Quote by Lizaleanrob
a little out of date
but i doubt there's been another report commissioned since
still..... makes a little more sence than most of the dribble being spouted
I'm sure it does ....
Sex God
I'm sure it does ....
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Swearing at police is not a crime
Swearing at police is no longer a crime
I'm sure it does ....
Sex God
I know what Star is saying though, it definitely feels like today's children have a much lower set of morals than they did when I was younger, there feels to be less respect from children for elders. Also parents talking to their children in a manner mine would not have dreamed of.
Whether this is real or perceived I don't know, I can remember my grandmother saying a similar thing
Whether this is real or perceived I don't know, I can remember my grandmother saying a similar thing
Quote by Bluefish2009
I know what Star is saying though, it definitely feels like today's children have a much lower set of morals than they did when I was younger, there feels to be less respect from children for elders. Also parents talking to their children in a manner mine would not have dreamed of.
Whether this is real or perceived I don't know, I can remember my grandmother saying a similar thing
no blue dont dare even suggest that.
this is the most amazing site i am currently on for peeple who walk around with blindfolds on. it amazes me also that some fail to see what others find so obvius and when some peeple are confronted with facts they start the dummy throwing routine.
the logical peeple amongst us know the truth. still i am sure back in the 50's or 60's that younsters were being shot dead by other youngsters with great regularity.
this is only from 2008 fgs and still some peeple refuse to take the blindfold off and confront the truth.
still these are probably the fault of those nasty police men as well.
Quote by Bluefish2009
My mothers cousin was mugged in 1951 by a shifty looking bloke in a black fedora and spats using a webley service revolver.
My mother was jumped on in the blackout by a fella in a wig with a glass eye.
My father used to keep a selection of sharpened coins in his pockets at the weekend to defend himself from street fights.
Why did the wig require this glass eye???
Hahaha! now that has brightened my day!
Quote by starlightcouple
I know what Star is saying though, it definitely feels like today's children have a much lower set of morals than they did when I was younger, there feels to be less respect from children for elders. Also parents talking to their children in a manner mine would not have dreamed of.
Whether this is real or perceived I don't know, I can remember my grandmother saying a similar thing
no blue dont dare even suggest that.
this is the most amazing site i am currently on for peeple who walk around with blindfolds on. it amazes me also that some fail to see what others find so obvius and when some peeple are confronted with facts they start the dummy throwing routine.
the logical peeple amongst us know the truth. still i am sure back in the 50's or 60's that younsters were being shot dead by other youngsters with great regularity.
this is only from 2008 fgs and still some peeple refuse to take the blindfold off and confront the truth.
still these are probably the fault of those nasty police men as well.
Facts are facts, no matter what you beleive. No one is denying the truth about the present state of society. i think we need to put some rationale into others blinkered extreme views.
I would like to add, it will more than likely get worse still, as more people are forced in to poverty.
What would be interesting is to consider how this should be resolved, other than "beating the crap out of them" that is not disciplinging a child, that is GBH. Monkey see, monkey do!
Sex God
Quote by starlightcouple
I know what Star is saying though, it definitely feels like today's children have a much lower set of morals than they did when I was younger, there feels to be less respect from children for elders. Also parents talking to their children in a manner mine would not have dreamed of.
Whether this is real or perceived I don't know, I can remember my grandmother saying a similar thing
no blue dont dare even suggest that.
this is the most amazing site i am currently on for peeple who walk around with blindfolds on. it amazes me also that some fail to see what others find so obvius and when some peeple are confronted with facts they start the dummy throwing routine.
the logical peeple amongst us know the truth. still i am sure back in the 50's or 60's that younsters were being shot dead by other youngsters with great regularity.
this is only from 2008 fgs and still some peeple refuse to take the blindfold off and confront the truth.
still these are probably the fault of those nasty police men as well.
OK
Sex God
Some things have got worse in recent years it would seam
The new figures indicate that in the year 2007-8 there were some 277 deaths from stabbings in England & Wales alone (the highest recorded figure for 30 years). This represents an average death toll as a direct result of stabbings of over 5 for every week of the year!
Knife Crime Increases in London (Metropolitan Police)
Knife crime has increased by 3.9% in London so far this financial year to date according to figures published on the Metropolitan Police website. Between April and November 2010 there were 8,609 knife enabled crimes recorded across city, 321 more than the same period last year when there were 8,288 knife enabled offences.
Numerically, the boroughs seeing the highest increases were Lewisham (+82), Westminster (+66), Lambeth (+62), Enfield and Greenwich (both +39). Despite the increases each area has seen a reduced number of reports regarding youth gang violence in 2010. Each borough, with the exception of Westminster, has also however seen increases this financial year to date in the number of homicide offences.
The number of knife enabled offences detected by police in London has increased slightly to 25.4% in 2010/11 or approximately 1 in 4 offences. The detection rate varies considerably by borough, for example in Lambeth (17.5%) and Waltham Forest (17.7%) police solve less than one in five knife enabled offences. In Greenwich and Haringey boroughs police detect over a third of knife enabled offences.
Since 2008 a nine boroughs have seen consecutive increases in the number of knife enabled crimes, they are as follows:
- Barking & Dagenham
- Camden
- Enfield
- Havering
- Lambeth
- Merton
- Newham
- Southwark
- Waltham Forest
In contrast, several boroughs in London have also seen consecutive yearly decreases in the number of knife enabled crimes since 2008, they are as follows:
- Bromley
- Croydon
- Haringey
- Islington
- Kensington & Chelsea
- Kingston upon Thames
- Sutton
Residents living in Southwark are the most at risk of knife crime, here 311.2 offences per 100,000 residents were recorded throughout 2009/10 (click here). This was almost two times greater than the London average of 163.0 knife enabled crimes per 100,000 population and six times higher than the safest borough Richmond upon Thames which had a rate of 52.3.
Rank of Boroughs with highest rates of knife enabled crime April 2009 to March 2010
Police recorded more than 26,000 serious knife attacks in the financial year to March 2009, an increase of six per cent on the previous year's total.
The new figures indicate that in the year 2007-8 there were some 277 deaths from stabbings in England & Wales alone (the highest recorded figure for 30 years). This represents an average death toll as a direct result of stabbings of over 5 for every week of the year!
Knife Crime Increases in London (Metropolitan Police)
Knife crime has increased by 3.9% in London so far this financial year to date according to figures published on the Metropolitan Police website. Between April and November 2010 there were 8,609 knife enabled crimes recorded across city, 321 more than the same period last year when there were 8,288 knife enabled offences.
Numerically, the boroughs seeing the highest increases were Lewisham (+82), Westminster (+66), Lambeth (+62), Enfield and Greenwich (both +39). Despite the increases each area has seen a reduced number of reports regarding youth gang violence in 2010. Each borough, with the exception of Westminster, has also however seen increases this financial year to date in the number of homicide offences.
The number of knife enabled offences detected by police in London has increased slightly to 25.4% in 2010/11 or approximately 1 in 4 offences. The detection rate varies considerably by borough, for example in Lambeth (17.5%) and Waltham Forest (17.7%) police solve less than one in five knife enabled offences. In Greenwich and Haringey boroughs police detect over a third of knife enabled offences.
Since 2008 a nine boroughs have seen consecutive increases in the number of knife enabled crimes, they are as follows:
- Barking & Dagenham
- Camden
- Enfield
- Havering
- Lambeth
- Merton
- Newham
- Southwark
- Waltham Forest
In contrast, several boroughs in London have also seen consecutive yearly decreases in the number of knife enabled crimes since 2008, they are as follows:
- Bromley
- Croydon
- Haringey
- Islington
- Kensington & Chelsea
- Kingston upon Thames
- Sutton
Residents living in Southwark are the most at risk of knife crime, here 311.2 offences per 100,000 residents were recorded throughout 2009/10 (click here). This was almost two times greater than the London average of 163.0 knife enabled crimes per 100,000 population and six times higher than the safest borough Richmond upon Thames which had a rate of 52.3.
Rank of Boroughs with highest rates of knife enabled crime April 2009 to March 2010
Police recorded more than 26,000 serious knife attacks in the financial year to March 2009, an increase of six per cent on the previous year's total.
I'm a london bus driver.
When I get young people 14-25ish on my bus who don't want to pay, I tell them they must pay or get off the bus.
99.9% of the time I am met by a volley of abuse and threats and they ask me to get out of the cab and fight them.
IMO, the youth's I have contact with everyday are horrible, violent and downright rude.
This court ruling won't help.
"you can't nick me for swearing pig, it's not ilegal".
A truly truly bad judgement IMO.
When I get young people 14-25ish on my bus who don't want to pay, I tell them they must pay or get off the bus.
99.9% of the time I am met by a volley of abuse and threats and they ask me to get out of the cab and fight them.
IMO, the youth's I have contact with everyday are horrible, violent and downright rude.
This court ruling won't help.
"you can't nick me for swearing pig, it's not ilegal".
A truly truly bad judgement IMO.
Sex God
Quote by browning
I'm a london bus driver.
When I get young people 14-25ish on my bus who don't want to pay, I tell them they must pay or get off the bus.
99.9% of the time I am met by a volley of abuse and threats and they ask me to get out of the cab and fight them.
IMO, the youth's I have contact with everyday are horrible, violent and downright rude.
This court ruling won't help.
"you can't nick me for swearing pig, it's not ilegal".
A truly truly bad judgement IMO.
thanks for the experianced opinion browning :thumbup:
god knows... we needed a real one in this debate
Quote by starlightcouple
this is the most amazing site i am currently on for peeple who walk around with blindfolds on. it amazes me also that some fail to see what others find so obvius and when some peeple are confronted with facts they start the dummy throwing routine.
Knowing and admitting ones own faults is the first step to knowledge. Well done for taking it
Dave_Notts
Quote by Dave__Notts
this is the most amazing site i am currently on for peeple who walk around with blindfolds on. it amazes me also that some fail to see what others find so obvius and when some peeple are confronted with facts they start the dummy throwing routine.
Knowing and admitting ones own faults is the first step to knowledge. Well done for taking it
Dave_Notts
:laughabove: pmsl
Quote by starlightcouple
A truly truly bad judgement IMO.
and not for the first time either mr browning i am sure.
can you imagine being a police officer after this ruling?
why they bother i reely do not know.
Agree with you there.
I'm a huge fan of the police, overall they do a brilliant job for not alot of money under very very difficult circumstances.
What a difference when I watch cops, even gun toting criminals call police officers in the usa 'sir'.
Alot depends on where in the UK you live, my mum lives in a small village in hampshire, and when I spoke to the locals about this years riots, they were truly shocked, I, however was not.
Sex God
Quote by browning
A truly truly bad judgement IMO.
and not for the first time either mr browning i am sure.
can you imagine being a police officer after this ruling?
why they bother i reely do not know.
Agree with you there.
I'm a huge fan of the police, overall they do a brilliant job for not alot of money under very very difficult circumstances.
What a difference when I watch cops, even gun toting criminals call police officers in the usa 'sir'.
Alot depends on where in the UK you live, my mum lives in a small village in hampshire, and when I spoke to the locals about this years riots, they were truly shocked, I, however was not.
there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction :huh:
Sex God
Quote by Lizaleanrob
i think they post for a reaction :huh:
What, on this site? Outrageous, I wont hear of it
Sex God
Quote by Lizaleanrob
there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction :huh:
Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot
Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion
Sex God
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction :huh:
Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot
Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion
You know we can not name and shame here :small-print: :jagsatwork:
Sex God
Quote by Bluefish2009
there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction :huh:
Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot
Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion
You know we can not name and shame here :small-print: :jagsatwork:
No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)
Sex God
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction :huh:
Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot
Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion
You know we can not name and shame here :small-print: :jagsatwork:
No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)
Oh, you mean this kind of thing
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Re-arrange these words
Ignorant
wit
pig
fuck
Now say out loud .... (insert user of choice) is a .....
We can all confer later and see who won
Sex God
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction :huh:
Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot
Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion
You know we can not name and shame here :small-print: :jagsatwork:
No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)
in the words of ant and dec "staggers"............. "its not you"
Sex God
Quote by Bluefish2009
there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction :huh:
Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot
Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion
You know we can not name and shame here :small-print: :jagsatwork:
No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)
Oh, you mean this kind of thing
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Re-arrange these words
Ignorant
wit
pig
fuck
Now say out loud .... (insert user of choice) is a .....
We can all confer later and see who won
That would be for you to decide ...I couldn't possibly comment
Sex God
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
there is a so much truth in what you say browning there are a lot that are almost protected for the real world by not living or working in these areas where this sort unacceptable behaviour is an every day occurrence
yet some think their qualified to comment based of what they think as apposed to what they know sometimes i think they post for a reaction :huh:
Thanks for reminding me Blue ... I had meant to ask this but got sidetracked and forgot
Who Rob ?? do tell and be kind enough to explain how and why you've reached this conclusion
You know we can not name and shame here :small-print: :jagsatwork:
No-one's suggesting shame Blue .... but I am tired by these constant veiled references to some possible other poster (and Rob is not the worst culprit)which allow that/those users no right of reply .... if anyone wishes to accuse me (or anyone else ) of something,then do it don't hide behind the vague deniable comment (and yes I know I've done it too and recently)
Well this one perhaps then? This looks quite vague to me
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
See, the thing I find most funny is, that he really does think he's winning the argument
Sex God
Quote by Bluefish2009
Well this one perhaps then? This looks quite vague to me
See, the thing I find most funny is, that he really does think he's winning the argument
Oh and I had thought that needed no qualification .... the he is obviously starlightcouple.... but you knew that didn't you
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Well this one perhaps then? This looks quite vague to me
See, the thing I find most funny is, that he really does think he's winning the argument
Oh and I had thought that needed no qualification .... the he is obviously starlightcouple.... but you knew that didn't you
it is so nice to see that someone is getting right up the nose of the forum bully.
you reely should not let on to these things
btw i think that everyone on here knew, there are many a smarter person on here than you!
your running out of those oportunities to point score. they can see through you very easily.:thumbup:
