I do like my kids to be open and frank about these matters.

NB I just _know_ she'll just go out in the New Year and get her foof pierced, I just know it!

Quote by flower411
Have you noticed how quiet the trolls are today ??
There`s been no abuse and no arguments ....it`s been days since one of them attacked somebody for disagreeing with an original poster !! :shock:
Are they hibernating ??
It has been quiet without them ....but maybe we can all have a bit of fun while agreeing to disagree![]()
We can say stuff without being attacked or abused just because we hold a different view !!!
Hurrayy !!! :thumbup:
Quote by Evane
Yes all of them desrve round of applause and pat on the back. Did you know the Nazi's put an end to swinging in germany in the 30's, Hitler was a complete arsehole.
Quote by kentswingers777
I dont know either but.....WITHOUT the Yanks money we would have lost the war. Hitler would have won. Looking at Brown and his cronies would we have been any worse off?
Quote by Evane
Apparantly grinding it up and snorting it reduces side effects also.
It has something to do with the oestrogen going straight to the blood stream rather than being digested by the kidneys.
Whatever you do don't try this in public, nobody will belive you when u say you are snoting the pill.
Quote by kentswingers777
I dont know either but.....WITHOUT the Yanks money we would have lost the war. Hitler would have won. Looking at Brown and his cronies would we have been any worse off?
Quote by flower411
I have no party loyalty. I am afraid these days I vote for the party that I believe will do the least damage. I am a floater :shock:
I do believe that one should vote so at least one can say I did my bit to improve our lot. To not vote undermines our voice imho, if we can't be arsed to make our views known with a vote we can't really critiscise when we get the dross we get.
Next stop lobbying my mp...now thats real democracy...make the buggers accountable
Quote by Sixfootsix
Then I stand corrected in single CPU configuration, but they're certainly not cheap and I'd imagine a dual CPU MB is going to be in the scary end of the price range.
It certainly tells me that in January (if the rumour mill is to be believed) the Mac Pro's will get even better.
I still don't understand the overpriced bit, yes they cost a bit more in certain circumstances, but they hardly depreciate. In a year the mac will have lost hardly any of it's original value, the "PC" will have lost almost all of it's value due to a million newer graphics cards/processors being released - you have to look at the purchase price of a mac over a longer term - you can recoup and awfully large amount of it back should you upgrade.
And for what it's worth, if somebody came to me and asked me for advice on getting a mac, I'd still send them down the Apple store to try for themselves, one size doesn't fit all.
Quote by Ian
I read at the weekend that the george forman grill was one of the most unused presents given in the UK. However top of the pile of presents used, and then very quickly given up with is the exercise bike.
hmmmm we've got both
Quote by kentswingers777
As for somebody saying about throwing money at the armed forces or the " war ", that comes out of a completly different budget. I am talking about the Social Security budget and what money they have, or not as the case maybe.
Quote by kentswingers777
Peanut I have made my opinions very clear, on many occasions. I have not nor never have had, any problems with people claiming benefits IF they are entitled to them.
Yes you are correct by saying these Mothers ARE entitled to the money they get by law. What is happening now is that the laws will be changed. Laws change all the time.
I believe that the genuine claimants out there are NOT given anywhere near the ammount they should be but....others are being given money that they could do something to get.
Would it not be a fairer system whereby the genuine ones get more money, and the ones that can work, do something constructive to get theirs?
As you seem to be a genuine claimant, would you not want more money? I think you would as would others but...we cannot continue to sustain Mothers with kids who do not or have never worked, and more importantly have no intention of ever doing so. That surely cannot be right, but a balance has to be struck where it is fair. And that is where I think this will fall down because, some genuine claimants will be dragged into the net and told they have to find some kind of work.
This kind of radical change in the law of course will have people up in arms, but radical decisions normally does.
I would just like to see a fairer system where the likes of Karen Mathews cannot screw the system, and if she could have worked and payed her dues like most do, maybe just maybe she would not have become the dreadful Mother she turned out to be.
It has become a culture for many who can work, but choose the benefit route as a lifestyle choice. I am saying that choice should be taken away, but NOT from the genuine claimants. That to me seems a fairer system than the one we currently have.
Quote by blonde
They cost roughly twice what an equivalent powered PC costs. They have limited software availability. They have limited hardware upgradeability. Did I mention they cost the fucking earth?
Quote by kentswingers777
I really cannot see a problem with this, and the Mathews comment makes my blood curl.
Quote by ayoke71
Not sure how you think of it as apples and pears. They're both computers doing the same thing in the same basic way.
Incidentally I should point out that I'm neither a PC nor a Mac 'fanboi'.
The other myth that needs debunking is the fact that OS/X does crash... regularly. Admittedly it doesn't crash as much as Vista, but it's not far off the same as XP. It may not get BSOD but it does crash in its own inimitable way.
Personally I prefer OS/X to any MS OS, but ultimately if you take away the OS you are left with a very expensive PC that is monopolised by Apple.
OS/X's superior stability hasn't got all that much to do with Apple. It's the FreeBSD superstructure that holds it up. Similarly if you install Linux/KDE on a PC you have an OS that is as reliable as OS/X and has all the strengths and on a hardware platform that is more than half the price.
So what Mac users usually wax lyrical about is OS/X, not the Mac itself. Once you take that out of the equation there are no real life benefits of spending out on a Mac.
Once Apple finally give in to public demand and release a PC version of OS/X (rather than the hacked versions) I'll be first in the queue! Until then I'll continue to use the best tool for the job... which currently, for everyday use (the use I put a computer to anyway), is the PC.
I hope you don't take offense on my comments. There is no intention to be offensive. My opinion is very different to yours and depending on point of view, both of us are just as right as we are wrong. My emphasis when buying a computer is simply a different one than yours. I have a Mac to work and a PC to play games (on XP) and tinker with Linux and Vista (both in virtual machines). There is currently no work that I can think of for myself that'd require me to move back to a PC. That said, it obviously depends on what software your company uses.
Quote by blonde
They cost roughly twice what an equivalent powered PC costs. They have limited software availability. They have limited hardware upgradeability. Did I mention they cost the fucking earth?
Quote by Sixfootsix
Both are capable of doing a job but the fact that a top spec quad core Mac will set you back £2000 or more and the equivalent spec PC can be picked up for nearer £400 and can do anything the Mac can do, and in some instances more, pretty much sums it all up really, and that’s how can apple justify the price.
Quote by Deviants
Both are capable of doing a job but the fact that a top spec quad core Mac will set you back £2000 or more and the equivalent spec PC can be picked up for nearer £400 and can do anything the Mac can do, and in some instances more, pretty much sums it all up really, and that’s how can apple justify the price.
Quote by ayoke71
I am in agreement with sixfoot. I am using both, work with both and can't really agree all that much with Peanut, sorry. Can't compare apples with pears.