From here .....http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/403307.html
Quote by essex34m
My feeling is that prime ministers don't warrant a state funeral. Only the existing monarch does.
Remind me, as I'm getting a bit old in the tooth. Didn't Churchill warrant a State funeral and didn't the Queen Mother lay in State in Westminster Hall before a public(ish) ceremony?
And what about the amount of money wasted on the very public funeral of the fruitcake Diana, Princess of Wales just to up Bliar's popularity?
Baroness T is in every way deserving of a good send off. AFAIK, even Arfur Scarguts would pay in handsomely to any kind of send off fund if it pre-dates his demise :lol2:
I think you meant HER .... how and where do I contribute to such a fund ??
No, it is very obviously pre-dates HIS demise. He would pay into a send off fund, if it happens before HE pops his clogs.
Look up go on up ...no a bit further ....aaaah there it is
just goes to prove that some people only see what they want to see!
It's not a case of reading what I want to read, I am reading it as he can't give once he has died. therefore pre-dates his demise.
See now if as is suggested Mr S hates Mrs T then surely his preference would be for a funeral that predates HER demise ... do you see ??? the substitution of her for his kind of changes the intent .... pearls before swine
:banghead::banghead: 
