Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

minium of five years?

last reply
149 replies
4.8k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by flower411
Google Erwin James.
Jimmy Boyle has written brilliantly about his life and experiences. Boyle was also brilliant fictionalized by Chris Brookmyre in 'One fine day in the middle of the night' - quite the funniest book you'll read until you pick up another Brookmyre book.
John Hirst, who blogs as Jailhouse Lawyer, is a really important voice as well about the corrosive effects of not caring adequately for young people in care. Inside Times provides good info about what it's really like inside.

So let me just get this clear......you think that violent killers making money from writing about their crimes is a good thing and we should all sleep easy in our beds as a consequence.
Have you actually read any of the stuff I suggested? I'm guessing not...
Quote by Kaznkev
There are no recorded instances of child murderers (children who have murdered rather than adults who have murdered children) going on to become serial murderers of family, or strangers come to that, after release. Unless of course you know different.
You would be hard pressed to find any serious violent crime, child offenders, who upon release returned to a life of violence. I couldn't find any such examples.
Rhetoric based on false representations based on biased media reports is very easy to confuse with rational fact based debate.

This has nothing at all to do with media reports....it is what I THINK!
Everyone on here knows your opinions as they know mine Benny.
I know you would be fine with these kids being released and living next door to you, but most people would not be.
As far as I am aware it has only been in Liberal broken Britain over the last 15 years or so where crimes like this, done by kids has happened.
I have no figures of this obviously but then again the figures you quote often come from some sort of media source.
IF you can come up with child crimes such as this say from pre 1975 I would be intersted to know. It is about Liberal Britain and it's attitudes now towards criminals, that we find ourselves in situations of crime that we do now.
As a kid of this age in the 70's I never heard of anything as violent or parents that are as broken, as they are now...my experience!
Broken Britain exists whatever the media or anyone else might say, because when you have easy laid back attitudes to everything now, there is ALWAYS a price to pay.
Prisons are full to bursting for the first time ever, and that is with prisoners being released way earlier than they should be....why is that I wonder?
These kids are evil, their crimes are evil and their parents are evil, you have your opinions as to why this is and I have mine.
Would you like them living next door to you then? You would be ok with that?
Mary bell,not in the past 15 years
rehabilitated and raised her own daughter well

this case is too sad to try and make party political points out off
The White Room by Martyn Waites captures the atmosphere of that case brilliantly
Quote by Ms_Whips
my ex-brother-in-law works for the prison services and juvenile detention centres. other than not being allowed to come and go as they please they have everything they could possibly want. i know someone who is currently in prison and it's not his first time. he wasn't bothered about going back inside as such as it's 'easy time' as he says. what bothered him most was leaving his dog. i know this guy and he's a nice one as such who did something stupid and is now paying a price. but it's still too easy.
there have been different views put forward in this thread just as i hoped there would be when i posted it. i can take some from each side which i also think is good.
i don't believe that we are all born a blank canvas. as i pointed out before, there are killers who have had very good upbrings. witchy mentioned dogs......i come from a large family of dog breeders, rotties, dobies, german sheppards, boarder collies, patterdales, westies, yorkshire terriers, pugs, poodles (minature and standard), dashounds, staffies and jack russles. given any litter of pups all brought up the same way by the same people they should all be the same, yes? after all, if everything is born as a blank canvas then the same rules that apply to us have to apply to all animals, as animals we are. but anyone who has bred a litter of pups will soon know that each one has a different temprament. this determinds just how the dog will react to any given situation. we see many dogs labled as dangerous breeds and some are in the list above. those who own dogs will say that it is how a dog is brought up that counts. those who breed will tell you that a dog can be made bad, but sometimes they just are no matter how they are brought up. breed has nothing to do with that and neithr does parentage.
now, a dog is not a person. it does not have the same thought patterns that we do. yes a dog maybe snappy out of fear and come right. but, and this is a big but.....the dog who has attacked someone.......does it get to live? we hear of dogs killing children/babies and they are instantly (in most cases) put down straight away. i would not have a dog like this in my house. if one of my dogs were to do it i would have it put down straight away. we can't do this with people and they do get a chance, but i'm not sure that all people can be cured.
if these boys were over 18 i wonder if people's opinions would be different?
i do think that these boys were well awear that what they were doing is wrong. they do not have any problems that we know of that would stop them knowing. their parents were not the only people in their lives either.
i have just heard on the tv that these boys have been promised anonymity (sp) for life at the cost of £2,000,000 a year to the tax payer. that being as costs stand at the moment of course.

Why would anonymity cost £2,000,000 a year? Secure detention for both of them will cost about a tenth of that; anonymity costs nothing. Mary Bell was sent away to live, after her rehab, in a small house in the middle of nowhere. The only problem she had was the constant efforts of the News of the Screws and other friends of freedom trying to expose her.
Quote by browning
Bet that no one loses thier job over this.....

A social worker has already been sacked. How much were you willing to bet? You could show you care by donating it to the NSPCC
Eugenics in this Mothers case would be a bloody good idea.
Or are you possibly saying this Mother should go on and have more kids, it would be ok?
It almost seems at times that there is some sort of sympathy for parents like this....it is how it seems to me at times.
Quote by Witchy
Witchy your comment " If she's not in a position to know that they've been properly punished, then she's surely not in a position to know that they're "laughing up their sleeves at the law " is to me quite laughable.
I am as sure as I can be that she KNOWS exactly how her sons killers have been treated. As a parent I am sure I would know as well.
The law is an ass at the best of times, and the problem that I know personally is that in the eyes of the law they are still minors, and the law is on their side.
I would without any shadow of a doubt trust and believe a Mother who has had to see her son by scum children, over any bloody lefty social workers...not saying you are one of those.
She knows or has been told how her sons killers have been treated, imagine how she must have felt that instead of them being punished, they were living the life of riley...nice eh?
And we wonder why our jails are full, and yes Broken Britain is out there.....everywhere caused by parents who should never have been given the right to a birth of a child.
I also think this Mother of these kids should be sterilized without any delay.

Most parents of murdered children would quite understandably seek the harshest punishment possible for their childs murderer/s. Anything less would provoke resentment.
I'd be shocked to find that Denise Fergus knows more than the basics about how Thompson & Venables have been treated. She may know of their day to day routine inside, which games console they had...etc etc, but she won't have been privy to the intimate details of their treatment and their outcomes. That's not to say I'd be likely to believe a social worker either ;)
The sweeping statement of "Boys like this who are so evil by the age of 10 and 11 will never be changed into decent people" is opinion, not fact.
But this isn't about the opinions of Denise Fergus. And it's sure as hell not about mine. I'm here to provide food for thought, as always.
Not always but on this occasion without a doubt.
To me every child matters not matter who they are and what they have done. The age of the boys who did these atrocities is extremely worrying. Their lives are over before it has even begun. Maybe it was the day they were born.
I do believe that rehabilitation has to be an option and I also believe that parents, families and communities should be bought to task on incidents that involve children under the age of 13. Without a sense of community we all reap the society we sew.
Our value systems have to be looked at or we all suffer and it will continue generation after generation.
I have no answers to this one. We cannot keep just locking people up as that just isnt the answer. We have to look at prevention and traffic light systems that stop the abuse and the abuser getting to that stage.
the boys are now 11 and 12. Neither is 14.
Ummm I got nothing more to add as my views have been put across quite well by the 'do gooders' the 'tree huggers' and the 'idiots' that think that rehab can and does work... oh, and the same people that believe that no-one is born bad.
Isn't it just catholics that think that people are born bad ? or, was that just my family ?
I'm avoiding quoting - it's getting a bit long on here.
I am all for giving violent offenders treatment, counselling and whatever else is needed to prevent them coming out and offending again. Not for their sake - but for mine and my family's. Since so many offenders are let out far too early - they should be taught not to offend any more.
But, these are not a couple of drug addicta, desparate for a fix and mugging someone to get it. They tortured the poor lads. TORTURED for HOURS. Not a quick bash, it dragged on and on. And when they got bored and tired they wandered off. Leaving one of the boys blinded and unable to move begging his friend to leave him to die - HE WAS 9 FOR GOD'S SAKE!!!!! And he was waiting to DIE! I remember when my son was 9 and upset when he fell out with his friend. This horror breaks my heart.
No these scum do not deserve to breathe the same air as my child or yours. Maybe they were damaged by their upbringing, buy non-existant parenting. I don't care - they must never, ever be allowed to practice being human on the rest of the population. They might be rehaibilitated, eventually. Would any of us want them living next door to our kids?
Their basic human rights should be catered for (since apparently we can't bring back capital punishment) - food, shelter, healthcare and education, and especially psychiatry to attempt to fix them. But as to letting them out - it would be an impossible risk.
Their 'parents'? I despair. Sterilise certainly. But what about their influence on other youngsters? Do they have nieces or nephews they are infecting with their appaling behaviour.
We're not talking about people who go to the supermarket in dirty shell suits here - it seems they (mother only?) destroyed their sons. What punishment/prevention is appropriate for that?
The answer for the future? I don't know - but there must be room for discussion about requiring every prospective parent (ma and pa) to have to pass at least a basic competency test before they can go ahead. I'm not talking exams or even GCSE's. But basic stuff. Stuff like not feeding your kids illegal drugs, looking after them, teaching them right from wrong. And if a parent doesn't know right from wrong what the hell are they doing bringing up kids.
I think what I said was their lives are over.
I believe in prevention not after the event locking away for 70/80 years. Build more prisons and we will fill them.
I Look at how people live and can see how this can happen.
I think the film "Lord of the Flies" says a bit about society and I also think war has a way of changung sane people to do things they wouldnt have done ordinairily.
If those kids who were the attackers (and I have no time for them by the way in what they have done) were born into a life of deprevation then that also has to be considered as horrific and I do think the parents should be prosecuted.
Don't some people think all human beings are born with aggression? And that nurture overcomes these base impulses?
Quote by Ms_Whips
Don't some people think all human beings are born with aggression? And that nurture overcomes these base impulses?

that's the thing, it's all just emotions that some have in a greater or lesser degree. however, i do think that for some it can never be nurtured out of them. just in the same way that some stay good no matter what happens to them.
i'm also interested in knowing at what age does it make a difference? only because as i have said already a couple of times (and everyone seems to be ignoring rolleyes ) there are those who torture, and murder who come from very good homes with good upbringing. so if we are all born good, then surely there must be a set age at which things go wrong? if evil is all to do with nurture because we are all born good, then surely the ones reported coming from a good background with no bad outside influence must be lies? how else did they suddenly become so bad?
is there not the possibility that no matter how nurtured you are, that some just have the predisposition to just seek it out? is it not possible that these boys would have done this anyway? yeah ok their upbringing has a big factor, but surely th seed was alreay there?
whips
A litter of puppies can have very different temperaments and personalities
Nature vs nurture is a fallacy. They're two sides of the same coin that influence each other.
With people there may be a predisposition to violence and violent behaviour, however environmental and educational influences may alter how individual will react in given situations.
As for the rest of this 'discussion', I'm waiting for Godwins law to raise its head again. rolleyes
I don't think there is any point focussing on the parents as having any responsibility. They were probably let down by the system as well.
Its no good looking to this wonderful 'system' as the cure for all life's evils. It just can't do it. Its selective where it points its energies and its funding. it cannot cope with all the demands that exist.
Quote by duncanlondon
I don't think there is any point focussing on the parents as having any responsibility. They were probably let down by the system as well.
Its no good looking to this wonderful 'system' as the cure for all life's evils. It just can't do it. Its selective where it points its energies and its funding. it cannot cope with all the demands that exist.

I think we should all focus on the parents in this case.
As for they were " probably let down by the system "..what the heck does that mean?
THEY chose to have kids...nobody forced them. They lack the basic fundamentals of being parents, that has nothing to do with any system.
Bad parents need educating to become decent parents, but there are so many bad parents out there now, that it would be an impossible task.
The violence shown by these kids is not just down to bad parenting, it is about a total complete lack of respect or any sort of boundary in their lives....that IS the fault of the system.
Social services WERE involved with this family, the school must have been aware of this family and these kids behavour...that IS the fault of the system.
All the do gooders out there who think they can be " saved " I wonder what their attitudes would be towards those kids, had it of been one of their kids that nearly died....at a guess it would be completely different to the Social worker approach they have at this moment in time.
These parents involved will nearly always come from the same sort of background...rough council estate....benefit lifestyle....no Father to be seen or one that is a drunk.....sound familiar?
Does that not tell anyone anything about the society we now live in?
It tells me everything I have to know and that same lifestyle they live, has been created by society. No values at all...no self esteem...only a benefit lifestyle fuelled by drink and drugs.
I always have said..." wanker parents always equals wanker kids " never a truer word spoken in this case.
Name and shame them because it will be on a facebook page near you soon.
It seems like these parents and the family developed under the auspices of the social service system, and what they have become is the failure of the 'system'. They lost their self respect a long time ago and simply let themselves be led into all that the social service wanted to do with them. So in that sense they let themselves down and then the system let them down. the system does not have the clout to take on what it thinks it can do.
Mad people commit more crimes too. And that's genetic 60% of the time. They should be on the list.
The last person to try this started with the mad ones, half a million of them I believe.
Quote by Kaznkev
I'm avoiding quoting - it's getting a bit long on here.
I am all for giving violent offenders treatment, counselling and whatever else is needed to prevent them coming out and offending again. Not for their sake - but for mine and my family's. Since so many offenders are let out far too early - they should be taught not to offend any more.
But, these are not a couple of drug addicta, desparate for a fix and mugging someone to get it. They tortured the poor lads. TORTURED for HOURS. Not a quick bash, it dragged on and on. And when they got bored and tired they wandered off. Leaving one of the boys blinded and unable to move begging his friend to leave him to die - HE WAS 9 FOR GOD'S SAKE!!!!! And he was waiting to DIE! I remember when my son was 9 and upset when he fell out with his friend. This horror breaks my heart.
No these scum do not deserve to breathe the same air as my child or yours. Maybe they were damaged by their upbringing, buy non-existant parenting. I don't care - they must never, ever be allowed to practice being human on the rest of the population. They might be rehaibilitated, eventually. Would any of us want them living next door to our kids?
Their basic human rights should be catered for (since apparently we can't bring back capital punishment) - food, shelter, healthcare and education, and especially psychiatry to attempt to fix them. But as to letting them out - it would be an impossible risk.
Their 'parents'? I despair. Sterilise certainly. But what about their influence on other youngsters? Do they have nieces or nephews they are infecting with their appaling behaviour.
We're not talking about people who go to the supermarket in dirty shell suits here - it seems they (mother only?) destroyed their sons. What punishment/prevention is appropriate for that?
The answer for the future? I don't know - but there must be room for discussion about requiring every prospective parent (ma and pa) to have to pass at least a basic competency test before they can go ahead. I'm not talking exams or even GCSE's. But basic stuff. Stuff like not feeding your kids illegal drugs, looking after them, teaching them right from wrong. And if a parent doesn't know right from wrong what the hell are they doing bringing up kids.

MM yes lets make a list of who should be allowed to parent,
obviously abusers sterilised,
drug addict
alcoholics
ppl with learning disabilities,well often abuse is as a result of a low iq( again ref mary bell)
mixed race families have a higher incidence of crime
black families have higher incidence of mental illness
mixed race families have a higher incidence of crime
males commit more crimes
poor commit more crimes

I know,only people like me should be allowed to parent
oh hang on I'm sexually deviant
OK so only white middle class straight families should be allowed to parent
You know i think that was tried one time in the 30s,.....not sure that's the end point you were aiming at foxy
Talk about take things to such silly extremes!
All of the above can also be fantastic parents, but agree with the first one.
Where can you get the figures for the rubbish that you are stating above?
" mixed race families have a higher incidence of crime " or " mixed race families have a higher incidence of crime "
Can you actually back those up at all?
People just cannot see that the Liberal approach over the last ten years of this Lefty Governemnt, have created this!
As I have already stated and will continue to state....these families usually come from the same sort of backgrounds.
They never seem to work and have not worked for years....benefit dependant even though it seems they are perfectly capable of working. Drink and drugs play a huge role.
The whole welfare system needs to be overhauled and to get these people into work, to pay their way. Maybe then they would develop a bit of self esteem, and with self esteem maybe to become better parents.
This Government in particular have created a social divide, and therefore with no responsibilty or boundaries now in so many homes, is it any wonder kids have no respect for anyone or anything....ask any teacher the kind of kids they have to deal with on a daily basis, and then look at the parents of those kids.
In this particular case and in the case of baby P, the investigation has been a whitewash to save the Government's blushes...
The Government are refusing to publish the full report but rather use the Labour secretive summary. Just like in the baby P case this Government want to suppress the report...I wonder why.
Surely the aim of publishing a full report would be to root out weak, incompetent and complacent public officials and to try and ensure better safety for children in care.
The totally out of touch schools secretary Mr Ed Balls ( I wish he had some ),summed uip Labours delusion yesterday by insisting that publishing the full report would not be supported by " anyone ". I would say most people would believe the opposite here.
Covering up people's mistakes is something that angers people, and if they had nothing to hide they would publish it.
Yes the system has helped to create people like this but the majority of parents fall under that same system and do not abuse it, and continue to be great parents.
There are without doubt people out there who should never have had kids, because they are either incapable of bringing them up properly, or are just plain selfish.
Publish the report the Tories have said, and if they get into power ( which they will ) they have said they will publish both the baby P report and this report in FULL. Then maybe we will find out for sure where the real blame lies.
Bad parents who are terrible examples to kids, and that equates to shocking childrens behavour and attitudes in dreadful cases like this.
Also I am tired of hearing that old thing " cannot be named for legal reasons ". What the heck does that mean, or is it that they deem they are too young to be named?
Name and shame them...it may well make them think twice.
Quote by Ben_welshminx
Mad people commit more crimes too. And that's genetic 60% of the time. They should be on the list.
The last person to try this started with the mad ones, half a million of them I believe.

Ben, is that point statistically weighted to account for higher incidences of
Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in certain areas?
Tee hee GnV.
I knew you would spot the subtle flaw in my argument.
I only discovered the genetic variant existed when a vegetarian friend was diagnosed with CJD recently.
I don't really see what all the fuss is - it's not as though they committed the most horrible of all crimes, stealing money from the government. All they did was torture and mutilate two human beings, and as we all know from the pointless waste of lives in Afghanistan - humans are worth jack-shit in the UK.
And naming and shaming them is oh so wrong in New Labours world.
You ok then with these kids living next door to you then? As it is always so much better to throw the problem over to someone else, without addressing the real causes....silly me. lol
Quote by SlurpySarah
I don't really see what all the fuss is - it's not as though they committed the most horrible of all crimes, stealing money from the government. All they did was torture and mutilate two human beings, and as we all know from the pointless waste of lives in Afghanistan - humans are worth jack-shit in the UK.

That is twice now I have seen that term used in the last few days. wink
No point giving up the discussion cos ya can't be bothered.
I asked you a genuine question and you gave me an answer...if that is the truth then fair play to you.
I think if most people found out they have a child molester or a child who has did this to other kids, and they had kids themselves I think most people would be terrified of that fact.
But of course there are always exceptions to every rule.
Quote by kentswingers777
And naming and shaming them is oh so wrong in New Labours world.

You ok then with these kids living next door to you then? As it is always so much better to throw the problem over to someone else, without addressing the real causes....silly me. lol

and in Gaunty's world too.
This morning on Sky, he said that there is no point in naming and shaming them; the real culprits here are the Social Services people and Ed (I've got no) Balls. It is they who should be in the dock for the catastrophic and continuing failures.
You know, I tend to agree with that and have modified my view accordingly.
Who said that forum discussions don't have influence?
Good for you GNV. wink
If that is what Gaunty did say, then he is a tosser!
Shock...horror..Kenty don't agree with something Gaunty has said. lol
Most of the time Gaunty is bang on the money but...just occasionally he talks a load of drivel.
First and foremost it IS the parents to blame, followed by the Social services who fail to do anything, then the schools for not reporting these kinds of people to Social services.
The kids are just a product of disgusting parents.
I would lay a years salary down that IF these kids had been brought up in a decent caring environment, they would not be where they are today.
Just like in the baby P case and the Karen Mathews case etc etc....disgusting parents that either do not care, or try and make some money on top of their benefits by disgusting acts against their kids, should be sterilized so as they never get the chance to inflict that on any other kids.
Then there was that other Mother ( ha ha ) who led everyone to believe her kid was ill, so as to rake in as much money as possible.
As little ago as twenty years people would have locked you in a nut house by saying that in the future Mothers would be like this, and don't forget these cases have only been in the last 18 months or less.
Is it getting worse or are the media being able to pick up on these kinds of parents more easily?
At least the public are having a right to know because if Labour had their way, the papers would be gagged and we would never know anything, apart from what they wanted us to know....a bit like not publishing the report in this case...guilty ya think?
Quote by kentswingers777
The totally out of touch schools secretary Mr Ed Balls ( I wish he had some ),summed uip Labours delusion yesterday by insisting that publishing the full report would not be supported by " anyone ". I would say most people would believe the opposite here.

And yet in October:
Quote by kentswingers777
Now if you are really telling me that an educated clever Minister like this guy is

Quote by kentswingers777
He is a far cleverer man than you and me

Do we see a volte-face?
Quote by northwest-cpl
The totally out of touch schools secretary Mr Ed Balls ( I wish he had some ),summed uip Labours delusion yesterday by insisting that publishing the full report would not be supported by " anyone ". I would say most people would believe the opposite here.

And yet in October:
Quote by kentswingers777
Now if you are really telling me that an educated clever Minister like this guy is

Quote by kentswingers777
He is a far cleverer man than you and me

Do we see a volte-face?
Nah.. peut-etre dunno
Quote by northwest-cpl
The totally out of touch schools secretary Mr Ed Balls ( I wish he had some ),summed uip Labours delusion yesterday by insisting that publishing the full report would not be supported by " anyone ". I would say most people would believe the opposite here.

And yet in October:
Quote by kentswingers777
Now if you are really telling me that an educated clever Minister like this guy is

Quote by kentswingers777
He is a far cleverer man than you and me

Do we see a volte-face?
So nice northwest that you have the time to look back that far, you obviously pay attention to what I say.....good boy. wink
Cannot see the relevance to be honest here...On one hand I said he had " no balls " and on the other I said " a cleverer man "
Can you not be clever and have no balls then?
Quote by kentswingers777
The totally out of touch schools secretary Mr Ed Balls ( I wish he had some ),summed uip Labours delusion yesterday by insisting that publishing the full report would not be supported by " anyone ". I would say most people would believe the opposite here.

And yet in October:
Quote by kentswingers777
Now if you are really telling me that an educated clever Minister like this guy is

Quote by kentswingers777
He is a far cleverer man than you and me

Do we see a volte-face?
So nice northwest that you have the time to look back that far, you obviously pay attention to what I say.....good boy. wink
Cannot see the relevance to be honest here...On one hand I said he had " no balls " and on the other I said " a cleverer man "
Can you not be clever and have no balls then?
One for the feminists then....