Would just say that a lot of these research things that you see in the papers dont really stand up!
Not obviously seen any details of the survey above, but its a fact that cancer is more prevalent in lower socio-economic groups. people in lower socio-economic groups generally eat less fibre( and smoke and drink more, take less exercise, get health checks as regularly). Therefore how do they manage to pinpoint its the fibre thats helping?
If you surveyed 500 mercedes drivers and 500 lada drivers(if there still is 500!) i guarantee the mercedes drivers would have less health problems, so can you then claim driving a merc makes you healthier?
Do mercs always break down??
I'm very interested in all these kinds of surveys etc as Mrs Kiss has had breast cancer. However I don't think it's fair to assume less or more money is spent on research on men - you only know what the media decides is newsworthy.
I know little or nothing about the levels of funding for medical research. I based my assumption on the fact that there are regular news items about female based research. These releases are generaly to increase funding. The more press releases the more funding.
I feel there is an edge to the replys to this thread and I want to make it clear I am not trying to devalue female health issues in anyway. I am just puzzled to why it seems there is a greater emphasis on them.
It is my understanding that men are more susceptable to illnesses at all stages of their lives.