who can cut the dept best ? a previous thread said that each of us owes 25k to the public dept ! i say no. the government without our consent, comitted billions of our future tax revenue to fill present black holes in bank balance sheets.
these banksters then proceeded to pay themselves bonuses measured in lifetime earnings of the rest of us. this future revenue will not now be spent on hospitals,education, training, welfare or socially required infrastructure.
so the arguments about the effectiveness or efficiency of public expenditure will come into play in the theatre of political screenplay and who can make the cuts most humanely ! we are being fried by international private financial interests who created an unsustainable dept/interst fuelled ponzi scheme and all our politicians (on the gravy train) capitulated.
i say, repudiate the dept and make the gamblers and sharks go bankrupt ! f$£k em all.
what do you all think ?
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
who can do it best ?
Sex God
Don't wait for them to fail take it off them now....nationalise everything....property is theft
This has been going on for years, the big difference here is the ammount of money the banks have lost.
The figures are mindboggling, I have heard mentioned £180 billion pounds in total. Yes it is paper money to me, written out on balance sheets.
But the fact is this country owes so much money and increasing on a daily problems are going to happen when we cannot borrow anymore or become slaves to the people who are lending us the money.
The next few generations of workers will be paying dear, and when Cameron comes into power, what cuts he will HAVE to make is anyones guess but harsh they will be.
The figures are mindboggling, I have heard mentioned £180 billion pounds in total. Yes it is paper money to me, written out on balance sheets.
But the fact is this country owes so much money and increasing on a daily problems are going to happen when we cannot borrow anymore or become slaves to the people who are lending us the money.
The next few generations of workers will be paying dear, and when Cameron comes into power, what cuts he will HAVE to make is anyones guess but harsh they will be.
yes, the big difference here is the amount THE BANKS have lost. not joe soap. there are many inequitous taxes. the government borrows money from the private bank of england at interest, this along with bonds sold by h.m. treasury to investors national and international on the international exchanges at interest goes to service interest on interest and maintain public services. finance houses borrow money at low interest and lend it on at higher interest to the government. present taxation pay's interest on previously borrowed capital.
since the seizure of international capital markets, the government has had to get the bank of england to print money (q.e.) at interest to be paid back to the bank from future tax revenue, to fill the black holes in bank balance sheet's in order to prevent the ripple effect of a systemic collapse.
the £180 billion that has been mentioned is probably a low figure. how much is that each and how many taxes would be unnecessary ? inheritance tax and paying for your own care until nearly all your money is gone is a device to keep you and me where we all belong and "you aint seen nufin yet" regardless of "who get's in".
since the seizure of international capital markets, the government has had to get the bank of england to print money (q.e.) at interest to be paid back to the bank from future tax revenue, to fill the black holes in bank balance sheet's in order to prevent the ripple effect of a systemic collapse.
the £180 billion that has been mentioned is probably a low figure. how much is that each and how many taxes would be unnecessary ? inheritance tax and paying for your own care until nearly all your money is gone is a device to keep you and me where we all belong and "you aint seen nufin yet" regardless of "who get's in".
oh, and i forgot, bank's create money out of thin air and lend it at interest and guess what they call it ? FRACTIONAL RESERVE LENDING. so while you are unhappy with taxation and paying your attention to the dirty rotten little guy who get's a few hundred quid a week for sitting on his ass smoking and drinking, banksters pay themselves billions out of your taxes ! (and keep all politicians of all colours on the gravy train)
£180Bn and the bloody rest. They have taken that money and used it to bail out capitalism, which just like communism before it obviously doesn't work. Hey, and they are already raking it back, a one pence rise in the duty on petrol raises unbelievable amounts of money. If we are in such a huge recession then why are we sending troops and equipment overseas?
We have the second largest government in the world after China, and the whole damn lot of them are shitting on us from a great hight.
David Icke for PM, even if he was a crap goalie.
We have the second largest government in the world after China, and the whole damn lot of them are shitting on us from a great hight.
David Icke for PM, even if he was a crap goalie.
Quote by flower411
guls .... I did type a reply to this thread a bit earlier today .....
Now ...I`m not good with a keyboard and I did spend rather a long time typing .....
And then pressed the wrong button !!!!:x :x
So I`ll just say that in my opinion none of the names on the ballot paper will make a blind bit of difference to what happens ....it`s time to take to the streets and attack the source of the problem .
Wheres the starting gate?
Quote by gulsonroad30664
who can cut the dept best ? a previous thread said that each of us owes 25k to the public dept ! i say no. the government without our consent, comitted billions of our future tax revenue to fill present black holes in bank balance sheets.
these banksters then proceeded to pay themselves bonuses measured in lifetime earnings of the rest of us. this future revenue will not now be spent on hospitals,education, training, welfare or socially required infrastructure.
so the arguments about the effectiveness or efficiency of public expenditure will come into play in the theatre of political screenplay and who can make the cuts most humanely ! we are being fried by international private financial interests who created an unsustainable dept/interst fuelled ponzi scheme and all our politicians (on the gravy train) capitulated.
i say, repudiate the dept and make the gamblers and sharks go bankrupt ! f$£k em all.
what do you all think ?
i musta bin wrong back then too
Orgasminator
And the prize for the most
'I told you so' threads being dug up goes to..............:uhoh:
'I told you so' threads being dug up goes to..............:uhoh:
Sex God
Quote by flower411
guls .... I did type a reply to this thread a bit earlier today .....
Now ...I`m not good with a keyboard and I did spend rather a long time typing .....
And then pressed the wrong button !!!!
So I`ll just say that in my opinion none of the names on the ballot paper will make a blind bit of difference to what happens ....it`s time to take to the streets and attack the source of the problem .
'kin 'ell....citizen flower :shock: .....show me the way to the barricades old boy
Sex God
The SH popular front
