Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Here are some public workers that deserve to be unemployed
Last month, after the boy was born, three social workers and five policemen entered the hospital ward where she was breastfeeding at 3am, wresting the baby from her by force. They then discovered that they had nowhere to keep him. The boy was put into intensive care, where his mother was taken to breastfeed him for four days, until she was fit to leave the hospital. She saw her baby for the last time two weeks ago
How much does the gov pay to the care agency that places children taken into care for adoption ?
Too little oversight.
Hopefully the 40% staff cuts will start with social shitvices.
I think I shall take the 5th on this one.
But the Mail ran a similar story a couple of years back about Social workers taking children away from their parents, purely because they were deemed to be a bit thick...
Reading stories like this just makes my mind up even more about Social Workers.
But the Mail ran a similar story a couple of years back about Social workers taking children away from their parents, purely because they were deemed to be a bit thick...
Reading stories like this just makes my mind up even more about Social Workers.
Quote by JTS
Last month, after the boy was born, three social workers and five policemen entered the hospital ward where she was breastfeeding at 3am, wresting the baby from her by force. They then discovered that they had nowhere to keep him. The boy was put into intensive care, where his mother was taken to breastfeed him for four days, until she was fit to leave the hospital. She saw her baby for the last time two weeks ago
How much does the gov pay to the care agency that places children taken into care for adoption ?
Too little oversight.
Hopefully the 40% staff cuts will start with social shitvices.
Ummm, your question suggests you're not really informed enough about how adoption works to place a figure on where cuts should take place.
Quote by Plimboy
I don't know the full facts in this case, but in general terms I am very suspicious of those in the public sector who are paid to "protect" society, sometimes they're worse than the people who they are supposed to be protecting society from!
Plim :sad:
No Plim they are there to supposedly protect members of a society.
Luckily enough most people do not need social workers in their lives, but for some poor people it can be a nightmare.
Quote by JTS
Plenty of opinions, not many facts. The facts that are there are contradictory. Booker approvingly cites Lord Wall and John Hemmings MP, missing the fact that Lord Wall said of John Hemmings MP that he would not "be persuaded to take seriously any criticism made by him in the future unless it is corroborated by reliable, independent evidence" (see
The aetiology of Hemmings bizarre behaviour on this topis is eomthing Booker overlooks as well. Hemmings was a Birmingham councillor. He got another Birmingham councillor pregnant, much to the surprise of his wife, and revelled in the notoriety when the story came out during an election campaign. He then decided to sue the council of which he was a member after its social workers questioned his lover about her disclosure that she had, whilst a teenager, concealed the still birth of a child. He lost that law case too. To say Hemmings is an unreliable witness is an understatement, but incompetent journos like Booker keep quoting him as if his being an MP makes him reliable. There's more here
