Now do not get me wrong here....I am a smoker and agree with some of the new laws that have been brought in over the last 12 months.
But stopping people from smoking at the wheel of your car or in your own home, surely is a step too far?
" But Tory MP Philip Davies said: ‘Given that people are well aware of the dangers of smoking, the Government should let people decide for themselves what they want to do".
Sounds like a very sensible approach to me but, as we have a Nanny state that seems to take away peoples FREE choices now, this will no doubt get backing and become law.
The idea that " hiding " fags uinder the counter will make them less attractive is a notion made up by a twat ( with an A ). Shows like Corrie and Eastenders watched by millions of people and no doubt a few million of those will be impressionable kids, should they not be looking more into stopping that on tv instead?
I cannot understand how having them on display in a shop makes them attractive to kids....sweets are far more attractive in a shop. Kids see it on the telly everyday so surely that is a place the Government should look at?
I kinow there will be a split on these new measures, the non smokers thinking it is great and a lot of smokers thinking it is going too far. I am in agreement as a smoker that some of the things they have done is a benefit, but I think things are now going a step too far.
The very people who are making these new laws are massive anti smokers themselves, so I believe have their own agendas. The smoking ban in pubs and clubs I agreed with but it should not have been a blanket ban, smokers should have been given some choice here as we live in a free society.....apparently.
The comment " Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson said: 'We must keep pushing hard for a tobacco free future and keep up the momentum gained by England going smoke-free in 2007 ", is all well and good but....why do they just not ban the sale of them in the UK? Revenue that is why.
They are always quick to spout the ammount the NHS spends on treating smokers, but are never equally as quick to say how much money is paid to the Government via tax on them, which I did see once is more taken in than taken out. Why do they never publish those figures?
Yes we should have laws to protect our children from smoking but I think they are now going too far. Proper school education like most things is a great way to start, not by inflicting draconian laws on people that choose to smoke.
Smoking at the wheel of your car,is no different than using a mobile phone whislt driving and should,if not already be,illegal to do.
Yes a good point there Gnv. But as usual it is " do as we say and not as we do ".
Yes I also fully understand the smoking whilst driving.
I when I am out on me bike see car drivers trying to light their cigs up whilst driving, and yes have to agree that it is just as distracting as talking on a mobile is.
I don't think it should be made illegal to smoke in a car any more than it is now.
Smoking is a stimulant and that in itself can be a positive whilst driving can it not? nicotine taking 7 seconds from lung to brain and increasing neuro activity or something. Lighting a cigarette is possibly the only piece of the act of smoking I can see being worthy of comment in being unsafe otherwise its about time to leave people alone in my mind
Oh and bring back smoking in pubs please. I'm not a smoker but I miss it.
I am a none smoker and also hate smoke free pubs.
Smoking has already been over legislated, and now needs leaving alone. So far all the attempts to deter young smokers have been ill conceived, and done the exact opposite.
My personal feelings are, that I have had quite enough of the nanny state, and what I see as Labours over zealous approach curbing our activity's
Anything that reduces the amount of smokers should happen.........whether they like it or not.
Maybe one day in the future this country will become a smoke free island
Dave_Notts
Whips I understand what you are saying, and the passive smoking thing I have my own belief on that but...I understand about non smokers rights, and lets be fair here you have far more now than you have ever had.
My gripe is the hypocrisy of it all. They take the tax yes always bleat on about how much it costs the NHS....bollox is what I say to that as smokers put in more than they take out, and I saw that in a medical journal somewhere.
We cannot smoke in pubs or clubs....fine. We cannot smoke at our workplace or in the works van/car...fine. Is that not enough?
Local councils in some areas are banning people from smoking outside of pubs on the streets, as it seems some people just drop their fags on the pavement. Now whilst I believe that is true to an extent, I believe it is about over zelous councils.
So it seems that now I can smoke in my car and in my home but....IF they get their way both of those COULD be made illegal. Where the feck does it stop?
IF someone comes into my home and does not smoke they have a simple choice, either do not come in or put up with my smoking. It is my house and I will do as I choose in it.
But even then that is not quite true as IF someone enters my home to say fix an appliance, that becomes their place of work and they could ask me to refrain from smoking.
I would love to know the true figures of ALL the tax they take from smokers over a year, I bet it would be a massive ammount of money yet....treat us like lepers.
I just wish they would stop bleating on about it costs the NHS this or that....lets have the figures of how much we put in as well, but they won't as I think the figures would far outweigh what we take out.
Bottom line here Whips is that you are a non smoker and that is great, but you can go almost anywhere now and be smoke free, so what more do you want?
If they banned it completly would you or others be prepared to cough up the money they will lose through tax, via your paypacket? Probably not.
I'm sure some brainbox will come up with the research, but the burning question is...
Is the amount of tax and duty collected on smoking equal to, in excess of or less than the (perceived) amount of money spent providing care to those with tobacco related illness?
No smoker on this planet buys fags in order to supply the rest of us with healthcare. So lets forget this nonsense about "if we didn't smoke etc etc etc " that isn't WHY people smoke.
If it was - they could buy the fags and throw them away.
I dislike smoke - I suffer from allergic rhinitis (hay fever except it isnt hay I'm allergic to) - and smoke makes it 10 times worse. Cigarette smoke seems to be particularly unpleasant, along with burning plastic. So you can say I am biassed but bear with me.
But what I have never been able to fathom is why people smoke. OK I know all the arguments about having a right to smoke etc. I have the right to paint my face blue and eat spiders - but I have no desire to do it.
I get how hard it is to stop - I've seen family members try over and over to stop. But why start at all - and once started, why not try every day to stop?
This is an honest question : What is enjoyable about smoking?
Ban it or accept there are always going to be people upset about smoking for one reason or another.
I've always been curious as to why people are so worried by the health risks involved in smoking and not those that come with..driving,industry,or even barbecues all pump out carcinogens why is smoking so much worse? because it smells? so does shit and we all pump out plenty of that.
Don't be too keen to join the anti-smoking bandwagon your vice is also on the list...whatever it is
P.S. I can't speak for all smokers but the reason I started smoking (I think) was the effect of nicotine...that initial dizzy head rush followed by the easy calm...it's almost worth stopping smoking to restart and get rush back
Whips....do you drive a car? Thought so.
So what about someone saying to you how much your car pollutes, and can you stop as they walk everywhere, so why do you pollute and have others breath in your car fumes, that do not drive?
You do not smoke..hey you don't like the smell, but there are plenty of things " apparently " that pollute and can kill us....If you believe in the climate change/ global warming stuff.
Now you can go anywhere you like without having to sit next to a smoker...so where,s ya problem now?
I see you did not answer my question about....would you pay more in tax out of your pay packet to subsidise the lost revenue?
As that ain't going to happen every single non smoker would of course say " yes of course I would " yeah right and there is a big pink flying piggy over there>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It of course is a drug and like most drugs you become addicted.
Why did I start? Peer pressure probably, the need to feel big at 13 may have been a factor. The times of the early 70's when cigarette dangers had not really been talked about a huge ammount.
Both my parents smoked which if you look at figures you are much more likely to smoke if one or both parents smoke.
After years of smoking I am fully aware of the dangers of smoking, just like I am fully aware of the dangers of riding a 200mph motorbike.
Risks are everywhere and yes I feel for non smokers when pubs and clubs used to have smoking in them. All that smoke for a non smoker must have been horrid, and then they had very little choice. Well the choice usually was simple....go into a pub or stay at home.
Now though the tables have turned where every club and pub is smoke free, yet they still want more restrictions.
I smoke...I want to smoke and except that I cannot smoke now where I used to be able to, but the thought of some twat telling me I cannot smoke in my house is a step too far, and they can feck off as I smoke in MY works unit and I will smoke in my home and my car whatever the " smoke haters " say.
But it stinks. And smoker's breath stinks. As does their hair and clothes. I know - both my parents smoked like chimneys, my ex smoked for years. Kissing him was yuk.
My Mum stopped about 6 years ago - in the January. She opened the wardrobe she kept her summer clothes in later that year and was horrified that the clothes in there reeked of old smoke. She asked me if she had always smelled like that - I could only be honest - yes she did.
And, daft child that I was, I did try it at 15. It tasted vile. OK, it gives an effect like any other drug, but I never saw how it was worth it. And those women smoking 'elegantly'? It's only elegant to some. To others it's ugly.
I started smoking about mid 1970s, not because of any pressure, but purely as a young man showing off. I hated the taste, the dizziness and feeling sick, but the need to show off was greater, so I kept going until I could not cope without it. I kept smoking until January 4 years ago. I do not miss it one bit and never hardly think about it.