Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Time To Moan About The Chatroom

last reply
42 replies
3.1k views
0 watchers
0 likes
don't want to argue but you wrote "but banning the bareback rooms will just drive them into secrecy" sorry but that doesn't make anything perfectly clear to me, what do you take from that line? Because the way I interpreted it was that everyone in there does it and if you ban the rooms you wont know where they are? i may be reading it wrong but the more i look at it i can't see what else it means.
whats the ffs for? i read your previous post but it was the last post i quoted not your previous one, what difference does it make what post it is? i still interpreted it from what you wrote whether right or wrong.
Think we all agree that banning rooms won't make the slightest bit of difference and to be honest a bareback room is probably the last place people who do it will be, more chance of ir being full of people having a nosey or perving at cams biggrin
And to any man that thinks bareback is disgusting etc.. I do hope you have a one woman one condom rule.
Transferring an infection from one woman to another on the outside of a condom while the male is safe on the inside does not qualify as sexual hygiene.
Quote by Kiss
And to any man that thinks bareback is disgusting etc.. I do hope you have a one woman one condom rule.
Transferring an infection from one woman to another on the outside of a condom while the male is safe on the inside does not qualify as sexual hygiene.

funny you should say that but you tend to see that often in swinging clubs in group play, but they wore a condom so its safe? yet anyone not wearing one would be shot down. its a funny world we live in.
The FFS i think stemmed from exasperation lol from the what comes across as a little too much of a 'looking for something that wasn't there or meant to be'. I read it as i assume flower intended it written and as far as i can see the agreement with you was pretty comprehensive.
I am the one who has been convinced of the arguement you guys gave forth and indeed have capitulated on those points to a degree that i would now use your arguements as you did. Good debate with well mannered arguement is such a joy.
I would however like to maybe explore the idea of, does an increased risk mean a person is wilfully and knowingly, with all the information available Putting those unknowing at risk ? Possibly. And conversely does that mean those who do practice safe sex are responsible enough to realise that reduced risk is better than increased risk. However small the difference. It is a difference.
Quote by Mallock2006

If it was only those involved with bare backing then ok maybe its a fair point. But can it not be seen that there are inevitably going to be innocent people this could effect. Or is just me that thinks that there are people out there that would cheat on their partners.

With regards to people cheating on their partners..
Is it something we have to worry about dunno
Sorry to sound mercanary but as long as you and I practise safe sex then why do we need to worry about anyone else :dunno:
I for one do care and worry for others and believe that issues should be raised and debated in a reasoned manner. Though i respect your thoughts that. Why, if it is something that doesnt affect you then have no need to be involved.
it could be said the same about many other issues that thank goodness arent by a good many people.
It is a good to have a viewpoint and learn by debate