Do you think swingers clubs should make sure they are accessable for disabled people ? I use a stick to walk, i have mobiltiy problems and pain when walking/moving and have had so for a few years, however the swingers club i go to (chams) isnt easy for disabled people to use, im not sure why swingers clubs dont have to comply with the same laws other plces have to (maybe they are classed as private clubs) but what do you think ?
I think it is the 'private clubs' thing. But I have a feeling even they will fall under the rulings for Access and Disability Discrimination legislation eventually . And a darned good thing too. I doubt any club could offer full access to all areas - but at least to the open/bar areas, changing rooms/showers and a play room or two.
I have friends who are disabled (god that sounds condescending - please don't read it as such) and have played with more than one guy who had restricted mobility. It was no better or worse than playing with 'fully-mobile' guys. If anything it makes you think about what is happening more, and that's got to be a good thing.
On a side thought - I would imagine playing with a guy who was blind would be a fanstastic experience - as he would be fully connected to his tactile sensations.
As stated to you in chat, what a club should do and what they end up doing (which for most is not a lot) is vastly different. I loathe the term disabled, it's so much of a tag to have hoisted around your neck. I dont see anyone as 'disabled' but simply broken, some fix up, some stay busted but they're still people, I'm married to a man that was until recently a happy go lucky, fit, active person who had more energy than anyone I've ever known, he jusr never stopped..that was until had had his accident and in just a few short days went from being as previously described to badly broken (in all ways) and since then I've seen things in a different light, not many cater for 'busted/broken people, it's been quite a learning curve.
I dont blame a business/premises for not making their business/premise user friendly to those classed as 'disabled' the cost of doing so seems prohibitive and for me personally if they dont and a 'disabled' person attempts to visit/do business with them but cannot due to their disability then they should simply move on and go elsewhere. My man has problems for all sorts of reasons, he can no longer visit some of his previous jaunts cos they can't cater for how he is right now but he just gets his head down and moves on. I guess this wont be to the liking of some but das how it is.
Sometimes there are just too many rules and regulations and even though business/premises should they comply with all the different rules/regs re disabled and stuff such as access for them.....would makes things easier for my man....well I don't mind (and neither does he) if they don't, we just adapt accordingly and move along (I recogise that some may not be so able to do this).
The swingers club we visit does not appear disabled friendly, there are no disabled toilet facilities, no ramps, no lifts, no wide aisles, no at anti-slip mats, no rails, no pull cords for lights,...feck all really and my man does find it a struggle when visiting (depending on how much morphine he's on and how bad he is at the time) but i don't blame them for it and we aint gonna slaughter them for it either.
Here is a rough guide and maybe a pointer as to why Private Clubs are maybe able to circumvent the system.
Essentially, the world doesnt owe him a living, neither does the state and neither do businesses, we;ll have fun somewhere, sometime with some people, we dont need a disabled ramp/stairs/ and all other such facilities to do so.
I'm sorry....but the rules for any business be it a private club or not are the same. this was clearly shown when the smoking ban was introduced. private clubs thought they would be exempt...they soon found out they weren't. Any business must operate a policy of non descrimination, be that on the grounds of sex,colour, or disability.
The " disabled discrimination act " clearly states that anywhere an able bodied person has access to, a disabled person must also have access to. Yes this may well be difficult and expensive in exisiting buildings, but 75% grants are available if this is the case !!
I think it is very wrong that clubs discriminate, against disabled people in this way. They have the same right, to a little liberated fun, as the rest of us, surely !! Its the same as they way they descriminate against single guys by charging 4 times the cost, to get in . the fact is unless someone is willing to actually complain to the council, or building control about this, nothing will actually get done.
As for Midscouple comment....I am surprised. You quite rightly over in current affairs had a go, as another member called disabled people freaks. The fact the someone might not like a disabled person being naked around them, is thier problem and most certainly should never be taken into consideration.. People are not asking you to play with a disabled person, unless you want to..its your choice. But they have exactly the same right to be there, no matter what anyone else may think.
There was a time when Black and Asian people were discriminated against in this way. Thankfully that time has past. Surely it is time to welcome disabled people into clubs and not exclude them.
Toots it is law, whether or not the club is private, they have to make all resonable adjustments to the club to make it accessable for disabled people of all kinds and they can be prosectuted for not doing so .... however i am not going to ask chams to do that for me because i would not feel comfortable going there after that.
I could copy/paste links but there are easy enough to find if you use google.
Toots,
Risk assesment, is what I do for a living. As part of that, I have to inspect buildings and tell them where they are or not complying with regulations. So the answer is NO, private clubs are not exempt. Any business with 5 or more people in the building, then they have to comply. And yes..there is a government grant for up to 75% of the work for them to apply for. It is not assured they would get it or the full 75%, but that it is up to them to put their case to the board. No one wants a business to be put into a situation that they simply can not afford.
The reason I mentioned the local authority, is if a complaint is made, it would be upto the local building control department, to send an inspector to the building, to asses what adaptations that would be required. It can then serve notice that the work must be undertaken. It would under normal circumstances give a 6 month period, for the work to be undertaken. So long as it see's you are starting the adaptations it would extend this date, by another 6 months if not completed.
Simply, I just don't think it is right that a person is excluded from visiting and enjoying liberated fun that can be had at a club, simply because they are disabled.
Nellie: I thought you said in an earlier post that you don't do Chams cos it's boring? but in any case if you want all that a 'disabled' person is entitled to by way of adaptations a swinger why not in the first instance write to the club you may want to visit?
Dean: You say ' Simply, I just don't think it is right that a person is excluded from visiting and enjoying liberated fun that can be had at a club, simply because they are disabled.'
and as previously stated I don't think many would disagree but it just aint gonna happen any time soon and I seriously doubt many (if any) businesses are fully compliant with the DDA/Equality act.
I do not see an established swingers club getting anywhere close to conforming with the absolute plethora of rules/regs/law where providing facilities for the disabled are concerned, some scenarios are just beyond the pale (but still have to be catered for) such as access for a Guide Dog? In a swingers club? (It's nose would never be off the floor) , lifts, easy to open doors at reasonable heights, brochures provided for the varying services available within the club, level access or if not ramps to each and every nook and cranny, corridors kept clear for wheelchair access, toilet facilities, large signs, trained staff, car parking? lighting, and on and on and bloomin on.
There is just too much gobbledygook where providing for disabled is concerned, the country has gorn mad with it all, just as an example, how many times have you driven to a supermarket to find yourself driving up and down the car park for a spot to park at the same time as observing the huge amount of Disabled Spots going empty? Ahh but the supermarkets have to comply with the Human Rights Act/ Equality Act but do they? I doubt they're 100% compliant.
Even the Olympic organisers fell foul of the Equality Ac
Anyway Dean back to your point as quoted above and again nowI just don't think it is right that a person is excluded from visiting and enjoying liberated fun that can be had at a club, simply because they are disabled. but would you visit the same 'offending' club or would you decide against it? In other words do you feel strongly about the rights of the disabled or are you simply an armchair critic?
PS: I'm married to a man who until very recently was active/able bodied but who is now busted (disabled) through no fault of his own and as stated before it's been a learning curve but for me personally the disabled are pandered too much by society but in reality and when you think about it it aint actually society is it, it's the usual do-gooders/ govt ministers and those wanting to make mountains from mole hills.
Of course disabled people should be allowed to enjoy the same facilities as anyone else but at whose expense? and would it really be that bad to think ' nope, no access here, lets move along' without reaching for the pen/complaint form/risk assessment officer?
Toots yes i did say i find chams boring now and thats partly because i can't get around it so am usually stuck in one place, the stairs are a nightmare for me, if i was able to get up and down the stairs and into the jacuzzis easier than i wouldnt be so bored.
I wouldn't ask them to alter it to make it easier for disabled people because i wouldn't then feel comfortable going, i have experienced animosity in places when i have asked for changes to be made to accomadate people with limited mobility.
I personally don't force anywhere to alter nor have i complained to the authorites about them, on the occasions when i have asked places to help me such as access to a seat without stairs to it, the places that have helped me still have my custom but i no longer go to places that havn't helped me (mainly because i can't get in) ... none of the help has cost the venues any money.
It may be worth mentioning that the Attic in Derby has a small cinema and jacuzzi on the ground floor.
It would be great to see accessibility comments on the clubs review page.
It would be wonderful to be able to design/build a made to measure swinger's club. Maybe there is a market for a Swinging Sims game. :giggle:
I think there's more "discrimination" in every day life, never mind accessibility to Swinging Clubs.
All the health and safety rules, planning regulations...... blah blah can be qouted, but it really boils down to enforcement.
I posted a comment in the following thread:
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopicpage/406953/140.html
which was:
" Most if not all the athlete's who participated could put some of us more able bodied people to shame with their strength and determination"
Law is Law and should apply across all spectrums.
I greet everyone I meet on the street, everyone I chat to in the chatroom eqaully irrespective of how they look and their preferences.
We're all equal here - we only get one chance on this planet.
Paddy x
Top tip of the day. Don't bother contacting the local authority or any central government body to enforce the DDA as it is down to the individual or group to take the business/entity to an employment tribunal if they feel their rights have been wronged.
Dave_Notts