Quote by niceguysdoexist
Surely the proof of the pudding is in the eating (think I'm hungry that's why that expression sprang to mind).
Personally I think, on balance, the mods do a difficult job vey well and I have not noticed new mods upset the applecart so I presume the selection process is working fine.
The question, as I see it is.
Are the mods doing , on balance , a good job?
A simple poll added to this thread may demonstrate whether the process needed fiddling with or not I suspect it doesn't .
Quote by flower411
then maybe there could be one on here late at night
:lol2:
Quote by Dawnie
then maybe there could be one on here late at night
:lol2:Quote by anais
Another rule could be.... a member that is banned has 24hrs from the time that they open the PM infoming them of this. In which they can appeal.
Does this exist or more importantly what is the current procedure of banning members on this website...
I would very much appreciate an answer...any Moderators please answer this.
From,
Wunderhorse.
Quote by Wunderhorse
I think that a set of rules & regulations should be placed as a Sticky in the The Cafe section of the Forum.
An example is the information that anais has provided above.
So people know the score, so to speak or type.
I feel that this would improve the service that is provided.
From,
Wunderhorse.
Quote by Phuckers
well well after alot of consideration and thinking have decided to put my name forward to contest for moderator post,i promise to achieve the following
-to do my best to divide the forumist into two groups
-to only favour one group
-members of the opposing group must mail me any thread they intend to post 24hrs before its listed on the forum
-if the posting by the opposing group exceeds 30 replies it will be locked or made to dissappear
-one of the opposing member must be suspended per week
-more to follow during electioneering
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
As a large proportion of the site users do not use the forums, it would not achieve anything by posting site rules in here. We have the terms and conditions and the AUP which are at the bottom of the page and that way, they are fully visable which ever part of the site you use.
Quote by Wunderhorse
The Link is soooo small it's hard to notice.
Quote by westerross:thumbup:
Democracy is overrated and in fact thrives on an argumentative environment. It is difficult enough attempting to conduct a discussion or argument in this medium without it descending into insults and too much heat.
I reckon the best system is a benevolent dictatorship, which is pretty close to what we have here already.
I 'vote' fer no change.
.
Quote by vodka_babe22uk
I have said in another thread!
The reason I am here is I feel secure in the knowledge that if I have a problem there are people that would help me to sort them out.
If you had the members voting for ops or mods it would go down the route if your face fits.
They have to be non bias and non judgemental and in having a members vote would I believe take this emphasise away. You could end up with a I’ll scratch your back you can scratch mine scenarios, the in and out crowds
Luckily I have never had to make a complaint but have asked mods and ops questions in the past and have always felt that I have been given a fair and just response.
So why change something that seems to be working?
: Quote by jameybruce
I have said in another thread!
The reason I am here is I feel secure in the knowledge that if I have a problem there are people that would help me to sort them out.
If you had the members voting for ops or mods it would go down the route if your face fits.
They have to be non bias and non judgemental and in having a members vote would I believe take this emphasise away. You could end up with a I’ll scratch your back you can scratch mine scenarios, the in and out crowds
Luckily I have never had to make a complaint but have asked mods and ops questions in the past and have always felt that I have been given a fair and just response.
So why change something that seems to be working?
: Quote by jameybruce
I have said in another thread!
The reason I am here is I feel secure in the knowledge that if I have a problem there are people that would help me to sort them out.
If you had the members voting for ops or mods it would go down the route if your face fits.
They have to be non bias and non judgemental and in having a members vote would I believe take this emphasise away. You could end up with a I’ll scratch your back you can scratch mine scenarios, the in and out crowds
Luckily I have never had to make a complaint but have asked mods and ops questions in the past and have always felt that I have been given a fair and just response.
So why change something that seems to be working?
: Quote by jameybruce
I have said in another thread!
The reason I am here is I feel secure in the knowledge that if I have a problem there are people that would help me to sort them out.
If you had the members voting for ops or mods it would go down the route if your face fits.
They have to be non bias and non judgemental and in having a members vote would I believe take this emphasise away. You could end up with a I’ll scratch your back you can scratch mine scenarios, the in and out crowds
Luckily I have never had to make a complaint but have asked mods and ops questions in the past and have always felt that I have been given a fair and just response.
So why change something that seems to be working?
: 
