Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Hoping to end my enforced celibacy

last reply
5 replies
658 views
3 watchers
0 likes
I came to this fine looking place in the hope of finding a sympathetic lady to ease my plight. Let me explain: I am a 34 yr old white male, not too unattractive rolleyes , 6`2" tall, dark short hair, deep brown eyes, slim, slightly on the hairy side redface with a healthy appetite for sex. I am in a relationship with a lovely woman, who is perfect in every respect, except she has personal problems
As much as I sympathize with her, as a healthy male with a healthy sex drive, I find it very hard to cope with and, regretfully, I feel I need to go elsewhere before my testicles explode confused
I am looking for a lady, any age up to 40 living in the West Midlands (black country area), to help ease the strain on my underwear. I am clean, gentle, very obliging, and love to give as much if not more than I recieve.
Thankyou
Hi - I'm not being funny here, but I've edited your post. Although you've not gone into detail I think people may just take offence or you may get some rude comments if it's left as it is.
Is there a policy on the editing of ads???
I know you are a moderator responsibilities etc...but does smack of censorship...and doesnt allow an honest impression of the indivindual..
was it because of location details? actual names?
perhaps Im just being pedantic? Maybe a pm of the original ad would help me understand?
There isn't a policy on editing ads, and I wouldn't normally dream of doing that unless the post was offensive, but in this case I felt strongly about it. The details I edited concerned details the poster's partners past that simply WON'T help alienhive get laid, so I'm doing him a favour really. However, that's not the point - would you like it if someone put personal details about your past on a web site when you had no idea they were there? I wouldn't, and I guess that a large proportion of the members of this forum wouldn't either. Yes, it is censorship but it was well-meaning censorship!
I wouldnt like it blue, and fully understand now you have explained the reasons.
Duly noted, and I apologise for any offence this may have caused