what's wrong with paint covered trousers?
lp
Said it before will say it again. better for my offspring to explore thier sexuality in comfort and safety than in a back alley----they can move on to that later if they feel like it.
Religious institutions and their long-term consequences suck.
If I were ever to have kids then I'd nip it in the bud early and buy a house with very thin walls. After years of hearing their parents having sex they'd get the message that they can't do it without parents knowing.
Personally I'd never be able to do it with parents in the same house, at least not mine. Had some great fun forcing an ex-girlfriend to make noise whilst her parents were outside the door :twisted:
I would have no problems with my boys bringing their girlfriends home, regular partners more so than passing ships in the night tho. I think if i was a girls parent i`d like to think that she would be ok under my roof with a regular boyfriend than out in a car with who knows who.
I have always been open with my kids regarding sex and always answered their questions, its a natural thing, we all do it so why be so prudish about it all
my children have always been allowed to bring boy/girlfriends home to stay the night and they have always been allowed to stay in their bedrooms
far rather them be having sex safely at home than down a dark alley
A long time ago, when a lady and I were dating we stayed at both her and my parent's homes.
When at my parent's she was all over me, but very quiet. At her parents, no way.
Didn't a certain Anthony Bliar admit to having sex at Balmoral Castle with Cherie, the result of which was their last offspring?
Disgusting.... off with his head!
Of course I remember being 16....just.
The difference here is that my parents would never have allowed me to shag a bird in their home.
But then again different times. Then the teenage pregnancy rate was not through the roof. Sex was not plastered everywhere, teaching kids sex at 5 would never have even been thought about.
Different times indeedy but.....because of our societies much more Liberal approach, with sex thrust down kids throats at every opportunity, is it any wonder they want sex. At a much younger age than 16 too.
I have heard of parents allowing their 14 and 15 year olds to have sex in their house. I do not believe the old rubbish about " better than doing it down dark alleys " approach to it. Instead of parents just saying it is ok to shag in their house, what about trying to teach them the rights of having sex, and all the adult responsibilities that go with that?
This is a subject where people will never agree, and I suppose it is about what one thinks is right in their own home. Well in my home I would not have allowed it, and in others they would/will. I do not have too much of a problem with that as it is their home but....those same parents who are " hip hop " will be the first ones to moan when their Daughters end up being in the baby club at 15 or 16. All it does by letting them do this is to actively encourage it, not to deter it.
Bottom line here is my home my rules and if they want to shag then get their own place. Yes I remember being 16 and know exactly what my parents would have told me.....not under our roof, and then I would have had to accept that....which I would have.
is it more likely for the parents of boys to allow sex in your house and for parents of girls to not allow them.
i have often seen and experienced this double standard in bringing up boys and girls. perhaps its that boys dont have to live with the pregnancy and child after doing the deed that seems to make it ok for parents of boys to have sex under the roof than it is for parents of girls.
i myself am like a lot of liberal parents that it would be ok for the said child to have sex but i also wouldnt want to know about it. but then again i have a son. my partner has boys and girls and i would like his opinion as to what he would allow later in life when his kids are closer to an age of thinking about sex and would his views differ for each child because of gender (i very much doubt they would) i will ask him later and to perhaps contribute to this thread.
and as for the second question from the OP it is never mandatory for any 'guest' to partisipate in having sex but always fab if they do :twisted:
I wasn't "allowed" to "go courting" with boys until I was 21. To say she was strict is an understatement.
I lost my 'ninity at 15 at the side of a canal.
At 16 and a smidgin, I fell pregnant. Does that mean I'm "just another statistc?" Blimey, that makes it sound like my life should have been over then & there.
With a much more realistic, IMO healthy, attitude to sex & relationships in the house, the daughter I concieved out of wedlock, (either in a Ford Capri or in my parents bathroom) was three years older than I was when she lost hers. What's far more important than her age is the fact that when she did it, it was for her reasons, and hers alone. Nowt to do with peer pressure, or needing to do it to "keep" a boyfriend.
. He must keep quiet or preferably wait until the house is empty. And they must all be over 16. (in edit- that is because he is now 16.... when he was having sex and was 15 we discussed over-zealous parents and his career being affected by any police involvement. We also discussed how 'you' would know that someone was willingly having sex with you and how vulnerable to peer pressure younger people are. We discussed the implications of drugs and alcohol on people's thought processes etc.... the list goes on. It is a minefield out there)
)
