Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

No reply to messages

last reply
30 replies
1.8k views
0 watchers
0 likes

Do you think it's rude not to reply to sensible messages?

Been numerous threads on this Sparky.
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/283990.html
Personally I don't reply to messages if the person makes it quite clear in the email by what they say that they haven't read my profile.
Otherwise I will reply, even if it's a thanks but no thanks.
Oh hello wave this topics a bit of an old friend but its good to air it evey now and then :-)
We answer all posts whether from single guys or couples we did however put an ad in the other day for a daytime meet with a single guy and got 14 mails which is cool, out of those 4 of them were in the realms of being possible and really only one fitted the criteria we laid down - luckily he was a nice guy and a great day ensued biggrin
Your point is sort of rhetorical though as couples, and i assume single fems. have that many mails from people not suited that in the end the lack of being bothered gets to them too. Its a shame that happens but it does,you just got to work through it. However, whatever your thoughts are there is no need to become rude or nasty to people no matter if cpls or singles. Just move on.
there is no rules about replying to anyone. Also 'sensible' is subjective. If I deem it to be sensible others may see it as totally annoying.
If I send out messages and they don't get replied to then I would take it we wouldn't be compatible sexually either. Job done time saved.
I don't have an ad and my profile makes it fairly clear that I'm not actively looking however I still get mail saying nice ad and when do I want to meet. I reply to those that are just saying hello but not to those who obviously can't be bothered to alter their multi-mailshot to a personal message.
In my alter-ego as a couple, we recently placed an ad, being quite specific about what was required, location, dates, what we wanted in reply. Of all the mail we got, only one sent what we asked for and fitted the rquirements of the ad. Should we reply to all the others that either couldn't read or just thought what the hell, I'm not what they're looking for but I'll reply anyway?
H.x
Quote by bbw_wboro
Been numerous threads on this Sparky.
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/283990.html
Personally I don't reply to messages if the person makes it quite clear in the email by what they say that they haven't read my profile.
Otherwise I will reply, even if it's a thanks but no thanks.

Same here.
A good proportion of the people who advertise will be "free" members who have no way of replying to your mail. There is no easy way to determine whether the person you are mailing has premium membership or not, so its easiest to assume that you will NOT get a reply unless the person has stated in advert or profile that they WILL reply. There are many other factors too, but they have all been covered in other threads.
Im a free member.... i can reply to messages.
Quote by splendid_
there is no rules about replying to anyone. Also 'sensible' is subjective. If I deem it to be sensible others may see it as totally annoying.
If I send out messages and they don't get replied to then I would take it we wouldn't be compatible sexually either. Job done time saved.

:thumbup:
Quote by Lilmiss
Im a free member.... i can reply to messages.

Although you are "a free member" miss what that actually means is that you are really a premium member because you joined before the cutoff date for "free members" that don't have to pay at all.
Admin made a deal, and as far as I am aware still stick to it, and that is if you joined before a certain date you are a premium member for life.
But if anyone joines the site just now as a free member then they would need to pay the upgrade fee in order to reply/post and chat etc.
Quote by woohoo
Im a free member.... i can reply to messages.

Although you are "a free member" miss what that actually means is that you are really a premium member because you joined before the cutoff date for "free members" that don't have to pay at all.
Admin made a deal, and as far as I am aware still stick to it, and that is if you joined before a certain date you are a premium member for life.
But if anyone joines the site just now as a free member then they would need to pay the upgrade fee in order to reply/post and chat etc.

Ahhhh well me being that "free/premium member... wouldn't know that lol
Unless your about to make me pay :shock:
:lol:
I try to reply to all personal messages (not winks). Because I am a single bi female, I have been inundated and have found it hard to make sure I reply to every message (as I don't want to seem rude to anyone!). I'm sure that I've missed some though!! It may just be that people do not have the time to reply to mail, and are not necesarily being rude!! smile
how about adding an auto reply button that sends a polite sorry but no thanks message - no excuse not to reply then - especially if it acted like a delete button and deleted the message too. Two clicks one to open the message, one to delete and reply... Thats all we/they do now anyway. Lol
ok, the profile to me is to confusing, and i think youve changed it since the start of this thread.
i dont often read profies and then send messages as profies are not ads. if i was to message someone i would check everything out first, the profile, the ads, the forum posts. the profie / add would have to be very clear on what someone liked, cuse i cant be arsed typing out messages if im not even sure if i am what they are looking for.
your profie says this ....
I do enjoy the social part of meeting people, but if you don't want that, it's fine, I can do that too.
but your forum posts say this ....
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:40 am
I'm not on here to make friends I'm on here for what the site was intended for), but if I happen to do so along the way, all the better.
_________________
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:04 am
Well I would consider the site to have been originally set up to allow people to broaden their sexual horizons, and to meet those of a like mind, not as a social networking site.
Forgive me if I'm wrong.
now i know you havent stated in your profie your here to be friends with anyone, but you like the social side, wouldnt that include being friendly?
i know what youve said in profie and then in forums i may be taking the wrong way, but thats my point, i dont have a clue from what you say what your looking for.
i probally havent made a lot of sense myself now.
xx fem xx
Quote by sparky33
I reply to profiles "only" if I think I "may" fit the bill, I never chance it, and the only other messages I may send are in compliment (If I already know I don't fit the bill but the pics are particularly pleasent).
But I'm totally disheartened at the lack of response, not even a thanks but no thanks.
I don't think I'm particularly repulsive, and I only respond to profiles that are looking for a single male, so it's not like I'm ignoring any specifics and I always read profiles.
If I have the decency and respect for the other member, by taking the time to read and take notice of what they are looking for, is it really so hard just to give a short reply, thanks but no thanks?
There is no need for ignorance, and this ignorance leads to contempt, then you get the single guys feeling aggrieved, moaning, then being moaned about for moaning.
It creates a vicious circle and animosity, so come on guys, a little mutual respect and less ignorance please, pretty please.
I should have said, I'm referring to the messages that are read, not the ones that aren't.

all well and good.... but I'll tell you the story of a single woman I knew who was on this site.....
she put up an ad...... went on holiday for 10 days....
when she came back she was faced with 700 replies....
now hand on heart..... would you answer EVERY single one???? would you?????
Quote by fem_4_taboo
ok, the profile to me is to confusing, and i think youve changed it since the start of this thread.
i dont often read profies and then send messages as profies are not ads. if i was to message someone i would check everything out first, the profile, the ads, the forum posts. the profie / add would have to be very clear on what someone liked, cuse i cant be arsed typing out messages if im not even sure if i am what they are looking for.
your profie says this ....
I do enjoy the social part of meeting people, but if you don't want that, it's fine, I can do that too.
but your forum posts say this ....
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:40 am
I'm not on here to make friends I'm on here for what the site was intended for), but if I happen to do so along the way, all the better.
_________________
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:04 am
Well I would consider the site to have been originally set up to allow people to broaden their sexual horizons, and to meet those of a like mind, not as a social networking site.
Forgive me if I'm wrong.
now i know you havent stated in your profie your here to be friends with anyone, but you like the social side, wouldnt that include being friendly?
i know what youve said in profie and then in forums i may be taking the wrong way, but thats my point, i dont have a clue from what you say what your looking for.
i probally havent made a lot of sense myself now.
xx fem xx

I know what you mean.
I lot of contradiction is off putting as you don't really know what they're after.
Consistency is the key, I think. Don't try to be a 'one size fits all'
wink
Quote by Bbw4umen
Don't try to be a 'one size fits all'
wink

I find it works well for me :P
So far my 'conquests' have ranged from size 8 to size 22 and most were very enjoyable. redface
Quote by Peanut
Don't try to be a 'one size fits all'
wink

I find it works well for me :P
So far my 'conquests' have ranged from size 8 to size 22 and most were very enjoyable. redface
I'm 18 bottom usually 20 top, though I do have one top that's a size 24
Wanna 'do' something you've never done before? :rascal:
hehe
Quote by sparky33
If you read those comments in context, they make sense.
The "social" thing is to say, if someone wanted to meet first and be sociable then get physical later (or not), that's fine, but if, as some do, they want to keep it strictly physical, I'm ok with that too.
I'm not really a "cold" person, so would find the first scenario easier.
I'm not on here to make friends as my main priority, I'm on here for "fun", yes being sociable is fun too, but if it happens along the way, all well and good.
That should put those extracts into better context.

lol
cos it's ALLLLLLLLLL about countdown! :giggle:
Quote by sparky33
I was never aware that context should be capitalised? Are you a grammar teacher? If so, when and where? The suits and glasses do it for me wink

Not a teacher, but I do wear a suit for work :wink:
No glasses I'm afraid but if you were in the chatroom last night you may have seen my beer goggles cool
:giggle:
Quote by sparky33
I wasn't lol, did I miss a treat?

You did lol
Not your 'typical' cam show but class all the same.
There was me with my beer goggles on, and yes they are physical beer goggles then there was another dude with a funky joker hat type thing and sunnies.
He said in the room, take a look at my cam I've got something that'll make you happy... expecting him to be wanking and saw that! I dunno about anyone else but it really cracked me up, was a nice change lol
Quote by sparky33
LOL
I don't wank on cam, don't see the point, unless personally requested that is.
Women look far better on cam as you have more to show and can dress up nice, cams can't really keep up with the movement of a wank..lol...plus, you have so many cocks to look at, can't be
I'm a memeber of xxxxxx, and on there on average there are 35 women ad 500 guys ffs, all wanking away, well most.
A cock is a cock, a face is what is most likely to get you noticed, and it's what most women are going to be attracted to.

uhuh
I go for the face.. if they've got a big cock it's a bonus but not a requirement cool
Quote by Bbw4umen
LOL
I don't wank on cam, don't see the point, unless personally requested that is.
Women look far better on cam as you have more to show and can dress up nice, cams can't really keep up with the movement of a wank..lol...plus, you have so many cocks to look at, can't be
I'm a memeber of xxxxxx, and on there on average there are 35 women ad 500 guys ffs, all wanking away, well most.
A cock is a cock, a face is what is most likely to get you noticed, and it's what most women are going to be attracted to.

uhuh
I go for the face.. if they've got a big cock it's a bonus but not a requirement cool
somewhat disheartening, given you have no face on your profile, but then again Ive been here long enough to know that for the most part, the lady calls the shots
Quote by Rising
LOL
I don't wank on cam, don't see the point, unless personally requested that is.
Women look far better on cam as you have more to show and can dress up nice, cams can't really keep up with the movement of a wank..lol...plus, you have so many cocks to look at, can't be
I'm a memeber of xxxxxx, and on there on average there are 35 women ad 500 guys ffs, all wanking away, well most.
A cock is a cock, a face is what is most likely to get you noticed, and it's what most women are going to be attracted to.

uhuh
I go for the face.. if they've got a big cock it's a bonus but not a requirement cool
somewhat disheartening, given you have no face on your profile.
If you read what we were talking about, you'd know we were talking about when I cam rolleyes