I agree with the principle of discretion being shown when referring to dogging sites by name...but I'm confused by what is defined as acceptable and what isn't.
As an example, there are 2 or 3 current and live threads about Blidworth Bottoms, and I just noticed a thread where Birdlip is being mentioned. Personally, I wouldn't have used these names (but do here as I assume that they have passed the acceptability test already by being allowed)
Please clarify where the line is drawn.
Thanks
well i agree that names shouldnt be mentioned because then u get alot of wasters down...then the police down (because they do see these sites) and then everything gets ruined..so i think if people are going to mention names of places...do it in PM
That's fair enough then. can I make a suggestion then...
As and when any specific sites are mentioned, you add the names to the forums "Excluded Words" list? (the one usualy reserved for profanities and other foul language) I operate some forums on other sites, and this could be a very simple matter to do on those, to anyone with the appropriate administrative privilages on the message board. I don't know the make of this message board or if it's possible, but if it is, it would stop such names from appearing in the first place.
Automatic censor, I like it! Everytime someone types something daft in, it could come up as `I`m a penis`! :mrgreen:
Venusxxx
I am a penis.
In edit: Shit, I hate this new automated system that Mark has set up.....
Me too, it`s spiralling out of control!
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewpost/309633.html#309633
:huh:
Venusxxx