Good boy!!
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Notice!
last reply
120 replies
3.6k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by Steve_Mids
A mention in dispatchs for Steve_Mids for managing to find a bad ad younger than the pound note in his wallet. He's actually got one from today!!!
Good boy!!
Thats just a sign of how often i am allowed money..... :cry:
Celery reported one from JANUARY 2006 - record holder now!
:lol: :lol:
Quote by Jags
A mention in dispatchs for Steve_Mids for managing to find a bad ad younger than the pound note in his wallet. He's actually got one from today!!!
Good boy!!
Thats just a sign of how often i am allowed money..... :cry:
Celery reported one from JANUARY 2006 - record holder now!
:lol: :lol:
'kin aol users never update em lol
Quote by celestria
Will SOMEONE PLEASE show HLB the 'report this ad' link before she swamps my PM inbox!!:roll: :roll:
Oooohhhh me me me..... Can I show HLB the button??? :bounce:
ops: :oops: Oh not THAT button :oops: :oops:HLB's flicking your bean? goodness you can see where wierd rumours start lol
Have no fear - I know how to push the right buttons - just thought I'd scare jags a bit :giggle:
But Shireen you're welcome to come round at check I'm doing it right just to be on the safe side :rascal:
Sex God
Quote by da69ve
How about counting cars on her nearest motorway,whilst standing on one leg.....singing land of hope and glory.....
You didn't specify which lane Shireen has to stand in!! :giggle:
Sex God
Sorry Jags
It seems Judge John Deed has just appeared on telly
:twisted:
It seems Judge John Deed has just appeared on telly
:twisted:
:smackbottom: :smackbottom: Sex God
A repeat or not, IMO it is better than footie :twisted:
:lol: :D :lol: :D :lol: :D
:kiss: :kiss: Sex God
I don't think I've ever noticed a dodgy ad.
Besides I never perve at the ads!!
But I'll go and have a look now...... oooops the footie's about to start!!
Besides I never perve at the ads!!
But I'll go and have a look now...... oooops the footie's about to start!!
Quote by Jags
I wish I'd started this yesterday.... I'd be in less trouble with feklar for some of my posts :giggle:
You have redeemed yourself today!! Thanks.
:
she might have redeemed herself with you.... but she hasn't with me... unless you are going to pay her penalty for her Jags..... :twisted: :twisted:
Sex God
Quote by celestria
Nooo I need help... I'm running out of witty comments to make here
And Im just waiting for a pm from you
ops: :oops: Sorry, I clicked on the wrong button and sent Celery a naughty message :oops: :oops:
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
Nooo I need help... I'm running out of witty comments to make here
And Im just waiting for a pm from you
ops: :oops: Sorry, I clicked on the wrong button and sent Celery a naughty message :oops: :oops:
:giggle: Sorry... only just stopped laughing (we don't have any ads so we knew it was done in error)
Actually we'd already blamed jags for it so it was even funnier that you popped up and apologised :giggle:
No harm done hunny... but I've run out of witty comments for tonight... I'll be back tomorrow with some more though
I'm always keen to please the Great Jags but I feel I may be in line for a Jags Slap :shock:
In my usual style I try to be clever and search for something that isn't allowed - like " ". I get hundreds of matches but when I open the ads they've either been censored already or there's no sign of the offending phrase!
Thinking about what I'd do to hide an email addy I started searching user profiles. Same thing again - matches - but they're either censored or not there at all.
My theory is that the search engine database is out of date or the text stays hidden somewhere. Isn't that defeating the object when a censored profile has had the " " piece removed but the rest is still there
By the way... doesn't the email thing apply to user names too? I found loads of 'em with in.
In my usual style I try to be clever and search for something that isn't allowed - like " ". I get hundreds of matches but when I open the ads they've either been censored already or there's no sign of the offending phrase!
Thinking about what I'd do to hide an email addy I started searching user profiles. Same thing again - matches - but they're either censored or not there at all.
My theory is that the search engine database is out of date or the text stays hidden somewhere. Isn't that defeating the object when a censored profile has had the " " piece removed but the rest is still there
By the way... doesn't the email thing apply to user names too? I found loads of 'em with in.
Quote by cu3b4ll
By the way... doesn't the email thing apply to user names too? I found loads of 'em with in.
Yes, yes, yes!! Report them cos we then ban them and make them change it away from an email address.
As for the censored ones, report it anyway cos we will 'advise' them of the error of their ways quite happily.
My favourite Mattmoleman made this :jagsatwork: specially for me but I'd rather have :smitten: this one instead!
:lol: :smitten: :smitten: 
Do any of these comments ring any bells with some reporters ........
nope it's not cryptic at all... 5/10
cryptic my arse
cryptic or what?... I;d say not
just call me enigma
awww bless... I'm starting to get addicted to finding these now lol
"let's see if the censors make anything if that!" hmmmm guess you're far to smart for me
running out of comments... nearly time to stop lol
Someone has been making my job a bit more fun today
:rotflmao: :rotflmao:
nope it's not cryptic at all... 5/10
cryptic my arse
cryptic or what?... I;d say not
just call me enigma
awww bless... I'm starting to get addicted to finding these now lol
"let's see if the censors make anything if that!" hmmmm guess you're far to smart for me
running out of comments... nearly time to stop lol
Someone has been making my job a bit more fun today
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: Quote by Jags
I
Always feel its somehow just a bit petty if I did though, there is alot of double standards at times. No not a dig Jags, its true!!
Is it a good idea to report honestly??
Mike x
There wouldn't be double standards if everyone took the time to report a bad ad.. then the standards would be maintained and everyone would be contributing to the site. As it is we only hear moans about 'this bloke has written .... thought it wasn't allowed' . ACTUALLY it's not allowed but he's posted it at this morning when the Mods are at work and it's now m. and it's our fault.
NO double standards - no pictures of children, no pictures of guns, no pictures of cars, no cartoons, no pictures of the woman I shagged last week, no pictures of my family on a visit to grandma, no double standards. Report them.
:shock:
Should we be reporting ones that say something along the lines of "We are not full members so please reply with hidden email address or mobile numbers" ?
And what about ads from singles with a picture of them having sex......does that fall into the
no pictures of the woman I shagged last week?????
Quite enjoying this thinly disguised excuse to perve :rascal:
Les x
