Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

two stories on same day.....you decide !!

last reply
27 replies
1.5k views
0 watchers
0 likes

First we have the RBS bank, state owned, announce losses almost double what they were last year. So much for paying us back the bail out money !! However at same time it is paying out 78 million in bonus payments !! rewarding success I can understand....but surely this is rewarding failure. That 78 million should be used to help pay off its debt to he british people.
at same time we have

It seems public sector workers are being told there will be no pay increase for he third year running !! Now I know government are strapped for cash, and we all have to tighten our belts, but at a time when energy bills have risen considerably, petrol prices have gone up etc etc.....I does seem public sector workers are taking a real hammering on pay.
Its just the contrast betwen these two stories that caught my eye. One is the bankers, who have gambled away our money, and dispite being bailed out, by the government, coninue and actually increase here losses.....and yet pay bonus's to workers, whilst hard working public sectors workers, who are no way to blame for thsi crisis, have had a pay freeze impossed upon them for the third year. Is it any wonder they are unhappy !!
Awww, don't be so hard on the poor hard up bankers dean.
Their operating profit is up but the toxic Greek debt they hold has pulled overall profit into negativity.
It's not their fault, really.
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...
Quote by Steve
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

In fact, its probably worse!
well...bankers are in private sector !!
What I am actually trying to point out...is how one set of workers make a loss, double what they did last year, and yet pay out £78 million as a bonus !!!
Whilst other workers, who are in no way to blame for the current financial situation,...(the example shown was as it was in the news), have not had a pay rise for 3 years !!
I for one, do not think, this is right !!!
Quote by GnV
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

In fact, its probably worse!
i shall correct you gnv as i know that you no longer live in the uk. there is no probably about it, it is definatly worse for the private sector.
many private sector workers do not have the luxury of a pay rise very yeer. yes i am aware that the last couple of yeers have been different but over the last say 20 yeers the public sector get a rise every yeer.
also the private sector do not have the added luxury of a forms cosy pension scheme like council workers and the like get.
yes gnv it is worse down here in the private sector, and has been for yeers.
Quote by deancannock
well...bankers are in private sector !!
What I am actually trying to point out...is how one set of workers make a loss, double what they did last year, and yet pay out £78 million as a bonus !!!
Whilst other workers, who are in no way to blame for the current financial situation,...(the example shown was as it was in the news), have not had a pay rise for 3 years !!
I for one, do not think, this is right !!!

i do not think it is right ether dean.
if a bank was any other business ( except a football club of course ), running at that amount of a loss would mean you was trading insolvent, and would have to go into liquidation. so why is it that banks are allowed to chase peeple like you or me for debts with threats of bailiffs of bankruptcy, yet they seem to be allowed to do as they please with regards to there debts?
i think the banks should have been 100% owned by the taxpayers and peeple put in to make profits and not losses. any part of that business that loses money should be got rid of. bonuses are only paid if or when profits are made. as to me they are being rewarded for failure.
i see today that also lloyds bank have made huge billion pound losses.
rbs are a law unto themselves as even though they still lost huge amounts of money, but they also failed to reech there targets for borrowing to small business.
Sack the ones at the top and how can the boss of rbs earn so much more money than the governer of the bank of england does? surely that cannot be right/
Quote by starlightcouple
well...bankers are in private sector !!
What I am actually trying to point out...is how one set of workers make a loss, double what they did last year, and yet pay out £78 million as a bonus !!!
Whilst other workers, who are in no way to blame for the current financial situation,...(the example shown was as it was in the news), have not had a pay rise for 3 years !!
I for one, do not think, this is right !!!

i do not think it is right ether dean.
if a bank was any other business ( except a football club of course ), running at that amount of a loss would mean you was trading insolvent, and would have to go into liquidation. so why is it that banks are allowed to chase peeple like you or me for debts with threats of bailiffs of bankruptcy, yet they seem to be allowed to do as they please with regards to there debts?
i think the banks should have been 100% owned by the taxpayers and peeple put in to make profits and not losses. any part of that business that loses money should be got rid of. bonuses are only paid if or when profits are made. as to me they are being rewarded for failure.
i see today that also lloyds bank have made huge billion pound losses.
rbs are a law unto themselves as even though they still lost huge amounts of money, but they also failed to reech there targets for borrowing to small business.
Sack the ones at the top and how can the boss of rbs earn so much more money than the governer of the bank of england does? surely that cannot be right/
Its only money wink
Quote by Bluefish2009
well...bankers are in private sector !!
What I am actually trying to point out...is how one set of workers make a loss, double what they did last year, and yet pay out £78 million as a bonus !!!
Whilst other workers, who are in no way to blame for the current financial situation,...(the example shown was as it was in the news), have not had a pay rise for 3 years !!
I for one, do not think, this is right !!!

i do not think it is right ether dean.
if a bank was any other business ( except a football club of course ), running at that amount of a loss would mean you was trading insolvent, and would have to go into liquidation. so why is it that banks are allowed to chase peeple like you or me for debts with threats of bailiffs of bankruptcy, yet they seem to be allowed to do as they please with regards to there debts?
i think the banks should have been 100% owned by the taxpayers and peeple put in to make profits and not losses. any part of that business that loses money should be got rid of. bonuses are only paid if or when profits are made. as to me they are being rewarded for failure.
i see today that also lloyds bank have made huge billion pound losses.
rbs are a law unto themselves as even though they still lost huge amounts of money, but they also failed to reech there targets for borrowing to small business.
Sack the ones at the top and how can the boss of rbs earn so much more money than the governer of the bank of england does? surely that cannot be right/
Its only money wink
It's actually a lot more money than Dean thinks.....£785 million!
Quote by Max777
It's actually a lot more money than Dean thinks.....£785 million!

how can they give away that kind of money with the losses they have generated? no wonder they almost collapsed in the first place.
surely failure should not be rewarded?
Quote by starlightcouple

It's actually a lot more money than Dean thinks.....£785 million!

how can they give away that kind of money with the losses they have generated? no wonder they almost collapsed in the first place.
surely failure should not be rewarded?
just to correct but the losses are 785 million and the bonus pay outs 400 million.
How about though if you have worked in a department and done really well and made loadsamoney but another department has lost more money than you have made, why should you be penalised for your bonus?
How do we not know that all the people entitled to the bonus made the company a billion and some other gits who are getting no bonus and may even be facing the chop lost the company 1.7 billion...?
Quote by Rogue_trader

It's actually a lot more money than Dean thinks.....£785 million!

how can they give away that kind of money with the losses they have generated? no wonder they almost collapsed in the first place.
surely failure should not be rewarded?
just to correct but the losses are 785 million and the bonus pay outs 400 million.
How about though if you have worked in a department and done really well and made loadsamoney but another department has lost more money than you have made, why should you be penalised for your bonus?
How do we not know that all the people entitled to the bonus made the company a billion and some other gits who are getting no bonus and may even be facing the chop lost the company 1.7 billion...?
Very valid point
It is not as simple as saying the bank made a loss therefore nobody gets a bonus. RBS and Lloyds are both huge organisations with thousands of departments and countless thousands of employees.
Some departments will have made a crap load of money for their bank, why should they not be rewarded for doing what the bank desperately needs them to carry on doing. All the losses stem from the previous regimes ineptitude, fraud and hubris. Once again a massive thanks to Gordon Brown for letting them run riot unsupervised.
Bonuses are way down on what they were but the bottom line is if the taxpyer wants their money back they cannot handicap both Lloyds ( again thanks to Gordon Brown for ruining a perfectly good bank in Lloyds by forcing HBOS onto it) and RBS by making them totally different from all other banks.
As for the public sector workers?
They need to wake up and smell the coffee.
Quote by Rogue_trader

It's actually a lot more money than Dean thinks.....£785 million!

how can they give away that kind of money with the losses they have generated? no wonder they almost collapsed in the first place.
surely failure should not be rewarded?
just to correct but the losses are 785 million and the bonus pay outs 400 million.

Just to correct the correction. Total losses were £2 billion. Total bonuses were £785 million, of which £390 million is due to their investment bankers.
Quote by Steve
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

The difference is that we ALL rely on public services to some degree.
Quote by Trevaunance
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

The difference is that we ALL rely on public services to some degree.
And the public services I "use" I pay for every month via my taxes....
And people rely on private sector services just as much...
Just take my particular job as an example....
If no-one maintains the HGV's that deliver the goods to the stores/warehouses etc how they be able to sell them and us be able to buy them dunno
That's just one example.....There are ,doubtless, many others.....
Quote by Steve
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

The difference is that we ALL rely on public services to some degree.
And the public services I "use" I pay for every month via my taxes....
And people rely on private sector services just as much...
Just take my particular job as an example....
If no-one maintains the HGV's that deliver the goods to the stores/warehouses etc how they be able to sell them and us be able to buy them dunno
That's just one example.....There are ,doubtless, many others.....
Trains? ........innocent
Quote by deancannock
well...bankers are in private sector !!
What I am actually trying to point out...is how one set of workers make a loss, double what they did last year, and yet pay out £78 million as a bonus !!!
Whilst other workers, who are in no way to blame for the current financial situation,...(the example shown was as it was in the news), have not had a pay rise for 3 years !!
I for one, do not think, this is right !!!

Of course it's not right .... I was going to write a post explaining why I thought this,but it's fucking obvious so I wont bother
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

The difference is that we ALL rely on public services to some degree.
And the public services I "use" I pay for every month via my taxes....
And people rely on private sector services just as much...
Just take my particular job as an example....
If no-one maintains the HGV's that deliver the goods to the stores/warehouses etc how they be able to sell them and us be able to buy them dunno
That's just one example.....There are ,doubtless, many others.....
Trains? ........innocent
How many stores do the trains stop at?
The thing is, there are hard working people in both public and private sector. I only used the link to the public sector workers, as that was in the news same day, that they were to experiance a thrid year of a pay freeze.
What i was trying to do, is contrast hard working people, in any sector, suffering hardship because of the times....with the Banks, who dispite being bailed out by the taxpayers, contunue and actually increase their losses, and yet still pay out bonus. Yes I know certain sectors of the business, may have indeed done better than others. But when a business is making such losses, and owes so much to the government, I still think it is wrong that a bonus should be paid to anyone.
Quote by deancannock
But when a business is making such losses, and owes so much to the government, I still think it is wrong that a bonus should be paid to anyone.

what like a sort of double incentive kind of thing dean?
what like the government giving additonal money to councils to do what they had been doing for yeers?

the tax payer pays a huge amount to the business that is there local council for services, and now the government are paying councils money over and above to start up weekly collections again. that is one of the main things i thought i and many others had been paying for as part of the extortionate amounts of money the councils take from us every month/yeer .
councils are in many respects no different to the banks. they take peeples money and spend a lot of it on worthless needs, there employees get rewarded with huge pension pots, and then squeal they have no money and have to resort now to fortnightly refuge collections. then the government just like with the banks, use taxpayers money to bribe the councils to collect rubbish weekly.
councils over spend just like the banks do. the councils waste huge amounts of money just like the banks do, and just like the banks, councils continue to want more money. is there that much of a difference dunno
oh yes there is a massive differance.
The money is not gambled away !!
we get services for our money. You may indeed feel this is not spent correctly sometimes. However you then have the right to vote that council out of office. Don't seem to re-call I have ever had the right to vote out the chief executive of RBS !!
Councils have had the money they recieve actually greatly reduced. One of the cost savings, to help with this, was to reduce the frequency of refuse collection to every two weeks. This was also to help with recyle targets they were all given. I myself have a fornightly colelction, and now used to it, find it no problem. It has, as intended, made me think about my refuse, and put more into recyle bin. May I add this action of fornightly collection, was agreed and implimented by councils of all political persuasion !!
Now some councils do over spend it is true. They then get next years budget allowance reduced and a penalty payment !! They do not get a bonus !!If they over run budget for three years in a 5 year period, they the government have a right to suspend the council, and put others in there to run the operation.
So no....councils and banks are not simular at all !!!!
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

The difference is that we ALL rely on public services to some degree.
And the public services I "use" I pay for every month via my taxes....
And people rely on private sector services just as much...
Just take my particular job as an example....
If no-one maintains the HGV's that deliver the goods to the stores/warehouses etc how they be able to sell them and us be able to buy them dunno
That's just one example.....There are ,doubtless, many others.....
Trains? ........innocent
Don't see many train tracks in my high street....
Perhaps the shop owners all go to the train station to collect their delivery dunno
Oh well,it was a joke....but our local Sainsburys and Tesco have a train line separating them and a station (closed) next to them both ... There is no reason why goods have to be transported long distances by road and few reasons why they need to travel short distances in large road destroying polluting resource hungry H.G.V's
Quote by Steve
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

The difference is that we ALL rely on public services to some degree.
And the public services I "use" I pay for every month via my taxes....
And people rely on private sector services just as much...
Just take my particular job as an example....
If no-one maintains the HGV's that deliver the goods to the stores/warehouses etc how they be able to sell them and us be able to buy them dunno
That's just one example.....There are ,doubtless, many others.....
Thanks for your input Steve. Once the race to the bottom has been achieved remind me to ask you how you like it down there.
I cannot for the life of me understand why private sector workers wanna drag everyone down to their level. Surely anyone with half a brain in their head should be clamouring for the working conditions they're so jealous of? Not the other way round?
Quote by neilinleeds
Thanks for your input Steve. Once the race to the bottom has been achieved remind me to ask you how you like it down there.
I cannot for the life of me understand why private sector workers wanna drag everyone down to their level. Surely anyone with half a brain in their head should be clamouring for the working conditions they're so jealous of? Not the other way round?

Not interested in "dragging anyone down to my level" at all....
Simply pointing out that it's not just the poor old public sector workers that the press are so fond of reporting on that are having a shit time of things !
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Oh well,it was a joke....but our local Sainsburys and Tesco have a train line separating them and a station (closed) next to them both ... There is no reason why goods have to be transported long distances by road and few reasons why they need to travel short distances in large road destroying polluting resource hungry H.G.V's

For that to work evey business would have to be on a rail line....
Never going to happen.....And a lot of newer trucks give out less emissions that a family saloon so not quite as polluting as you might think....