Im with you on it... I don't like to see the close up's either. More so men's. I'd rather see nice classy pics the fem in nice underwear than a profile full of close up cock pics.
there could always be the comparison to 'flowers' (botanical... not site-users, just to clear that up)
ganitalia can range from the finest and must delicate of lillies... to the fragrant stink-pot.
Then again, if you're talking 'images', well in my eye that's always a very diferent deal to the real thing.
I don't really think I've said anything there have I?
lp
Nope dont think either look good close up its a whole image for me.
I need a little.....context, or it is just.....folds of skin.
Travis
Genitalia ...attractive or not ?
NOT!
:giggle:
Sam xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A decent non close up photo, might do the trick
Whereas they may be similar, they don't all look the same!
We had this conversation last night! General opinion was that genitalia = yuk.
Although I am very predominantly straight, I have to say that I do find the penis to be a magnificent organ (or maybe that's just because I get to see mine a lot...); I think that's pretty much the only thing that makes me think about bisexuality. They can be beautiful things. And so photographed right, the picture can be sexy - I have seen cock pictures that made me think, yeah, I'd like to suck that. I'm not interested in men's bodies at all, or faces, or bums; so I guess a picture that shows me only the thing I want to see, and none of the things I want not to see, can really work. But it has to be a good picture and a good cock - not something that looks like some kind of horrible deformed slug. And probably photographed from above or the side, not front on (why?); probably with something in there for scale (like a hand); definitely erect.
As far as pussy shots go - actually women's bodies interest me quite a lot; it's not just about the aperture into which I'm potentially going to insert my magnificent organ. I usually want to see some idea of what her body looks like. Pretty much the only pussy shots that work for me are ones from behind, with her bending over; so it's essentially an arse picture, with added pussy.
If I am presented with a pic of a cock, with no idea who it belongs to I rarely see it as an object of beauty. However, if I first see the person and start to desire the person before seeing the cock, I then find I want to see their cock and it becomes an object of my desire, in turn to me it is then a thing of beauty that I want to become intimate with.
I think girly bits are not attractive, but then we have boobs that compensate for that and they are attractive to me.
Well here's a cunt that most certainly isn't attractive :twisted:
Thanks, Peanut. That made my day!
Well..... i was gona reply....but then i got to peanuts bush,
now iv totaly lost it :crazy:
ur all nutters,(in the nicest way)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...and I like fish and chips :-)
I've definitely seen some attractive man-bits and lady-gardens... not all of 'em are though :shock: