This great country we live in.

16 Oct 2009

I was just wondering if we could come up with some ideas to improve the state of the nation as Im concerned that Mr Kent is on the verge of a breakdown due to his many concerns..I have no reason to disbelieve that Mr Kent is a hard working man ( he makes many references to this) but it strikes me as rather sad that someone so apparently comfortable is not enjoying himself more..Surely if this great nation has ppl in it who work hard for their money and are not enjoying themselves to the extent they are on here often complaining about its state we the more happy ones have a responsibility to cheer him up..
I looked through the posts in current affairs this week and the only one he did not comment on was Nola's comic one..the fun one...
I did also notice that his posts were at hours where he may not be getting a regular sleep pattern..this will also impact on his health, as you know especially the hard working ones
uninterrupted sleep is essential..
I have no doubt that Mr Kent is a true Brit with the nations best interest at heart so come on ppl lets all find ways of removing this wedge from his shoulder to let him enjoy all this hard earned money and live a little.. smile

16 Oct 2009

You should be on the telly. lol

:lol: :lol: Then I realised your from Scotland, nobody is funny up there.
I have a great life. I just got married to the lovely mrs777 ( check the pics ), I have my own pretty ok business.
I have two lovely kids and two wonderful Grandkids, I have a lovely house and a massive telly.
My life is wonderful, it is the other fuckers out there who spoil it for me. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh btw....I have a big knob and lots of money, and get to shag quite a lot of women. How can any man not be happy with all that?
Answers on a postcard to....po box 322 lefty street, tree hugging lane,Gaunty cottage, Peterborugh. ll1 666

16 Oct 2009

You should be on the telly. lol

:lol: :lol: Then I realised your from Scotland, nobody is funny up there....
You clearly have not seen River City.... biggrin

Congrats on tying the knot.. :D

17 Oct 2009

Quote by kentswingers777
(SNIP)
Oh btw....I have a big knob and lots of money, and get to shag quite a lot of women. How can any man not be happy with all that?
Answers on a postcard to....po box 322 lefty street, tree hugging lane,Gaunty cottage, Peterborugh. ll1 666

hold on...bog knob, loads of money..shags all the time..i knew it...i knew it....its plain for all to see now.
kenty and Brucie are one and the same person !!! lol

17 Oct 2009

damn, I looked at Kenty's profile expecting to see wedding pics...... ffs. Not a white dress in sight.
Right I am off out on Tallulah.

17 Oct 2009

Shouldn't that be... in which we live ?:jagsatwork: bolt

17 Oct 2009

Quote by splendid_
damn, I looked at Kenty's profile expecting to see wedding pics...... ffs. Not a white dress in sight.
Right I am off out on Tallulah.

Splendid....mrs777 in white? :shock:
We have loads and loads of piccies of our wedding Splendid, but people on a swingers site will not get too see any, unless of course the ones that came to our wedding of course.

17 Oct 2009

Quote by deancannock

(SNIP)
Oh btw....I have a big knob and lots of money, and get to shag quite a lot of women. How can any man not be happy with all that?
Answers on a postcard to....po box 322 lefty street, tree hugging lane,Gaunty cottage, Peterborugh. ll1 666

hold on...bog knob, loads of money..shags all the time..i knew it...i knew it....its plain for all to see now.
kenty and Brucie are one and the same person!!! lol

Fuck been rumbled.....outta here quick. wink

You should be on Mastermind. Your talents are obviously wasted on here.

17 Oct 2009

Quote by flower411
Shouldn't that be... in which we live ?:jagsatwork:

I just assumed it was deliberate, in honour of the subject lol

Cant say it was! clever fkers!! flipa

17 Oct 2009

This is the sort of pedantic nonsense up with which I will not put.

17 Oct 2009

I think you just have to pacify the grumpy old men here, they can't help it you know. wink

17 Oct 2009

Quote by Theladyisaminx
I think you just have to pacify the grumpy old men here, they can't help it you know.

Yeah true Minxy....but you just sooooooooooo wanna shag me. :wink:

17 Oct 2009

Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Shouldn't that be... in which we live ?:jagsatwork:

Not necessarily. The edict on never ending a sentence with a prepostition is a legacy of the assumption that English is a direct descendent of Latin.
This basic premise is wrong. English is derived directly from (largly) Romantic (French/Italian) and Germanic (German/Scandanavian) langauges, which all have Latin in their distant history but plenty has changed in the mean-time.
Latin as a langauge works differently from English in that, for us, word order defines who is doing what to whom. In Latin, that is dealt with by word endings. So word order is freed up to indicate other things. For Latin, it ended up with prepositions shouldn't or couldn't find themselves at the end of sentences.
In English, you can put the preposition anywhere in the sentence that makes sense - including at the end.
Reference : Eats, Shoots & Leaves. I forget the author and am too idle to go upstairs and find out.
I'll get my coat :bolt:

17 Oct 2009

Just get rid of lefty liberals, ban political correctness, bring back the death penalty for rapists, murderers, and terrorists, make unemployed school leavers do national service.
I have no desire to be here all night so will leave it at that, and if Kenty agrees with those sentiments then he is of course right.

17 Oct 2009

Quote by flower411
Shouldn't that be... in which we live ?:jagsatwork:

Not necessarily. The edict on never ending a sentence with a prepostition is a legacy of the assumption that English is a direct descendent of Latin.
This basic premise is wrong. English is derived directly from (largly) Romantic (French/Italian) and Germanic (German/Scandanavian) langauges, which all have Latin in their distant history but plenty has changed in the mean-time.
Latin as a langauge works differently from English in that, for us, word order defines who is doing what to whom. In Latin, that is dealt with by word endings. So word order is freed up to indicate other things. For Latin, it ended up with prepositions shouldn't or couldn't find themselves at the end of sentences.
In English, you can put the preposition anywhere in the sentence that makes sense - including at the end.
Reference : Eats, Shoots & Leaves. I forget the author and am too idle to go upstairs and find out.
I'll get my coat :bolt:
Awwwwww Shaddup !! we was having fun until you got all sensible !!! :giggle:
Admit it, you love it when I get all 'school-mistress'. biggrin

:D:D

17 Oct 2009

kenty reflects the veiws and aspirations of the corporate owned media. veiws which he is entitled to have and i want to defend him. he is right. asylum seekers, doleites, lazy sickness benefit bastards and all the other claimants should be made to work, oh, and catch the bus not drive a fuckin car ! close down the welfare state and make all the lazy fuckers work. sack everyone who works for the state and make everyone fen for themselves, lazy fuckers anyway. every man for himself ! reduce everyone to individuals and helpless. that way, we as a nation state will be able to compete with the bowl of rice a day and build this once great nation into the workshop of the world again! such veiws serve the interests of a small group in society and that aint 98% of us but hey, kenty is right !

17 Oct 2009

Good point...lol...i agree with him in some respects,,,but as i have said to him, he does go on a bit...oh and he can obviously pick having seen his missus.... silly

hwoar:

17 Oct 2009

Quote by gulsonroad30664
kenty reflects the veiws and aspirations of the corporate owned media. veiws which he is entitled to have and i want to defend him. he is right. asylum seekers, doleites, lazy sickness benefit bastards and all the other claimants should be made to work, oh, and catch the bus not drive a fuckin car ! close down the welfare state and make all the lazy fuckers work. sack everyone who works for the state and make everyone fen for themselves, lazy fuckers anyway. every man for himself ! reduce everyone to individuals and helpless. that way, we as a nation state will be able to compete with the bowl of rice a day and build this once great nation into the workshop of the world again! such veiws serve the interests of a small group in society and that aint 98% of us but hey, kenty is right !

Blimey I ain't that tough.
Money to people who are entitled. The scroungers get them out to work and give that money to the most deserving people in society.
Am sure that would be a good vote winner, but any future Government would never say that, as they would lose about 3 million votes, by people who are doing exactly that. wink

18 Oct 2009

3 million scroungers ?
Unemployment is at the level of 2.5 million, so it cannot be them then.
We can examine a major benefit saving that could be made by ending Child Tax Credit . You could easily say "why should I, who worked my way through college/uni to get the education I needed to get on, fund those who are uneducated and low-earning so that they can have families they cannot afford"
We could stop paying the unemployed for being unemployed all savings made cost someone else money.
Cutting public spending costs jobs. Not only public service jobs, but private sector jobs as well. Within 20 years decisions made 30 years ago will come back to haunt government here (whichever government). By then China/India/Asia will have higher living standards than this country: The option of buying cheaper devices/utensils from abroad will not exist. They will be providing them to themselves.
The much-vaunted "service sector" jobs will have emigrated to follow the manufacturing sector abroad.

18 Oct 2009

Quote by foxylady2209
Shouldn't that be... in which we live ?:jagsatwork:

Not necessarily. The edict on never ending a sentence with a prepostition is a legacy of the assumption that English is a direct descendent of Latin.
This basic premise is wrong. English is derived directly from (largly) Romantic (French/Italian) and Germanic (German/Scandanavian) langauges, which all have Latin in their distant history but plenty has changed in the mean-time.
Latin as a langauge works differently from English in that, for us, word order defines who is doing what to whom. In Latin, that is dealt with by word endings. So word order is freed up to indicate other things. For Latin, it ended up with prepositions shouldn't or couldn't find themselves at the end of sentences.
In English, you can put the preposition anywhere in the sentence that makes sense - including at the end.
Reference : Eats, Shoots & Leaves. I forget the author and am too idle to go upstairs and find out.
I'll get my coat :bolt:
Now that's just semantics isn't it or is it syntax.....dashes off to get dictionary

18 Oct 2009

Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Shouldn't that be... in which we live ?:jagsatwork:

Not necessarily. The edict on never ending a sentence with a prepostition is a legacy of the assumption that English is a direct descendent of Latin.
This basic premise is wrong. English is derived directly from (largly) Romantic (French/Italian) and Germanic (German/Scandanavian) langauges, which all have Latin in their distant history but plenty has changed in the mean-time.
Latin as a langauge works differently from English in that, for us, word order defines who is doing what to whom. In Latin, that is dealt with by word endings. So word order is freed up to indicate other things. For Latin, it ended up with prepositions shouldn't or couldn't find themselves at the end of sentences.
In English, you can put the preposition anywhere in the sentence that makes sense - including at the end.
Reference : Eats, Shoots & Leaves. I forget the author and am too idle to go upstairs and find out.
I'll get my coat :bolt:
Now that's just semantics isn't it or is it syntax.....dashes off to get dictionary
They're taxing that now too?
I'm fucked. confused

19 Oct 2009

Quote by kentswingers777
I think you just have to pacify the grumpy old men here, they can't help it you know.

Yeah true Minxy....but you just sooooooooooo wanna shag me. :wink:
You been dreaming about me again? :therethere:

21 Oct 2009

Quote by kentswingers777
kenty reflects the veiws and aspirations of the corporate owned media. veiws which he is entitled to have and i want to defend him. he is right. asylum seekers, doleites, lazy sickness benefit bastards and all the other claimants should be made to work, oh, and catch the bus not drive a fuckin car ! close down the welfare state and make all the lazy fuckers work. sack everyone who works for the state and make everyone fen for themselves, lazy fuckers anyway. every man for himself ! reduce everyone to individuals and helpless. that way, we as a nation state will be able to compete with the bowl of rice a day and build this once great nation into the workshop of the world again! such veiws serve the interests of a small group in society and that aint 98% of us but hey, kenty is right !

Blimey I ain't that tough.
Money to people who are entitled. The scroungers get them out to work and give that money to the most deserving people in society.
Am sure that would be a good vote winner, but any future Government would never say that, as they would lose about 3 million votes, by people who are doing exactly that. wink

Live in a Republic like France is my contribution.
Federalist Administrations like the States and the UK never work properly for the reasons stated.