you could start a whole new thread , snip
oh sod it i will
I've locked this thread for a while. It does seem to me like it is getting a little heated and I would rather not have to remove it.
I'll open it up again later so you can all reply with some calm thoughts :thumbup:
In edit - I'm going to open this back up but don't any of you forget the AUP please
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/main/aup.html
Two vegetarians marry. Being vegetarian is very important to both of them. They have several children, a mortgage and all the trappings of married life. They are blissfully happy. A few years down the line they are still blissfully happy but one of them discovers a previously unknown lust for meat. Should she go to a friend’s house to eat a beefburger, knowing that her partner would be very upset if he found out. Should she lead the rest of her life meat free but feeling unfulfilled. Or should she just divorce him and take up with a carnivore? Wouldn't a white lie would be acceptable in this case?
Cheating is a very emotive word. Hands up anyone who hasn’t lied to a partner (ie cheated) about anything. Should be working late but down the pub? Scratch on the car? New shoes hidden at the bottom of the cupboard? Gambling the wages away? Shagged the neighbour? All cheating if not owned up to.
It’s funny that on a swinger’s site people get so wound up about a sexual act. In my view there are plenty of ways of cheating your partner that are far worse than rubbing two bits of epidermis together, but straight society views adultery as the worst of all. I have always felt that I would be far more upset at finding mrs northwest having an intimate but non-sexual dinner date without me knowing than her shagging behind my back.
Live and let live and leave the moralising for the clergy – they are paid to do it.
A cliche perhaps, but...
Never judge a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
Wouldn't the world be a happier place?
oh goodness me,
what on earth is happening?
I find myself actually agreeing with kentswingers.
>splendid goes to finish a bottle of whisky to get some sense in her head<
wow... okay I have been wondering whether to say anything in this debate, whether to say anything for fear of hurting some of the closet people i am too online....
I too got a pm from the person with regards to the situation and it did make me think a whole lot about the entire subject... i thanked them for their honesty in the matter and I respect them so much as a person that has never changed..... and I still love and respect that person to bits....
a lot of people who have been here in the forum will also remember the situation with regards to a specific member who use to be on this site..... really respected member of the site, of the forums, I don't think a bad word had ever been said about this person, was liked at munches and socials alike......
no one knew this person was married..... we had all been at a party with them one saturday night, getting an e-mail on the monday morning asking me if they had been drinking (to which the answer was no, drinking water and coffee all night) and then to find out this person had died in a road accident after they left...
then their "partner" found out about SH..... came on and wrote things in the forums that will stick with me for as long as I am around....the pain, the anger, the loss of someone who meant a lot to them.....
and it is at times like that, that within our own little "swinging world" that you do realised there are other people that are affected,
I am not going to judge anyone, its not my place to.. i don't know peoples lives... peoples motives.... but the one thing that will stick with me is a sense that people out there can be hurt by others actions, directly or indirectly.... and that is no part of what I want from my life, or the scene, or the world in general.....
sean xxxxxxxxxxxx
Its beginning to sound like the main difference between cheaters and genuines is that:
Cheaters are recklessly willing to make fuck ups and suffer the consequences. Which involves a certain amount of risk and error.
Genuines are more protectionist and on their guard aginst making or finding themselves in a fuck up. Which involves more method and calculation in finding the assurances they need.
I don't suppose there is anything else but the two things to choose from, when organising sex. But good enough reasons to cause serious argument apparently.
I was unsure if I should post my thoughts on this topic for fear or recrimination.
I have decided to.
Hubby and I thought long and hard about if we would consider meeting attached men. I questioned myself on my own level of forgiveness and come to this conclusion.
But first would just like to say I have been married for 21 years and yes have been cheating on (if that’s what you want to call it) 16 years ago. I forgave as I know it was about lack of sex at the time, and I wasn’t about to split a marriage and children up over a stupid fling with a girl at work.
My thoughts on this are, if my hubby over the years had met a couple for sex, then I would see it that he was looking for just sex, if he met a single I would be wondering what else he was looking for.
As a couple meeting a married man we are no threat to his life or his relationship, but in a funny kind of way could be helping to hold his marriage/ relationship together, also married men I find to be more loyal to us as we like to meet regular guys.
I don’t have guilt about doing this as at the end of the day they are consenting adults, but I would never meet a married man on this site that I know come on here with their wives or partners behind their partners back.
Hope this all makes sence!
I await the thrashings!
Hi Minx
I was 'with you' up to the last bit then got a bit confused ... so you will play with a married guy but only with his partner's consent?
I agree with you that, somehow, an attached guy seeking an experience he couldn't reasonably get with his wife (3sum, bi encounter etc) indicates he's looking for something other than a sexual 'fling' - to itch a scratch that can't be satisfied in his vanilla relationship. Although me & Pom wouldn't rule an attached guy out altogether as a possible play partner, I wouldn't see one if I were unattached myself and playing alone.
The last bit meant I chat to couples on the site as friends, I will banter and have a laugh with them, but I would not meet the men without their partners consent. I would a married man playing alone! And I agree with you I would never meet a married man if i was single.
We do,on occasion, meet single guys and to be honest if they are married or not is no concern of ours...
We are not here to act as anyones concience to be quite honest...
If we like the look/sound of the guy then we arrange a meeting.....