Darwin would say that behaviour that reproduces in greater numbers will reproduce the same traits in the next generation.
Women who have more than one male partner avoid the chance of mating only with a sterile partner. Men who have more than one partner spread their genes far and wide, and avoid the chance of mating only with a sterile partner.
Therefore, from a Darwinian point of view Swinging is an activity that is a more successful means of an individual reproducing. Does that make it normal?
I know swingers do not fuck to reproduce, but who does know, we can avoid reproducing so easily. Does that stop the swinging being normal?
It may be just me having a moment but I'm not sure what question you're asking :confused2:
Are you asking if swingers are more likly to have promiscuous offspring/come from promiscuous parents?
or
If Darwin's theory makes swingers normal? or maybe abnormal because (most of us) use contraception?
Debatable I expect. But allowing rampant reproduction in a localised,area results in inbreeding and inferior offspring. The only people practising selective breeding are the aristocracy and the rich.
But maybe swingers who shag in the jacuzzi are hoping to crossbreed like fish.......
Darwin himself doesnt have much to say this, his theories on sexual selection mostly relate to the differences between male and female, choosing which partner(s) to fuck, or competing to get fucked, rather than having a base need for more than one partner for species survival reasons.
If only we could measure some really old balls we might get an answer :shock:
There is a correlation between testicle size and natural mating systems - the males in naturally non monogomous species tend to have bigger stones. Chimps have really big balls and hump around for fun, gorrilas are strictly monogomous and have iddy biddy bollocks in comparison :lol2:
Unfortunately we dont have enough samples of early man bits to find out what our behaviour was like before social conventions were introduced, or see which direction we are evolving in.....
As Mrs fun says we now have contraception, another example among many as to why darwinian theory does not relate well to human behaviour, much of which is counter productive when it comes to reproduction.
Looks like we are going to need a few sets of fossilised bollocks to pore over
skinny doesn't have big bollocks.....so that's the promiscuity theory shot down fer starters cos I've been everywhere .... over a fairly long period of time mind you :lickface:
does everyone get a funny tingly sensation when they lick their own eyebrows....or is it just me?
This was prior to us ever having had any sex outside of the realationship or looking at swingers sites etc. My balls at the time were reportedly large :shock: So there is one result for a survey 
