As usual I'm irritated by the intrusion into individuals private affairs. I presume the lady didn't court this publicity and although the court proceedings are a matter of public record that doesn't mean theses people have to have their dirty knickers waved around.
To quote the Press Complaints Commission code
"Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence, including digital communications. Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual's private life without consent."
And yes there are exceptions for "public interest" stories, Which I dont think apply to this or similar cases.
"1. The public interest includes, but is not confined to:
i) Detecting or exposing crime or serious impropriety.
ii) Protecting public health and safety.
iii) Preventing the public from being misled by an action or statement of an individual or organisation.
2. There is a public interest in freedom of expression itself.
3. Whenever the public interest is invoked, the PCC will require editors to demonstrate fully how the public interest was served.
4. The PCC will consider the extent to which material is already in the public domain, or will become so.
5. In cases involving children under 16, editors must demonstrate an exceptional public interest to over-ride the normally paramount interest of the child."
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
do we have any sympathy for
last reply
27 replies
1.7k views
0 watchers
0 likes
It might have been a better idea to have asked a general question as opposed to an article in the news papers, where it is hard to know all the facts, thus possibly making uninformed judgements.
If the question had been should a wife be entitled a large settlement of the husband’s wealth if they divorced or split up.
I personally would judge that on.
Has he built the empire while he has been married?
If the wife and husband have been together through the process of what he has achieved I would say she should be entitled to a very large claim, as like any relationship you venture into that includes a partner, each must have contributed something for it to have lasted as long as it had. On monetary terms the share might not be equal but I believe commitment and time should be a key factor.
If the husband had the empire before marrying then I would view that differently and I would say I would not expect the woman to get the same faction of the share as the example about should get.
If the question had been should a wife be entitled a large settlement of the husband’s wealth if they divorced or split up.
I personally would judge that on.
Has he built the empire while he has been married?
If the wife and husband have been together through the process of what he has achieved I would say she should be entitled to a very large claim, as like any relationship you venture into that includes a partner, each must have contributed something for it to have lasted as long as it had. On monetary terms the share might not be equal but I believe commitment and time should be a key factor.
If the husband had the empire before marrying then I would view that differently and I would say I would not expect the woman to get the same faction of the share as the example about should get.
Quote by brucie
but come on, reading about this this morning got me thinking.
the husband seems to be a real prick. living the high life and dating a fashion designer whilst putting his ex wife and daughters through what is for them hardship.
Brucie dear chap you have a lot to learn about things on here.
Don't ever...ever...quote anything from the newspapers. It is the dreaded sin to do so on here, as everything the press write is manipulated and twisted so much, that the only thing that is true in there, is the date.
Benny it was a joke, I know that is a tad hard for you but here is the definition of the word joke...
1. Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line.
2. A mischievous trick; a prank.
3. An amusing or ludicrous incident or situation.
4. Informal
a. Something not to be taken seriously; a triviality: The accident was no joke.
b. An object of amusement or laughter; a laughingstock
Don't get too carried away jeez. :shock:
1. Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line.
2. A mischievous trick; a prank.
3. An amusing or ludicrous incident or situation.
4. Informal
a. Something not to be taken seriously; a triviality: The accident was no joke.
b. An object of amusement or laughter; a laughingstock
Don't get too carried away jeez. :shock:
Sex God
Quote by kentswingers777
Benny it was a joke, I know that is a tad hard for you but here is the definition of the word joke...
1. Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line.
2. A mischievous trick; a prank.
3. An amusing or ludicrous incident or situation.
4. Informal
a. Something not to be taken seriously; a triviality: The accident was no joke.
b. An object of amusement or laughter; a laughingstock
Don't get too carried away jeez. :shock:
Methinks he doth protest too much
Sex God
And on(ish) topic I have no sympathy for the rich .....shoot the f**king lot of them....Class war now
Sex God
Who the hell is Michelle Young? Never heard of her. A few details would help.
How the heck can she not have paid the rent on a pad like that?
Is her husband the guy who reckons he lost all of his money, but cannot remember what on?
If it is I do think it is quite funny, as he is obviously doing his best for his wife to get as little as possible.
I do not know enough about this one to comment any further, and the circumstances are such I do not know.
Is her husband the guy who reckons he lost all of his money, but cannot remember what on?
If it is I do think it is quite funny, as he is obviously doing his best for his wife to get as little as possible.
I do not know enough about this one to comment any further, and the circumstances are such I do not know.
Quote by brucie
If the question had been should a wife be entitled a large settlement of the husband’s wealth if they divorced or split up.
quote]
thats not teh question though. i want to know if anyone feels sorry for a woman kicked out of her £10,000 a week home?
I just been having a debate on the needs of the greedy.
It Brucie depends on your thought patterns. Some may love it that a woman gets kicked out of a big flash ten grand a week home. Some would say that everyone should live in a hut and all get £100 a week to live on. Russia this ain't.
Yes to some it will seem obscene that anyone can live in a ten grand a week house, but hey her Hubbie paid for it, and if he can afford that ammount, imagine what he earns.
Now if he earns that kind of money, think about how much tax he pays, far far more then the average person.
In life you will have the haves and have nots. With the vast majority falling somewhere in the middle, probably hearer the end of the scale.
So for me no I do not think it is wrong for her or anyone else to live in a ten grand a week house....fuck I wish I was. I would have a big indoor pool as well.
Sex God
Quote by kentswingers777
If the question had been should a wife be entitled a large settlement of the husband’s wealth if they divorced or split up.
quote]
thats not teh question though. i want to know if anyone feels sorry for a woman kicked out of her £10,000 a week home?
I just been having a debate on the needs of the greedy.
It Brucie depends on your thought patterns. Some may love it that a woman gets kicked out of a big flash ten grand a week home. Some would say that everyone should live in a hut and all get £100 a week to live on. Russia this ain't.
Yes to some it will seem obscene that anyone can live in a ten grand a week house, but hey her Hubbie paid for it, and if he can afford that ammount, imagine what he earns.
Now if he earns that kind of money, think about how much tax he pays, far far more then the average person.
In life you will have the haves and have nots. With the vast majority falling somewhere in the middle, probably hearer the end of the scale.
So for me no I do not think it is wrong for her or anyone else to live in a ten grand a week house....fuck I wish I was. I would have a big indoor pool as well.
The problem is Kenty if he earns that much cash he probably pays bugger all tax because he'll be paying someone to help him avoid it...I have no problem with the rich if they pay their dues...it just seems they have a collective habit of not doing so
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
The problem is Kenty if he earns that much cash he probably pays bugger all tax because he'll be paying someone to help him avoid it...I have no problem with the rich if they pay their dues...it just seems they have a collective habit of not doing so
aah yes but tax avoidance is legal..tax evasion is not.
and should I be sorry for her? erm no. She is of workable age, children are teenagers, as far as I know she is not disabled and therefore prevented from working. So she can get a job like the rest of us.
Sex God
Quote by kentswingers777
Staggers dear boy....That is a bit of a stereo typical comment for you Sir.
We go not know about his tax returns, but let us assume he does pay his tax, it would be a vast ammount of money...no?
It would indeed, BUT as we come at this from different sides of the fence you know my answer to this already,and same to you too (the stereotypical bit)
