Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Have you all seen the news?!?!?!?

last reply
199 replies
6.6k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by firelizard

Let me ask you a question, If the bombing had been successful and massive civilian casualties had occurred. Would you if you had the power, order the retaliatory bombing of a city believed to be the base of the bombers, knowing that you would also cause massive civilian casualties as well?
Would You be angry enough to take the lives of the innocent, just to get revenge for our dead?
In Edit, dont take this personally it’s not a nasty post aimed at anyone.

yes...if i had the power i would take the nessessary action needed.....it would beyond talking now.....it would not be revenge for the dead but justice for them.......terrorists are very good at hiding amongst innocent civilians......just goes to show how high they regard life......these people cannot be reasoned with.......they want evrything and they want it there way....
Then How Dave are you any different from the Terrorists themselves? dunno
If the lives of innocent people including women and children have no meaning to you, why do you expect them to have meaning to a Terrorist? :dunno:
I understand Anger and I understand fear, I understand revenge and justice, but I don’t understand how eviscerating a 4year girl with a 1000 lb bomb equals either justice or revenge. :dunno:
If bombing a bus full of civilians in London is Terrorism, What is dropping a bomb on an Ambulance in Lebanon? :dunno:
From their perspective, It looks like “We want everything and we want it our 
Storm
Its a no win situation then......because no one will back down!
Quote by Tania

what is there to understand about someone who straps a bomb to their chest and blows themselves up taking innocent people with them......the only thing i understand is this is pure evil......terrorism is not the solution to fight your battles...

What you/we need to understand Dave is why someone would feel the need to do the things they do. Without understanding how are we to stop it?
Stormy
Stormy
Don't waste your breath with Da69ve, he doesn't understand other people in SH, how do you expect him to understand the very complicated reasons an innocent child turns into a terrorist! rolleyes
Tania, I understand you have had issues with Dave and are probably feeling bitter about them. However my point is this…….
It’s when we decide that someone is not worth talking to, not worth our compassion or care, not worth our time and effort, that we loose the opportunity to see them as people just like us, when that happens we all loose.
Stormy
OK.. time out folks!
I am locking this thread for the remainder of the afternoon. This is not aimed at any one person but I suspect that heat is forming and I want to let the pressure out. I WILLunlock it later in the day (when I return from my chores) and will hope that fevers will have cooled.
DO NOT start this debate in another thread - it's against site AUP and will bring a ban to the person/s involved.
I have returned and, as promised, unlocked this thread.
Please bear in mind that the thread WILL be locked again if personal abuse continues. All the Mods are watching this debate very closely and the first time abuse is offered a ban will come about.
Healthy debate is good for the intellect and for society - name calling is totally useless.
I did not want to poke my oar in here but have just seen this >>>>>>>
Click to read it
Ladies please read and be proud of you gender.
Phredd (ex RAMC and proud of her)
I read that article in the paper and was very moved by her bravery.
As a Buddhist I am aposed to war, but if only life were that simple. In my own personal opinion these things are far from black and white and I am positive that our 'enemies' feel as justified in their beliefs/reasons/motives as we do in ours.
As I said I am against war as a response (for varied and lengthy reasons) but I admire and think about those who are in our armed forces and have the courage to do the things they do and to risk their lives everyday for what they believe is right - for you and for me.
I come from a family where several close relatives who were (and a couple who still are) in the Royal Marines. From talking with them, usually late at night after a few glasses of wine, we get on to the subject of their last posting or current afairs etc. Anyway what I am trying to say here is that through talking to them I have always noticed that it's not something they do lightly, they do it because they feel patriotic, feel like they want to make a difference and to help people at home and abroad.
This is never going to be a perfect world and we won't always agree on each others point of view, but getting angry and trying to vent our anger against each other over this very emotive subject is perhaps what our 'enemies' would want.
We have just come back from the States and whilst over there on the newas they predicted an attack on a plane! We were not very amused but what can you do?
We have been to the U S a number of times but arent looking to go back in the forseeable future!!!
The bottom line is there are too many nutters out there and a plane makes an easy target for them so we, sadly, think its only a matter of time before one is brought down.
Mr & Mrs goodtimez
Quote by Scandal
What exactly is the price you are willing to pay - in short term loss of liberty and freedom, and in the very unfortunate loss of innocent life - in order to prevent such atrocities ?
What realistic alternatives do you have to the way things are done now ?

Stop giving people the motivation.
People can not be ground into the dirt, piling oppression on top of oppression always has the same consequences.
Change UK foriegn policy.
Educate our children to the similarities to the rest of the worlds population not the marginal differences.
Ditch the nations education of a small minded xenophobic view of the world for a more balanced enlightened one.
For me, there is no distinction between the consequences of individual suicide bombers and those who fly planes carpet bombing everything below them.
:thumbup: Precisely.
It will not stop things over night but it’s a start, and will dissuade others from joining the cycle of violence.
Stormwalker
Quote by PoloLady
What exactly is the price you are willing to pay - in short term loss of liberty and freedom, and in the very unfortunate loss of innocent life - in order to prevent such atrocities ?
What realistic alternatives do you have to the way things are done now ?

Stop giving people the motivation.
People can not be ground into the dirt, piling oppression on top of oppression always has the same consequences.
Change UK foriegn policy.
Educate our children to the similarities to the rest of the worlds population not the marginal differences.
Ditch the nations education of a small minded xenophobic view of the world for a more balanced enlightened one.

So when we change our policy... how many extremists will ditch the distorted interpretation of the Koran... where it is the ultimate act of faith to die if your death brings about the death of non-believers?
I’m not a student of the Koran Polo, but I have seen “interpretations” of the Koran that suggest what you say and others that do the opposite. You will find the same thing in any argument based around the exact interpretation and meaning of words. The Bible is contradictory and ambiguous enough to encompass a whole host of different sects, all claiming that “their” particular interpretation is the one true way.
Don’t fall into the trap of assuming that all Muslims are fanatical killers intent on world domination just because some of them are.

It is far too easy to be idealistic and say - "yes, there is the solution - doesn’t it sound perfect. All we need to do is opt for peace and education and the world will harmonise".
But we don't live in a perfect world.
No we don’t, nor will we ever, unless we are prepared to try and change it.May be we should keep out of something’s - as long as you don't mind the odd act of genocide happening else where - such as repeats of the 100 days of slaughter, Rwanda, 1994.
But it is easy to ignore the mass graves when it has no impact on your daily life. You still eat, sleep, work, have heat, drive your car and have the medical resources to meet the vast majority of your needs.
The path to utopia is easily written but harder to walk.
True, but again is that enough reason not to try?
Stormy dunno
Quote by Scandal
Stop giving people the motivation.
People can not be ground into the dirt, piling oppression on top of oppression always has the same consequences.
Change UK foriegn policy.
Educate our children to the similarities to the rest of the worlds population not the marginal differences.
Ditch the nations education of a small minded xenophobic view of the world for a more balanced enlightened one.

Yes - we should all join hands around a big camp fire and share a coke and a smile smile .
I would just like to hear though.... how exactly that will work confused
I have said before - it can seem so easy to make broad statements of how things should be and all nod agreeing as the description of the ideal sounds so appealing. It is when you look at the longer term effects of other countries actions which will effect your day to day living that the illusion of the ideal begins to crack.
In this very thread people have displayed what is human nature and resorted to name calling when others did not share their beliefs - and the irony is it appears to be some of the anti-violence/war supporters who resorted to it first.
Of course we need to educate people to be tolerant of others who do not share the same values and beliefs - though that is something done over a long period of time - between now and then something else needs to be done instead.
But then again we can't even convince the society that we live in that swingers are not all depraved of morals and lack any form of self respect or control - so what chance do we as a nation have on changing the values and beliefs of another nation or the up and coming dictators?
Quote by firelizard

So when we change our policy... how many extremists will ditch the distorted interpretation of the Koran... where it is the ultimate act of faith to die if your death brings about the death of non-believers?
I’m not a student of the Koran Polo, but I have seen “interpretations” of the Koran that suggest what you say and others that do the opposite. You will find the same thing in any argument based around the exact interpretation and meaning of words. The Bible is contradictory and ambiguous enough to encompass a whole host of different sects, all claiming that “their” particular interpretation is the one true way.
Don’t fall into the trap of assuming that all Muslims are fanatical killers intent on world domination just because some of them are. Hence the use of the words "extremists" and "distorted"
:
Quote by Jon
Sit back and take it - yeah fucking right, let any terrorist organisation from PETA to Al Qada do as they wish - how many dead and maimed do you want the population to suffer before we do anything about it?

Well I'm sorry you feel so strongly about my posts.
How many dead and maimed have we caused other populations? How is it okay for us to kill, and yet terrorists must not - and MUST be stopped? Who will stop US, as a nation?
Of course the Army is there to protect me and my fellow citizens, and without their existence I may not exist, being a Jew. At no point have I said they shouldn't exist.
However, my point was that I fail to see why I should praise what they are doing in the Middle East, if I disagree with the war they are fighting.
Terrorists will attack us as long as we attack their people. Or are we arrogant enough to think we have a right to harm their people, but not the other way round? If we pull out of the war they may or may not continue to target us - but at least we would not be provoking them.
We should advocate peace - not war. That's not saying abolish the Army - it has to exist to defend us - but not necessarily to go out and attack. Terrorists are not full-blown armies. Terrorists don’t send tanks and bomber planes and warships, killing thousands and devastating whole societies.
I repeat what has been said already - how can we condone war and yet condemn terrorists? It all amounts to the same thing : loss of innocent lives.
I don't pretend to know everything - or to have all the facts, figures, statistics, etc. But I do know that whatever way you look at it, war is wrong, and if we kill, then we must expect to be killed. The only way to stop the killing is to stop doing it ourselves.
Quote by BerryBelinda

Sit back and take it - yeah fucking right, let any terrorist organisation from PETA to Al Qada do as they wish - how many dead and maimed do you want the population to suffer before we do anything about it?

Well I'm sorry you feel so strongly about my posts.
How many dead and maimed have we caused other populations? How is it okay for us to kill, and yet terrorists must not - and MUST be stopped? Who will stop US, as a nation?
Of course the Army is there to protect me and my fellow citizens, and without their existence I may not exist, being a Jew. At no point have I said they shouldn't exist.
However, my point was that I fail to see why I should praise what they are doing in the Middle East, if I disagree with the war they are fighting.
Terrorists will attack us as long as we attack their people. Or are we arrogant enough to think we have a right to harm their people, but not the other way round? If we pull out of the war they may or may not continue to target us - but at least we would not be provoking them.
We should advocate peace - not war. That's not saying abolish the Army - it has to exist to defend us - but not necessarily to go out and attack. Terrorists are not full-blown armies. Terrorists don’t send tanks and bomber planes and warships, killing thousands and devastating whole societies.
I repeat what has been said already - how can we condone war and yet condemn terrorists? It all amounts to the same thing : loss of innocent lives.
I don't pretend to know everything - or to have all the facts, figures, statistics, etc. But I do know that whatever way you look at it, war is wrong, and if we kill, then we must expect to be killed. The only way to stop the killing is to stop doing it ourselves.
So is terrorism.......but you seemed to forget that.......when you say we go an attack their people....who is their people?........other terroists?......
Quote by da69ve
So is terrorism.......but you seemed to forget that.......when you say we go an attack their people....who is their people?........other terroists?......

I'm not sure I understand your question - can you try writing in proper English?
I never said terrorism was right.
Who do YOU think the terrorists are, Dave? Who do YOU think they are fighting for? Surely their people are the people we choose to bomb on a daily basis? Or do you fail to see the connection?
Quote by BerryBelinda
I'm not sure I understand your question - can you try writing in proper English?

banghead :banghead:
Quote by BerryBelinda

So is terrorism.......but you seemed to forget that.......when you say we go an attack their people....who is their people?........other terroists?......

I'm not sure I understand your question - can you try writing in proper English?
I never said terrorism was right.
Who do YOU think the terrorists are, Dave? Who do YOU think they are fighting for? Surely their people are the people we choose to bomb on a daily basis? Or do you fail to see the connection?
who are we bombing on a daily basis?......i obviously can't keep up it....i mean who are we bombing at the moment then?
I heard on the news ealier that at airports massive queues are forming and its taking 4 times as long to check people in,they say its because of the proper checks they need to do but it makes me wonder how good the normal checking system was if it only took a 1/4 of the time.
I remember my hubby going to new york a month after 9/11 and he said the checks were the best he had ever been through but then we went a year later and they seemed to be more relaxed, Maybe it should always be that non essential items should be put in the hold and not taken on as hand luggage.
If we take the stance that all war is wrong and we should keep out of it unless it lands on our doorstep opens the front door and shouts "surprise!" - should we have allowed 100's of 1000's more Jews be killed during the 40's (and no doubt to this day or to the completion of their elimination)? After all, Mr H had not set foot on our great shores had he?
Some wars are wrong.
Some wars are difficult to understand the complexity of, when on the face of it, it seems just to be about money or land or oil.
Some wars we may well at lease be able to apply moral values to in-part justify the actions - if they take out a bastard who is committing genocide.
To make broad and blanket statements that 'all war is wrong' lacks some thought IMO.
To suggest that our troops should have decided not to go and refused to fight is plain ignorant. The day our troops ignore their orders and make their own minds up as to what they will or will not do is the day we either have a military coo and find ourselves under a much less fair governing system or we have no armed forces.
Quote by da69ve
So is terrorism.......but you seemed to forget that.......when you say we go an attack their people....who is their people?........other terroists?......

Yes, of course Terror campaigns are wrong......but the Terror campaigns are being waged by groups, not by nations - which is why many people feel very strongly against the arguments for a war on Terror.
By carrying out bombing campaigns against countries because a group of people happen to reside or are hiding in that country does not make sense. The 7/7 bombers in this country came from the Leeds area - does this mean that it would be just to section off the Leeds area and begin a bombing camaign againt all residents - as they harbour terrorists, or if ETTA (?ETA) begin another car bombing campaign we should start bombing parts of Spain?
Les x
Quote by couple_ne2000

So is terrorism.......but you seemed to forget that.......when you say we go an attack their people....who is their people?........other terroists?......

Yes, of course Terror campaigns are wrong......but the Terror campaigns are being waged by groups, not by nations - which is why many people feel very strongly against the arguments for a war on Terror.
By carrying out bombing campaigns against countries because a group of people happen to reside or are hiding in that country does not make sense. The 7/7 bombers in this country came from the Leeds area - does this mean that it would be just to section off the Leeds area and begin a bombing camaign againt all residents - as they harbour terrorists, or if ETTA (?ETA) begin another car bombing campaign we should start bombing parts of Spain?
Les x
I'd be in favour of bombing Scunthorpe lol
There are countries that would like to see Israel obliterated even long before their war with Lebanon.....Israel will never be able to talk even if they found peace with Palestine, to these countries,they just don't want to know....Does Israel have the right to defend its self by whatever means nessessary?
Jags, I would ask you not to lock this thread.
The more we talk about a subject the more we understand it.
We in the west are lucky because we have access to the free media and we can form our own views.
Imagine living in a poor country with no access to free media and the rulers of that country telling you what is true, in the end you will belive them.
Terrorisism works, you only have to look at the IRA/PIRA/PLO to see that.
Wether you agree with it depends on who's side you are on.
The man who has stood outside the houses of parliment for the last five years has made no difference to goverment policy, however, if he was blowing people up, the goverment would have taken notice.
As long as human beings walk the face of this planet, we will kill each other.
I would also ask people to respect the armed forces, they have to do what the goverment tell them to do.
"For those that have fought for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know".
Quote by PoloLady

So is terrorism.......but you seemed to forget that.......when you say we go an attack their people....who is their people?........other terroists?......

Yes, of course Terror campaigns are wrong......but the Terror campaigns are being waged by groups, not by nations - which is why many people feel very strongly against the arguments for a war on Terror.
By carrying out bombing campaigns against countries because a group of people happen to reside or are hiding in that country does not make sense. The 7/7 bombers in this country came from the Leeds area - does this mean that it would be just to section off the Leeds area and begin a bombing camaign againt all residents - as they harbour terrorists, or if ETTA (?ETA) begin another car bombing campaign we should start bombing parts of Spain?
Les x
I'd be in favour of bombing Scunthorpe lol
rotflmao :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Maybe I should have found a better argument :P
Les x
Quote by browning
We in the west are lucky because we have access to the free media and we can form our own views.

But not to be confused with an unbiased media!
Les x
Quote by couple_ne2000

We in the west are lucky because we have access to the free media and we can form our own views.

But not to be confused with an unbiased media!
Les x
Or a fault proof, accurate, honest one with no spin, no leaking of not quite right information and no propaganda mixed in.
Quote by PoloLady

We in the west are lucky because we have access to the free media and we can form our own views.

But not to be confused with an unbiased media!
Les x
Or a fault proof, accurate, honest one with no spin, no leaking of not quite right information and no propaganda mixed in.
And for an instant demonstration on how the same news stories can be delivered to Western audiences with different spin and propaganda mixed in - try watching the UK version of CNN report of a story and then the American CNN report on the same story.
Les x
There is no such thing as unbiased media.
Quote by PoloLady
If we take the stance that all war is wrong and we should keep out of it unless it lands on our doorstep opens the front door and shouts "surprise!" - should we have allowed 100's of 1000's more Jews be killed during the 40's (and no doubt to this day or to the completion of their elimination)? After all, Mr H had not set foot on our great shores had he?
Some wars are wrong.
Some wars are difficult to understand the complexity of, when on the face of it, it seems just to be about money or land or oil.
Some wars we may well at lease be able to apply moral values to in-part justify the actions - if they take out a bastard who is committing genocide.
To make broad and blanket statements that 'all war is wrong' lacks some thought IMO.
To suggest that our troops should have decided not to go and refused to fight is plain ignorant. The day our troops ignore their orders and make their own minds up as to what they will or will not do is the day we either have a military coo and find ourselves under a much less fair governing system or we have no armed forces.

We have such a system in place right now, It is the duty of a serviceman/woman to refuse an order they believe is Illegal, or at least that is the position of the Nuremberg principles. Of course, trying to prove the illegality of an order is again down to interpretation of the rules. A loose-loose situation for most service personnel.
Stormy
Quote by firelizard
If we take the stance that all war is wrong and we should keep out of it unless it lands on our doorstep opens the front door and shouts "surprise!" - should we have allowed 100's of 1000's more Jews be killed during the 40's (and no doubt to this day or to the completion of their elimination)? After all, Mr H had not set foot on our great shores had he?
Some wars are wrong.
Some wars are difficult to understand the complexity of, when on the face of it, it seems just to be about money or land or oil.
Some wars we may well at lease be able to apply moral values to in-part justify the actions - if they take out a bastard who is committing genocide.
To make broad and blanket statements that 'all war is wrong' lacks some thought IMO.
To suggest that our troops should have decided not to go and refused to fight is plain ignorant. The day our troops ignore their orders and make their own minds up as to what they will or will not do is the day we either have a military coo and find ourselves under a much less fair governing system or we have no armed forces.

We have such a system in place right now, It is the duty of a serviceman/woman to refuse an order they believe is Illegal, or at least that is the position of the Nuremberg principles. Of course, trying to prove the illegality of an order is again down to interpretation of the rules. A loose-loose situation for most service personnel.
Stormy
Good point - but it is not quite intended to give the armed forces the right to decide "I am not in favour of this particular war, so I am not going. I will go when one comes along which I do support".
Quote by da69ve
There are countries that would like to see Israel obliterated even long before their war with Lebanon.....Israel will never be able to talk even if they found peace with Palestine, to these countries,they just don't want to know....Does Israel have the right to defend its self by whatever means nessessary?

Of course it doesn't. If that was aimed at me (because I admitted I am Jewish), then let me state quite clearly that I am against what they are doing to Lebanon. All war is wrong - I am not hypocritical enough to support them because i share their religion.