Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Behaviour at a "munch "

last reply
278 replies
13.8k views
1 watcher
0 likes
Quote by Juniper_couple
Phoenix - all i can say is what a sad sorry affair this has been :dry: kiss

And the people loosing out and being made to feel bad about it all, where the people that stayed within the rules. ie>>>>>>>
Hugs Vicky and Phoenix and the 99.9% of people there that stayed within the rules and the 99.9% of the people that don't have a problem with the cam thread.
Quote by kazswallows
Phoenix - all i can say is what a sad sorry affair this has been :dry: kiss

And the people loosing out and being made to feel bad about it all, where the people that stayed within the rules. ie>>>>>>>
Hugs Vicky and Phoenix and the 99.9% of people there that stayed within the rules and the 99.9% of the people that don't have a problem with the cam thread.
And hugs to the people who bravely have stepped up to complain about the behaviour at the recent Munches. Let's not forget them, eh??
cool
Quote by Jags
think the shows were the twats indulging in oral sex in the middle of a Munch, or perhaps the two women snogging and groping each other in the middle of a Munch. Right??

OK, if that's the case, then it is an overt sexual act and is considered play. I agree.
But I still take a stand over a bit of relatively harmless "flashing" that has been turned in to the same as banning all hand guns because of Dunblane.
Sport gun owners now have to travel to Europe to shoot and the Olympics cannot have shooting in the schedule of events in the UK. Has it stopped the use of guns in the, just look at the recent teen killings in London. Ludicrous.
Over compensation, which I believe the classification of a bit of flashing at a munch as an overt sexual act is also over compensation.
So next time ladies, if you want your tit photographed, bring along a suckling baby and have the munch in scotland, as it is perfectly legal to feed a baby in a public place .
Last comment.
Quote by Phoenix
think the shows were the twats indulging in oral sex in the middle of a Munch, or perhaps the two women snogging and groping each other in the middle of a Munch. Right??

OK, if that's the case, then it is an overt sexual act and is considered play. I agree.
But I still take a stand over a bit of relatively harmless "flashing" that has been turned in to the same as banning all hand guns because of Dunblane.
Sport gun owners now have to travel to Europe to shoot and the Olympics cannot have shooting in the schedule of events in the UK. Has it stopped the use of guns in the, just look at the recent teen killings in London. Ludicrous.
Over compensation, which I believe the classification of a bit of flashing at a munch as an overt sexual act is also over compensation.
So next time ladies, if you want your tit photographed, bring along a suckling baby and have the munch in scotland, as it is perfectly legal to feed a baby in a public place .
It's perfectly legal in England too.
The only thing stopping such acts are the prudes!
Cx
Quote by Phoenix
think the shows were the twats indulging in oral sex in the middle of a Munch, or perhaps the two women snogging and groping each other in the middle of a Munch. Right??

OK, if that's the case, then it is an overt sexual act and is considered play. I agree.
But I still take a stand over a bit of relatively harmless "flashing" that has been turned in to the same as banning all hand guns because of Dunblane.
Sport gun owners now have to travel to Europe to shoot and the Olympics cannot have shooting in the schedule of events in the UK. Has it stopped the use of guns in the, just look at the recent teen killings in London. Ludicrous.
Over compensation, which I believe the classification of a bit of flashing at a munch as an overt sexual act is also over compensation.
So next time ladies, if you want your tit photographed, bring along a suckling baby and have the munch in scotland, as it is perfectly legal to feed a baby in a public place .
Last comment.
and what a mature comment to end on rolleyes
Quote by Jags
Telling me to 'wake up' implies that I've been sleeping rather than spending the first day of my holidays trying to straighten out the mess which various twats have caused the site. In fact I found your comment 'wake up' more than offensive given the fucked up mess that Mods have been struggling with all day and then along comes you and starts again.
No enemies here, real or imagined and it's getting really tiresome being made to feel like one.

Let's not ignore this post. One more comment from you won't break your rules.
Quote by Huxley Pig
Ok if I accept all thats said here by the "moral majority".........what has this got to do with some people having fun guessing jigsaws taken at a munch that has no complaints levied against it I think a very wide brush is being used if it manages to tar that with the same stroke.

Ok, I was not going to comment anymore but I will just once more with some figures to compliment the comment above, relating to the Who's Who thread.
675,621 members, 7238 views on thread, 56 Photos taken (no complaints), 3 requesting clarification, 2 valid complaints, 2 I wasn't there but want to complain anyway coz I feel like it.
Objection upheld & thread deleted. :shock:
I of course cannot comment on any PM complaints, so I may stand corrected on the number of complaints.
Thanks for the PM's btw
:sleeping: :sleeping: :sleeping:
Time for bed said Zebedee.
Quote by Jags
:sleeping: :sleeping: :sleeping:
Time for bed said Zebedee.

Boing!!!! confused :? :? lol :lol: :lol:

I'm now getting fed up with hearing "won't somebody think of the newbies" (in best Maude Flanders voice) when there's only been one newbie passed comment as far as I can see.
They are joining an adult site that deals with adult sex, so I think that it's not unreasonable to say that if they attend Munches they may witness some adult sights.
Maybe the definition should be changed to include an advisory statement....
"while Munches are not the places for sexual acts or play, there may be members who will "flash" parts of their bodies (boobs, bums etc). The site does not condone this action, but understands that it can happen and would like new Munch attendees to be aware of this. Anyone involved in any behaviour that goes beyond this, in any part of the venue at Munches, will be asked to leave and may be banned from future events, or the site."
I'd define flashing as ....
to show something for a short time

(Note how it does not mention touching, groping, licking, kissing or sucking.... :huh: )
Not some bloke walking round with his schlong out dipping it in drinks or women walking around topless, knicker-less in a short skirt etc.
I have felt 2 woman's bottoms up their skirts at Munches and if anyone saw this and was offended I apologise, but I honestly don't think that anyone did, because even though I was drunk both times I think ( confused ) I was still very discrete in my actions.
Which (hopefully) goes to prove you can engage in slightly risky behaviour without offending anyone OR without having to get down and dirty in a public place.
As for the deletion of Phoenix thread, I do think that was a little unfair, but I can understand that it may have been considered to be encouraging lewd behaviour in the "one-up" style mentioned earlier.
I've seen the situation before, someone gets their boobs out, so someone gives them a squeeze, so they react and grab their cock and it just goes on from there.
When I started this thread I never meant things to go this far .
All I was trying to do was point out that some people ( a very small minority) where committing overt sexual acts in toilets on dance floors and in stare wells .
I had heard about and seen some of this at the last two munches I went to .it didn’t so much shock me as iv been her for some time now . it just made me think what would other people think of use if they saw this? Swinging , from what I can tell in the vanilla community has a bad name .so newbies who where maybe trying out the scene and bar staff who had to be there where not seeing the best side of us .
I never wanted this thread to tern into an argument .
And least of all to have a thread pulled because of me just trying to point something out
I feel gutted that I have started this and im sorry for all the upset and raised voices iv coursed with this but I truly believed something had to be said about “ overt sexual behaviour “ not the boob or bum flashing which has now been dragged in . I was just trying to help that’s all
Phoenix i am truly sorry about your thread being pulled that was the last thing i wanted to happen :cry:
Quote by PoloLady
So next time ladies, if you want your tit photographed, bring along a suckling baby and have the munch in scotland, as it is perfectly legal to feed a baby in a public place .
Last comment.

and what a mature comment to end on rolleyes
It is a valid , although "tounge in cheek" comment. Breast feeding a baby is not considered a sexual act in most civilised countries of the world (England has declined at the moment, but turns a blind eye). So, why should flashing boobs at an adult party be considered a sexual act ?.
As for "Wake up" Jags, this was and is intended in the "look around and take a broader view". You seemed to be on a one way path with no deviation, in self preservation mode. A la Maggy Thatcher, "the lady is not for turning".
I agree that actual sex acts as described in law should not be allowed but I also do not agree that flashing a breast or arse is liable to create an avalance of sexual abuse. It doesn't happen at commercially organised adult theme nights, where equal, if not more, flashing takes place. It rarely happens at private adult parties. If someone is going to partake in a sexaul act, they are going to do it despite antics around them. I wasn't at NW, so the "pervecam" had no influence over what went on. So why involve such a popular idea and thread in this mud fight.
I do firmly believe that the mods, taking the stance that "flashing" posed for a photograph and not done willy nilly, is considered a sexual act, is one step too far over the border.
If you were a political party, I wouldn't be voting for you again. Remember Maggy.
EDIT: Sercher, no problem. The discussion took a different route than you intended. No fault of yours at all.
well its finally arrived....SH has gone Politically Correct!
Quote by easy

I'm now getting fed up with hearing "won't somebody think of the newbies" (in best Maude Flanders voice) when there's only been one newbie passed comment as far as I can see.
They are joining an adult site that deals with adult sex, so I think that it's not unreasonable to say that if they attend Munches they may witness some adult sights.
Maybe the definition should be changed to include an advisory statement....
"while Munches are not the places for sexual acts or play, there may be members who will "flash" parts of their bodies (boobs, bums etc). The site does not condone this action, but understands that it can happen and would like new Munch attendees to be aware of this. Anyone involved in any behaviour that goes beyond this, in any part of the venue at Munches, will be asked to leave and may be banned from future events, or the site."
I'd define flashing as ....
to show something for a short time

(Note how it does not mention touching, groping, licking, kissing or sucking.... :huh: )
Not some bloke walking round with his schlong out dipping it in drinks or women walking around topless, knicker-less in a short skirt etc.
I have felt 2 woman's bottoms up their skirts at Munches and if anyone saw this and was offended I apologise, but I honestly don't think that anyone did, because even though I was drunk both times I think ( confused ) I was still very discrete in my actions.
Which (hopefully) goes to prove you can engage in slightly risky behaviour without offending anyone OR without having to get down and dirty in a public place.
As for the deletion of Phoenix thread, I do think that was a little unfair, but I can understand that it may have been considered to be encouraging lewd behaviour in the "one-up" style mentioned earlier.
I've seen the situation before, someone gets their boobs out, so someone gives them a squeeze, so they react and grab their cock and it just goes on from there.
easy mate, u sumbed up a perfectly good idea, i have done the same, and i hopefully doubt i have offended anyone,
I have also been on the end of discreet groping by women of my wilie, and i hope that that hasn't offended anyone.
Now I am sure people would be more offended with me on all fours with a fem, with her legs on me back...but no1 has complained about that, or my arse being spanked (one request to please stop) which i did do.
Personally i think this whole issue is turning Politically Correctness gone mad. I know we dont want to offend "newbies" or Bar Staff, but at the end of the day its boundrys that we put down, i wouldnt have sex with someone on the floor of a munch...as thats not the time and the place.
People just need to be sesible with what they get up and down to. I think most of us at one time or another might have done something that mayby considered inapropriate at a munch but we wouldnt do it all the time.
Mike
For me the photo thread shouldn't have been taken off.
I know people would contact Phoenix asking him to take pics of them in raunchy poses. Everyone knew he was safe and respectful. For an adult site I thought he struck the right level. It was fun and people got to know each other more. But hey ho ... I think the community has chucked something good away through over reaction.
Just my opinion. Shame really cause I know of all people the amount of time Phoenix put into the threads with no personal gain for himself other than the pleasure of doing it and to cover his own shyness originally at Munches and Socials.
Well .. its the peoples lose DD
Quote by devondelight
For me the photo thread shouldn't have been taken off.
I know people would contact Phoenix asking him to take pics of them in raunchy poses. Everyone knew he was safe and respectful. For an adult site I thought he struck the right level. It was fun and people got to know each other more. But hey ho ... I think the community has chucked something good away through over reaction.
Just my opinion. Shame really cause I know of all people the amount of time Phoenix put into the threads with no personal gain for himself other than the pleasure of doing it and to cover his own shyness originally at Munches and Socials.
Well .. its the peoples lose DD

Just to re-iterate the camera point - I personally do not like the idea of cameras at munches etc and people being able to take pics willy nilly.
Phoenix was totally respectful in his asking and manner - this was not a sexual gratification thread - he took no head pics and even showed you the photograph immediately after and said he would delete it if you were not happy - I for one was totally happy and comfortable with everything that he did.
I have found this thread to be very harsh, unreasonable and as others have stated "a pc adult site" - beyond belief in my opinion - all over a few saucy pictures for a jigsaw thread rolleyes
(Sercher - in no way does this reflect on you hun wink )
Quote by Juniper_couple
I have found this thread to be very harsh, unreasonable and as others have stated "a pc adult site" - beyond belief in my opinion - all over a few saucy pictures for a jigsaw thread rolleyes

The thread wasnt started as a knock the photo thread and to be honest there has been some quite vociforous(sp)defence of both the photo thread and the photographer...
I cant comment personally as I was neither at the munch or on the photos but I felt the photo thread was fine..
Pics were not overtly sexual(from what I saw)...
This thread was started to decide what was considered appropriate behaviour at a Munch....after some incidents that have occurred at a couple of munches of late...it somehow got out of control...thats an understatement....now i believe all common sense went out of the window when a thread that was started as abit of fun and non offensive...we all know the one has it has now been removed and more than likely deleted....so is it now inappropriate behaviour to go to a munch in a top that show's your cleavage or a skirt that show's a stocking top....now what the hell has that got to do with certain idiots performing sex acts or unwelcome groping....which this thread was really about?
Quote by Mr-Powers
so is it now inappropriate behaviour to go to a munch in a top that show's your cleavage or a skirt that show's a stocking top....

You're not going to know what to wear now are you Mr-Powers :lol2:
Quote by Dawnie
so is it now inappropriate behaviour to go to a munch in a top that show's your cleavage or a skirt that show's a stocking top....

You're not going to know what to wear now are you Mr-Powers :lol2:
well it looks like dungerees and woolly rollneck sweaters will be coming back into fashion at the next munch! lol
Firstly the comments about ‘prudes’ etc – you don’t have to be a prude to understand there is a time and a place for certain behaviour… it is actually more about dignity, respect and decorum.
No, there is no harm (on the face of it) in a bit of breast flashing. However, I find it laughable that the examples used to justify munches being the appropriate place to flash ones jugs are reasons such as;
Drunken teenagers do it in nightclubs – well lots of other things happen in nightclubs too, but you wouldn’t want the fighting, drug taking, vomiting, glassings to also be happening at a munch.
You see tits in the tabloids – yes and you also see stories about swingers being depraved moral-lacking freaks… which usually results in an uproar on here about how wrongly swingers are represented by the press – yet now the tabloids are being used as an example of social/moral values for swingers to follow.
Munches are not nightclubs, beaches or newspapers – they are meant to be a relaxed, non-pressure social environment… more in keeping with gathering in a local pub than a cattle market style nightclub – but I didn’t see anyone saying they see tits being flashed all the time in their local Beefeater.
I don’t think I have expressed whether or not I am personally offended by flashing… but I will express that I know some people are made to feel uncomfortable by it. Not all swingers are exhibitionists and people will have varying standards of social etiquette.
Regardless of what my personal opinions on tit flashing are – what does it really say about people if they feel they can’t go out for a sociable drink without needing to have a clause written into a rule so they will be able to get their tits out? I do not proclaim to be an angel, but I don’t think people quite understand what it is they are saying when they claim that stopping tit flashing because of the behaviour of a small minority will spoil it for everyone – are you really saying that you can’t have a good night without someone flashing?
People have said the rule is clear enough and we are all adult enough to know where the line should be drawn… which kind of contradicts what is also being said by other people and the very reason for this thread… it is pretty obvious people don’t know where to draw the line. Behaviour breads behaviour.
It is not about labelling anyone who had a laugh in the past – it is about what is right for the future. It is about making munches a pleasant environment for everyone… not most, some, a few or those who don’t mind…. everyone. It is about not what we as individuals want or what we do and don’t find acceptable – but setting a clear standard for everyone to follow. Munches where once considered a major event if 40-50 people turned up, they have gone well beyond that now. Personally, for the sake of clarity, I think for the future it would be much simpler if there were no exceptions… No Flashing anything. Then there is no room for arguments on what was a flash and what was a parade. No one will need to worry about alcohol getting the better of them and effecting their judgement (as has been suggested as a cause) and nobody will get the wrong impression.
If munches are going to become so PC in future, that only behavior found in your local pub/family pub is tolerated -
That means no skimpy outfits, no flashing, no discreet (and consenting) groping of each other etc etc it also means that there is to be no snogging of other peoples partners!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
After all this is NOT acceptable behavior in your local pub, therefore if we are to go down that route it is NOT acceptable behavior at a munch.
I suppose a discreet peck on the cheek and a quick hug is the only thing that is PC
I hope the current and any future munch organizers can run munches of this basis, as there will be more people policing the events than attending to be able to keep up with it all.
Quote by kazswallows
If munches are going to become so PC in future, that only behavior found in your local pub/family pub is tolerated -
That means no skimpy outfits, no flashing, no discreet (and consenting) groping of each other etc etc it also means that there is to be no snogging of other peoples partners!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
After all this is NOT acceptable behavior in your local pub, therefore if we are to go down that route it is NOT acceptable behavior at a munch.
I suppose a discreet peck on the cheek and a quick hug is the only thing that is PC

I'm sure I'm not the only one, although brand me a pervert if I am. But I wouldnt travel x amount of miles, and pay for a hotel room if this is what munches are going to be in the future!!!
Quote by PoloLady
It is not about labelling anyone who had a laugh in the past – it is about what is right for the future. It is about making munches a pleasant environment for everyone… not most, some, a few or those who don’t mind…. everyone. It is about not what we as individuals want or what we do and don’t find acceptable – but setting a clear standard for everyone to follow. Munches where once considered a major event if 40-50 people turned up, they have gone well beyond that now. Personally, for the sake of clarity, I think for the future it would be much simpler if there were no exceptions… No Flashing anything. Then there is no room for arguments on what was a flash and what was a parade. No one will need to worry about alcohol getting the better of them and effecting their judgement (as has been suggested as a cause) and nobody will get the wrong impression.

Great post, Polo, especially the quoted bit. I agree wholeheartedly that munches must set a standard acceptable to everyone.
Perhaps it would be better if the "political correctness gone mad" brigade organised their own separate social meet.
Quote by MikeNorth

It is not about labelling anyone who had a laugh in the past – it is about what is right for the future. It is about making munches a pleasant environment for everyone… not most, some, a few or those who don’t mind…. everyone. It is about not what we as individuals want or what we do and don’t find acceptable – but setting a clear standard for everyone to follow. Munches where once considered a major event if 40-50 people turned up, they have gone well beyond that now. Personally, for the sake of clarity, I think for the future it would be much simpler if there were no exceptions… No Flashing anything. Then there is no room for arguments on what was a flash and what was a parade. No one will need to worry about alcohol getting the better of them and effecting their judgement (as has been suggested as a cause) and nobody will get the wrong impression.

Great post, Polo, especially the quoted bit. I agree wholeheartedly that munches must set a standard acceptable to everyone.
Perhaps it would be better if the "political correctness gone mad" brigade organised their own separate social meet.
The thing is Mike....they will probably have a bigger turnout than....a political correct social!
Quote by redangel
I'm sure I'm not the only one, although brand me a pervert if I am. But I wouldnt travel x amount of miles, and pay for a hotel room if this is what munches are going to be in the future!!!

Well I can't comment on the 'pervert' bit but do find the latter part of your post very sad confused
So, if I'm reading this right, unless you are guaranteed a flash, grope or some inappropriate/indecent sexual behaviour you can't be arsed to fork out to meet people from here? :shock:
Quote by kazswallows
If munches are going to become so PC in future, that only behavior found in your local pub/family pub is tolerated -
That means no skimpy outfits, no flashing, no discreet (and consenting) groping of each other etc etc it also means that there is to be no snogging of other peoples partners!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
After all this is NOT acceptable behavior in your local pub, therefore if we are to go down that route it is NOT acceptable behavior at a munch.
I suppose a discreet peck on the cheek and a quick hug is the only thing that is PC
I hope the current and any future munch organizers can run munches of this basis, as there will be more people policing the events than attending to be able to keep up with it all.

sounds more like a funeral wake to me!
Quote by Mr-Powers
sounds more like a funeral wake to me!

But at least you won't have to run and hind behind Blokes again to get away from the tit sucking :shock:
Quote by PoloLady

sounds more like a funeral wake to me!

But at least you won't have to run and hind behind Blokes again to get away from the tit sucking :shock:
The good lady has a point wink
Quote by Mr-Powers
sounds more like a funeral wake to me!

I'll remember the tea and cucumber sandwiches for the buffet at my next munch, if I ever do another.