Quote by essex34m
Well, I am thoroughly disgusted and disillusioned with the pulling of the who's who thread.
It's just like the "Moulin Rouge". A knee jerk reaction based upon a grey rule as to what is and what is not a sexual act and a few moans (NOTE, a few.)
If 7500 views of a thread isn't an indication of it's popularity, then I'll eat my hat. Such a thread is liable to do more for the popularity of a site than anything.
I agree rules state, no play, and if anyone can show me where "play" was photo'd, then I'll hold up my hands. There was no play in any photo of the Wakefield thread.
Good god, there is equal sexuality on page three of the Sun and Sport as was shown in the thread.
I only know the thread I started and cannot comment on any other thread.
Things move on and times change, shall we all go back to Victorian ethics or are we at the forefront of sexual liberation.
Jesus, wake up, take a walk down the front in Ibiza or any other holiday hotspot and you will see more than the pics I took.
I'm so disheartened that a site supposed to promote a lifestyle of a sexual nature has to behave like a bunch of Mary Whitehouses on what were perfectly innocious pictures for adults.
So, are you going to ban people from munches from the popular pastime of shirt and clothes swapping ?? This took place at Nottingham, without any pictures being taken.. is that a sexual act ??
Geez.
Quote by hisandhers
MY utter disgust is being reserved for those who behaved so inappropriately at Munches and caused this whole ugly problem to rear it's head.
well 100% now thats its sorted
Quote by melons45
"In every group of people there is always someone who tries to piss against the wind" ...sums it up really...that about closes the thread...
"In every group of people there is always someone who tries to piss against the wind"
the 'stand on the boundary line and rub you feet over it, before leaping back in innocence' - in other words, the pranksters........ Out pops a nipple or bum or something - people around gasp with omg what are they gonna do, before that person leaps back into the boundaries, with mock innocence.
Quote by Dawnie
We are currently looking at complaints regarding the NW munch and complaints that a cake dawnie baked recently was shite, hardly any iceing and burnt round the edges which she tried to disguise by wrapping it with a fancy paper thingy....and thats all.
Quote by Phoenix
Well, I am thoroughly disgusted and disillusioned with the pulling of the who's who thread.
It's just like the "Moulin Rouge". A knee jerk reaction based upon a grey rule as to what is and what is not a sexual act and a few moans (NOTE, a few.)
If 7500 views of a thread isn't an indication of it's popularity, then I'll eat my hat. Such a thread is liable to do more for the popularity of a site than anything.
I agree rules state, no play, and if anyone can show me where "play" was photo'd, then I'll hold up my hands. There was no play in any photo of the Wakefield thread.
Good god, there is equal sexuality on page three of the Sun and Sport as was shown in the thread.
I only know the thread I started and cannot comment on any other thread.
Things move on and times change, shall we all go back to Victorian ethics or are we at the forefront of sexual liberation.
Jesus, wake up, take a walk down the front in Ibiza or any other holiday hotspot and you will see more than the pics I took.
I'm so disheartened that a site supposed to promote a lifestyle of a sexual nature has to behave like a bunch of Mary Whitehouses on what were perfectly innocious pictures for adults.
So, are you going to ban people from munches from the popular pastime of shirt and clothes swapping ?? This took place at Nottingham, without any pictures being taken.. is that a sexual act ??
Geez.
Quote by Phoenix
MY utter disgust is being reserved for those who behaved so inappropriately at Munches and caused this whole ugly problem to rear it's head.
Quote by st3v3
We are currently looking at complaints regarding the NW munch and complaints that a cake dawnie baked recently was shite, hardly any iceing and burnt round the edges which she tried to disguise by wrapping it with a fancy paper thingy....and thats all.
Quote by Phoenix
what do you mean clarify?
im saying i agree with what you are saying
Quote by jags
Then perhaps you could take the time to read the entire thread - otherwise it's just tedious saying it all again. Anyway, no point in a post mortem as the thread has been buried with due ceremony and angst.
Quote by Jags
MY utter disgust is being reserved for those who behaved so inappropriately at Munches and caused this whole ugly problem to rear it's head.
Quote by Jags
Anyone fancy a shag??
:smackbottom: 
Quote by Calista
I appreciate that not everyone wants to see the tits out brigade and I take the point, I will refrain in future but don't lump everyone in the same boat!
Quote by Jags
still isn't that clear, is flashing tits , stocking tops, and arses a sexual act...
Otherwise, I'll restart the thraed, there atre lots of pics left.
Quote by st3v3
We are currently looking at complaints regarding the NW munch and complaints that a cake dawnie baked recently was shite, hardly any iceing and burnt round the edges which she tried to disguise by wrapping it with a fancy paper thingy....and thats all.
Quote by Phoenix
Offensive :shock: , I havn't sworn at you yet.
Appologies to anyone who was waiting to see their picture or would like a copy of those already shown now the thread has been deleted, PM me with the name that was on the badge and I'll send it to you. I'm sure you don't think it was a sexual act.
Quote by Jags
:shock: You're joking obviously...
think the shows were the twats indulging in oral sex in the middle of a Munch, or perhaps the two women snogging and groping each other in the middle of a Munch. Right??
