Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

My thoughts on social gatherings.......

last reply
432 replies
19.5k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by Jiggle
been grabed and forced in to a situation, that you can't get out out off, and are not hapy with is not very nice indeed, and it kinda ruins ya night!

I don't like to see someone like Jigs say that they are thinking about not attending munches 'cos of others behaviour. It makes me sad - 'cos Jigs was one of the first people I met at my very first Munch - and I know I teased you an all mate - but you really did help me that night kiss
And Little Gem too. Although she promised to grab me and never did! confused
I think this has been a good thread with a lot of good debate - and I welcome it for that.
For one - I enjoy going to munches for purely the social side. So come on guys - lets keep them social and fun.
I know I have been guilty of snogging at munches - but never uninvited (I hope :? ), but I have always worried about how it looked to the bar staff after! And maybe I should apologise to the owners of the pub in Glasgow - 'cos I think I ended up persuading the barmaid to give up her job and travel the world redface
aRSexx :color:
Quote by Dawn_Mids
been grabed and forced in to a situation, that you can't get out out off, and are not hapy with is not very nice indeed, and it kinda ruins ya night!

Jiggle..........I take it you never got your apology and reassurance that this would NEVER happen again?
Dawn mad
He's had a private one from me, and a reassurance that it won't happen again. I thought it had been dealt with and put to bed.
I appriciate that Jiggle didn't name anyone openly here.
I have no problem standing before my peers to make my apology to Jiggle public.
db
Quote by dambuster
He's had a private one from me, and a reassurance that it won't happen again. I thought it had been dealt with and put to bed.
I appriciate that Jiggle didn't name anyone openly here.
I have no problem standing before my peers to make my apology to Jiggle public.
db

I know that Dammie and I thank you for your comment.
The other person involved in this situation was asked by me to pm Jiggle, apologise and provide reassurance that the situation would not happen again.
Alas he has not mad
So there is a groper/abuser/bully in our midst, one who obviously feels that he has done no wrong?
He is also a well known long time member of the Forum.
Seeing as the guy has shown no remorse should he not be banned from future events?
Also, because he may want to attend future events, and therefore decides to apologise now, shouldn’t his sincerity be doubted?
Quote by Happy Cats
So there is a groper/abuser/bully in our midst, one who obviously feels that he has done no wrong?
He is also a well known long time member of the Forum.
Seeing as the guy has shown no remorse should he not be banned from future events?
Also, because he may want to attend future events, and therefore decides to apologise now, shouldn’t his sincerity be doubted?

I totally agree, but even if he does apologise, should he still remain a member of this site?
Defintely not IMO. An apology does not detract from the fact that an act occured which made someone feel uncomfortable. In other words a form of abuse.
Would it be looked upon in another light if it had been a woman who had suffered this assault? confused
So what if he apologises? Does that mean he's free to do it all over again . . . just as long as he says "sorry" after each event rolleyes mad
Tracy-Jayne
I havent read all the most recent replies and to be honest it wouldnt make any difference to my thoughts anyway..
IMHO anyone involved with this most recent act should no longer be a member of this site..
After all that has been said and written of late then people should have been aware of how this kind of act is viewed...
I know for a fact that the idea of the most recent incident was banded about in the chatroom a couple of weeks ago and certain individuals were told in no uncertain terms that in no way should this happen but.........It has and now I believe action must be taken to ensure this never happens again..
And as for the appology well.......As has already been said......Anyone can say sorry after the event cant they but it doesnt detract that it has happened again..
Edited to correct my useless spelling..
jiggle mate... i sent you a pm, i really hope that what happened to you doesn't put you off going to other munches because you would be missed.... who else would i have to make go red... smile :) :)
seriously mate, if what happened is almost enough to make you start considering whether to stop going then we have gotten to a very sad stage..........
i think it has to be one rule for all now........ a lot of people are going to be looking at how the offending people are treated........and we can't have "well they did it and got away with it, why can't i???"
i am not asking for the offending people to be banned, but i can see why other people are....maybe this is the straw that breaks the camels back and reigns us all back in......
sean xxxxxxxxxxx
There are a few people who if we know they are going to a munch then we definately wont go....
So its started already hasnt it??
Quote by Steve_Mids
There are a few people who if we know they are going to a munch then we definately wont go....
So its started already hasnt it??

the sad thing is that you are right.. and i am beginning to do the same thing up to a point.....
if it was talked about in the chatroom then it has gotten out of control....
on the other side of the coin i can see a lot of people now walking on eggshells to make sure that no one is offended by anything, so it is going to be a very fine line.....
for example..say i would like to kiss a lady on saturday.. but i am not sure of how if is going to be construed by everyone else.. the dilema is do i still kiss her?if we do then how passionate is too passionate ect.....
at times i wish it was all more black and white.......
sean xxxxxx

I have absolutely no idea what any of you are talking about............... as usual I am the last to know....... and to be quite honest, that suits me down to the ground.......
But just want to say to Dawn and Jiggle........... I love both of you and if you think I am going to stop the cheek pecks when we meet............ then u r very much mistaken !!
To those of you who don't go to munches coz I am going................ I have changed my perfume nad my sense of dress.......lol........... and promised not to get drunk again !!.... Oh yes, and will, of course leave the axe at home next time..........
Happy playing, you sexy people . xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Quote by essexlady
.
Jiggles i know you was offended, but the person(s) concerned took you aside on the night and apologised cause I saw it......................... it was a joke that went too far and you were upset, the people concerned were told and have apologised. !!

Sorry to contradict you essexlady but this was NOT a joke that went too far....
This was pre-meditated as I have already said and I can show chatroom logs to prove it !!!!
It displays an almost predatory nature and is so far out of order its unbelievable...
Yes the main reason most of us are here is connected with sex but that is no excuse for the behaviour that is becoming commonplace is it??
i was intrigued and was considering nervously attending a munch with a female friend.. but now im horrified...my presumption that these are just social gatherings to say hi , ask questions and meet new likeminded friends is obviously wrong...being snogged or fondled upon entrance didnt appear in any desvcriptions i had read before
i prefer any woman i am with to be safe and wouldnt want to find myself not relaxing due to keeping an eye out for some moron
please please tell me that this is not the norm!
Non alcahol gatherings may be a better idea
Quote by essexlady
we are all here openly seeking sex, if ya can't handle it get off the roundabout

No, actually... that is TOTALLY the wrong approach. Some of us are not here OPENLY seeking sex. And even the ones that are do not go to munches to get sexually assaulted.
I say once more... munches are SOCIAL gatherings.
rolleyes
We have discussed at length on this very thread the steps we could possibly take if things get out of hand or if someone feels they have been wronged. I'm glad this thread has come to life again as nothing was really decided at the last discussion.
Quote by blonde

I have absolutely no idea what any of you are talking about............... as usual I am the last to know....... and to be quite honest, that suits me down to the ground.......
But just want to say to Dawn and Jiggle........... I love both of you and if you think I am going to stop the cheek pecks when we meet............ then u r very much mistaken !!
To those of you who don't go to munches coz I am going................ I have changed my perfume nad my sense of dress.......lol........... and promised not to get drunk again !!.... Oh yes, and will, of course leave the axe at home next time..........
Happy playing, you sexy people . xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You are adorable at times blonde, you really are kiss
Quote by mattius
i was intrigued and was considering nervously attending a munch with a female friend.. but now im horrified...my presumption that these are just social gatherings to say hi , ask questions and meet new likeminded friends is obviously wrong...being snogged or fondled upon entrance didnt appear in any desvcriptions i had read before
i prefer any woman i am with to be safe and wouldnt want to find myself not relaxing due to keeping an eye out for some moron
please please tell me that this is not the norm!
Non alcahol gatherings may be a better idea

Babe,
My post was just me being daft !!!
The Munches are great fun........... U dont need to keep an eye out for anyone at all !!
Don't be put off............... we chat, Have a giggle , a dance and sometimes a karaoke or bowling etc........ just ppl meeting ppl !!
Jiggles i know you was offended, but the person(s) concerned took you aside on the night and apologised cause I saw it......................... it was a joke that went too far and you were upset, the people concerned were told and have apologised. You are one of the true gents in the room, I agree, but all this banning for ice throwing and name calling and kissing is riidulous, we are all here openly seeking sex, if ya can't handle it get off the roundabout, cause very soon there won't be anyone left in forums, chat room, munches other than the new people who cant get to attend any of them anyway!!
Ok i dont do muches(one of the reasons being the type of behaviour i have heard of happening at these events) and probably have no right to comment on this matter but i do know Jiggle (not in the biblical sense) and he wouldnt hurt a fly.
He may be little over enthusiastic at times(and yes in the past he has really wound me up) but he didnt deserve to be the butt of this "joke". We all know that he blushes easily and i find it really hurtfull that anyone would bully him like this , knowing the way he would react.
It is not fair to be-little the way he felt and reacted. It has clearly taken him a lot of courage to raise the problem here and he was considerate enough not to mention names.
Also I have not mentioned names but this could lead to confusion :shock:
Untill I receive conformation I will continue not to mention specific names..
The chatlog I spoke of in previous posts does not include any of the people who were present on the night of the munch though..
can i just take 2 parts of what you have written....
Quote by essexlady
I have never been abused or annoyed by anyone at any SH munch, mainly as I don't go around approaching men and flirting with them in an too open manner, ive seen people in all states of undress and sorry but some of you are openly asked to be groped. What will happen is someone will seriously be abused one day and then all this crying wolf will back fire and threat person will not be taken seriously.

openly asked to be groped!!!!.... i find that deeply worrying that anyone should think that of anyone else.......does it matter what anyone wears if it is a social gathering....people should know better.......
Quote by essexlady
we are all here openly seeking sex, if ya can't handle it get off the roundabout, cause very soon there won't be anyone left in forums, chat room, munches other than the new people who cant get to attend any of them anyway!!

we are here seeking sex...yes, i agree but i know that a munch is just a social function, at a mucch i am there for nothing more than that.. or that is the way that i go into them looking, if other people go into them with a different agenda then i think it need to me made crystal clear that they will not be tollerated...
i now know of two people who were maybe considering going to munches that your statement have made them decided that they do now not want to attend which is sad....
can we now have a firmly defined line between the munches and the meet/after-parities please.....
sean xxxxxxxx
EssexLady i completely take the point you're making. munches for me, and others i know, have always been very liberating events, and i'd hate to think we've lost that.
i stand pretty much by what i said earlier, that lots of us have really enjoyed and benefitted from the openness and intimacy among friends that has always characterised the munches i've been to. but it seems people have lost sight of the fact that this kind of horseplay, and snogging, and whatever else, should ONLY happen among friends who are BOTH happy with it. when people are getting genuinely upset by it and considering not going to munches any more, things have gone way too far, which is really bloody sad.
i'm absolutely stunned that some members here, who should know better, would so invade someone elses personal space, and seem to be struggling so hard with the concept of mutual consent!
i still hope these are genuinely isolated incidents, and we can resolve this without losing something. i'd hate to feel as though i had to be on my guard and second guess everything i did at a munch, cos if we're all gonna be worrying now what signals we're sending out when we kiss a friend and lark about to others who are seemingly inacapable of making those distinctions, then i think we've lost something really valuable, and that pisses me right off!
neil x x x ;)
I am pretty new to the site and about to attend my first mini munch. Having followed this thread I can see why some people would be put off by the antics that have been described. I can see that a munch or mini munch is a perfect forum to meet and put faces to names personally I like to feel that noone would invade my personal space even though they may feel they know me from having chatted online or exchanges in the forums. These events have to be self policed and at the end of the day its sort of presenting a public face of swinging and that isnt that swingers are easy or that they indulge in sex at every opportunity (now theres a thought) far too many people come on here expecting an instant fix up (a view that could partly be gained from behaviour observed at munches by non swingers) ok i'm rambling now and am gonna shut up.
I've avoided replying to this thread so far, becasue I've done things (consensually) at a munch that I shouldn't have, and I don't want to be the pot that calls the kettle black, but I want to add a few points that haven't come up so far, so with an apology to anyone my behaviour offended, here goes...
It's been suggested that munch organisers be given the power to ban people for life from munches. As a munch organiser, I have to say that that would be an unbearable burden. Running a munch can be hard work. Adding in the knowledge that at any time I could be summoned to the other end of the room to pronounce a permanent and lifestyle-changing judgement on something that I didn't see happening, based purely on hearsay eveidence from (mostly) drunk people, and quite possibly involving people I fancy/or have played with would probably put me off running munches. Anyone can run a munch, not everyone can be, should be, or wants to be a site mod, or have mod-like powers.
Secondly, having been briefly involved in the S&M scene has taught me that never, under any circumstances, does dressing a certain way mean that you 'are asking for it'. If you take that point of view, then you are removing other people's freedom to dress how they please, which is a freedom of self-expression that many people (myself included) think is very, very important.
Lastly, at the top of every page in this site, including the whole of 'lets meet up' and the 'what is a munch?' page, right above the top menu are the words "Meet Swingers". I think those words ahve a great deal of importance in this debate. While a munch is unarguably "a social event, often in a public place", it's also an event where you will, inevitably 'meet swingers'. Does that mean meeting people who are more likely to behave slightly outragously? Or should it mean 'meet swingers who are trying hard to act vanilla'? Would a munch be a good way for people to get to know what our community is like if we all behaved in a very politically correct way? I really don't know, but that is in a sense, what's being discussed here.
Quote by Mister_Discreet
Secondly, having been briefly involved in the S&M scene has taught me that never, under any circumstances, does dressing a certain way mean that you 'are asking for it'. If you take that point of view, then you are removing other people's freedom to dress how they please, which is a freedom of self-expression that many people (myself included) think is very, very important.

I appreciate your point here and strongly agree with you on freedom of choice. Unfortunately society as a whole does not think this way. In circumstances where the public are there or are likely be, whether we like it or not, we have to consider the way in which societies unwritten rules will be applied – sometimes for our own safety as well as for the sake of avoiding reinforcing an inaccurate stereotype.
Quote by Mister_Discreet
Lastly, at the top of every page in this site, including the whole of 'lets meet up' and the 'what is a munch?' page, right above the top menu are the words "Meet Swingers". I think those words ahve a great deal of importance in this debate. While a munch is unarguably "a social event, often in a public place", it's also an event where you will, inevitably 'meet swingers'. Does that mean meeting people who are more likely to behave slightly outragously? Or should it mean 'meet swingers who are trying hard to act vanilla'? Would a munch be a good way for people to get to know what our community is like if we all behaved in a very politically correct way? I really don't know, but that is in a sense, what's being discussed here.

Something I have learnt is - the scene is and means different things to different people. We are all different, some people more outgoing or even outrageous than others – we should not judge people by this, it is their choice. Just because one group of people make one choice it does not follow that all people on the scene make the same choice and adopt the same behaviour. Some people may choose to be more reserved than others – they are no less part of the scene. However, I do not believe people should try to pretend to be something that they are not - but do feel an amount of common sense should be applied. We adjust our behaviour all day every day to some degree, according to our surroundings – we behave to some extent differently when we are at home to when we are at work, or, when we are in a regular pub to when we are in a swinging club. You would not expect to see the same behaviour at a supermarket as you would at a swinging club. Whilst I again totally agree with freedom of choice and expression, society as a whole is not ready to accept that. There is a time and a place for most things and we as members of society, as well as the swinging scene, need to be aware that in some circumstances some behaviour is not appropriate. I am not saying this is fair, right or something I feel should always be the case – but for the time-being it is a fact of life.
Fee and I have only attended the Glasgow munch so far and had a fantastic time.
I said my bit at the start of the post but having read through the last few pages to date then I feel the need to say a bit more.
Our own experience was really good.
We had the benefit of being on the forum for a while and had chatted back and forward with a few people and generally got ourselves known before hand.
It was a great night, in good company and in my opinion a lot more civilised than the majority of (non swinging) clubs I’ve been in but……….there are still similarities to such venues.
I had three lovely snogs from three lovely women. It was the first time we had met in real life although we had all chatted before.
Did I do anything out of the ordinary? No.
Did I grope any of them? No.
Did I want to………. cool
Did it make any difference the fact that I had met them via a swingers website? No.
Now don’t get me wrong, I’m no angel :angel: but I do, like the VAST majority of people on here, know how to behave and treat people with respect.
We are all adults.
Are people REALLY suggesting that we can’t have a consensualkiss and a cuddle at a night out?
Has anyone ever visited a “vanilla” night club and not witnessed consensual public snogging and an arse getting felt?
I’d be very surprised if you had.
I think that this debate is a healthy one and was obviously needed. I just worry that we are blurring what is acceptable consensual behaviour and what is downright unacceptable be it physical, sexual or just making an out and out pest of yourself.
We personally did have an unfortunate incident with one male, which was dealt with at the time by me telling him to leave us alone.
He was being an arse, with possibly too much alcohol and trying to take things for granted.
His actions were eventually reported and he was informed that what had happened was unacceptable.
Did that incident or his actions differ from those of a drunken male at any other disco? Nah, not really.
We are all liberated people. Because of that we can openly discuss things such as this and I have no doubt that the Munches will continue to be a great success and fantastic nights out for all.
Personally though I’d be very wary of introducing too many rules and regulations other than those of common decency.
If there are persistent offenders then we, as a community, should deal with them by way of exclusion, banning whatever you want to call it.
Having a joke at someone else’s expense is juvenile and can and will undoubtedly get out of hand and if it causes hurt or embarrassment is obviously unacceptable behaviour.
I am totally ignorant of the circumstances surrounding any particular incident previously referred to so have no place to comment on them but I do admire Dammie’s post for his obvious sincerity.
The more serious offence of sexual assaults, and you can wrap it up whatever way you want but that is what some of the peoples experiences are amounting to, should be dealt with severely in order that no one else has to be faced with such a possibility again. If it doesn’t go as far as a criminal complaint then at least the offenders should NEVER attend another SH munch.
I go back to my original post on the matter. Lets all just try and have a bit more respect and common sense when it comes to attending munches. They are great events and nobody should feel scared at them. It would be a huge shame to see them drift away.
the Laird
Quote by Mister_Discreet
Would a munch be a good way for people to get to know what our community is like if we all behaved in a very politically correct way? I really don't know, but that is in a sense, what's being discussed here.

I don't think acting within the law and respecting people's right not to be assaulted should be so casually dismissed as political correctness. If someone's approaches are not wanted and if those approaches are explicitly rejected and the predator continues, that is assault, plain and simple.
A munch is a social gathering, not an orgy. You can have the orgy in private afterwards if you want, but even at your private party you wouldn't (unless you were particularly stupid) go along with the expectation that you were by default up for anything just by being there.
If you want to know what is acceptable behaviour at a public venue, it's really very simple: Imagine that you are not part of the munch group - you just happen to be there, perhaps a member of staff at the pub or whatever or another guest of the establishment. What behaviour would you in those circumstances deem acceptable from a group of people at that venue?
If people weren't so selfish, they'd know how to behave, but then selfishness is something I've learned to expect from a small but very visible minority in this community. sad
Sorry, I've not made my original point very clearly... by 'very politically correct' I meant behaving in a totally vanilla way, ie none of the consensual bottom-patting, same sex kissing, or other behaviour that is totally legal and mutually acceptable for those invovled, but would raise eyebrows if the women's Institute were sharing the room with us.
I certainly didn't mean to imply that anything illegal or non-consensual is in any way acceptable.
Hmm good to see more on this, it has as was said not gone on to a conclusion.
Jiggle I am sorry you also had a problem mate, I don't know the details but do know how much these things can affect people.
As was discussed before I still feel we need Munch Helpers. Volunteers who will try to sort these issues on the night, as well as just look out for everyone. Equally I don't think they or the munch organiser should be making calls to ban from all SH events or the site. What they should be able to do is ask someone to leave a munch if there is a real need to, after exhausting all other ways to resolve an issue. Helpers also should not be site mods as:
1. Mods need nights off
2. Mods need to be the impartial judges if somthing ends up being passed to them to look at
For a stronger response there is only group of people we can trust with it, the mods. They have the overview of us as people, can take via PM views on any incident of complaint, and make a decision of a reasonable response in the cold light of day. Banning for ever from the site and munches I think should be a last resort, or a reaction to some form of criminal action with the Police involved. After all if we make an idiot of ourselves then we want a slapped wrist. However if you hurt someone, or do somthing illegal then you get what is coming to you.
I would suggest that we have levels of response from:
1. Ejecting from the night
2. Private apology
3. Public apology
4. 6 month ban from munches
5. A site and munch ban from a period to forever
6. Civil or criminal action being taken
Final suggestion is that all complaints be done through either munch helpers on the night, or the normal complaints system on the site. I think we should keep names out of the public forum until a decision has been taken. I don't suggest this has happened, but we need to ensure a false accusation does not destroy someones reputation before the person can explain themselves.
Oh and very final point, munches are 99% safe and enjoyable and I have had a great time at a few of them. I have been approached and involved in a few snogs, and politly refused a few offers as well without incident. What we are discussing here is for the very small number of incidents as you would get in any big gathering where things go a little too far.
Even if nothing else comes out of this thread I think everyone will have a new concept of what a munch is and we will be looking out for each other a bit more. I thnk that alone will lead to a better enviroment in future munches and social meets.
Quote by tallnhairy
As was discussed before I still feel we need Munch Helpers.

I would prefer to think that, having discussed it, we can wake up, acknowledge our social responsibilities, act as normal adult human beings and police our own behaviour, rather than being scrutinised by an arbitrary gang of enforcers. The presumption to police other people is what prevented me going to the Leicester munch insofar as a member, who has a massive chip on his shoulder and has for a long time regarded himself as SH's self-appointed moral guardian, told the organiser I was out to cause trouble. The organiser then took it upon himself to demand, via a mod instead of approaching me personally, that I be made to promise to behave. Naturally I told him where to shove it, but my point is, a munch police force cannot, as I have just demonstrated, be guaranteed to be fair and in my opinion would almost certainly not be fair.
For a stronger response there is only group of people we can trust with it, the mods.

A dangerous assumption, IMO. There is nothing special about mods. They are no more qualified to enforce discipline at munches than you or I. I don't often disagree with you, but on this occasion, I think this is a really bad idea.
Regards,
Ice
People who attend munches are from a swinging website. Some are active swingers, many are probably not and are dipping their toes in the water, maybe for the first time. Since a munch is advertised as a social event in a vanilla environment then surely that is what it should be.
Some of the behaviour that we have witnessed at the 2 munches we have attended, and the behaviour that has been mentioned in this thread, is not vanilla behaviour. We play at clubs every week and probably fall into the category of 'hardened' swingers, but we feel embarrassed to watch adolescent type fumblings in public places, even the social areas of swinging clubs. We are not shocked or disgusted but embarrassed for the participants who give the impression of being desparate for play and unable to wait for the right time or place.
We think that sexual activity should be kept for after the munch but we were surprised to see the relative lack of action at the club after the munches. Possibly the overt sexual behaviour goes on at a munch because of, not despite, it being a vanilla environment. Maybe some people see it as a safe place to indulge in a little soft swing where it is certain that it cannot go further.
As Ice says, self regulation should be the way to sort out the problem, rather than active policing, but until everyone is prepared to take responsibility for their own behaviour then munches will be less than pleasant for many people.
Quote by Ice Pie
I don't often disagree with you, but on this occasion, I think this is a really bad idea.

Ice please feel free to disagree smile I don't feel there is a right or wrong view on this and debate is the best way to find a solution.
Quote by Ice Pie
As was discussed before I still feel we need Munch Helpers.

I would prefer to think that, having discussed it, we can wake up, acknowledge our social responsibilities, act as normal adult human beings and police our own behaviour, rather than being scrutinised by an arbitrary gang of enforcers. The presumption to police other people is what prevented me going to the Leicester munch insofar as a member, who has a massive chip on his shoulder and has for a long time regarded himself as SH's self-appointed moral guardian, told the organiser I was out to cause trouble. The organiser then took it upon himself to demand, via a mod instead of approaching me personally, that I be made to promise to behave. Naturally I told him where to shove it, but my point is, a munch police force cannot, as I have just demonstrated, be guaranteed to be fair and would almost certainly not be fair.

Re munch police I can see where you are coming from, it is my worry that they would act as 'moral guardians' as well, but that is not the role I would envisage for them. I think having strict guidlines on what they are there for would be a way around this. I really see them as the people a single person could go to for help. Not so much to judge as simply to assist, for example:
A single lady decides to go to a munch (ok I know I playing on lady being vunerable so read bloke if you wish, we all the same for this example). While there they have not made many friends and get cornered by someone who makes them feel uncomfortable, where do they go?
Now in the case of munch helpers there is 3 or 4 people there to help, not to run around trying to throw people out, but to be a listening ear and someone the new person knows they can approach safely for help. Someone who will be sober, and just look out for them.
Ok that is a slight change on what I posted above, but based on what you said it is maybe a better way. I agree with you that moral police won't help the situation, that should be left to the 'feel' of the night and some general guidelines.
Quote by Ice Pie
For a stronger response there is only group of people we can trust with it, the mods.

A dangerous assumption, IMO. There is nothing special about mods. They are no more qualified to enforce discipline at munches than you or I.
As for using the mods, I know they are just human beings, I know a few of them personally and know how hard they can find the role. However they do try to maintain an impartial attitude, they can gather info from a number of sources, and we already trust them with our usernames on the site.
I would not suggest they enforce discipline at the munch, but that in the case of a complaint coming out of a munch they investigate. My reasons for this are that doing nothing sends the wrong signals to people who my abuse the privilage of being a muncher, and as I commented at the end of my previous post a public complaint damages someones reputation before they can defend / explain themselves. Once we have a confirmed complaint the response should I suppose be guided by all the mods and the person who was wronged, together they could come as close to fair as we going to get IMO.
Quote by Sexysteph
I did see the incident on Saturday and I believed at the time that Jiggle was party to what was going on. I unreservedly apologise to Jiggle for NOT picking up on his distress as I had thought he had gone along with it as he has in the past.

What a load of bollocks.... In no way, shape or form had he been a willing party to this sort of behaviour in the past!!.... The previous time he was forced into a situation that he was not happy with, at no time was he a willing party....
I have been in the chatroom when the antics with ducktape etc have been joked about but that is all I believed it to be - a joke. Jiggle was part of some of these chats and I wish he had told me that he was an unwilling participant - I may have then not misread his body language on Saturday and been more in a position to assist him.

Yes I was in the chatroom at the time as well and made it perfectly clear that what was being suggested (I personally took it to be a veiled threat) was unacceptable... If you have the logs you may want to look back because at the time Jiggle went very very quiet and said very little... A little unusual for one so chatty dont you think??... Perhaps he was uncomfortable with the conversation??
As far as this incident is concerned I know all parties involved and I know that had they been aware of the effect they were having - then this incident most likely would NOT have happened.

I have to dis-agree as the people involved in this incident were also involved in the previous incident along with another and they were well aware that Jiggle was not happy with the situation.
As for the suggestion of "Munch helpers" I think that would be very unfair on the nominated people as it would not be a social gathering for them... I doubt you would actually get anyone to put themselves forward for it...
Like IcePie said, what we need is self-regulation.... "we can wake up, acknowledge our social responsibilities, act as normal adult human beings and police our own behaviour"
For goodness sakes we are supposed to be adults!!.... This sort of behaviour is what I would expect from teenagers who have just discovered sex...
Shireen (Severely pissed off at the minute)