Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Morals... on a swinging site?

last reply
49 replies
2.1k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by redpantherman
No need Red, life will do that eventually mate

Quote by BIoke
:sleeping: Someone poke me wiv a stick wen he's finished!

... and just where would you like poking exactly? :twisted: wink
Curse you Big G...
you & your Gypsy Lee predictions!!!
bolt
biggrin lucky heather sir ?
Quote by Silk and Big G
biggrin lucky heather sir ?

Hello Dave...? Is that Dave...?
You're MY wife now....! :twisted:
Quote by splendid_
I think that Biker said something about attached men being less 'bunny boilerish.' That is certainly one of the reasons that I prefer fucking them.
I also find them more grateful wink
Ummm I also don't fuck coppers. More indiscrete and knobbish 'swingers' I have yet to meet. rolleyes
ummm I won't fuck people who are attached if I know their partner. I am uninterested if they lie to their partner but I won't be.
I won't fuck people who slate their partner to me. I am not interested in their personal life, I just want sex with them and am not a marriage counsellor.
I won't fuck people who slag off or talk about people, by name, that they have been with. I dislike indiscretion and name dropping is crass and just a leedle bit nasty.
I have a lower age limit but when meeting with Worlass that is moved as she is 6 years younger than me and I have to take that into consideration. I don't have an upper age limit but, again, when meeting with worlass I have to take her thoughts into consideration.
I don't know which of those things are attached under the label morals. I would just say preferences. Some are moveable and some are not.

Some fair comments there, certainly made me think. I might have to reconsider the marriage thing
Quote by Silk and Big G
Well its all about meanings and definitions DG.
Morals are really just a social construct, imposed basic regulations which help make the fabric of our system of living together work more efficiently. Of course just as society is a living dynamic thing so are its 'moral' requirements and as such they lend themselves to some bending and adjustment as they develop. That development is not always successful as it is constantly fluid and sometimes the adjustment of morals takes place more as a consequence of completely selfish motives of the individual. Unfortunately the human condition dictates that selfish motives often overtake our awareness of the greater good of society and we lose sight of the bigger picture. Thats why you will often see the same individuals expressing their intense worry about the break down of the family unit and the moral decline of young peoples values, whilst happily flouting convention in a swinging lifestyle blissfully unaware of the connections between the two.
We are all just human, with all the weaknesses and vagueness which that entails so sometimes, in fact mostly, we live our lives in a messy mix of morals that suit us and areas of our lives we choose(unconsciously or not)to carefully avoid moral evaluation of even in our own applies to pretty much every person that exists with the possible exception of sociopaths . Either way it makes the subject a difficult one to have a conversation of specifics about, especially when its swinging.
Of course some would say that difficult discussions are the most productive, but I just come here for fun ;-)
Hope I took my time enough x
Peace

Agree with everything except the implication that the two drivers in bold are inextricably linked. There are many reasons why couples or even half of a couple might swing and they might even be necessary for the preservation of the family unit. I know this to be a fact. Not often the case though I admit.
So DG, I think issue of not swinging with married men who are cheating may not be moral so much as one of self preservation. Understandably, one doesn't want to get into confrontational situations that this sort of encounter can result in. But if you don't do it because you really wouldn't want to subject the wife who's being cheated upon to pain then that's a different matter. It's motivation.
.
Sorry Toon I didnt mean (in fact I dont think I did) suggest an inextricable link. It was a nod towards the larger implications of swinging as a lifestyle, its acceptability to both society and the individual and what that willingness to accept suggests about the collective psyche and its attitudes towards family as a structure. Assuming we accept that a positive attitude towards fidelity and monogamy is a major factor in the traditional view of a relationship. I didnt want to go into great detail about other factors as I wouldve been going on a bit ....I do that you know :-)
sometimes i wonder, why is the frisbee getting bigger? and then it hits me!................ rolleyes
Quote by Silk and Big G
Sorry Toon I didnt mean (in fact I dont think I did) suggest an inextricable link. It was a nod towards the larger implications of swinging as a lifestyle, its acceptability to both society and the individual and what that willingness to accept suggests about the collective psyche and its attitudes towards family as a structure. Assuming we accept that a positive attitude towards fidelity and monogamy is a major factor in the traditional view of a relationship. I didnt want to go into great detail about other factors as I wouldve been going on a bit ....I do that you know :-)

I guess I did 'tie your points together a bit' and that was an expedient to make my point - sorry. I'm not trying to construct an argument against your point because I agree with what you're saying.
But your reply helps me more. For example monogamy and fidelity are not necessarily coincident. One can be faithful and not be monogamous. The moral argument arises where there is infidelity and so it is possible to swing (not be monogamous) whilst being faithful and hence win the moral argument. So the answer to DG's cheating men is 'Yes it is proper to maintain moral behaviour on a swinging site'.
I was suggesting though that there maybe a moral reason for DG's choice not to swing with cheating men (the most likely in my judgement kiss) but there could be merely one of self protection, which is not based on morality.
Will someone kindly snatch this fooking shovel outta me hand???!!!
.
I didnt mean to directly contradict you either mate. I was just trying to clarify. I have the feeling we are talking slightly at cross purposes because of the vagueness of our respective definitions of what morality means to us.
Which is probably exactly what I meant by the chances of this thread going round in circles and imploding :-)
Gladly let you take the shovel and have the last post , then I reckon we should stop or neither of us will ever get a feckin blowjob again for fearing of boring the other members to death :-)
Peace
Sorry to go against your faithful but non monogamy thing Tune but I thoiught about it then checked.
faithful
Adjective
1. remaining true or loyal
2. maintaining sexual loyalty to one's lover or spouse
3. consistently reliable: my old, but faithful, four cylinder car
4. accurate in detail: a faithful translation of the book
I think i can maybe see where your coming from but faithful and monogamy are mutually exclusive
I have found that the people I have met through this site have strong morals.
Quote by westerross
I was suggesting though that there maybe a moral reason for DG's choice not to swing with cheating men (the most likely in my judgement kiss) but there could be merely one of self protection, which is not based on morality.
Will someone kindly snatch this fooking shovel outta me hand???!!!
.

You don't need a shovel Choon :kiss:
I think to a certain extent you're absolutely right. It is about self preservation up to a point, from looking after my feelings to having to deal with an angry wife. wink
I dare say the moral part, for me, comes in because I've been on the receiving end of a cheating partner. It hurts. It's unpleasant and I don't want to be responsible for someone else being in that position. If you make a choice to be with someone and the terms of that partnership are to be together exclusively and you find yourself wanting to be with someone else then you need to deal with that like an adult.
In my view, cheating is not the answer and no matter how you dress it up as a safe, clean, discreet option for me, nothing is going to get away from the fact that you're lying to your partner. I don't want any part of that. I'm sure that there are many reasons for cheating on your partner but none of them will ever make it right for me. In my world, it's fairly black and white.
Whilst I appreciate that everyone has their own boundaries and I'm sure I've inadvertantly fucked someone who's married without any knowledge of it, it's not something I would choose to do. I do respect other people's right to that choice and it's not for me to judge them for making those choices. To each their own.
:mrgreen:
This is a very interesting subject and one that affected us today, we recieved a mail from a couple who, on first glance, ticked all the right boxes.
We then read their profile properly and discovered that this "couple" were actually 2 people who were having an affair and actually swinging behind their partners backs as a couple :shock:
Now, we're not easily shockable but we were speechless for a few very short seconds as we find this morally un-acceptable.
To have an affair is bad enough, but to have an affair and swing is unbelievable!!
Needless to say we deleted the mail as we're having nothing to do with that train wreck bolt
Quick hijack.....I did'nt know R6 was Bloke!!! :shock:
So welcome back to my world..I missed you!!!!!!
and reply to the original post...No I have no Morals cool
Quote by westerross
I was suggesting though that there maybe a moral reason for DG's choice not to swing with cheating men (the most likely in my judgement kiss) but there could be merely one of self protection, which is not based on morality.
Will someone kindly snatch this fooking shovel outta me hand???!!!
.

Haha, gimme the shovel!
That's exactly my reason for not playing with "not getting any at home" people - it's not about my morals or theirs, it's about making sure that I don't end up in the middle of a domestic!
Those who do that can get on with it, just not with me biggrin
Quote by Serendipity

I was suggesting though that there maybe a moral reason for DG's choice not to swing with cheating men (the most likely in my judgement kiss) but there could be merely one of self protection, which is not based on morality.
Will someone kindly snatch this fooking shovel outta me hand???!!!
.

Haha, gimme the shovel!
That's exactly my reason for not playing with "not getting any at home" people - it's not about my morals or theirs, it's about making sure that I don't end up in the middle of a domestic!
Those who do that can get on with it, just not with me biggrin
Agreed. Lets be honest as well - It just doesn't feel right either - Some of us can look at it in the way that we know how we would feel if cheated on by a partner so have a spark of sympathy for the unknowing partner.
I am not so sure that it is always or precisely morality which is at work. There are a variety of values and emotions which are selected and applied at the owners convenience.
The ‘progress’ of a sexual adventurer can be rapid. Those who may have begun from fairly humble beginnings, can find themselves confronting a mix of new values, which not only include sexual abilities but many other thoughts and feelings that need to adjust to the new circumstances.
It may be that a couple who were in effect ‘washed up’ now have a new lease of life. Advancing their sex life puts them back in a position of power and control and subsequently they experience the feelings that go with that.
Cheating and equivalent activities are the standard stuff of tabloids and soaps. Almost meaningless in the vanilla world. Having a sense of ‘morality’ in the swinging world, gives the owner significant clout.
A new found status. But its meaningless in the vanilla world. And this is often where equating the two worlds is not always so easily workable.
It becomes selective to suit whichever circumstances it can be applied to, to make it seem right or effective. A lot of effort may go into screening out prospective partners before meeting, but the values can change instantly when someone is just too difficult to resist. Then suddenly the fact that someone is married is conveniently avoided, or skilfully ignored.
Perhaps a couple lived unsuccessfully by conventional morality, feeling weighed down by it. Swinging gives them the choice to reinstate it in a way which suits them, they can control it.
Often those who have done well in life look beyond sex and material values, it may be spiritual. In some cases its a feeling of benevolence towards others and advanced expectations of people. Asking them to share in an enlightenment. This kind of thing may come about unexpectedly and quickly to balance out the effects of sexual adventuring.
I think the greater part is confidence, decisiveness and the power of saying no. This is often delivered in a moralistic way to soften the blow. Otherwise it may appear smug and arrogant.
Morality is part of it, but not all of it.
Quote by Lost

I was suggesting though that there maybe a moral reason for DG's choice not to swing with cheating men (the most likely in my judgement kiss) but there could be merely one of self protection, which is not based on morality.
Will someone kindly snatch this fooking shovel outta me hand???!!!
.

Haha, gimme the shovel!
That's exactly my reason for not playing with "not getting any at home" people - it's not about my morals or theirs, it's about making sure that I don't end up in the middle of a domestic!
Those who do that can get on with it, just not with me biggrin
Agreed. Lets be honest as well - It just doesn't feel right either - Some of us can look at it in the way that we know how we would feel if cheated on by a partner so have a spark of sympathy for the unknowing partner.
Absolutely right! It doesn't feel right because in many ways swinging demands a more rigorous form of honesty than normal. This is, I believe for two main reasons - firstly it can be risky, as I don't think anyone will deny there are potential emotional pitfalls along the way for the unwary and secondly - for a couple - it is quite often all about sharing the experience whether you're let out on your own or not.
There is a level of maturity needed to swing as a couple successfully.
.
Quote by Lost
Sorry to go against your faithful but non monogamy thing Tune but I thoiught about it then checked.

faithful
Adjective
1. remaining true or loyal
2. maintaining sexual loyalty to one's lover or spouse
3. consistently reliable: my old, but faithful, four cylinder car
4. accurate in detail: a faithful translation of the book

I think i can maybe see where your coming from but faithful and monogamy are mutually exclusive

Hehe - now that definition didn't come from the Swingers' Dic did it!! lol
.