Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Recession - Negative or Positive

last reply
42 replies
2.3k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Thought is may be interesting to see how the recession is affecting the group of people on this Site. This could be a straw poll of the entire country.
How is the recession affecting you overall?
POSITIVE - You still have a job, mortgage payments down, utilities down, deflation in shops, cheaper products.
NEGATIVE - You or your partner have lost their job, arrears, real cash flow problems, threat of job losses, general feel of doom and gloom.
NO DIFFERENT - You life is largely unaffected either way by the recession.
(Try to avoid the perceptions created by shock TV reports and just vote how it is actually affecting you day to day ignoring the TV and newspaper news)
Quote by Too Hot
Thought is may be interesting to see how the recession is affecting the group of people on this Site. This could be a straw poll of the entire country.
How is the recession affecting you overall?
POSITIVE - You still have a job, mortgage payments down, utilities down, deflation in shops, cheaper products.
NEGATIVE - You or your partner have lost their job, arrears, real cash flow problems, threat of job losses, general feel of doom and gloom.
NO DIFFERENT - You life is largely unaffected either way by the recession.
(Try to avoid the perceptions created by shock TV reports and just vote how it is actually affecting you day to day ignoring the TV and newspaper news)

The recession has affected me both financially and emotionally, however, I've not voted in your poll.
To be honest I found the remainder of your post quite patronising and you say at the bottom that we should avoid the perceptions created by shock TV reports etc. yet you've put your perceptions there about what we should be thinking about. confused
dunno
What a delightful thread and far more interesting than the news coverage, thank you.
I have many friends and family who have been sacrificed by their employers and Im trying to support them emotionally as best I can. One thing that I keep bringing up is the huge number of colleagues who were victims of the last capitalist shake down who have moved on and who tell me are happier than they ever would have been had things continued as they were.
As for the deflation in shops- it's spin. In reality, food prices on (especially) basic items continue to rise.
i am 3 years into a fixed rate mortgage and have found its the only real place where i am losing money but i still thank goodness for it cos things could so easily have gone the oposite direction and i may have been in a position of losing my home
as wales has not recovered fully from the previous 2 recessions i find other areas of my cash flow have changed very little but i do also find myself shopping around for bargains and settling on shop brands rather than named brands in my shopping basket
I love it when people refere to being " sacrificed by their employers ".
I run a print business and I can assure you that times are the hardest I have known in over 30 years. It is not just the print business, but all the things that affect my business.
Now IF I had an employee who I was paying good money too, but for the sake of my business I had to make them redundent, then sorry nothing Capitalist about that.....that is just pure common sense.
It would not be a personnel decision, but a business one. So easy for people who probably have never owned a business to bleat on about employers but...they would no doubt do exactly the same things, IF ever put into that position.
Yes times are hard, yes people are finding things tough but....don't tar every employer with the same brush. Like me my business, whatever money I have made has been through bloody hard work and believe me some sacrifices along the way.
It always seems to be the same kind of people who moan about employers. IF those people had any sense themselves they too would have their own business, but some people do not have the business accruments needed to do so.
Yes we are finding it tough, and yes I do have my own bills to pay but......thankfully through hard work and graft, we will survive this and come out of it stronger. If not I will join others down the dole office.
Well said Kent, thank you for the well informed focused and non personal rant.
If one thing gets my goat its bleeding heart liberals who disagree with me and by definition have spent their entire life eating lentil burgers whilst chained to a tree and never doing an honest days work.
Quote by benrums0n
Well said Kent, thank you for the well informed focused and non personal one thing gets my goat its bleeding heart liberals who disagree with me and by definition have spent their entire life eating lentil burgers whilst chained to a tree and never doing an honest days work.

Glad I could be of some kind of assistance to you Benny.
Anthing else......just ask. wink
Quote by Witchy
As for the deflation in shops- it's spin. In reality, food prices on (especially) basic items continue to rise.

you are correct, it is a myth......
just so you are there are two different measures for inflation in the uk...
RPI.... which includes everything was at -0.1%, which is the one the government work with for public pay rises, pension increases ect...
however the RPIX, which strips out the mortgage interest payments is running at 3%, which is basically "every day inflation" food, petrol, shops, ect.....
Quote by Too Hot
Thought is may be interesting to see how the recession is affecting the group of people on this Site. This could be a straw poll of the entire country.
How is the recession affecting you overall?
POSITIVE - You still have a job, mortgage payments down, utilities down, deflation in shops, cheaper products.
NEGATIVE - You or your partner have lost their job, arrears, real cash flow problems, threat of job losses, general feel of doom and gloom.
NO DIFFERENT - You life is largely unaffected either way by the recession.
(Try to avoid the perceptions created by shock TV reports and just vote how it is actually affecting you day to day ignoring the TV and newspaper news)

with regards to your "positives" a couple of things...
1)mortgage payments are down..... some are down, remember a lot of banks haven't been passing on the mortgage rate decreases from 2.5% downwards... so only if you have a track mortgage have you got the full benefit....
and that doesn't even include those who don't own houses .. or those who rent ect ect...
2)utilities are down.... yes and no.... they were actually increased by more then the decreases, so there is no net benefit as such.....
3)deflation in shops.... myth.... see the post above
4) still have a job... is that really a positive??? lol seriously though I had for the best part of 18 months our jobs under threat, and to be honest it is something I would never wish on anyone else, thankfully now my job is a lot safer than it was, but to have to keep looking over your shoulder and wondering if you would have a job does affect your spending patterns...save just in case... not spend on "x" just in case, not go out as much just in case
I cant say its affected me that badly but :shock:
Trade is deffinitely down but what the hell :taz:
A few friends and family are now out of work but hopefull of a new job biggrin :D :D
Prices in the shops have gone up :shock: but only by a few pence :shock: can bear that.
all in all for me it isnt that bad :P :P :P
My only gripe mad :x :x :x :x
THE PRICE OF DIESEL ggggggggggggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
trav.....
There's no option in the poll for us to select either :cry:
We count ourselves as extremely lucky; we decided to sell up and take a couple of years off from business with no mill-stone round our neck. Having achieved our objective (it took a year to finally complete) the recession then hit and boy could things have been so different :shock:
Personally, I don't think we would have survived if we hadn't sold when we did and I'm sure we would have been a nice target for bank foreclosure and an addition to the ever increasing bankruptcy statistic in UK.
I agree with T7; unless you have run your own business, you cannot believe the pressure you can be placed under.
I'm glad we were out of the firing line this time round. We are both now far more relaxed than we ever were and ready to focus on our next adventure.
Quote by GnV
There's no option in the poll for us to select either :cry:
We count ourselves as extremely lucky; we decided to sell up and take a couple of years off from business with no mill-stone round our neck. Having achieved our objective (it took a year to finally complete) the recession then hit and boy could things have been so different :shock:
Personally, I don't think we would have survived if we hadn't sold when we did and I'm sure we would have been a nice target for bank foreclosure and an addition to the ever increasing bankruptcy statistic in UK.
I agree with T7; unless you have run your own business, you cannot believe the pressure you can be placed under.
I'm glad we were out of the firing line this time round. We are both now far more relaxed than we ever were and ready to focus on our next adventure.

That is my major point GNV.
These people bleat on yet, won't do anything about starting their own business. If there were no employers, there would be no employees, a simple anology that even the simplest minds should be able to understand.
We have a 25 grand overdraft, which most months we are nearly up to it. Our customers take an age to pay, even though we have to pay our bills on time.....Paper bills and business rates of 4 grand and the rent on the unit.
Yet I know of somebody who does not work, reckons he has some kind of back problem, though he seems to be able to do things I would struggle to do. He then moans it is so unfair he has to manage on blah blah ammount of pounds per week.
Well he runs a car and he drinks and smokes. He can get up when he likes and do exactly what he wants with his days. Nice.
Me? I get to work at , then do a days hard graft on a printing press, whilst my business partner struggles to find work for the days ahead. On top of that has to get the money in to pay the bills, and the other member of staff we have.
Easy being an employer? Yeah right. For those that moan about them and their actions on trying to save their business through these hard times is this....try it yourself and see just how easy it all is. Humbug.
Quote by kentswingers777
There's no option in the poll for us to select either :cry:
We count ourselves as extremely lucky; we decided to sell up and take a couple of years off from business with no mill-stone round our neck. Having achieved our objective (it took a year to finally complete) the recession then hit and boy could things have been so different :shock:
Personally, I don't think we would have survived if we hadn't sold when we did and I'm sure we would have been a nice target for bank foreclosure and an addition to the ever increasing bankruptcy statistic in UK.
I agree with T7; unless you have run your own business, you cannot believe the pressure you can be placed under.
I'm glad we were out of the firing line this time round. We are both now far more relaxed than we ever were and ready to focus on our next adventure.

That is my major point GNV.
These people bleat on yet, won't do anything about starting their own business. If there were no employers, there would be no employees, a simple anology that even the simplest minds should be able to understand.
We have a 25 grand overdraft, which most months we are nearly up to it. Our customers take an age to pay, even though we have to pay our bills on time.....Paper bills and business rates of 4 grand and the rent on the unit.
Yet I know of somebody who does not work, reckons he has some kind of back problem, though he seems to be able to do things I would struggle to do. He then moans it is so unfair he has to manage on blah blah ammount of pounds per week.
Well he runs a car and he drinks and smokes. He can get up when he likes and do exactly what he wants with his days. Nice.
Me? I get to work at , then do a days hard graft on a printing press, whilst my business partner struggles to find work for the days ahead. On top of that has to get the money in to pay the bills, and the other member of staff we have.
Easy being an employer? Yeah right. For those that moan about them and their actions on trying to save their business through these hard times is this....try it yourself and see just how easy it all is. Humbug.
I see it grips you when someone generalises about your job or business. Generalisations do grip peoples pips.
I can see what you are saying and agree with it when you put it in the single term of the person you know and your business.
I wouldn't say that all business' are like you though. Some are going bust but others are booming. The recession is just a redistribution of wealth......some go down and others grow.
Dave_Notts
My heart is bleeding for the capitalists. Its a terrible terrible thing when you cant find a use for your workers and are forced to abandon the profits from their labours.
Of course its pretty sad for the workers too. I assume they are the first against the wall when the recession hits as I have yet to see any capitalist make themselves redundant before the workers.
I do have a tip though. If you can get control of resources rather than workers you can normally ride out the recessions comfortably.
I try to avoid justifying my opinions based on my expertise in a particular field as I have been accused of egotism on that basis. However we can assume that I have been both a capitalist and a capitalist worker for the purposes of this debate.
Quote by benrums0n
My heart is bleeding for the capitalists.

What is your interpretation of a capitalist. Is it a major Inc or Ltd or is it any small to medium sized enterprise?
This is why I think this topic will bounce from one extreme to another if we are all talking about different things.
Kenty having a small business with one other partner and one employee is not in the same league as McDonalds or RBS in my books. Him taking control of the resources he needs makes me chuckle. He is a small business that relys on others to supply to his business. It is his business that I have respect and sorrow if it goes under......not the big players though.
Dave_Notts
I may be wrong but....I think it is ANYONE who makes a profit by employing workers.
I obviously should not employ anyone, and just work me nuts off, and then cream all of the profits.
When I get all this nice new money, I can then go and spend it in the Capitilist shops, and make them even richer.
Pity the poor old employee eh? wink
To clarify I find it difficult to distinguish between capitalists based on the number of people they exploit.
Quote by benrums0n
To clarify I find it difficult to distinguish between capitalists based on the number of people they exploit.

I have never understood this or looked into it.
What do you mean exploit? If I started up a small business and employed one other person.......would that mean that I exploit them?
Dave_Notts
It would in my view Dave, assuming they weren't rewarded fully for the contribution their work made to the profits of a business.
Imagine I have my own business painting widgets. I get more widgets than I can paint on my own so I employ an experienced widget painter. In fact she is such a good widget painter that I can do 3 times the work I did before. Now the going rate for a widget painter is £12,000 so thats what I pay her. Before I employed this lady my business made a net profit of £20,000 and now she is working for me we make £60,000. Because it is my business I make an additional profit of lets say £20,000 from her labour. If the widget business goes down hill I can sack her and keep my job and if she goes sick I can get rid of her too. That's what I mean by exploitation.
I realise its a very simplistic model but I cant sit back and listen to tales of the altruism of employers without saying something.
Quote by benrums0n
It would in my view Dave, assuming they weren't rewarded fully for the contribution their work made to the profits of a business.
Imagine I have my own business painting widgets. I get more widgets than I can paint on my own so I employ an experienced widget painter. In fact she is such a good widget painter that I can do 3 times the work I did before. Now the going rate for a widget painter is £12,000 so thats what I pay her. Before I employed this lady my business made a net profit of £20,000 and now she is working for me we make £60,000. Because it is my business I make an additional profit of lets say £20,000 from her labour. If the widget business goes down hill I can sack her and keep my job and if she goes sick I can get rid of her too. That's what I mean by exploitation.
I realise its a very simplistic model but I cant sit back and listen to tales of the altruism of employers without saying something.

Please bear with me here as I am a very simple man when it comes to complex situations.
If the widget painter thought that their worth was £12,000 and thats what they demand and thats what they get.......how can they be exploited?
I know my worth and that is what I ask for from my employer. If I wanted more then either I ask for it or I start a rival company.
I can understand you point of view but each person puts a worth on themselves and will accept that pay.
In simple terms I can see where you think exploitation is but isn't this going down the lines of communism where everyone is equal.......and that truely went pearshaped and I can't think of one communist state that is truely working without major problems for their citizens.
Dave_Notts
No wonder some people do not want to work. :shock:
That is the reason so many do not then? They do not want to be exploited by an employer. Ah right understand now.
Luckily enough though the ammount of " Capitilist " companies paying massive ammount of " employer contributions " through their tax system, enables others to sit on their arses?
Sorry but I employ somebody and pay them more than the going rate. He is more than happy and I am as well. That is how employment structures work ya know. wink
What a strange view of the world some people have. Millions no doubt look at their wages every month and see what tax they pay and see it as unfair, unless of course one pays no tax at all.....
I tell you what I will sell up my business and sack the staff, and go and take a nice long three year holiday on all those profits I have made by exploiting my staff. I will sit on the beach sipping my nice cold drink, laughing at the system that made me so rich.
Then I woke up and saw that I am still struggling to pay my way, pay loads of tax towards those that do not want to work. Unhappy with that system?.........you bet I am.
Fair enough Dave but Ive had a good look round and I cant see any capitalist countries that are thriving or indeed have thrived without an inevitable crash that hurts a lot of people.
I would happily argue that you do not in fact get your fair reward for the work you do for your employer. I assume there are shareholders or partners who benefit from the profits. I could be wrong of course. In terms of my lady widget painter setting up her own business, that requires education/capital/connections. I think the real work of painting widgets is more valuable and deserves a greater reward than any of those things.
These basic principles aren't communist, that would be like me calling a capitalist a fascist.
There is a dull incredibly long winded and patronising book that seeks to explain things slightly better than I can. Its called the Ragged Trousered Philanthropist and is actually worth ploughing through for a while although I admit even this lefty libertarian found it gripped his pips at times.
Quote by benrums0n
Fair enough Dave but Ive had a good look round and I cant see any capitalist countries that are thriving or indeed have thrived without an inevitable crash that hurts a lot of people.
I would happily argue that you do not in fact get your fair reward for the work you do for your employer. I assume there are shareholders or partners who benefit from the profits. I could be wrong of course. In terms of my lady widget painter setting up her own business, that requires education/capital/connections. I think the real work of painting widgets is more valuable and deserves a greater reward than any of those things.
These basic principles aren't communist, that would be like me calling a capitalist a fascist.
There is a dull incredibly long winded and patronising book that seeks to explain things slightly better than I can. Its called the Ragged Trousered Philanthropist and is actually worth ploughing through for a while although I admit even this lefty libertarian found it gripped his pips at times.

Don't think I am calling you a communist or any other type of political type. I was trying to explain my thinking but looks like I cocked that up.
Dave_Notts
PS if there are any communists out there then I ain't having a go at you either. Oh ffs, I am throwing the shovel away as I have dug a big enough hole here as it is redface
Quote by benrums0n
It would in my view Dave, assuming they weren't rewarded fully for the contribution their work made to the profits of a business.
Imagine I have my own business painting widgets. I get more widgets than I can paint on my own so I employ an experienced widget painter. In fact she is such a good widget painter that I can do 3 times the work I did before. Now the going rate for a widget painter is £12,000 so thats what I pay her. Before I employed this lady my business made a net profit of £20,000 and now she is working for me we make £60,000. Because it is my business I make an additional profit of lets say £20,000 from her labour. If the widget business goes down hill I can sack her and keep my job and if she goes sick I can get rid of her too. That's what I mean by exploitation.
I realise its a very simplistic model but I cant sit back and listen to tales of the altruism of employers without saying something.

Ben, so what do you suggest as being a workable alternative to the present system?
As to your view that ALL employers exploit their workers simply by empoying them, I'm afraid that is utter tosh. There are many good employers out there in the private sector paying fair remunertion packages to their employees. In this day and age, most people in the private sector are employed by SMEs and good staff are increasingly difficult to find and therefore it is in the employers' interests to look after their staff. That is certainly the case in my sector. In my particular instance, we operate a bonus scheme that further rewards the staff and is based on the profits the business makes.
In most small businesses, the owners will have mortaged themselves to the banks in order to finance the business and if the business were to fail, they would be at risk of losing them. Is it not right therefore, that the employer should receive a higher level of the reward as he/she is taking the bigger risk? If the business were to go belly up, the employees would lose their jobs, as would the employer but their homes would not be at risk.
I'm not sure as to how long it is since you were last employed or employed anyone but its been quite some time since employers were able to get rid of staff due to them being sick.
No offence taken at all Dave, its an accusation that anybody with leftish tendencies like me is a little over sensitive about.
Max, I take your points. I think we have to agree to differ.
One point I would make is that it is relatively easy to dump sick staff and it is a practice I witness and try to help those people fight on an almost daily basis.
Quote by benrums0n
No offence taken at all Dave, its an accusation that anybody with leftish tendencies like me is a little over sensitive about.
Max, I take your points. I think we have to agree to differ.
One point I would make is that it is relatively easy to dump sick staff and it is a practice I witness and try to help those people fight on an almost daily basis.

Yep, I agree, we certainly differ.
Ben I really don't mean to ask a rude question but.....do you work?
If you do, do you work for a Capitilist boss or....if you do not work do you get your money off of the Capitilist Government?
That is not a rude question, just some sort of explanation for your thoughts.
Quote by Max777
snip...
Ben, so what do you suggest as being a workable alternative to the present system?
As to your view that ALL employers exploit their workers simply by empoying them, I'm afraid that is utter tosh. There are many good employers out there in the private sector paying fair remunertion packages to their employees. In this day and age, most people in the private sector are employed by SMEs and good staff are increasingly difficult to find and therefore it is in the employers' interests to look after their staff. That is certainly the case in my sector. In my particular instance, we operate a bonus scheme that further rewards the staff and is based on the profits the business makes.
In most small businesses, the owners will have mortaged themselves to the banks in order to finance the business and if the business were to fail, they would be at risk of losing them. Is it not right therefore, that the employer should receive a higher level of the reward as he/she is taking the bigger risk? If the business were to go belly up, the employees would lose their jobs, as would the employer but their homes would not be at risk.
I'm not sure as to how long it is since you were last employed or employed anyone but its been quite some time since employers were able to get rid of staff due to them being sick.

That was indeed our position and the prospect of continuing to service a massive and increasing personal liability against our home in an ever changing environment over which you have no external control meant that, for us, closing the whole thing down before the bank did (because that would have been the easiest option for them to recover their money for the "good" of their shareholders) meant that we maintained a significant amount of control over our destiny and our investment in providing employment to other people. At personal risk to the good of our investment, I always did all I could do to make sure our employees were properly considered. Thousands of small employers like us would do no differently and would not be deflected in their efforts by talk of being "capitalist" or exploiting the labours of their employees. It's just the natural order of things.
I have no shame in having provided employment to over 30 people in the 20 years we ran our company; indeed, I'm proud of what we achieved. Small and insignificant in the grand order of things it may have been.
Quote by kentswingers777
I tell you what I will sell up my business and sack the staff, and go and take a nice long three year holiday on all those profits I have made by exploiting my staff. I will sit on the beach sipping my nice cold drink, laughing at the system that made me so rich.

As for KT7's comment, we are in year 2 of a planned 3 year sojourn :thumbup:
Employing people now however is a mug's game and having taken time out, I doubt I will ever return to the treadmill of "walking eggshells so as not to upset the staff" that is the lot of the small employer in this day and age.
I still ask the question though; where did all that extra fooking tax and Class 4 NI money go that we (and many other small employers too) paid?
The poor and needy as Ben would have us believe?
Hell no! A significant proportion has been used to line the pockets of politicians at all level of governance - witness The Telegraph and their current campaign about MP's expenses from those in high office downwards.
Now tell me who is being exploited?
Let me respond GnV to the tax and national insurance and fiddling expenses point.
Some people see state benefits as a hand out to the indolent, I see it as a subsidy for employers who do not pay a living wage. How can somebody work 40 hours a week and still the government has to step in to make sure they don't live in poverty.
In terms of fiddling expenses frankly the MPs dont worry me at all. I know as do you that every business big and small fiddles its expenses and evades/avoids tax at every opportunity. As one tiny example with apologies to anyone in the business have you ever seen a hairdresser fill out their appointment diary in pen? Why do you think petrol stations constantly ask if you need a VAT receipt? I left the accounting profession when I realised the deeply corrupt practices involved in professional tax evasion. Its systemised its endemic and its totally ignored. I believe HM revenue and customs dont even look into known fiddles of less than £10,000. The media seem to prefer to focus on benefit scroungers.
I am afraid you wont convince me that our system is the "natural order" or that its fair or even approaching reasonably fair.