How about the option to remove Winks complelty - now that gets my vote!
Winks or Wanks we don't want either appearing in our mailbox.
Orgasminator
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Feature Replacement
last reply
22 replies
1.8k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Orgasminator
Agree - in all my time here nothing good has ever come from a wink - and I nearly always respond to them.
Admin
We've now added a 'neither' option :thumbup:
Gufuncouple, I've opened the survey back out to you so you can take the survey if you wish to do so now.
Big_Fraser, I've changed your vote to neither.
Gufuncouple, I've opened the survey back out to you so you can take the survey if you wish to do so now.
Big_Fraser, I've changed your vote to neither.
Orgasminator
Quote by admin
Big_Fraser, I've changed your vote to neither.
:thumbup:
Admin
Quote by Pink_n_Blue
Big_Fraser, I've changed your vote to neither.
:thumbup:
Can you swop ours to neither as well please lol
Of course, that's done.
Orgasminator
could we have a option... this would be where the reciever has set up there full address that cannot be seen to the site members. however when a is sent, the system automaically sends chinese food from your local chinese eatery to your home address!!!
nom nom nom lol
Mines a beef in green peppers with black bean sauce please, withe chinese chicken curry for mrs both with rice and prawn crackers thanks! lol
nom nom nom lol
Mines a beef in green peppers with black bean sauce please, withe chinese chicken curry for mrs both with rice and prawn crackers thanks! lol
The new suggestion is horrendous!
Really crass and suggests more than anything that people sit there looking at profiles whilst tossing themselves off (which may be true of many but most that do I would suggest are largely the sort of people that get off on 'looking' rather than 'doing'!)
Really crass and suggests more than anything that people sit there looking at profiles whilst tossing themselves off (which may be true of many but most that do I would suggest are largely the sort of people that get off on 'looking' rather than 'doing'!)
Sex God
Its worth noting that you can stop winks appearing in your mailbox by going to http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/members/my-wink.html and selecting one of the auto-responders.
Orgasminator
Quote by two-4-more
nom nom nom lol
Mines a beef in green peppers with black bean sauce please, withe chinese chicken curry for mrs both with rice and prawn crackers thanks! lol
No probs mr two-4, just get the mrs to move that lolipop out of the way and lie naked on the kitchen table - I will bring a full chinese banquet and a few other boys and girls to help us eat it ;)
Quote by Flirtybertie
The new suggestion is horrendous!
Really crass and suggests more than anything that people sit there looking at profiles whilst tossing themselves off (which may be true of many but most that do I would suggest are largely the sort of people that get off on 'looking' rather than 'doing'!)
I'm with you there :thumbup:
Sex God
There's a few forum members who need their features replaced 
Sex God
There's good and bad we can see in the wink function. Maybe one idea would be to have winks not be so generically crap and be able to personalise by having just 50 characters space to put your own spin on the wink, Or at least be able to put the members name on it rather than the one click no thought carpet bombing option/s?
What a truly awful idea. Am I right in assuming that the majority of winks are sent by basic members? Why not just give them a limited number of messages they can send each month. Might encourage them to pay for a standard membership if they know what's available if they pay and should cut down the number of unwanted winks.
Orgasminator
Good idea MartnJewl, but Imagine it would be a bit of a bugger to code in and lead to people creating multiple accounts to send messages from.
St3v3 is on the case:
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/390434.html
Quote by amatuerman
Whilst we are on the subject, what about ' send a gift ' could that do with an overhaul? Do people actually use it?
St3v3 is on the case:
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/390434.html
Orgasminator
Quote by MartnJewl
What a truly awful idea. Am I right in assuming that the majority of winks are sent by basic members? Why not just give them a limited number of messages they can send each month. Might encourage them to pay for a standard membership if they know what's available if they pay and should cut down the number of unwanted winks.
They already do:-
Std Members = 20 winks per day
Extra's Members = 30 winks per day
Orgasminator
Quote by Lost
There's good and bad we can see in the wink function. Maybe one idea would be to have winks not be so generically crap and be able to personalise by having just 50 characters space to put your own spin on the wink, Or at least be able to put the members name on it rather than the one click no thought carpet bombing option/s?
You already can - but most people don't get as far as changing the default message in Wink Settings.
Orgasminator
Quote by admin
We've now added a 'neither' option :thumbup:
Gufuncouple, I've opened the survey back out to you so you can take the survey if you wish to do so now.
Big_Fraser, I've changed your vote to neither.
Many thanks Admin's - done!
Quote by Gufuncouple
What a truly awful idea. Am I right in assuming that the majority of winks are sent by basic members? Why not just give them a limited number of messages they can send each month. Might encourage them to pay for a standard membership if they know what's available if they pay and should cut down the number of unwanted winks.
They already do:-
Std Members = 20 winks per day
Extra's Members = 30 winks per day
You got what I said tit about arse Guffers. The non-paying basic member can only send winks, which I feel is where the majority come from. Why not give these members a handful of messages they can send a month instead of restricting them to winks, which the majority don't want.
Orgasminator
Quote by MartnJewl
What a truly awful idea. Am I right in assuming that the majority of winks are sent by basic members? Why not just give them a limited number of messages they can send each month. Might encourage them to pay for a standard membership if they know what's available if they pay and should cut down the number of unwanted winks.
They already do:-
Std Members = 20 winks per day
Extra's Members = 30 winks per day
You got what I said tit about arse Guffers. The non-paying basic member can only send winks, which I feel is where the majority come from. Why not give these members a handful of messages they can send a month instead of restricting them to winks, which the majority don't want.
Ops.. must learn to read and inwardly digest your prose Mart.
We get them from basic, standard and extra's members - but you're right it's usually the junior tits that send them :doh: