Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Obama going for sainthood !!!

last reply
68 replies
3.0k views
0 watchers
0 likes
barrack hussain obama is a puppet of wall street which financed his election campaign.
and, it's quite likely that goldman sach's or one of the others purchased the prize for him or strong armed it antway.
in many of his speeches on the campaign trail, he declared he would withdraw from iraq, bring his boys home and repeal the patriot act "on taking office" with slogans of "we are change" and "yes we can". since taking office he has :- increased the military budget, increased the bailout stimulus package to banks, increased the war in afghanistan, made threats against pakistan and carried out "drone" attacks in northern pakistan and his latest, said he would sign the copenhagen accord without reference to congress by using his "executive powers" in contravention of the constitution and bill of rights. his medicare programme, not to be confused with our n.h.s. would mean every working american contributing a set amount to PRIVATE health companies by LAW.
the nobel PEACE prize awarded to him for having achieved nothing of the sort, is designed to maintain confusion of the electorate in the u.s. and elsewhere while he continues with the policies determined by his masters, WALL STREET BANKERS.
I disagree.
I think that the Nobel Peace Prize committee sent out a very bold message.
I listened intently to the Obama acceptance lecture where he set out his ideals and aspirations.
I have said in other threads that we should pull out of Afghanistan and I still believe that but with an open mind, I listened to his reasoning about the increase in troop numbers as a means to an end.
He did not seek to win this prize; indeed, I genuinely believe it took him by surprise.
But I can see the American point of view more clearly now. Let's hope he is worthy of his word.
They had good foresight then :thumbup:
******************
on topic:
Flower... My thought about the Nobel and Mr Obama;
the award makes as much of a mockery of the Peace Prize as some of the posts I have seen in responce to your original question.
If it was awarded politically to send a "message" of support of Obama's actions, the intended audience for that message don't give a hoot in the first place.
Obama does not persue peace. Niether do the United States, and niether do any of our western 'powers'.
... in my humble etc.
travesty
lp
what he said!
whips
Ditto - the prize is supposed to be awarded to people who have actually done something great, monumental, over and above, extraordinary - it devalues the currency of the prize and is an insult to previous worthy winners
Can you imagine the world's response if he had turned it down?
Screaming headlines "OBAMA REJECTS PEACE", "BARAK NOT NOBLE ENOUGH FOR NOBEL" etc etc etc. Clearly I am not a copywriter but you get my drift.
I think he has handled the embarrasssment of an un-earned award he couldn't get out of accepting very well.
I have no comment about the war in Af'stan cos I'm too lazy to find out the facts and I don't read the papers.
Quote by foxylady2209
Can you imagine the world's response if he had turned it down?
Screaming headlines "OBAMA REJECTS PEACE", "BARAK NOT NOBLE ENOUGH FOR NOBEL" etc etc etc. Clearly I am not a copywriter but you get my drift.
I think he has handled the embarrasssment of an un-earned award he couldn't get out of accepting very well.
I have no comment about the war in Af'stan cos I'm too lazy to find out the facts and I don't read the papers.

Yeah, but they would have asked him first - the honourable thing to do whould have been to decline in favour of a more worthy recipient, and if it ever came out, his reasons would have won him admiration the world over - even better, a manufactured leak could have ensured it came out smile
But the vain little tart that he is, he obviously wanted the glory and couldn't see far enough ahead to the upside in declining
(edited in case of offence)
Quote by easyrider_xxx
Can you imagine the world's response if he had turned it down?
Screaming headlines "OBAMA REJECTS PEACE", "BARAK NOT NOBLE ENOUGH FOR NOBEL" etc etc etc. Clearly I am not a copywriter but you get my drift.
I think he has handled the embarrasssment of an un-earned award he couldn't get out of accepting very well.
I have no comment about the war in Af'stan cos I'm too lazy to find out the facts and I don't read the papers.

Yeah, but they would have asked him first - the honourable thing to do whould have been to decline in favour of a more worthy recipient, and if it ever came out, his reasons would have won him admiration the world over - even better, a manufactured leak could have ensured it came out smile
But the vain little coconut that he is, he obviously wanted the glory and couldn't see far enough ahead to the upside in declining
So, in his shoes, you would have turned it down then...
i would
lp
Quote by __random_orbit__
i would
lp

Never known you turn anything down rolp :huh:
Quote by GnV
Can you imagine the world's response if he had turned it down?
Screaming headlines "OBAMA REJECTS PEACE", "BARAK NOT NOBLE ENOUGH FOR NOBEL" etc etc etc. Clearly I am not a copywriter but you get my drift.
I think he has handled the embarrasssment of an un-earned award he couldn't get out of accepting very well.
I have no comment about the war in Af'stan cos I'm too lazy to find out the facts and I don't read the papers.

Yeah, but they would have asked him first - the honourable thing to do whould have been to decline in favour of a more worthy recipient, and if it ever came out, his reasons would have won him admiration the world over - even better, a manufactured leak could have ensured it came out smile
But the vain little coconut that he is, he obviously wanted the glory and couldn't see far enough ahead to the upside in declining
So, in his shoes, you would have turned it down then...
Yeah, in his shoes I would have, I mean they're the wrong size and I go more for the timeless classic of a hand made brogue or plain fronted oxford smile
Quote by Kaznkev
sorry but can we avoid terms like coconut please
thank you

okay - no offence meant - I retract that
Quote by easyrider_xxx
sorry but can we avoid terms like coconut please
thank you

okay - no offence meant - I retract that
Being thick here.......but why coconut? And why could it be classed as a problem?
There was/is a member who calls others "My little cornflake" or other words. I took it in this vain........was there another meaning that I do not know of?
Sad I know but I have googled it...........and the only thing I came up with is a scout song redface
Dave_Notts
In Edit: Now had a PM and told what it means. I was being thick.
barky being nominated for the nobel peace prize in 2008, ACCEPTANCE IN JANUARY 2009 is and was all about creating/maintaining an IMAGE by his handlers. fortunately or unfortunately, depending on which way you look at it, as the world economic crisies developes, more and more people are awakening to the bullshit/propaganda they have been told over the recent past as their social condition changes for the worse, no more so, than in the u.s.
as this crisis continues to develope, contrary to "green shoots" "house prices are rising" "unemployment not getting worse as fast" "jobless recovery" propaganda churned out every day to keep the great unwashed from realising whats happening, thanks to the net, people are becoming very much more, aware.
what on earth are people thinking, particularily the inteligent of the well meaning "greens" supporting the copenhagen accord that barky has said he will sign and enforce by executive powers in contravention of "the constitution" and without reference to congress, while world production/activity/trade/greenhouse gas production IS FALLING AT THE RATE OF 30% ?????. if the worlds population is 6.7 billion and to feed and clothe them, even if 5 billion at subsitence level, if you cut the poor countries carbon emissions you will KILL THEM ! nobel peace prize my ass. if there were any good intentions behind such a prize, they've been long since hijacked by the same mob who own the politicians and media and propagate manipulated data as scientific evidence of global warming while the u.s. suffers its coldest decenber since records began in 1888.
and while this process takes place, the media primes the divisions within society and preys on their backwardness with stories of "its all the blackies, muslims, asylum seekers, lazyphuckers, doleites, poles, kosovans, pakis, etc's FAULT ! wake up sheeple, hope i have'nt disturbed too many here and awaked any at this unearthly hour, just got in from work an hour ago.