I vote for the midget, being 4, 11, a 16" knob would go through the middle and out the other side . Which reminds me of a programme i watched last night, about an A&E ward ... a guy fell off a roof and landed feet first in a tree and the 4ft branch went str8 up his arse , :shock: They had to operate to remove it, :cry: I get the feeling thats what would happen to me if i had to take a 16" knob :eeek:
Quote by warwick Im not cutting two feet of my legs for anyone
O.K. so does this mean you are cutting your feet off your legs, because if it thats what you mean, you will only be 4 inches shorter and not qualify as a dwarf. On the other hand, it might imply that you are intending to cut off two foot (24 inches) off your legs however to facilitate this, it would be necessary to remove the foot of each leg as well ,thus adding a further 4 inches (this being the depth of the average foot) to your height reduction. You would now be the 4 inches that is a foot, plus the two feet that are actually 24 inches, shorter. My own thoughts are that you initially meant to reduce your overall height by two feet, which in my view would necessitate the removal of only 22 inches of leg plus two feet, that are only 4 inches.
has to be the midget. What use is a 16" knob? Gill x
Unknown User
Quote by davej Im not cutting two feet of my legs for anyone
O.K. so does this mean you are cutting your feet off your legs, because if it thats what you mean, you will only be 4 inches shorter and not qualify as a dwarf. On the other hand, it might imply that you are intending to cut off two foot (24 inches) off your legs however to facilitate this, it would be necessary to remove the foot of each leg as well ,thus adding a further 4 inches (this being the depth of the average foot) to your height reduction. You would now be the 4 inches that is a foot, plus the two feet that are actually 24 inches, shorter. My own thoughts are that you initially meant to reduce your overall height by two feet, which in my view would necessitate the removal of only 22 inches of leg plus two feet, that are only 4 inches. Hmmmm Dave? Surely it should only be 20" of leg plus the foot to make 2 feet?
Quote by Alexandra Im not cutting two feet of my legs for anyone
O.K. so does this mean you are cutting your feet off your legs, because if it thats what you mean, you will only be 4 inches shorter and not qualify as a dwarf. On the other hand, it might imply that you are intending to cut off two foot (24 inches) off your legs however to facilitate this, it would be necessary to remove the foot of each leg as well ,thus adding a further 4 inches (this being the depth of the average foot) to your height reduction. You would now be the 4 inches that is a foot, plus the two feet that are actually 24 inches, shorter. My own thoughts are that you initially meant to reduce your overall height by two feet, which in my view would necessitate the removal of only 22 inches of leg plus two feet, that are only 4 inches. Hmmmm Dave? Surely it should only be 20" of leg plus the foot to make 2 feet? :doh: Damn and there's me thinking it ws enough bollox to fLuck people ......and I used a calculator