBOL, loads of places still use it, but most techies are quite happy to profess ignorance and leave it to somebody else (or are simply too young to have come across it).

Anyway, I'd better stop hijacking the really important announcement thread, it's not really fair.

 

19th Nov 2005 - 11:34am
Osmosis's AvatarOsmosisGodlike
Joined:
8 Apr 2005
Posts:
2027
Location:
Hiding behind your
monitor
ProfilePM
Day 2, and for those still complaining about the new ownership...... Just remember that it was Mark who sold the site to them. I don't think he would have sold for the profit. If Mark trusted them to take good care of his creation and to maintain it's success, then I will too.

 

19th Nov 2005 - 11:48am
Bazza64's AvatarBazza64A slave to my art
Joined:
16 Aug 2005
Posts:
360
Location:
and Vicky uk
ProfilePM
Waded through this thread and all the other take-over threads over the last day, my head is spinning. Various members have made excellent, valid points, some others have been shocked and angered by the events.
Any points or questions i have are already raised elsewhere, so i won't repeat them, but i am left with one overriding feeling: for the first time since i joined the site on Aug 16th, i've NOT enjoyed swinging heaven. icon_sad.gif
Hopefully, martin, elliot and co will listen to the moderators who KNOW this community and site so much better than they do, take their thoughts and opinions on board, and EARN our respect and loyalty. Sincerely hope there's a way the site can continue the way it has been doing, alongside the new company's ideas and improvements - only time will tell.

 

19th Nov 2005 - 11:56am
tigersgobounce69's Avatartigersgobounce69A slave to my art
Joined:
23 May 2004
Posts:
383
Location:
Essex
ProfilePM
Good Morning All,

We have been following this since we received a phone call last night telling us what had happened. It took us hours to read through the whole thread and did not want to post a hasty knee-jerk reply.

I lot of people’s statements have the same view as us, we don’t like the idea the SH has been sold and you are about to start earning money off the communities back. icon_mad.gif icon_mad.gif

Whatever way you put, or dress it up, this is exactly what you will be doing. You may have bought the site off Mark, but as said before, the community is SH, which means you have bought us, without our knowledge or our permission. icon_mad.gif icon_mad.gif

So far a lot of people are feeling hurt over this take over and a lot of our friends are angry with the way that it has been handled.

Why is it that a number of the post’s in this thread have broken AUP rules, but their threads have not been edited or removed. icon_confused.gif

We have noticed that one thread has already been removed because it broke AUP rules, having seen a copy of this I can understand why, but it should not have been singled out, just because it was on the extreme side. Under these circumstances everyone has a right to view their opinion.

Somewhere amongst the mass pages of this thread the new owners have said (cant remember the words exactly ) These were Mark’s words and not ours. If this is the case the AUP/Chatroom rules were Mark’s and the Mod’s just enforced them, which they did very well and to the best of their ability.

You have not come along and chosen which parts of the site you want to enforce and which parts you want to rip out. (You can do this as you have bought the rights to do so.), but would have thought under the changes you would have given some lee way to allow the SH community to voice their opinion, whatever way they wish, and considering that Elliot broke AUP rule by swearing and that was not edited or deleted it does not show that the new owners have any idea of what they are actually doing, or even know the rules of this site, and if they do then they are choosing to break their own rules already.

We know that it was a Mod from the site that decided the post should be removed, but it was just a case of someone who cares a lot about the site and the community voicing their opinion, be it rather strongly. icon_eek.gif

As for everything else, what will be will be. icon_biggrin.gif

Just to make you aware there will be a couple of polls that might appear to be controversial going up by Mr Tigs but its not like controversial posts/threads have not gone up before, unfortunately on this occasion peoples nerves are very raw, but they will be within AUP rules, but the new owners are not going to like it FACT, they may have bought the site but they have not bought the right to tell us what we can and cannot say, as long as it is within AUP rules. So unless these have been changed overnight and if this is the case, the company that now own SH should have informed the community personally.

Hay Ho, been members now for well over a year and this is the biggest post we have ever done icon_biggrin.gif icon_biggrin.gif

P.S. Any Bi-Fems fancy a shag icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif

 

19th Nov 2005 - 12:13pm
evie's AvatarevieJust popped in
Joined:
28 Dec 2004
Posts:
7
Location:
-
ProfilePM
Quote:

sad but not downtrodden ..... ready to do war ...if needed......or.....to smoke the peace pipe.....


Dargento, funny you should mention peace pipes .... as well as ringtone and other swinging sites they seem to do an interesting sideline in pipes and zong bongs icon_lol.gif

Takeover

19th Nov 2005 - 12:14pm
tigersgobounce69's Avatartigersgobounce69A slave to my art
Joined:
23 May 2004
Posts:
383
Location:
Essex
ProfilePM
Who thinks this takeover is a good idea

You have said that you want our input so this is a short and sweet poll to show you how the community feel.

Please do not use this thread to add comments just vote on the poll.

 

19th Nov 2005 - 12:30pm
McCloggie's AvatarMcCloggieI've got chair sores
Joined:
6 Apr 2005
Posts:
493
Location:
UK/Europe
ProfilePM
Only discovered the news this morning and have spent some time trying to catch up events.

I think that, given the way the site has expanded, it was inevitable that some changes were going to occur. I have no problem with Mark moving on and even making a profit on all the hard work he started but maybe some sort of explanation from the man himself would have been tactful.

I certainly do feel slightly worried that what was a "free" site/comunity can now be owned by a bunch of faceless people whose claim to success seems to be selling ring tones for phones and who have no idea at all about the swinging scene. As has been said before, this is now a commercial enterprise that will not be driven by members needs but by business reality and IF they fail and the whole site goes under then there is very little chance that we, the members, will be able to do anything about it or claim it back.

I am also worried about what a commercial business could do with our names and privacy etc. Even if I decided to leave/resign now, the new owners still have all my details.

So, what can we do? Not a lot really apart from waiting to see what happens and hope that our new owners - whoever they are - are genuine and that their changes are not too intrusive.

Sadly, I would not put any money on it.

McC

Re The Take over

19th Nov 2005 - 12:35pm
nighteyes's AvatarnighteyesYou looking at me?
Joined:
24 Aug 2004
Posts:
81
Location:
leeds
ProfilePM
hi all

i've only just read whats going on!

I know i don't post often, But we have two or three options

1 we can see hows its goes?

2 We can leave and find another site?

3 We get a groups of us and setup a site like it was?

4 We can work with Elliot and his team to keep the site how we want it and have the best of both worlds?

Whats your veiw on it yes we all nervious about what will happen but ain the mean time lets do what we set out to do by signing on to this sita !! Have Fun with Each other
Thats i think at the moment

Thanks Nights

Stabbed in the back.

19th Nov 2005 - 12:38pm
suzyandbrian1973's Avatarsuzyandbrian1973Finding my feet
Joined:
11 Oct 2005
Posts:
11
Location:
Stockport, Cheshire
ProfilePM
Well, this is a shock, but it reminds me of something about Mark.

We orginally advertised on SH a couple of years ago and had our adverts linked to an online diary of our swinging exploits, Sue and Brian's Swinging Diary. We had quite a fall out with Mark over our website, partly because we were using a service called Adult Hub to create the forum and chat room. He accused us of trying to profit out of swingers, which was just not true. Adult Hub works in a similar way to how the new owners say that SH will operate in the future. There is a basic service for free with extras at a cost. Lots of swingers sites use Adult Hub because it is the only way that they can ever conceiveably inculde advanced features on a 'home made' web site.

Anyway, my point is that I find it pretty ironic that Mark could acuse other people of profiteering and then sell the whole community to a company who's knowledge of swinging probably doesn't extend beyond what they have read in the News of the World. To say that he has stabbed us all in the back is an understatement. If he had to get rid of the site, what was wrong with giving it to the moderators to run as a co-operative. Or, at the very least, what was wrong with having the balls to come here and tell us himself what was going on? In short, we are disgusted with the way that Mark has acted. He created a web site that had a sense of real community and fooled us with his promises.

"First things first. We get emails every now and then asking how to pay to use this site, or whether we will be making it a site you have to pay for to use in the future. We want to take this opportunity to say don't bother asking. No payment is required, no payment will ever be required. Keep your Credit Card in your pocket/purse/thong! You will NOT come to this site one day and find that you have to pay to use it. We'd sooner stop all together than start charging anyone to use Swinging Heaven - and we're not about to do that! So, let that be the final word on the matter."

"We are simply a genuine couple running a genuine site for the UK swinging community."

"Finally, so why/how on earth can we do all this for free? Because we care about swinging and the state of most 'swinging sites' out there, so here we are trying to make a difference. Of course we'd have to care, because the amount of time Mark puts into developing this site and moderating it (along with help from Helen and a few other very helpful people) puts him at a great expense of time. But, there you go, it's what he's decided he can and wants to do. "

Now we can all see what was really behind these fine words!

So we aren't happy that the site has new owners, but....... On the bright side, there are some aspects of SH that have not been updated for a long time. For instance, the dogging locations are terribly out of date. Maybe the new owners will get round to doing that. But as for paying, if we have to start getting our hands in our pockets then we will be off like a shot! I suspect that this will apply to most of the people here. If the new owners came here hoping to make some money they might have a shock coming to them.

Brian and Sue.

 

19th Nov 2005 - 12:40pm
evie's AvatarevieJust popped in
Joined:
28 Dec 2004
Posts:
7
Location:
-
ProfilePM
McCloggie wrote:


I certainly do feel slightly worried that what was a "free" site/comunity can now be owned by a bunch of faceless people whose claim to success seems to be selling ring tones for phones and who have no idea at all about the swinging scene. As has been said before, this is now a commercial enterprise that will not be driven by members needs but by business reality and IF they fail and the whole site goes under then there is very little chance that we, the members, will be able to do anything about it or claim it back.
McC


They have more idea about the 'swinging scene' ....or at least commercial swinging sites than they seemed prepared to admit at the outset. Some of their other nonswinging related websites have odd links to swinging information sites ....that ultimately lead to a uk swinging site that claims to have over 100,000 members and many of the new improved fetaures that we're being promised.

Last edited by on 19th Nov 2005 - 12:52pm; edited 1 time in total

new owners

19th Nov 2005 - 12:49pm
les_southwest's Avatarles_southwestSuper human rambling
Joined:
1 Jun 2003
Posts:
710
Location:
devon
ProfilePM
welcome to elliot and the new owners very best wishes to mark and i wish him well as a long term member of this site i was thinking we should all wait and see what affect the new changes have on us all first before deciding on an uprising we can not possibly comment untill we know what is a foot so please elliott and co please bear in mind the communitys thoughts and take into acoount the mods feed back as these people represent the thoughts of the majority of usall and they work dam hard and deserve a big thanks so i will say it thanks guys and girls you do a grand job icon_lol.gif

 

19th Nov 2005 - 1:00pm
MadMax's AvatarMadMaxSite Admin
Joined:
18 Nov 2005
Posts:
886
Location:
Sunny South
ProfilePM
Good day, there is a lot of points being raised here again that have been covered at least a few times in this thread. icon_lol.gif

 

19th Nov 2005 - 1:03pm
Darksparrow's AvatarDarksparrowGodlike
Joined:
12 Jan 2004
Posts:
4898
Location:
Mainly South Yorks
ProfilePM
Martin_M wrote:

Good day, there is a lot of points being raised here again that have been covered at least a few times in this thread. icon_lol.gif



Martin - maybe start a locked thread where you can post the Q & As from this thread would be useful - then you can just direct people there - and no-one excepts admin and mods can post on it icon_biggrin.gif

 

19th Nov 2005 - 1:06pm
dargento's AvatardargentoSuper human rambling
Joined:
15 Aug 2005
Posts:
913
Location:
NW
ProfilePM
hope youve sobered up you drunken sot......

if you dont remember you were offering your services to all the guys on your last thread last night.............

(listens for the clamour as martin reviews his last post last night and sighs with relief icon_smile.gif )


good mornin too ya icon_smile.gif

 

19th Nov 2005 - 1:06pm
MadMax's AvatarMadMaxSite Admin
Joined:
18 Nov 2005
Posts:
886
Location:
Sunny South
ProfilePM
Blimey, this is not right there are only negative answers here.

 

19th Nov 2005 - 1:10pm
dargento's AvatardargentoSuper human rambling
Joined:
15 Aug 2005
Posts:
913
Location:
NW
ProfilePM
woah martin....

some re still just getting to know......

i think the locked threads a good idea for telling people yet to find out the news and just defer perople there......

keep your chin up and we'll all see what happens......

meanwhile we can continue to dog you on this thread lol

 

19th Nov 2005 - 1:33pm
Tim and Lene's AvatarTim and LeneLook at meee
Joined:
8 May 2005
Posts:
46
Location:
London
ProfilePM
Evie,

You are right, they do seem to have experience with other swinging sites.. Elliott said as follows last night :

Quote:



Ok im not exactly sure what happend, i left my pc for an hour for dinner!

kbuk - you couldn't be further from the truth. We are not just a 'fucking ringtone company', we run a LOT of other dating and swinging sites, and yes i do care about the people here, and no we are not here to fleece money at all.



Martin,

Could we ask what other Swinging Sites you have been involved in. Of course we appreciate what you have done with other sites might not be want you want to do here, but it would be very interesting for us to have a look.

I think it usually breaks forum rules to mention other swinging sites. Mods is it ok in these unusual circumstances?

Tim & Lene