Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

UK politics

last reply
146 replies
5.2k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by starlightcouple
...from MY experience of working amongst over 18 poles and 7 south african asians, i can assure you that my story is much nearer fact than your is...

Whilst reading the usual exchanges with interest, must admit to being puzzled with the latest snippet 7 south african asians when the recent exchanges of views, information, and entrenched political views have been around the EU and the Commission.
Now whilst we don't religiously watch every news programme or read every paper, even we would have noticed if South Africa had joined the EU.
One therefore has to presume that the 7 south african asians are not here via via 'open borders' for fellow EU populations which sees many Poles, French, Germans, Spanish, etc. working here in the UK.
Though Cameron got himself into a pickle at the G20 Summit with "If the French go ahead with a 75% top rate of tax we will roll out the red carpet and welcome more French businesses to Britain" (By the way flying in the face of Osborne's view that "I regard tax evasion and indeed aggressive tax avoidance as morally repugnant", which is what Cameron was suggesting. But that's another debate)
Anyway back to your 7 south african asians work colleagues. One look at the relevant section on advises South Africans coming to the UK that "prospective visitor must satisfy the Immigration Officer amongst other things that he or she is genuinely seeking entry only for the period and purpose stated, and will be maintained and accommodated without recourse to public funds or taking employment."
Therefore Star if you are working amongst...7 south african asians they are here via a Visa of some type issued by HM Government's Customs and Border Agency ?
Perhaps checking with your 'work colleagues' about their Visa status might be in order and if not, you are duty bound to let the authorities know asap.
Just a thought.
By the way there were restrictions on benefits that Polish immigrants can claim, which was covered by the Worker Registration Scheme until 1st April 2011, however it cost Poles time and money and wasn't enforced anyway.
banghead
i was talking about migrant worker HNS in a general term. i am sorry if i either went off topic, or stated something that was not true.
Quote by starlightcouple
i was talking about migrant worker HNS in a general term. i am sorry if i either went off topic, or stated something that was not true.

Quoting 18 Poles and 7 South African Asians is hardly expressing something in a general term :lol2:
However star, I didn't make up the story of the Polish Builder, it is factual. I'm not about to provide you with evidence as such because I don't have to, besides which, it's none of your friggin business.
You will just have to accept my word on it realising of course that your judgement about ex-employers seems somewhat clouded with perhaps some unfortunate whole-life experiences which have contributed to your intolerance of people who work their bollocks off and risk their own well-being and personal wealth in order to provide employment to others, often ungrateful who believe that the world owes them a living.
And since you ask - yes, I did have some excellent employees. I led by example and never asked them to do something I would/could never do myself.
If you choose not to believe it, pas grave, c'est la vie.
Quote by GnV
Quoting 18 Poles and 7 South African Asians is hardly expressing something in a general term :lol2:

so tell us then GNV how migrant workers often on minimum wages, can seem to earn enough money to live and to send money home to there families? all the migrant workers that i know which is a damn site more than the one you mention in your story, sorry answer, seem to back up the fact that they could not if they did not live as they do. there has to be a very simple logical explanation as to why peeple come from another country to work in the UK for minimum wages, would it not?
Quote by GnV
However star, I didn't make up the story of the Polish Builder, it is factual. I'm not about to provide you with evidence as such because I don't have to, besides which, it's none of your friggin business.
your answer says a lot more about you, than it does about me. :bounce:
touched a nerve obviously rolleyes
Quote by GnV
You will just have to accept my word on it realising of course that your judgement about ex-employers seems somewhat clouded with perhaps some unfortunate whole-life experiences which have contributed to your intolerance of people who work their bollocks off and risk their own well-being and personal wealth in order to provide employment to others, often ungrateful who believe that the world owes them a living.

oh GNV you will have me :violin: in a minute. i have worked for good and bad employers, but they are all in it for the money at the end of the day. some like your good self can then end up retireing to a nice lifestyle, a lifestyle that many of your employees probably do not get, but i digress. of course the other side of the coin is as you have stated, that yes an employer can lose everything in the pursuit of running a business. but on many occasions working for yourself is a better alternative than working for someone else, and watch them get rich. i am sure you would agree.
Quote by GnV
And since you ask - yes, I did have some excellent employees. I led by example and never asked them to do something I would/could never do myself.

as an employer should, but many in my experience pay others to clean shitty toilets as persish the thought of them getting there hands dirty, but i have also known some employers who would clean the toilets. horses for them old courses eh?
Quote by GnV
If you choose not to believe it, pas grave, c'est la vie.

ditto GNV,,,,ditto :jagsatwork:
Quote by starlightcouple
i was talking about migrant worker HNS in a general term. i am sorry if i either went off topic, or stated something that was not true.

Star,
fair enough, however noticed that you've chosed not to answer the points put to you
"Therefore Star if you are working amongst...7 south african asians they are here via a Visa of some type issued by HM Government's Customs and Border Agency ?
Perhaps checking with your 'work colleagues' about their Visa status might be in order and if not, you are duty bound to let the authorities know asap"
whilst questioning why another member on this thread has not seemingly answered the questions/comments that you've posed to them.
HnS
In my little corner of the Country, and I can only speak for my bit the Polish debate is very true.
I live at No12 the largest house on the block with 4 bedrooms, there are two of us here
at No1 (opposite) there are 3 bedrooms and 2 reception rooms (both used as bedrooms) housing 5 very nice Polish guys.
at No3 next door to them another 5 Polish guys
at No5 next door to them another 5 Polish guys
at No7 2 Polish Couples and one guy
at No14 (nobody)
at No16 4 Polish guys
So do the maths, 6 occupied houses 1 with 2 permanent UK residents and 5 housing 24 Polish migrant workers (and they do work very long hours seemingly at the same place as car sharing is a daily occurence throughout the day and night).
They do however make very good neighbours lol
My biggest beef with the EU rules and Migrant workers is that if any of them have kids still living in Poland they can claim Child Benefit in the UK, I believe that any migrant worker should only be entitled to the same benefits whilst here that they would get in thier own Country, or at the very least only get Child Benefit in the UK if the children are living with them.
Quote by HnS
i was talking about migrant worker HNS in a general term. i am sorry if i either went off topic, or stated something that was not true.

Star,
fair enough, however noticed that you've chosed not to answer the points put to you
"Therefore Star if you are working amongst...7 south african asians they are here via a Visa of some type issued by HM Government's Customs and Border Agency ?
Perhaps checking with your 'work colleagues' about their Visa status might be in order and if not, you are duty bound to let the authorities know asap"
whilst questioning why another member on this thread has not seemingly answered the questions/comments that you've posed to them.
HnS
He's just full of wind and piss H, I'd give up if I were you as I now have. Jed's take on it is far more believable.
That said, I had 15 poles in my office, but it was a 4 bay pole barn after all :grin:
Quote by GnV
i was talking about migrant worker HNS in a general term. i am sorry if i either went off topic, or stated something that was not true.

Star,
fair enough, however noticed that you've chosed not to answer the points put to you
"Therefore Star if you are working amongst...7 south african asians they are here via a Visa of some type issued by HM Government's Customs and Border Agency ?
Perhaps checking with your 'work colleagues' about their Visa status might be in order and if not, you are duty bound to let the authorities know asap"
whilst questioning why another member on this thread has not seemingly answered the questions/comments that you've posed to them.
HnS
He's just full of wind and piss H, I'd give up if I were you as I now have. Jed's take on it is far more believable.
That said, I had 15 poles in my office, but it was a 4 bay pole barn after all :grin:
G,
all for informed intelligent debate, especially was can learn an awful lot more.
Agree sounds like Mids is more the case, know S-o-T has larger Polish community than here, but didn't know that about Child Benefit so have to dig around
Quote by HnS
Star,
fair enough, however noticed that you've chosed not to answer the points put to you
"Therefore Star if you are working amongst...7 south african asians they are here via a Visa of some type issued by HM Government's Customs and Border Agency ?

I would presume so HNS. i know two were here on student visas to start with but then met an english woman and the other met a Belgian woman and have both now settled here. the others i am not sure at all, and if i were to ask them, would they actually tell the truth? plus that is certainly not relevant surely as my employer would have check there right to work here anyway as a matter of law?
Quote by HnS
Perhaps checking with your 'work colleagues' about their Visa status might be in order and if not, you are duty bound to let the authorities know asap"

see answer above HNS
Quote by HnS
whilst questioning why another member on this thread has not seemingly answered the questions/comments that you've posed to them.
HnS

all done then now HNS to everyones satisfaction i would hope.
Quote by GnV
He's just full of wind and piss H, I'd give up if I were you as I now have. Jed's take on it is far more believable.

well i shall add rude and obnoxious as well as a porky teller to your list of traits GNV rolleyes
i bet you was a bundle of laughs to work for. :kissmyarse::lol2:
Our tiny nation island has experienced economic migration and emigration for centuries - it is nothing new.
What have the Poles/Eastern Europeans ever done for us lol
Well, they arrived from a country with little prospects for personal financial solvency and so they did what Norman Tebbit suggested all those years ago to us - they got on their bikes and made an effort to improve their lives. Rather than stay home moaning about how unfortunate their lot was and blaming their terrible lives on everyone else but themselves. So now we have a service and hospitality industry dominated by a "non native" work force. We also have highly skilled construction professionals who work very hard because they want to make the most of their opportunity.
On the other side of the coin, we now have a fat load of "native" unemployed people who moan constantly that jobs are going to the foreigners - they out to take a leaf out of the "foreigners" book and get on their bikes and find themselves a better life.
There is remarkable similarity in todays problems to the days centuries ago when communities lived off the land. If the land stopped feeding them - they moved on. We have forgotten that basic fact of life and the majority of the native population expect so much to simply happen for them, without feeling obliged to give anything in return.
Charles Darwin said that it is not the strongest who survive - but those most adaptable to change. UK workers need to wake up and realise that EVERYONE in the world has to now work harder, for less money and for longer.
ASIDE - My best friend has a specialist construction company that undertakes high value unique projects all over the UK. He gave up completely with "native" construction staff because they would not travel around the country from job to job with any kind of reliability or without moaning. He now has a workforce of 40 - all Eastern European and since he stopped employing native Brits he has fulfilled every contract on time and not had a single delay penalty. The reality is that his Company is successful - he and his workers contribute to the tax take and up to two years ago he was struggling to complete every other project on time and was paying out almost as much in delay penalties as he was earning profit.
Quote by starlightcouple
i know two were here on student visas to start with but then met an english woman and the other met a Belgian woman and have both now settled here. the others i am not sure at all, and if i were to ask them, would they actually tell the truth? plus that is certainly not relevant surely as my employer would have check there right to work here anyway as a matter of law?

If they were here on a Student Visa and you met them whilst working it's illegal, and given some of your previous views on the subject, always worth using the 'hot line'.
Depends if they have since changed their Visa, but the Agency will check.
Yes the employer should check, but some don't hence the usual £10,000 fines when 'caught'.
Your moral duty init
Quote by HnS
If they were here on a Student Visa and you met them whilst working it's illegal, and given some of your previous views on the subject, always worth using the 'hot line'.
Depends if they have since changed their Visa, but the Agency will check.
Yes the employer should check, but some don't hence the usual £10,000 fines when 'caught'.
Your moral duty init

of course it is my moral duty if there was anything illegal, but i do not know that there is anything illegal. you always meet your moral obligations as well in life HNS?
i work for a company that employs over 2000 and is a major supplier of water, so have a google. i am sure that a company of that size has done all the relevant checks on all its workers where needed. as you are so concerned about my morality on this issue i can always pm you the name of my company and the dept and you can report them.
then it would be your moral duty also.
Quote by starlightcouple

He's just full of wind and piss H, I'd give up if I were you as I now have. Jed's take on it is far more believable.

well i shall add rude and obnoxious as well as a porky teller to your list of traits GNV rolleyes
i bet you was a bundle of laughs to work for. :kissmyarse::lol2:
Am I bovvered?
Am I bovvered though?
Do I look bovvered?
No cos I ain’t bovvered.
I'm not bovvered.
I AIN'T BOVVERED!
I ain’t cos I ain’t bovvered.
No I ain’t.
No I ain’t though.
Yeah that's cos I'm not.
No it ain’t actually.
Are you deaf?
But do I care though?
But I don’t care though.
Are you stupid?
Why don't you shut up though?
Shut up then.
Are you telling me what to do?
Don't tell me what to do.
Yeah I will and don't tell me what to do.
Are you disrespecting me?
I don't need your opinion is it.
the employment crisis facing the lazy british worker is caused by migrant economic refugees.
the employment crisis facing the lazy tax avoiding greeks is caused by migrant economic refugees
the employment crisis facing the siesta driven lazy spanish is caused by migrant economic refugees
the employment crisis facing the short working week french is caused by migrant economic refugees
the employment crisis facing........
banker sniggers ha ha ha ha ha
are you sure it's them johnny foreigners ?
Quote by GnV
Am I bovvered?
Am I bovvered though?
Do I look bovvered?
No cos I ain’t bovvered.
I'm not bovvered.
I AIN'T BOVVERED!
I ain’t cos I ain’t bovvered.
No I ain’t.
No I ain’t though.
Yeah that's cos I'm not.
No it ain’t actually.
Are you deaf?
But do I care though?
But I don’t care though.
Are you stupid?
Why don't you shut up though?
Shut up then.
Are you telling me what to do?
Don't tell me what to do.
Yeah I will and don't tell me what to do.
Are you disrespecting me?
I don't need your opinion is it.


glad to see you have sky in france GNV. lol
Quote by starlightcouple
glad to see you have sky in france GNV. lol

The sky we have here is unpolluted star.
You can sit out at night and watch the stars without the intrusion of city lights :lol2:
sorry to point out the obvious,but why would the British public vote for an organisation that would effectively become extinct once they was voted in
ukip would cease to exist once we left Europe lol :lol:[/quot
Quite right. If you ask anyone in UKIP what they want to be doing in 5 years time the answer is rarely "be a politician", it would more likely be "doing the "day job". Few in the party want to be involved but we have found the hard way that you simply can no longer trust the three "main parties" to be honest, particularly about the EU.
Once elected in it would be the work of one day to get us out of the EU and three years to undo the damage it has caused. We would then, most likely, call a General Election soon after, but that, obviously, would be a decision taken far above my level in the party. In any case our future as a domestic party would be very much in your hands as an electorate. By writing that we would be "extinct" pre supposes that we exist merely to get us out of the EU but that is a misunderstanding of the party and it's position in UK politics.
UKIP was founded by people who see the EU for what it really is and want to get our nation free. It began as a "pressure group" but is now the second biggest British party (by popular vote) in EU politics and the third (we regularly beat the Lib Dems, sometimes even Labour in local elections) in domestic politics. It is often thought that the party is just an "anti EU one" but it should be realised that it has a full and comprehensive manifesto for domestic politics too.
In reply to the point about Nick Clegg not having a "day job" there are few, if any, "professional politicians" in UKIP and the vast majority of us have to earn our living the same way most here do - by working.
Quote by GregSH
sorry to point out the obvious,but why would the British public vote for an organisation that would effectively become extinct once they was voted in
ukip would cease to exist once we left Europe lol :lol:

Quite right. If you ask anyone in UKIP what they want to be doing in 5 years time the answer is rarely "be a politician", it would more likely be "doing the "day job". Few in the party want to be involved but we have found the hard way that you simply can no longer trust the three "main parties" to be honest, particularly about the EU.
Once elected in it would be the work of one day to get us out of the EU and three years to undo the damage it has caused. We would then, most likely, call a General Election soon after, but that, obviously, would be a decision taken far above my level in the party. In any case our future as a domestic party would be very much in your hands as an electorate. By writing that we would be "extinct" pre supposes that we exist merely to get us out of the EU but that is a misunderstanding of the party and it's position in UK politics.
UKIP was founded by people who see the EU for what it really is and want to get our nation free. It began as a "pressure group" but is now the second biggest British party (by popular vote) in EU politics and the third (we regularly beat the Lib Dems, sometimes even Labour in local elections) in domestic politics. It is often thought that the party is just an "anti EU one" but it should be realised that it has a full and comprehensive manifesto for domestic politics too.
In reply to the point about Nick Clegg not having a "day job" there are few, if any, "professional politicians" in UKIP and the vast majority of us have to earn our living the same way most here do - by working.
Greg,
That might well be the case, however to many people UKIP is still perceived to be a Party of dis-affected right wing Tories with a single policy (Europe).
Until that perception is changed, then they will continue to be seen as a 'fringe' party by many.
Perhaps this will change during the life of this current Coalition and the poor 'official' opposition, time will tell.
Quote by HnS
sorry to point out the obvious,but why would the British public vote for an organisation that would effectively become extinct once they was voted in
ukip would cease to exist once we left Europe lol :lol:

Quite right. If you ask anyone in UKIP what they want to be doing in 5 years time the answer is rarely "be a politician", it would more likely be "doing the "day job". Few in the party want to be involved but we have found the hard way that you simply can no longer trust the three "main parties" to be honest, particularly about the EU.
Once elected in it would be the work of one day to get us out of the EU and three years to undo the damage it has caused. We would then, most likely, call a General Election soon after, but that, obviously, would be a decision taken far above my level in the party. In any case our future as a domestic party would be very much in your hands as an electorate. By writing that we would be "extinct" pre supposes that we exist merely to get us out of the EU but that is a misunderstanding of the party and it's position in UK politics.
UKIP was founded by people who see the EU for what it really is and want to get our nation free. It began as a "pressure group" but is now the second biggest British party (by popular vote) in EU politics and the third (we regularly beat the Lib Dems, sometimes even Labour in local elections) in domestic politics. It is often thought that the party is just an "anti EU one" but it should be realised that it has a full and comprehensive manifesto for domestic politics too.
In reply to the point about Nick Clegg not having a "day job" there are few, if any, "professional politicians" in UKIP and the vast majority of us have to earn our living the same way most here do - by working.
Greg,
That might well be the case, however to many people UKIP is still perceived to be a Party of dis-affected right wing Tories with a single policy (Europe).
Until that perception is changed, then they will continue to be seen as a 'fringe' party by many.
Perhaps this will change during the life of this current Coalition and the poor 'official' opposition, time will tell.
Sadly, you are quite right. Britain is in the mess it is today because too many people only think in terms of party names, NOT policies. I have lost track of the times when out on the campaign trail that I have heard "I agree with you, but you see I am ------ party, my dad was and his before him so that's why I can't vote for you". Well, we do have ex Tories of course, but also ex Labour, ex Lib Dems and many others who simply are not interested in politics but do want Britain free and independent again. We have a large variety of members ranging from Lords of the Realm to the local dustman.
We have policies ranging from Europe (obviously) to education, defence, the NHS and the rest, and not made by career politicians but people who know what they are about. Examples include our farming policy advisor being a respected working farmer, our defence advisor being a retired Admiral who was also a NATO advisor, our NHS advisor a practising GP, our economic advisor a Professor of Economics and so on. We concentrate on the EU because that is where some 75 - 80 % of our laws are made. All we are saying is that they should be made in Westminster as they always were but the only way to attain that again is through our independence.
Greg.
I can't agree with you.
To seek 'independance' would leave the UK seriously isolated.
Change the membership ticket by all means to something that is more suited to her needs, but total withdrawal from the EU would spell disaster.
There is much to fault the EU, particularly the Commission - as I have said before in this forum, but you can only fight it by being in it with people who will not be persuaded to roll over like a dutiful dog the minute they are elected.
Quote by GnV
Greg.
I can't agree with you.
To seek 'independance' would leave the UK seriously isolated.
Change the membership ticket by all means to something that is more suited to her needs, but total withdrawal from the EU would spell disaster.
There is much to fault the EU, particularly the Commission - as I have said before in this forum, but you can only fight it by being in it with people who will not be persuaded to roll over like a dutiful dog the minute they are elected.

Sadly you seem to overlook many things. The most important, in my view, is that far from being "isolated" we would still be head of the Commonwealth, a far bigger organisation than the EU. Yes, our EU membership has left the bonds strained, but they are still there and can be rebuilt particularly when freed from petty EU restrictions which have caused the problems in the first place.
Secondly, are Norway or Switzerland "isolated" in any way? No, both nations are doing much better than us, and most other EU members too, yet they never made the mistake of joining. And, don't forget, we have literally world wide advantages they don't (our Commonwealth).
Thirdly the British have spent the last near 40 years trying to "change the membership ticket" without success. How many times do you think we should try to batter the walls down before we realise "it ain't gonna work"?
Sadly there are but a few MEPs who do not "roll over like a dutiful dog the minute they are elected" and most of those are in UKIP. Please though, do not take my word for it, go on to You Tube or the party website and hear the speeches for yourself.
I ask you to do but one thing; consider the very different fates of MEPs Robert Kilroy Silk, Tom Wise, Nikki Sinclair and others who have tried to break the rules in any way, and were kicked out of the party for it, with the many Tory, Labour and Lib Dem MPs who have broken the rules and "blind eyes" have been turned to them by their leadership. In some cases the villains have even been to prison and are put back into high office on release, even if they haven't been re-elected!
i do not say i know all about european politics, but what i can see very easily is that we put in a lot more than we take out. Why should any of our money go towards bailing out the likes of Greece and Spain or Ireland? they decided after referendums, and twice in Irelands case, to opt in to a europe lock stock and both smoking barrels, as far as giving up there money for the now dead euro.
they thought at the time that it was possibly the answer to there prayers going head first into europ, but it has instead been there downfall. so as we never went in and were so opposed to the euro, why should we as a nation bail out or get involved by the billions and billions of pounds it will cost us? i say let those countries sink, as apart from tourism they offer very little else, and when spain was a thriving tourism place, it did not want any part of europe then.
all this nonsense of unelected peeple dictating to our judges, imposing cranky health and safety rubbish onto us, costing our industries millions to comply with. european directives on this that and everything else, that none of us had any say over. this country voted to trade with europe, not to be run and dictated by europe. politicians will always feather there own nests, way beforew anything else, and the suited mob of politicians will never want the british public to have a say, and so end there gravy train will they?
i if i had my way would opt out of europe. we are not europeans and never will be, we are british/english, and i would never class myself as a european in any way shape or form, never. give the peeple of this country the option of a simple yes or no to europe. why has the nation been denied this for so long? well i belive it is an obvious thing, because we would vote out and where would the politicians then find themselves? out and out again to a doomed but self satisfying bunch of cretins, only in it for there own PR's and of course the expenses.
sorry but Thatcher was the only politician or maybe i should say PM, who had any balls to stick up for this country. this would never have come down this road had she still been here. all the others since her have allowed us to be sold down the river, even cameron who said differently when he first came into power. no british politicain seems to have the guts to stand up for this nation where europe is concerned. do we really need them? i think they need britian in, much more than they would want us out. save all the billions we spend on this nonsense, and use it more wisely by reinvesting it back into our structure, and into our struggling businesses, and to hell with europe and it's courts and it's unelected peeple dictating it's unelected ways onto this great country, and dragging us down into the sewers with the rest of europe.
Quote by GnV
Greg.
I can't agree with you.
To seek 'independance' would leave the UK seriously isolated.
Change the membership ticket by all means to something that is more suited to her needs, but total withdrawal from the EU would spell disaster.
There is much to fault the EU, particularly the Commission - as I have said before in this forum, but you can only fight it by being in it with people who will not be persuaded to roll over like a dutiful dog the minute they are elected.

So you think Japan is seriously isolated? Does not seem to be doing them too much harm.
There are no benefits for the UK to be in a club that is busily cutting its own throat economically. The UK already trades more with the rest of the world and has actually done so for quite some time. The Rotterdam Effect skewed the figures, goods destined for the rest of the world that transit the massive Dutch ports were counted as trade with the EU. A more obvious lie and massaging of the figures you would be hard pressed to find.
And every trading agreement the UK has with Europe is covered by the rules of the WTO.
There is no single decent economic reason why the UK needs to be in the EU, it is and always has been a political project.
Well put, Bayboy 1664. The latest figures I have available re trade (published in 2010) show that Britain needs the EU like a drowning man needs more water when it comes to this subject.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics show that between 1999 and 2009 we went billion into the red with the EU but made a profit of billion trading with the rest of the world.
Greg,
One thing to consider is the number of Japanese companies with manufacturing or assembly plants in the UK, thus helping or 'trade figures', purely on the basis when they were announced of our proximity and membership of the EU
There is no reason for the UK not to be in Europe but every reason for it not to be run by Europe - or those parts of it which are corrupt and an ever increasing burden.
Cite as evidence distant lands who are not European by all means and who do good trade. Even better cite closer countries in the continent of Europe who do good business too, better than the UK. It only serves to strengthen my argument.
Because with all the trade at it's disposal from within the Commonweath and beyond, why is Great Britain not outstripping Germany and France and leading the way in Europe, increasing her prosperity? What possible argument can be given to support the view that, outside of Europe, Great Britain will fare better on her own?
You can break eggs to make a omelette but you can't make eggs from an omelette. Supper has already been served; make the most of it, serve it with with some relish and enjoy.
Quote by HnS
Greg,
One thing to consider is the number of Japanese companies with manufacturing or assembly plants in the UK, thus helping or 'trade figures', purely on the basis when they were announced of our proximity and membership of the EU

This is no reason to be in the EU. Are you saying we British can not build our own things any more? Sadly too many seem to think like you do rather than takingf the attitude of we once built the best things in the world and we can do it again given the chance.
Quote by GregSH
Are you saying we British can not build our own things any more? Sadly too many seem to think like you do rather than takingf the attitude of we once built the best things in the world and we can do it again given the chance.

The reason that we build so little has much to do with successive governments over regulating. It is not about people being given a chance but government reducing regulatory burden and encouraging initiative. An example is aviation where once Britain led the way - now only a fool would attempt to launch a new aviation initiative in this country and most manufacturers choose to by pass the UK in their approval processes such is the onerous burden invented by our very own CAA. These "safety related" regulations have little evidenciary substance but in any event have been added to layer upon layer as successive generations of bureaucrats attempt to justify their salaries.
There is no common sense at all in some of the UK's civil and criminal legislation. Drugs is my number 1 pet issue and I despair that the current generation of politicians will have invariably experimented in their youth yet no one is brave enough to understand that current drug laws simply empower the criminals. Accepting that people do take recreational drugs is the first step in taking money and power away from criminals and no one has the guts to do it.
Britain is not necessarily best and better out of the EU when we have a pretty good history of shooting ourselves in the foot. There is a predominant part of the national psyche that worries about what other people will think of us and until that changes the UK will never be a great success no matter what you say. Whether you are an individual, a company, a team, or a country - selfishness is the only path to success.
Quote by GregSH
Greg,
One thing to consider is the number of Japanese companies with manufacturing or assembly plants in the UK, thus helping or 'trade figures', purely on the basis when they were announced of our proximity and membership of the EU

This is no reason to be in the EU. Are you saying we British can not build our own things any more? Sadly too many seem to think like you do rather than takingf the attitude of we once built the best things in the world and we can do it again given the chance.
Who is stopping Britain getting on?
Not Europe for sure.
As Too Hot says, the British are their own worst enemy.
If there are negatives in Britain's membership of the EU she should be relentlessly exploiting those negatives by turning them into positives and taking the trading world by storm with all her other opportunities from within (at least) the Commonweath and beyond.
But, does she do so? No. No. No. She listens too much to politicking fractional parties and attempts to preen her image with cosmetics to disguise her ageing ability to cut the mustard and then blames everyone but herself when she inevitably trips over a poorly repaired paving stone.
Ditching Europe will not aid her cause; it will secure yet another nail in her coffin - and there are far too many in place already.
Britain needs a strong and imaginative leadership. A renewal if you like. Cutting off her nose to spite her face is not the way forward. Sadly, in the current class of politicians, I see no one capable of leading Britain in such a revolution.