Can I make a point.........
I personally dont think we should start a which hun over the members that overstepped the line. Personnally the members invloved should come forward and say look were rally sorry what we done and apologise.
If i started to complain about EVERY unapropriate grope i got, i would be PMing munch organisers all day, and that is not just from females. People should look at it objectivly and say right this is what is acceptable and this is what isnt.
What we should say is this, is mayby have a warning system in place if things to get a bit heated. I am not justifying it just looking objectivly. When alchole and randy people, get together sometimes people will overstep the mark.
I am sure most people wudnt take offence to mayby asked to stop it.
Mike
If you know the person and have perhaps been touched by them in the same way on a previous occasion does not automatically give them the right to touch you in a similar manner again.
Therefore if someone does touch you in what is considered to be an inappropriate manner and you are not comfortable with it... you either say directly to that person.. excuse me I'm not happy with you doing that... or if its continuing after you have spoken to them... then it is sexual assault.
I would hope that members are respectful of each others wishes and would not be guilty of such behaviour after all swinging is all about trust, honesty and respect isn't it????
So we all agree the rules don’t need changed but there is a problem that needs “nipped in the bud “ as has been pointed out .
Iv been thinking over the weekend and may have a solution , if everyone agrees ,( after all this is a democracy )
There are lots more people going to munches now .most newbies and we don’t want to stop this as the more the merrier . but we do need to protect people from this sort of thing happening we all agree on this point ?
My idea
As we have chatroom opsmoderators an admin on the site who do a very good job .
Why not have door hunks and door bitches?
These people would then get well known by newbies and us old hands alike
They would only have power at a munch ,but would be able to take names and eject people officially as site and organiser representatives ( obviously we would have to work on the powers thing) I know this happens already but if you put names up in colour of these people you would have an immediate physiological affect , and these people would get known and respected . although this may not stop the “overt sexual acts “ completely I feel it would have a positive affect and would make people think twice and feel safer ?????????
What do we all think ?
Just an idea that’s all
I would like to know how these "support persons" "security" "bouncers" etc etc would be selected ? It has already been mentioned by several people that well established members of the site are as guilty of inappropriateness as the "newbies".
Perhaps we should all just, as has been mentioned several times, manage our own behaviour in a public environment and remember that swinging is about having sex with whomever we desire at a time and place that suits us. Public decency and the law states that that should be in a private place and a munch venue doesn't qualify.
The munch rules should be written out in full in the sticky on the Lets' meet up section and again in the invite PMs'
As humans managing our behaviour is something we should do at all times irregardless of the social or drug induced setting. Alcohol is no excuse for being a prat.
My 2p worth.....
I dont believe anyone should be responsible to "police" a munch. Everyone there, including the organisers, should be able to have a chat, a drink, a laugh, a dance etc etc and not have to spend the night wandering around checking on what people are doing.
The last munch was worse than any other I have been to, Oral sex on the dance floor and oral sex in the Ladies loo (male/female - no idea who they are. If you'd seen the loo's you would know why that was a desperate act!)
When I first joined the site a Munch really was a social event. A party was a playing event and I dont understand why that's changed, but it has.
People who break the rules should be banned ...... has that changed?
Does it make any difference if they have paid to be a member? IMHO it shouldnt!
Sam xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
How many witnesses are required for the person(s) to be banned?
Does it have to be the organiser who sees the inappropriate behaviour or will they take word-of-mouth that it occurred?
Will you go by whether one person finds the behaviour offensive or if it is by general consensus?
How do you police personal grudges or genuine mistakes?
Hmmm. Good luck!
Inappropriate behaviour at munches is a long term problem. We went to the first NW munch, the second organised munch on SH. At that munch mrs northwest was taken to the ladies by a group of well established female members who were playing with vibrators and I saw male/female groping in the gents toilet. Tits and bums were also on display in the main bar.
The problem is not isolated to newbies, but what messages do you want to give to newbies? Every munch thank you thread is full of snog counts and innuendo. At the moment there is a thread running showing photos from a munch, some of which could not be taken in your local pub in full view of the landlord without you being thrown out. From reading between the lines of the forums (as most newbies will do) it would appear that munches are not the purely social events that they are supposed to be and never have been.
While mild sexual behaviour is celebrated it is unsurprising that some people will take it one step further.