I see that we made todays issue of the news of the world. Wot a load of crap as usual. Did anyone else read this article ?
Some of the clubs charge ? Well, theres a thing !
I'm surprised they haven't also mentioned that cars need petrol to run, hotels charge for rooms and that you have to pay for items you take from shops. They're all equally obvious and logical !
Carpathian, who's not seen the article but could probably write 60% of it without even trying - sigh
But Mark... it looks good now (particularly with those new photos of Posh - ooooooh!). You mean it's going to get even better?
Right I didnt see the articul, so who is going to send it to me.
I would advise against buying the News Of The World, as it is fraught with risks. As well as exposure to brain-stunting articles, there are huge mind-narrowing dangers. And they charge money for it!
MikeNorth
I've spent most of my 45 years running away from what the 'Vox Populi' advocated; I'm not likely to start buying 'The News of The Screws' now. (I stiil think 'Jordan' is a 'Conservation Grade'Cereal Bar'). They haven't even got passable Rugby coverage-except on that day when Erica Roe' strutted her stuff. So, this one has passed me buy and , ala Rhett Butler: 'Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn'.
You'll only get yourself a reputation saying things like that, Sappho !
Would it really be that good a plan considering Saege's little "accident" in there ?
Carpathian
It's annoying when somebody answers you back and you still aren't sure if they've just taken the piss....which you then realise means they probably did.
Thanks Sappho, er, I think
Carpathian
They missed the offending article out of the online version - but neglected to miss out the offensive articles about Jordan and Peter - (who they?)
Mind you if the people who buy such yellow press come here they will be sadly disappointed by the lack of frenzied sex and the lack of sexually explict talk It won't take them long to wander off again.
WISH I'D NEVER MENTIONED IT !
No, no, it's good you did - it's given us a laugh if nothing else - now, we need to think of something jucy to talk about so we get mentioned next week too.... :grin:
So blue.... will you send them your WWW or just hope that they pick up on it?
Has to be one of the finest, but prob too sophisicated for NoW.... Does anyone on this site actually admit to buying that rag?
Regards
Gman
suspect you are sitting on a potential fortune Blue, but doubt NoW has the balls.... Suspect you would chew them ( NoW) up and spit them out....
Gmanx
Well, they can contact me if they're reading this and we'll see if they've got balls or not :grin: :grin: :grin:
I know papers trade/sell on the amount of stuff they can put it that makes punters buy them, but I thought I'd make a couple of points.
The lower end tabloids haven't run these kinds of storys for a while, when whas the last time they did an "expoze" on a swingers or bdsm club... fare while ago!
One possible reason for this is that with the huge increase in the numbers of people that are on the net people are far more able to get another view point, one that totaly conflicts with the papers original "moralistic/holyer than thow" stance.
The other thing was most of the article was based on the couple, if they are genuine, that for them swinging works. Probably because they could put lots of titilating sexual exploits information into the paper that way.
Without realising it the paper posted some great info on swinging, and some sound advise
"1 rule, we both have to like the other couple"
"swinging allows you to enjoy other people, without infidelity and secrecy of afairs"
They also have, good or bad, advertised this site and la-chambre's
Janes info on why not to swing looks as though it was put there as an after thought because the paper cant officially been seen to condone something like swinging. (Interestingly enough, the papers have learnt the difference between swinging as a whole and parts of it such as dogging which is comming in for a hammering in the papers and by police)
"Arisara"s negative view on swinging wasnt as negative as it first seems... A little different editing and quoting would have made her bad story into "I loved it playing with the women while my partner was there... I just didnt want to shag the blokes like he wanted me to..." Sounds to me that she was loving swinging, and would do it again just as long as it was only FMF action.
"corallie"s not quite a negative review (she said it wasnt the swinging that broke them up, but did cause problems) was a good way of saying "You've got to talk, and keep talking..." its true jealousy can come with swinging, but a strong couple will either resolve the issues or will stop swinging either way the relationship itsself is strong.
A weak relationship wont survive, but then again its more than likely doomed anyway... either one/both with have an affair (resulting in far more animosity and heart ache than swinging openly) or they will split just cos its not working.
You're not the journalist that wrote the article in question are you by any chance? If so, damn fine piece of work if you ask me - well done :grin: