Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Gallows humour, is it just a British thing?

last reply
89 replies
4.2k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by the_Laird
I’ve sadly seen and been party to more death and destruction than most of you will see in a lifetime!
The “gallows humour” you refer to is the way that myself and colleagues got through the task of clearing up the mess. I’ve effectively eaten my lunch on a hillside with the most beautiful views next to a bag full of body bits I’ve just poured into a body bag. It aint pretty, it aint clever but there’s absolutely no dignity in death.
The problem with gallows humour is that it is a mask, it stops people from truly expressing the feelings of fear, anger and revulsion that they feel, that they keep deep inside and that eventually come back to bite you when you are at your lowest!
My thoughts only

having read this thread i find i am guilty of "gallows humour" those of you who know me can guess why
looking back i am not proud of this and the only excuce i can give would be to totaly agree with the_Laird as i couldnt have put it any better myself
well sed m8 wink
I think there's a difference between using a bit of light humour in an awful situation, to the kind of humour that was rattling around in texts after the likes of diana and steve irwins deaths, the tsunami, the 9/11etc.
I don't want to go back to the steve thread, but just want to use it as an example in that a lot of people don't know the guy, probably weren't that upset by his death, but are jumping on the band wagon to get a crack out of the poor guys death with childish sick jokes. Same goes for all the other jokes in these situations.
Thats when I think galllows humour is wrong, its not being used as a coping mechanism there, what coping does someone have to do to 'come to terms' with the death of a celebrity they don't know?
I understand the need for this in situations such as those the emergency services come across on a day to day basis, (not that i have ever noticed it or used it myself when working) but ! don't think there is any place for these kinds of sick text message jokes.
Quote by de_sade

well bud, in a dictarship gallows humour would definetly be outlawed.....but wait a minute is`nt that exactly what the politically correct people would want as well?....are we sliding towards dictarship already and just don`t realise it.
wee Jack McConnell imposed the smoking ban on Scotland without consulting the electorate......never mentioned it in his ( labour) manifesto pre -election????? this is just the start mark my words

Bud??? I'm not your bud, buddy or anything else. Nor am I part of the PC brigade.
Please DON'T take this personally Robhambledon, but I was simply reiterating that I think that gallows humour jokes, such as the ones flying around at the moment about Steve Irwin's death are in very poor taste.
Further, that folk who resort to making fun of a tragedy, a death, or make light of the terrible grief the bereaved must be feeling are puerile, cowardly and beneath contempt. How anyone could use jokes like that is personally beyond me and I will not resort to going on and on and on ad nauseum about the terrible deaths I have witnessed like some in this thread and how I need to laugh in the face of death because it helped me cope. A good cry is much more (was much more) cathartic, believe me. There is little enough dignity in death as it is, without having some moron guffawing over a cadaver.
It is about respect.
The last thing the grieving family of a recently deceased person want is some arsehole making light of it for a cheap laugh in an attempt to court publicity that they cannot elicit with their personality alone.
Some of the older members will remember Hagar and the tragic circumstances of his untimely death. Would gallows humour have been appropriate about him in a thread in the forum two days after his death??? Or would the thread have been locked or removed completely and the joker severely warned or banned???
I think we all know the answer to that one don't we? So why is it still one rule for one and another for a few privileged few?
Incidentally, a dictatorship is a period of political power characterised by an absence of any political opposition, so that hardly describes GB does it? (Hmmmmm.... He mused cynically, or does it?)
As for Jack McConnel, you got what you voted for. If you don't like it, vote differently next time.
My 22p
De_sade
Hi De Sade......how are you doing?
BUD!!
bolt
Quote by mazandden
I think there's a difference between using a bit of light humour in an awful situation, to the kind of humour that was rattling around in texts after the likes of diana and steve irwins deaths, the tsunami, the 9/11etc.
I don't want to go back to the steve thread, but just want to use it as an example in that a lot of people don't know the guy, probably weren't that upset by his death, but are jumping on the band wagon to get a crack out of the poor guys death with childish sick jokes. Same goes for all the other jokes in these situations.
Thats when I think galllows humour is wrong, its not being used as a coping mechanism there, what coping does someone have to do to 'come to terms' with the death of a celebrity they don't know?
I understand the need for this in situations such as those the emergency services come across on a day to day basis, (not that i have ever noticed it or used it myself when working) but ! don't think there is any place for these kinds of sick text message jokes.

i agree with you.
the jokes are sick. and the people that are telling them would be the first to complain if they had something bad happen to them and everyone told jokes about them, wouldent they?
Quote by de_sade
The last thing the grieving family of a recently deceased person want is some arsehole making light of it for a cheap laugh in an attempt to court publicity that they cannot elicit with their personality alone.

I've followed this, and similar, threads; trying to not contribute.
I can't fully contribute without given what I think would be too much insight to personal history.
But I would though like to raise a point. Highlighted to me by some of de_sade's postings.
I think two outwardly similar, but wildly differing senses of humour are being confused and put in the same phrases.
I don't have names for them, but I think there's a huge difference between the sick and puerile, bad taste humour told for the sake of it in an attempt to be "funny" and what is often referred to as black/dark/gallows "humour" used as a so called coping mechanism by people involved with/in certain types of "trauma"
Agreed Dammi
The two are often poles apart, but often so close as to be almost indistinguishable.
During the Second World War the principle allied tank was the American made Sherman. It was a petrol engine machine, notoriously prone to bursting into flame when hit.
The allied tank crews who had to fight and live in the Sherman christened it “The Ronson” after the Ronson petrol lighter that was advertised at the time with the slogan “Lights every time” Gallows humour, a joke made by men to help them with the reality of their daily lives?
The Germans Christened the Tank “The Tommy cooker” because if you hit it, it would cook the crew inside.
Not passing judgement one way or the other, but most people seem to be confusing two very different arguments.
Stormwalker
Quote by Stormwalker
..most people seem to be confusing two very different arguments.

Hit the nail on the head there.
:thumbup:
Quote by dambuster

The last thing the grieving family of a recently deceased person want is some arsehole making light of it for a cheap laugh in an attempt to court publicity that they cannot elicit with their personality alone.

I've followed this, and similar, threads; trying to not contribute.
I can't fully contribute without given what I think would be too much insight to personal history.
But I would though like to raise a point. Highlighted to me by some of de_sade's postings.
I think two outwardly similar, but wildly differing senses of humour are being confused and put in the same phrases.
I don't have names for them, but I think there's a huge difference between the sick and puerile, bad taste humour told for the sake of it in an attempt to be "funny" and what is often referred to as black/dark/gallows "humour" used as a so called coping mechanism by people involved with/in certain types of "trauma"
I think that is what de_sade is trying to point out, that there is no place for the kind of bad taste 'humour' that was exhibited before in another thread, and yes, there is a difference between 'gallows humour' and the text message style jokes that some are referring to as gallows style, which they definately are not.
Quote by de_sade

Hi De Sade......how are you doing?
BUD!!
bolt

You're a funny guy. :dry:
De_sade
just trying to inject "my sense of humour"....as i believe this thread needs it.....but hey thats how some of us deal with certain sitiuations.
I don't think the gallows humour is just a british thing.... but i think you have to be a bit detached from it all to make real sense of it all.
for example.... i heard jokes about 9/11 for example that would make my toes curl.... but you wouldn't hear the same jokes about 7/7 because people are too close to the situation....
Oh yawn rolleyes get over it, you don't like my sense of humor, I do - end of.
Having done motorcross cover we have used humour to get through the day just as others have said. I also know a number of paramedics and we share a 'dark' sense of humour, and the occasional opening up and sociable drink when we are more serious. It all helped, them and me.
As for bad taste humour this is part of the world we live in, there will always be people on the fringe. Yes it offends those deeply involved, and I would uphold their right to complain. However I also uphold the right of people to be in bad taste. It is part of life, certainly seems british (my american friends cant even get Blackadder and that is not particually dark), and end of the day is one of those things.
TBH from Steve Irwin's published life (as I don't know him personally) the current spate of jokes would have tickled his sense of humour in my opinion. Live and let live peeps, you may diasgaree with the dark side of some peoples humour, but look at what some people call art... Even to strike a closer home truth look at what a lot of people say about us swingers...
Quote by dambuster

The last thing the grieving family of a recently deceased person want is some arsehole making light of it for a cheap laugh in an attempt to court publicity that they cannot elicit with their personality alone.

I've followed this, and similar, threads; trying to not contribute.
I can't fully contribute without given what I think would be too much insight to personal history.
But I would though like to raise a point. Highlighted to me by some of de_sade's postings.
I think two outwardly similar, but wildly differing senses of humour are being confused and put in the same phrases.
I don't have names for them, but I think there's a huge difference between the sick and puerile, bad taste humour told for the sake of it in an attempt to be "funny" and what is often referred to as black/dark/gallows "humour" used as a so called coping mechanism by people involved with/in certain types of "trauma"
Once again Dammie makes perfect sense worship
There's a HUGE difference between the two
is it my imagination or has someone deleted a post...........
and id just got the popcorn
:cry:
Quote by dambuster
...I think two outwardly similar, but wildly differing senses of humour are being confused and put in the same phrases.
I don't have names for them, but I think there's a huge difference between the sick and puerile, bad taste humour told for the sake of it in an attempt to be "funny" and what is often referred to as black/dark/gallows "humour" used as a so called coping mechanism by people involved with/in certain types of "trauma"

Took the words out of my mouth ;)
I wonder too - should have been me if I had seen it.
:twisted:
PS in edit:
Just read this on the bbc website

Mr Irwin also said that both father and son were aware of the extreme risks involved in Steve's work.
"Both of us over the years have had some very close shaves and we both approached it the same way, we made jokes about it," Mr Irwin said.

Now, I haven't got an opinion on this topic except that BULLYINGof members is not allowed, no matter how strongly views are held, it seems that the family of Steve Irwin do have one.
Quote by de_sade
I don't need the approval of a flock of bleating sheep.
Popularity be damned, I've got my principles.

If that were true, why bother to say?
Quote by de_sade
BTW...For all the folks out there who think that Dambuster made a valid point, took the words right out of their mouths, etc, etc, etc, ya-da-ya-da-ya-da. Try reading the posts BEFORE his.

Surely you aren't seeking to justify/explain yourself to us bleating sheep?
dunno
Quote by de_sade
And as I mentioned to one of the many members who sent me PMs of support for my stance on this subject. It's sad that so many SH members think as I do but are afraid to say so for fear of rocking the boat. I don't need the approval of a flock of bleating sheep.
Popularity be damned, I've got my principles.

Yes you do, you remind us all frequently confused. Should we be grateful to have you among us minions who you obviously don’t rate as being able to hold opinions of our own or to voice them where we feel necessary ?
Quote by de_sade
BTW...For all the folks out there who think that Dambuster made a valid point, took the words right out of their mouths, etc, etc, etc, ya-da-ya-da-ya-da. Try reading the posts BEFORE his. This is quoted from mine
Whilst some folk may justify their warped sense of humour by saying "it is a mask we wear to keep ourselves sane" there is a World of difference between taking a very serious and traumatic situation lightly to enable them to come to terms with such an event and some sick, puerile joke about someone who is unconnected with the person telling the joke.
:thumbup:

Do you want it copyrighted? Do you want us to applaud you, have we not given you the recognition or credit of "you thought of it first", Is that your dummy in the corner???
Not really sure what you want with that last statement de Sade, It sounds a bit childish from someone who I believe obviously enjoys reasoned argument but I’m sure you’ll be along to correct us or expand further :?
Personally I read the above section of your post and personally acknowledged the fact that you had made the difference between the two. Perhaps your point got lost in your following posts or perhaps Dammie was able to say it all a little clearer than you did.
I’ll go back to grazing now
wink
Having read through this thread with some interest I am going to stick my twopenorth in again.
Gallows, Black, Dark humour call it what you will is a valid mechanism for coping with traumatic conditions. It just helps you function. Nothing to do with being callous or uncaring and generally the most extreme varieties are kept 'in house'.
There is a time and place for this sort of stuff and most people are well aware of the boundaries of acceptability put in place by social standards. The people who use this humour in general public tend not to be those who are exposed to situations where it is needed. I is kept for those times when like minded people are gathered Black jokes are exchanged as part of a sort of unofficial group therapy.
When ‘Sick’ jokes about deceased celebrities do the rounds it is hardly surprising, but do people who courted publicity whilst alive expect to suddenly become exempt in death? Think of a dead Celeb and there were jokes doing the rounds, generally speaking they peter out in a few days.
Dark humour is a fact of life, do we really want the PC brigade to go all Po faced over it? If it’s not to your taste walk away, it’s easy really.
Bbbbbbbaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbaaaaaaaaaaaa - my field is full of sheep too! Anyone got mint sauce??
lol
Quote by Jags
Bbbbbbbaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbaaaaaaaaaaaa - my field is full of sheep too! Anyone got mint sauce??
lol

I don't have any mint sauce to hand, but may I just compliment you on your lovely woolly coat!
biggrin
Being a farmer's daughter, I like sheep, so leave them alone.
I think the majority of posts hold with the gallows humour approach to tradgedy.....unfortunately some people have obviously had a sense of humour by pass
all of us have been touched by tradgedy in our lives that does`nt mean we can`t find humour later, if it helps ease the pain......without giving away too much my family has been devasted by the drug scene.
if your religious or even if your not .....there but by the grace of god , go I
SO COME ON LIGHTEN UP BUD
Is this typical of gallows humour?
The day of my Dad's funeral and he was resting in the front sitting room of my mum's house. When the time came to take the coffin out to the hearse, the funeral directors were having trouble getting the gurney into the hallway due to the position of the door. We were all there watching and my brother pipes up 'Good job he's not a double wardrobe' to which each of us, my mother included, giggled.
It was the type of thing my dear Dad would have laughed at too. It was not said with any malice to the poor undertakers but out of respect for my Dad's wacky sense of humour ( you can see where I get it from can't you? rolleyes )
I should have been in bed half hour ago :roll:
Sassy , I think that sums up ,exactly what myself and a lot of people have been trying to put across to our members who are less than humourous smile
No rob, what sassy said - that IS gallows humour, text message jokes to get a cheap laugh are very different and that is where my lack of humour is.!
When I read Sassys post there, it brought a little smile to my face, i did find it funny, in a comforting kind of way, however, I found the steve irwine 'jokes' turned my stomach and thought they were in very bad taste.
But as we say, each to their own! Den probably laughed at them.
m xx
Quote by robhambledon
.....unfortunately some people have obviously had a sense of humour by pass

Quote by robhambledon
Sassy , I think that sums up ,exactly what myself and a lot of people have been trying to put across to our members who are less than humourous smile

Could it not just be that those with "a sense of humour bypass" are just waiting for something that's actually funny to exercise their sense of humour? I find it very condescending for you to assume that anyone who doesn't like your particular sense of humour must have no sense of humour at all. confused
The latest round of internet/text jokes are reminiscent of primary school playground jokes - they're ok when told by a 10 year old but are a little dull when an adult repeats them to an adult audience.
Quote by northwest-cpl
.....unfortunately some people have obviously had a sense of humour by pass

Quote by robhambledon
Sassy , I think that sums up ,exactly what myself and a lot of people have been trying to put across to our members who are less than humourous smile

Could it not just be that those with "a sense of humour bypass" are just waiting for something that's actually funny to exercise their sense of humour? I find it very condescending for you to assume that anyone who doesn't like your particular sense of humour must have no sense of humour at all. confused
The latest round of internet/text jokes are reminiscent of primary school playground jokes - they're ok when told by a 10 year old but are a little dull when an adult repeats them to an adult audience.
Well said!!!! :thumbup:
I actually was agreeing with Stormy had YOU botherd to read it my post!
Who is this Kate that the great De_Sade is talking about yet again? I told you last time it's not my name. rolleyes Are you unable to hold on to that bit of information?
I also note you don't comment on the other posts taking the p*ss out of you, but I guess you feel safe attacking me!
rotflmao
seems to be a bit of a persecution complex rolling about in this thread :cry: