Mother Nature has been unkind to some swingers giving us mastectomies, ileostomies or other surgical procedures which change our appearance a little but not us as people. Would YOU be comfortable with a partner who had one of these? Please be honest.
in all honesty? Probably not. I guess the exception to the rule would depend on how well I new them and if I found their inner being sexy.
Being naturists makes it easier for us to accept it but many potential swinging partners cannot see the person 'inside, only the body 'outside'.
I'm not sure what an ileostomy is, is it similar to a colostomy?
I think I'd be a little trepidatious (is that a word?) in case anything got dislodged. We had a difficult time with my father-in-law's colostomy bag. So that would be the only thing that might put me off, worry that I might hurt someone.
As far as being attractive, sexy, etc - well as I've said on another thread, scars, and other unusual aspects just make a person more interesting, to my mind.
Wow...I have so many bits missing (and not just from my head!) but am still functioning!
It's a hard question.
Seriously...I do have bits missing and enough scars to map out the roads of Britain!! It has never affected how people relate to me as a person or sexually.
Scars and slight disfigurement and 'wonky' bodies wouldn't bother me (or I'd be a right hypocrite!!). But (this may be controversial) extreme disfigurement would be something that I would not find attrative.
Another factor to sexual atteraction is how confident the person is in their skin...but that goes for everyone, not just people who have had surgery!!
Thanks for those,
Generally the pouches are safe and hygenic but you do have to be a little less acrobatic!
to be honest, i dont think it would bother me, i like to get to know the person first prior to any form of play, i would miss playing with nipples but im sure there would be other places to turn the lady on.
none of us are perfect, we all have our own dislikes on our bodies, and personally i think we all worry to much about how others percieve us.
I don't usually worry about such things I'm much more interested in getting to know the person.
I agree with what Jaymar and Tan say but it is true to say that there are people, who swing just for a shag and look for things on a shallow (I don't mean that in a nasty way) level. This is perfectly valid - we all need to acknowledge eachother's preferences and there is space for all.
So if people are out for plain sex and nothing else then, I guess it is quite possible that they will be judging by appearance to a greater degree than looking for the person within.
That is not to say that they would baulk at the colostomy or mastectomy but I think it is more likely that they will.
Personally, I prefer the whole package type of person - it is so much more fun and rewarding in my view. Imperfections are what make people fascinating in any case - as Tan says perfect is boring.
.
I believe I may have said something similar before, but:
Japanese potters used to deliberately add an imperfection to thier finest wares.. in the belief that the flaw would add to piece.
lp
It wouldn't be something I was searching for, but then again it wouldn't be a deal breaker if I had some affinity with the poor sod that had one.
I think it would depend on the person and what they had, I dont think I would have an issue with most things but there again we are kind of people who are shallow and go on pictures of people before we meet them, we also prefer not to get to know people to well before shagging them so we wouldnt have time to get to know the inner person.