Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Have you all seen the news?!?!?!?

last reply
199 replies
6.6k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by da69ve
Every terrorist started his/her life as an innocent child.

well in that case so did Tony Blair......but it seems some people have more sympathy in the cause for someone who tries to smuggle explosives on a plane with the intent to blow it up mid fight!.......
I think you may be confusing sympathy with understanding. I understand some of the reasons, someof the people do the things they do, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I sympathise with them all.
Stormy
Quote by firelizard

We have a stated policy not to negotiate with terrorists hun, kiss but behind closed doors we talk to anyone given the chance. Hell we made most of them….. sad

god..........i love being patronised.............
ok i'm 25 and blonde........but do not assume i'm that daft..........as i said earlier.......i'm not going to get involved any further into this debate (and thats for personal reasons)
right night all........
Hiya Kate
I think this is a case of the classic internet problem where you can't see people's faces or hear their tone of voice. There honestly is'nt a patronising bone in Storm's body! I was'nt here when he wrote that post but as I know him I can hear the tone and see his face when writing it. What he's trying to say is that it's a damn shame that behind the closed doors we don't hold up what the country's policy is. and the kiss emoticon is because he's fond of you and did'nt want you to think his post is at odds with your view.
Love
Fire xx
PS He's not here now so I'll probably get a smackbottom when he comes in along with a lecture about how he can answer his own posts thank you very much :giggle:
You, my Office now! :smackbottom: :smackbottom: :smackbottom:
Stormwalker
Or should I do it on cam later :idea: :twisted:
Quote by Tania
People may well say it is all about money – but so is life. You may not care who owns the oil – but you would care if businesses folded – if food prices rise – if hospitals close – if your power supply became rationed.

Polo, I'd rather live a more measured (moderate) life with a few more hardships and have world peace than bask in the riches of Britain (or America or whatever country) and ignore the people dying in other parts of the world every day due to our actions/lack of action. As for businesses folding, prices rising, hospitals closing... surely you are not talking about the Thatcher era?
So do you think if we sit back and do nothing there will be world peace? I am sure you don't beleive that? Religion and those who use religion to manipulate would see to it that it never happened.
And no I am not talking about Thatcher - if you think that is all that would happen then it would be worth it.
Quote by firelizard
Every terrorist started his/her life as an innocent child.

well in that case so did Tony Blair......but it seems some people have more sympathy in the cause for someone who tries to smuggle explosives on a plane with the intent to blow it up mid fight!.......
I think you may be confusing sympathy with understanding. I understand some of the reasons, someof the people do the things they do, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I sympathise with them all.
Stormy
what is there to understand about someone who straps a bomb to their chest and blows themselves up taking innocent people with them......the only thing i understand is this is pure evil......terrorism is not the solution to fight your battles...
Quote by da69ve
Every terrorist started his/her life as an innocent child.

well in that case so did Tony Blair......but it seems some people have more sympathy in the cause for someone who tries to smuggle explosives on a plane with the intent to blow it up mid fight!.......
I think you may be confusing sympathy with understanding. I understand some of the reasons, someof the people do the things they do, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I sympathise with them all.
Stormy
what is there to understand about someone who straps a bomb to their chest and blows themselves up taking innocent people with them......the only thing i understand is this is pure evil......terrorism is not the solution to fight your battles...
What you/we need to understand Dave is why someone would feel the need to do the things they do. Without understanding how are we to stop it?
Stormy
Quote by PoloLady
People may well say it is all about money – but so is life. You may not care who owns the oil – but you would care if businesses folded – if food prices rise – if hospitals close – if your power supply became rationed.

Polo, I'd rather live a more measured (moderate) life with a few more hardships and have world peace than bask in the riches of Britain (or America or whatever country) and ignore the people dying in other parts of the world every day due to our actions/lack of action. As for businesses folding, prices rising, hospitals closing... surely you are not talking about the Thatcher era?
So do you think if we sit back and do nothing there will be world peace? I am sure you don't beleive that? Religion and those who use religion to manipulate would see to it that it never happened.
And no I am not talking about Thatcher - if you think that is all that would happen then it would be worth it.
I don't think theres much chance of world peace at any time. Even if we took the "head in the sand" approach to world policy there will always be a group of ****** trying to impose their will/ideolgy on someone else.
As for the Iraq/Afghanistan has brought it all down on us brigade, just remember that our "friends" in the middle east were attacking Western/European targets long before the Iraq invasion. The first World Trade Centre attack in the nineties, France etc..
Harry
whatever the the causes of todays unrest across the globe ive got to say that the present position is scary beyond belief........
i for one have experienced terrorist attacks at a personal level on a number of occasions and the singular common denominator is that the none of the perpetrators have ever directly been punished.... and i was nearly killed through no fault of my own ... other than because i was regarded as the enemy...
i seriously hope that the end result would be for men and women the world over to live in peace and harmony without the killing and the bloodshed... but i have to be a realist.... it isnt gonna happen........ not without thousands more dying.
The sad fact is that there are powerful people out there who want war and theres no shortage of willing troops to fight their war for them... whilst they sit on their arses with the benefit of security around them.
We need to be strong, forceful and non-comprimising ............ otherwise we're gonna get a shock when things turn even worse than they already are....
Quote by firelizard
Every terrorist started his/her life as an innocent child.

well in that case so did Tony Blair......but it seems some people have more sympathy in the cause for someone who tries to smuggle explosives on a plane with the intent to blow it up mid fight!.......
I think you may be confusing sympathy with understanding. I understand some of the reasons, someof the people do the things they do, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I sympathise with them all.
Stormy
what is there to understand about someone who straps a bomb to their chest and blows themselves up taking innocent people with them......the only thing i understand is this is pure evil......terrorism is not the solution to fight your battles...
What you/we need to understand Dave is why someone would feel the need to do the things they do. Without understanding how are we to stop it?
Stormy
do you honestly believe its just about US policies abroad and our involvement....if it wasn't that it would be something else......it will always be about something else....whats the only solution.....everyone go back to there own countries,close their borders and ban all religions.....now thats not likely to happen.....even if you understood why they do what they do......you cannot believe you could negotiate with them.....i think they would want to much...
Quote by firelizard
What you/we need to understand Dave is why someone would feel the need to do the things they do. Without understanding how are we to stop it?
Stormy

Because evil men use religion and the promise of reward to manipulate the weak minded into feeding their greed for power.
Quote by PoloLady

What you/we need to understand Dave is why someone would feel the need to do the things they do. Without understanding how are we to stop it?
Stormy

Because evil men use religion and the promise of reward to manipulate the weak minded into feeding their greed for power.
whilst you lot are worrying about the whys and the wherefores..... there are people planning to blow the shit out of you .............
anyone got a solution?
mine has to be meeting fire with fire.......
Quote by PoloLady

What you/we need to understand Dave is why someone would feel the need to do the things they do. Without understanding how are we to stop it?
Stormy

Because evil men use religion and the promise of reward to manipulate the weak minded into feeding their greed for power.
I know a woman like that! :shock:
She knew how to put the fear of god into me...
My ex :giggle:
OOOhhh pleeeeeze can we stop now? This is an emotive issue we're all discussing and lets face it none of us here are ever going to get to the bottom of all the why's and wherefores or agree with each other on all things. Can we not just agree to disagree on some things and leave it at that otherwise there will be people falling out all for no reason and what for? nothing! or at least nothing any of us can do anything about. Sad but true!
Love
FIRE xxxx
Come over to the GFZ room we're having fun in there!!!
Quote by Tania
People may well say it is all about money – but so is life. You may not care who owns the oil – but you would care if businesses folded – if food prices rise – if hospitals close – if your power supply became rationed.

Polo, I'd rather live a more measured (moderate) life with a few more hardships and have world peace than bask in the riches of Britain (or America or whatever country) and ignore the people dying in other parts of the world every day due to our actions/lack of action.
And of course I am sure you have considered the direct links between National Wealth, infant mortality and average life expectancy.
I am not sure I would be happy to say that I would sooner live in a country where more babies died and people didn't live so long and died through ill health rather than old age confused
You see it is not so black and white as you would like to paint it is it?
Quote by firelizard
Can we not just agree to disagree on some things and leave it at that otherwise there will be people falling out all for no reason and what for?

It is sad that you have a point - unfortunately some people cannot debate without taking disagreement personally
Quote by firelizard
nothing! or at least nothing any of us can do anything about. Sad but true!

also true - however failure to talk and have other points brought to the table leaves some people making judgements in ignorance.
Quote by Tania
I'd rather live a more measured (moderate) life with a few more hardships and have world peace than bask in the riches of Britain (or America or whatever country) and ignore the people dying in other parts of the world every day due to our actions/lack of action. As for businesses folding, prices rising, hospitals closing... surely you are not talking about the Thatcher era?

I hate to say it but I agree with Tania here (sorry Tania - I don't usually agree with all you say confused).
Whilst we are busy enjoying the luxury of a rich country, 'following in US' footsteps', we are justifiably being targeted by terrorists who are probably quite narked that we are fighting them because we have something they don't.
Why else would we be in Iraq and Afghanistan? Let's not pretend that it's not for their oil or poppies. They're worth millions and the Big Fish know it.
Prices are rising anyway. Our education/health/inflation is a nightmare - mmmm - could it be that we are spending too much on wars in countries that have never started a war with us? We went in because the US did. Like ignorant sheep we follow Bush and murder thousands. Do they come over here and bomb us? No. So they send in the terrorists, because what else can they do?
What has the US done to cut down its oil needs? It has refused to cooperate and is the largest consumer of oil - it refuses to back down, needs more an more oil, wants our full support, and then we all get heated because the 'other side' gets angry and seeks to retaliate.
All I'm saying is that we should back out of wars that are really no concern of ours - okay some may disagree with that - but fighting in the Middle East is hardly going to stop the terrorists is it? Quite the opposite.
Loads of countries have unstable, unjust regimes. Have we bombed Zimbabwe? NO. Because they don't have anything we want.
I would be quite happy to live a less consumerist lifestyle - in fact I do try to - perhaps we should learn that being as fat and rich as we are is going to cost us something, and that if we value our lives, we should value theirs.
Just one more comment for this evening before I depart for the Friday night entertainment……….
What was it you did Tania when you couldn’t get your operation in this country? Did you fly to another country and get it there?
Unfortunately people living a more moderate lifestyle (as you put it) in a collapsing economy do not have that luxury of choice.
It is worth thinking about what it really means giving up.
leaves some people making judgements in ignorance.
I know I said to stop, but actually I must agree with this from my own point of view. I'm one of those people. I never know the names of the people in power, who's fighting who unless it's on my doorstep so to speak or why they are doing it and I'm certainly not a history buff. It's not because I'm an airhead more because I don't buy the papers ((they depress the hell out of me and tell me lies) and I'm not an avid listener to the news (I do try to catch up at least once a day) my work tends to get in the way of TV and radio. So in the past I have been guilty of doing just what you said.
If most people here were open to hearing the views of others and learning things they perhaps did'nt know from others, threads like these would be a great place to be, but they always seem to descend into personal stuff because people are not open to other views or opinions and only want to get their own across.
So thats why I said what I did :cry:
Love FIRE xx (who has'nt a clue if that made sense or not!)
Quote by da69ve
Every terrorist started his/her life as an innocent child.

well in that case so did Tony Blair......but it seems some people have more sympathy in the cause for someone who tries to smuggle explosives on a plane with the intent to blow it up mid fight!.......
I think you may be confusing sympathy with understanding. I understand some of the reasons, someof the people do the things they do, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I sympathise with them all.
Stormy
what is there to understand about someone who straps a bomb to their chest and blows themselves up taking innocent people with them......the only thing i understand is this is pure evil......terrorism is not the solution to fight your battles...
What you/we need to understand Dave is why someone would feel the need to do the things they do. Without understanding how are we to stop it?
Stormy
do you honestly believe its just about US policies abroad and our involvement....if it wasn't that it would be something else......it will always be about something else....whats the only solution.....everyone go back to there own countries,close their borders and ban all religions.....now thats not likely to happen.....even if you understood why they do what they do......you cannot believe you could negotiate with them.....i think they would want to much...
I don’t remember suggesting it was ever just about US/UK involvement in the Middle East. However only the very naïve would believe that there was no connection with the fact that US/UK forces are occupying two Muslim countries, an ally of the US (Israel) is bombing the civilian population of a third and we (UK) are allowing the US to transport arms to the Israelis, through British airports, all the time stalling the UN’s efforts to broker a ceasefire. Add to those, President Bush’s weekly rants at the Iranian nuclear “crisis”, take into consideration the fact that due to the harsh sanctions imposed after the first gulf war thousands of Iraqi children have died from lack of basic medical care. Consider Palestine and the years of US led blocks to UN I go on?
You can beat the Dog if you like, but don’t play the martyr when it finally turns around and bites your arse.
If we don’t talk to our enemies Dave then what’s the alternative, do we just kill them all and be done with it? dunno
Stormy
PS.
Let me ask you a question, If the bombing had been successful and massive civilian casualties had occurred. Would you if you had the power, order the retaliatory bombing of a city believed to be the base of the bombers, knowing that you would also cause massive civilian casualties as well?
Would You be angry enough to take the lives of the innocent, just to get revenge for our dead?
In Edit, dont take this personally it’s not a nasty post aimed at anyone.
No one should take any of these comments personally - it is a healthy (IMHO) debate about things that, at the end of the day, we have little control over.
Politics will always divide people - and this thread highlights the fact. If we can't speak out here, where else can we? Surely no one expects MPs to be listening? Surely we should be able to voice our opinions, educated or not? Surely by reading others' opinions, we are more informed?
Some think the terrorists are wrong - some think they have a point - some think we should pretend none of it is happening and carry on enjoying our lives of opulence and luxury, outraged that terrorists seek to disrupt our holiday plans. (This is a general comment - not aimed at ANYONE). I wonder how many Iraqis or Afghans have the time/means/inclination to sit and chat on a swingers' site all day.
Quote by firelizard
Let me ask you a question, If the bombing had been successful and massive civilian casualties had occurred. Would you if you had the power, order the retaliatory bombing of a city believed to be the base of the bombers, knowing that you would also cause massive civilian casualties as well?
Would You be angry enough to take the lives of the innocent, just to get revenge for our dead?
In Edit, dont take this personally it’s not a nasty post aimed at anyone.

yes...if i had the power i would take the nessessary action needed.....it would beyond talking now.....it would not be revenge for the dead but justice for them.......terrorists are very good at hiding amongst innocent civilians......just goes to show how high they regard life......these people cannot be reasoned with.......they want evrything and they want it there way....
The first causality of war is the truth.
Terrorist or freedom fighter?.
Democracy is not perfect, but until something better comes along, I will suffer it.
Winston Churchill.
Quote by dirtytwo
Some interesting reading, if you have the time. Real food for thought. This all scares me so I'm reading around and educating myself.
Anwaar Hussain
A huge terror plot has just been uncovered in London. This was intended to be mass murder on an unimaginable scale say the London Metropolitan police. Britain's terror alert, accordingly, has been ratcheted up to its highest-ever level with security services, military and police now on severe specific alert.
Not to be left behind, even though the list of unanswered questions, irregularities, and discrepancies continues to grow with each passing hour, the obedient Western media jumped at the occasion ensuring a spate of spectacular cover stories and anti-Muslim tirade.
As usual, though the facts are still coming in, the media is dutifully following the open-ended cues provided by the US and British governments, and reproducing the handed-down script without a pause for the facts to emerge fully. With an indecent haste, government enforcers have already slapped ridiculous restrictions on travelers, with mother's having to taste baby milk before they board planes and all hand luggage, including liquid drinks, being banned.
If there indeed was such a plot, then by its uncovering innocent lives surely have been saved and just in time too. If not, then let us thank God for that and hasten to analyze the event from a slightly closer quarter as it has happened a little too conveniently for certain personages of rather dubious repute and vile agenda.
Consider the following.
The Anglo-USraeli juggernaut is on a roll and under fire at the same time. George Bushs Iraq jaunt has spun out of control with his own top General now openly admitting the possibility (read happening already) of a civil war in that unfortunate country. With the US presidents war on terror now thoroughly discredited by renowned policy specialists, his approval ratings stand at a historical worst for any President of United States in opinion polls. Tony Blair is beleaguered by his own party men for his sycophantic support of Zionist extremists. Israel is getting some lessons in humility from the rag tag Hezbollah fighters raising fears among its supporters in the West. Iran not only remains defiant over its nuclear program but also continues to provide both overt and covert support to Hezbollah and Hamas. Syria, uncompromising as ever, watches on quietly for now yet ready to jump into the melee come the calling. In short, it is a mess and THE ISLAMISTS are clearly responsible for all this. Undoubtedly, a single major distraction capable of killing a whole slew of nasty birds was the crying need of the time.
Not surprisingly, therefore, clichés that are the corner stone of Anglo-American policy for global hegemony like Islamic Terror, 'Bin Laden', 'Jihaadis', Al-Qaeda style attack, suicide bombers and security of Western citizens etc. are back with a bang with this latest buildup. The smear machine has had gallons of oil thrown on its creaking cogs and is in full gear instantly. At the same time, to breathe new life into the stalling agenda of their masters, crawling out of the woodwork are these states instruments of coercion and control such as the CIA, MI6, Mossad and affiliated intelligence agencies, like Pakistan's ISI.
Statistical analysis has now conclusively proven that every time Blair and Bush slump in approval ratings, a fresh terror alert gives them a rebound back up the charts. Every single major terror alert, hear this, issued by the US, Canadian or UK governments has proven to be either a contrived facade, a setup sting operation or an out-and-out fraud.
But then why not a full blown 9/11 as predicted by many, self included? Why this just-in-time-uncovering of the plots (e.g. Toronto, Florida, the earlier London plot etc) only days/weeks before the supposed attempts, one may ask?

The answer probably lies in the 9/11 truth movement being on the crest of a wave of media exposure. Distinguished scientific minds and brave citizens have now blown open the lid on evidence of government sponsored terror and how they control the society through the power of nightmares. The movement itself, already on the lens of quite a few main stream media big names like C-Span, is about to burst out full time from the sidelines into the middle of the road. Similarly, just like the 9/11, the July 2005 London bombings too, have been now proven to be a British intelligence operation and the alleged ringleader, Mohammed Siddique Khan, to be working for ]
.

I would like to know, why you think this, and what evidence you have, that he was working for MI5
i am been dithering over whether to right in this or not... i know that some of you have low opinions of americans (that was just a flippant remark....no need to read into it anything, because there is no ulterior motive behind it)
the intelligent and the police are going to take flack whichever side you view it.. damned if they do or damn if they don't...
mohammed siddique khan was known to the intelligence services... did they think he was enough of a threat to bring him in and arrest him.. no...
the result....the 7/7 london bombings... I think that is what you would call an "intelligence failure"
they thought jean charles de menizes was a suicidal bomber.... the inteligence services failed to notice that he wasn't at various occasions between the time he left the house and the time he got the stockwell station.....
the result..... 1 innocent man dead..... again another "intelligence failure"
I was rather that if they were going to get in wrong... they get it wrong in the "forest gate" incident than either of the ones above... before the horse has bolted... if there is any evidence to prosectute the CPS will..
at the moment there are approx 60 prosectutuions going thru the uk judical system with regards to various terrorism acts at the moment... yes they are going to get some wrong, but remember that they are also getting some right..... and if it comes down to the old addage of better being safe that sorry, then I would rather bust in before... they try to clear up the messes after
if is as being reported some of this intelligence did come from pakistani intelligence and well as survailence of there own then i didn'y think they had any option but to go in....after all if they had sat on that and did nothing, could you imagine the amount flack they would be getting now..... if there is enough evidence to charge i am sure they will... if not they will be let go.....
sean (american and proud...I not voted for "G.W" twice!!!)
p.s the most interested element of all this for me.. are two things...
1) if certain people are being radicalised... the one place it hasn't really happened yet is in the main country targeted... the US..... i wonder why this would be?
2) are 2nd generation asian kids going thru the same phase of feeling "disenfranchised" as 2nd generation afro-carribean kids did in the 80's with the inner city riots?
p.p.s
With regards to Blair being on "holiday".... it is not like he is in the middle of nowhere where get is away from a phone or anything... if every other worker in the u.k gets 4 weeks annual leave why shouldn't he???? he has a family as well, some of them are young and i am sure he would like to spend time with them... would you deny him that right?????
firelizard, i understand your sympathies, and agree with many of your arguments, so no flaming here, ok? ;) by way of general reply, rather than to you specifically . . . .
first off, our past actions have definitely made us high on the list of targets. compare attacks on the U.S. and the U.K. with, say . . . attacks on France, then compare those countries positions re: the middle east / iraq / israel etc. seems a fairly onbvious connection!
i could argue that al-qaeda are the direct result of the west's support for the mujaheddin in afgfhanistan; the funding and arming of afghan warlords; the deployment of CIA / Special Forces operatives to help them set up their training camps, and show them how to fight a campaign of terrorism and insurgency against the USSR? i could argue that it's a bit rich to bomb the taliban out of afghanistan when we assisted their rise to power, and turned a big blind eye to heroin exports that decimated our council estates so long as they spent the money on arms to fight our own little proxy war for us. i could offer possible explanations for those who walk into tel aviv cafes at lunchtime with explosives under their shirts. and no, the war in lebanon, and the posturing about the iran issue ain't exactly helpful or constructive?
but . . . .
much as i understand how the naive come to be radicalised to the point of self-destruction, so long as it takes out as many innocent bystanders as possible, i know that the guys who sent them in there care nothing for "liberation struggles against the forces of occupation." they don't even really care about that whole shia versus sunni thing that's tearing iraq apart, and threatens to spill over to the whole region. all they care about is power and control, possibly with a touch of pathological hatred thrown in, but the kind of terror we are seeing these days is very different from IRA versus UK re: 1921 and partition, or FARC versus Columbian Death Squads, or even Tibet versus China.
the terror in iraq these days is mainly muslim versus muslim. not muslim versus the US / UK forces occupying them. we took the lid off a pressure cooker that already existed, and was kept quietly simmering so long as saddam was in power repressing and murdering them both indiscriminately, but our responsibility only goes that far. we made civil war probable, if not quite inevitable, but the ethnic and religious tensions that lead to mass executions aren't down to us. Moqtada al-Sadr is rubbing his hands and thanking his god that he now has the opportunity of absolute control over his patch of iraq, thanks to the toppling of saddam. he might want to see us gone, but he's damn glad we went i can tell you!
bin laden and his ilk? what exactly is they're row, cos they were hitting the west long before iraq, and they bore no love for saddam, as he bore no love for them, so it weren't gulf war one that kicked it all off? i think, the simple fact is, they had a taste of power in afghanistan, defeated the USSR, in their imagination, and think they can now defeat the one remaining superpower? that's their goal. nowt more. no moral high ground to cling to there? their war is every bit as economically and strategically motivated as ours. we're all playing the same game.
course, we're playing right into their hands when we use military options against terrorists, cos that's exactly what they want. it justifies them no end, and means we can hardly demand they drop their weapons, sit down, and thrash out political solutions when we're not exactly prepared to do that either? self-defeating and pointless all round, but hisbullah rocketting haifa has little to do with occupation, palestine, 1967, etc, just as bombs in baghdad markets have little to do with democracy versus islam, freedom versus fascism. power games all round.
neil x x x ;)
The intelligence service carry out alot of behind the scene work we never know about.
To only reason we are talking about current events is because it is high profile and affecting the travelling public.
Unless you have worked in the intelligence services/army it can be hard to understand how they work.
"Time spent in reconnaissance is seldom wasted".
If the airport security gets any tighter ,pretty soon we will all have to board the plane in our birthday suits !!
Guess there wil be some advantages if your lucky enough to be on the same plane as the Womens Brazilian Netball Team? wink
Quote by john60
If the airport security gets any tighter ,pretty soon we will all have to board the plane in our birthday suits !!
Guess there wil be some advantages if your lucky enough to be on the same plane as the Womens Brazilian Netball Team? wink

:doh:
rolleyes
Quote by firelizard

what is there to understand about someone who straps a bomb to their chest and blows themselves up taking innocent people with them......the only thing i understand is this is pure evil......terrorism is not the solution to fight your battles...

What you/we need to understand Dave is why someone would feel the need to do the things they do. Without understanding how are we to stop it?
Stormy
Stormy
Don't waste your breath with Da69ve, he doesn't understand other people in SH, how do you expect him to understand the very complicated reasons an innocent child turns into a terrorist! rolleyes
Quote by Tania
Stormy
Don't waste your breath with Da69ve, he doesn't understand other people in SH, how do you expect him to understand the very complicated reasons an innocent child turns into a terrorist! rolleyes

Tania, I personally think those words of yours are far too personal and derogatory, but I'll leave da68ve to answer them, in the hope he'll actually treat your comment with the contempt I believe it deserves and not do so.
But with them, you've raised a question in my mind that I now ask of you, and others.
Do you "understand the very complicated reasons an innocent child turns into" the sort of person that is willing to put their life in very real danger of death ?
or willing to take the lives of people based on the information given to them by others ?
in the full and clear knowledge that possibility exists that the lives of some innocent people may also be taken in the process ?
so that you, me and countless others can go about their daily business with as much freedom as possible ?
To others that appear to be pouring scorn on the intelligence services, police - of what ever level, nomenclature or status - and the public actions taken recently, I have a couple of very simple questions.
Did someone fly a number of commercial aircraft into building in the US ?
Did someone explode IEDs in London ?
Straight Yes or No.
What exactly is the price you are willing to pay - in short term loss of liberty and freedom, and in the very unfortunate loss of innocent life - in order to prevent such atrocities ?
What realistic alternatives do you have to the way things are done now ?
I'm watching this thread for ANY personal abuse. If you can't have an interesting debate about a contentious issue without resorting to personal comments then go back to the threads about favourite music! If it continues then Mod buttons will be fully deployed.
As I have said before, the site AUP applies to everyone - take your personal comments elsewhere..

*goes off wondering why.....*